Tracing the Roots of Innovativeness in Family SMEs: The Effect of Family Functionality and Socioemotional Wealth

Journal of Product Innovation Management

Volumn 35, Issue 4, 2018, Pages 609-628

  Filser, Matthias ^a   De Massis, Alfredo ^b   Gast, Johanna ^c   Kraus, Sascha ^d   Niemand, Thomas ^e  

^a UNIVERSITY OF LIECHTENSTEIN   (Liechtenstein)

^b FREE UNIVERSITY OF BOZEN BOLZANO   (Italy)

^c MONTPELLIER BUSINESS SCHOOL   (France)

^d OMNES Education   (France)

^e Technology University of Clausthal   (Germany)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

MANAGEMENT;

EMOTIONAL ATTACHMENTS; FAMILY FIRMS; INNOVATIVENESS; MULTI-GROUP; SMALL AND MEDIUM-SIZED ENTERPRISE; STRUCTURAL EQUATION MODELING; THEORETICAL MODELING; THEORY AND PRACTICE;

TELECOMMUNICATION SERVICES;

EID: 85048035079     PISSN: 07376782     EISSN: 15405885     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/jpim.12433     Document Type: Article

References (136)

1. Ainsworth, S., and J. W. Cox. 2003. Families divided: Culture and control in small family business. Organization Studies 24 (9): 1463–85.
2. Aldrich, H., and E. Auster. 1986. Even dwarfs started small: Liabilities of size and age and their strategic implication. Research in Organizational Behavior 8: 165–98.
3. Aldrich, H., and J. Cliff. 2003. The pervasive effects of family on entrepreneurship: Toward a family embeddedness perspective. Journal of Business Venturing 18 (5): 573–97.
4. Ashforth, B., and R. Humphrey. 1995. Emotion in the workplace: A reappraisal. Human Relations 48 (2): 97–125.
5. Avery, R. J., D. C. Haynes, and G. W. Haynes. 2000. Managing work and family: The decision to outsource child care in families engaged in family-owned businesses. Journal of Family and Economic Issues 21 (3): 227–58.
6. Barczak, G. 2014. From the editor: JPIM research priorities. Journal of Product Innovation Management 31 (4): 640–41.
7. Barker, V. L., and G. C. Mueller. 2002. CEO characteristics and firm R&D spending. Management Science 48 (6): 782–801.
8. Berrone, P., C. Cruz, and L. R. Gomez-Mejia. 2012. Socioemotional wealth in family firms: Theoretical dimensions, assessment approaches, and agenda for future research. Family Business Review 25 (3): 258–79.
9. Berrone, P., C. Cruz, L. R. Gomez-Mejia, and M. Larraza-Kintana. 2010. Socioemotional wealth and corporate responses to institutional pressures: Do family-controlled firms pollute less? Administrative Science Quarterly 55 (1): 82–113.
10. Bettis, R., A. Gambardella, C. Helfat, and W. Mitchell. 2014. Quantitative empirical analysis in strategic management. Strategic Management Journal 35 (7): 949–53.
11. Block, J., D. Miller, P. Jaskiewicz, and F. Spiegel. 2013. Economic and technological importance of innovations in large family and founder firms: An analysis of patent data. Family Business Review 26 (2): 180–99.
12. Brislin, R. W. 1980. Translation and content analysis of oral and written materials. In Handbook of cross-cultural psychology, ed. H. C. Triandis and J. W. Berry, 389–444. Boston, MA: Allyn and Bacon.
13. Byrne, B. 2004. Structural equation modeling with AMOS: Basic concepts, applications and programming. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
14. Cabrera-Suárez, K., P. De Saá-Pérez, and D. Garcia-Almeida. 2001. The succession process from a resource- and knowledge-based view of the family firm. Family Business Review 14 (1): 37–46.
15. Campopiano, G., A. De Massis, and F. Chirico. 2014. Firm philanthropy in small-and medium-sized family firms the effects of family involvement in ownership and management. Family Business Review 27 (3): 244–58.
16. Carnes, C. M., and R. D. Ireland. 2013. Familiness and innovation: Resource bundling as the missing link. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice 37 (6): 1399–419.
17. Carney, M. 2005. Corporate governance and competitive advantage in family-controlled firms. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice 29 (3): 249–65.
18. Cassia, L., A. De Massis, and E. Pizzurno. 2012. Strategic innovation and new product development in family firms. International Journal of Entrepreneurial Behavior and Research 18 (2): 198–232.
19. Casson, M. 1999. The economics of family firms. Scandinavian Economic History Review 47 (1): 10–23.
20. Cennamo, C., P. Berrone, C. Cruz, and L. R. Gomez-Mejia. 2012. Socioemotional wealth and proactive stakeholder engagement: Why family-controlled firms care more about their stakeholders. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice 36 (6): 1153–73.
21. Cerrato, D., and M. Piva. 2012. The internationalization of small and medium-sized enterprises: The effect of family management, human capital and foreign ownership. Journal of Management & Governance 16 (4): 617–44.
22. Chrisman, J. J., J. H. Chua, A. De Massis, F. Frattini, and M. Wright. 2015. The ability and willingness paradox in family firm innovation. Journal of Product Innovation Management 32 (3): 310–18.
23. Chrisman, J. J., J. H. Chua, A. W. Pearson, and T. Barnett. 2012. Family involvement, family influence, and family-centered non-economic goals in small firms. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice 36 (2): 267–93.
24. Chrisman, J. J., H. Fang, J. Kotlar, and A. De Massis. 2015. A note on family influence and the adoption of discontinuous technologies in family firms. Journal of Product Innovation Management 32 (3): 384–8.
25. Chrisman, J. J., and P. C. Patel. 2012. Variations in R&D investments of family and nonfamily firms: Behavioral agency and myopic loss aversion perspectives. Academy of Management Journal 55 (4): 976–97.
26. Chua, J. H., J. J. Chrisman, and A. De Massis. 2015. A closer look at socioemotional wealth: Its flows, stocks, and prospects for moving forward. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice 39 (2): 173–82.
27. Chua, J. H., J. J. Chrisman, and P. Sharma. 1999. Defining the family business by behavior. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice 23 (4): 19–39.
28. Chua, J. H., J. J. Chrisman, and P. Sharma. 2003. Succession and nonsuccession concerns of family firms and agency relationship with nonfamily managers. Family Business Review 16 (2): 89–107.
29. Chua, J. H., J. J. Chrisman, L. P. Steier, and S. B. Rau. 2012. Sources of heterogeneity in family firms: An introduction. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice 36 (6): 1103–36.
30. Churchill, G. A. 1991. Marketing research: Methodological foundations. Chicago, IL: The Dryden Press.
31. Classen, N., M. Carree, A. Van Gils, and B. Peters. 2014. Innovation in family and non-family SMEs: An exploratory analysis. Small Business Economics 42 (3): 595–609.
32. Coleman, J. S. 1990. Foundations of social theory. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
33. Colombo, M. G., A. De Massis, E. Piva, C. Rossi-Lamastra, and M. Wright. 2014. Sales and employment changes in entrepreneurial ventures with family ownership: Empirical evidence from high-tech industries. Journal of Small Business Management 52 (2): 226–45.
34. Corbetta, G., and C. Salvato. 2004. Self-serving or self-actualizing? Model of man and agency costs in different types of family firms: A commentary on “Comparing the agency costs of family and non-family firms: Conceptual issues and exploratory evidence.” Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice 28 (4): 355–62.
35. Covin, J., and D. Slevin. 1989. Strategic management of small firms in hostile and benign environments. Strategic Management Journal 10 (11): 75–87.
36. Covin, J. G., F. Eggers, S. Kraus, C.-F. Cheng, and M.-L. Chang. 2016. Marketing-related resources and radical innovativeness in family and non-family firms: A configurational approach. Journal of Business Research 69 (12): 5620–27.
37. Craig, J. B., M. Pohjola, S. Kraus, and S. H. Jensen. 2014. Exploring relationships among proactiveness, risk-taking and innovation output in family and non-family firms. Creativity and Innovation Management 23 (2): 199–210.
38. Cucculelli, M. 2013. Product innovation and firm's growth in family firms: A quantile regression approach. International Journal for Entrepreneurship and Innovation Management 17 (1/2/3): 124–41.
39. Damanpour, F., R. M. Walker, and C. N. Avellaneda. 2009. Combinative effects of innovation types and organizational performance: A longitudinal study of service organizations. Journal of Management Studies 46 (4): 650–75.
40. Danes, S. D. 2014. The future of family business research through the family scientist's lens. In The sage handbook of family business, ed. L. Melin, M. Nordqvist, and P. Sharma, 611–19. London: SAGE.
41. Danes, S. M., J. Lee, K. Stafford, and R. K. Z. Heck. 2008. The effects of ethnicity, families and culture on entrepreneurial experience: An extension of sustainable family business theory. Journal of Developmental Entrepreneurship 13 (3): 229–68.
42. Danes, S. M., and P. D. Olson. 2003. Women's role involvement in family businesses, business tensions, and business success. Family Business Review 16 (1): 53–68.
43. Danes, S. M., V. Zuiker, R. Kean, and J. Arbuthnot. 1999. Predictors of family business tensions and goal achievement. Family Business Review 12 (3): 241–52.
44. Davis, J. H., F. D. Schoorman, and L. Donaldson. 1997. Toward a stewardship theory of management. Academy of Management Review 22 (1): 20–47.
45. De Massis, A., A. Di Minin, and F. Frattini. 2015. Family-driven innovation: Resolving the paradox in family firms. California Management Review 58 (1): 5–19.
46. De Massis, A., F. Frattini, J. Kotlar, A. M. Petruzzelli, and M. Wright. 2016. Innovation through tradition: Lessons from innovative family businesses and directions for future research. Academy of Management Perspectives 30 (1): 93–116.
47. De Massis, A., F. Frattini, and U. Lichtenthaler. 2013. Research on technological innovation in family firms: Present debates and future directions. Family Business Review 26 (1): 10–31.
48. De Massis, A., F. Frattini, E. Pizzurno, and L. Cassia. 2015. Product innovation in family versus nonfamily firms: An exploratory analysis. Journal of Small Business Management 53 (1): 1–36.
49. De Massis, A., J. Kotlar, G. Campopiano, and L. Cassia. 2013. Dispersion of family ownership and the performance of small-to-medium size private family firms. Journal of Family Business Strategy 4 (3): 166–75.
50. De Massis, A., J. Kotlar, J. H. Chua, and J. J. Chrisman. 2014. Ability and willingness as sufficiency conditions for family-oriented particularistic behavior: Implications for theory and empirical studies. Journal of Small Business Management 52 (2): 344–64.
51. De Massis, A., P. Sharma, J. H. Chua, and J. J. Chrisman. 2012. Family business studies: an annotated bibliography. Northampton, MA: Edward Elgar.
52. De Massis, A., P. Sieger, J. H. Chua, and S. Vismara. 2016. Incumbents' attitude toward intrafamily succession: An investigation of its antecedents. Family Business Review 29 (3): 278–300.
53. Deephouse, D. L., and P. Jaskiewicz. 2013. Do family firms have better reputations than non-family firms? An integration of socioemotional wealth and social identity theories. Journal of Management Studies 50 (3): 337–60.
54. Duran, P., N. Kammerlander, M. van Essen, and T. Zellweger. 2015. Doing more with less: Innovation input and output in family firms. Academy of Management Journal 59 (4): 1224–64.
55. Eddleston, K., and F. Kellermanns. 2007. Destructive and productive family relationships: A stewardship theory perspective. Journal of Business Venturing 22 (4): 545–65.
56. Eggers, F., S. Kraus, and J. Covin. 2014. Traveling into unexplored territory: Pioneering innovativeness and the role of networking, customers, and turbulent environments. Industrial Marketing Management 43 (8): 1385–93.
57. Eggers, F., S. Kraus, M. Hughes, S. Laraway, and S. Snycerski. 2013. Implications of customer and entrepreneurial orientations for SME growth. Management Decision 51 (3): 524–46.
58. Fernandes, A., and A. M. Ussman. 2013. The learning ability of Portuguese small family businesses. International Journal for Entrepreneurship and Innovation Management 17 (1/2/3): 105–23.
59. Filser, M., A. Brem, J. Gast, S. Kraus, and A. Calabrò. 2016. Innovation in family firms: Examining the inventory and mapping the path. International Journal of Innovation Management 20 (6): 1–39.
60. Filser, M., and F. Eggers. 2014. Entrepreneurial orientation and firm performance: A comparative study of Austria, Liechtenstein and Switzerland. South African Journal of Business Management 45 (1): 55–65.
61. Fletcher, D. 2000. Enterprise and small business: Principles, practice and policy. In Family and enterprise, ed. S. Carter and D. Jones-Evans, 155–65. Essex, UK: Pearson Education.
62. Fornell, C., and D. F. Larcker. 1981. Evaluating structural equation models with unobserved variables and measurement error. Journal of Marketing Research 18 (1): 39–50.
63. Freeman, J., G. R. Carroll, and M. T. Hannan. 1983. The liability of newness: Age dependence in organizational death rates. American Sociological Review 48 (5): 692–710.
64. Gardner, W., P. A. Nutting, K. J. Kelleher, J. J. Werner, T. Farley, L. Stewart, M. Hartsell, and A. J. Orzano. 2001. Does the family APGAR effectively measure family functioning? Journal of Family Practice 50 (1): 19–25.
65. Gedajlovic, E., M. Carney, J. J. Chrisman, and F. W. Kellermanns. 2012. The adolescence of family firm research: Taking stock and planning for the future. Journal of Management 38 (4): 1010–37.
66. Gomez-Mejia, L. R., C. Cruz, P. Berrone, and J. Castro. 2011. The bind that ties: Socioemotional wealth preservation in family firms. Academy of Management Annals 5 (1): 653–707.
67. Gomez-Mejia, L. R., K. T. Haynes, M. Nunez-Nickel, K. J. L. Jacobson, and J. Moyano-Fuentes. 2007. Socioemotional wealth and business risks in family-controlled firms: Evidence from Spanish olive oil mills. Administrative Science Quarterly 52 (1): 106–37.
68. Hair, J. F., W. C. Black, B. J. Babin, and R. E. Anderson. 2010. Multivariate data analysis. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson Prentice Hall.
69. Hayton, J. C., G. George, and S. A. Zahra. 2002. National culture and entrepreneurship: A review of behavioral research. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice 26 (4): 33–62.
70. Hu, L., and P. M. Bentler. 1999. Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal 6 (1): 1–55.
71. Hult, G. T. M., R. F. Hurley, and G. A. Knight. 2004. Innovativeness: Its antecedents and impact on business performance. Industrial Marketing Management 33 (5): 429–38.
72. James, A. E., J. E. Jennings, and R. S. Breitkreuz. 2012. Worlds apart? Rebridging the distance between family science and family business research. Family Business Review 25 (1): 87–108.
73. Jaskiewicz, P., J. G. Combs, and S. B. Rau. 2015. Entrepreneurial legacy: Toward a theory of how some family firms nurture transgenerational entrepreneurship. Journal of Business Venturing 30 (1): 29–49.
74. Jaskiewicz, P., J. Combs, K. Shanine, and M. Kacmar. 2017. Introducing the family: A review of family science with implications for management. Academy of Management Annals 11 (1): 309–41.
75. Jaskiewicz, P., and W. G. Dyer. 2017. Addressing the elephant in the room: Dis-entangling family heterogeneity to advance family business research. Family Business Review 30 (2): 111–18.
76. Johnson, H. M. 1971. The structural-functional theory of family and kinship. Journal of Comparative Family Studies 2 (2): 133–44.
77. Kammerlander, N., and M. Ganter. 2015. An attention-based view of family firm adaptation to discontinuous technological change: Exploring the role of family CEOs' noneconomic goals. Journal of Product Innovation Management 32 (3): 361–83.
78. Kellermanns, F. W., K. A. Eddleston, R. Sarathy, and F. Murphy. 2012. Innovativeness in family firms: A family influence perspective. Small Business Economics 38 (1): 85–101.
79. Kennedy, P. 1992. A guide to econometrics. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
80. Khazanchi, S., M. W. Lewis, and K. K. Boyer. 2007. Innovation-supportive culture: The impact of organizational values on process innovation. Journal of Operations Management 25 (4): 871–84.
81. Kline, R. B. 1998. Principles and practice of structural equation modeling. New York, NY: The Guilford Press.
82. König, A., N. Kammerlander, and A. Enders. 2013. The family innovator's dilemma: How family influence affects the adoption of discontinuous technologies by incumbent firms. Academy of Management Review 38 (3): 418–41.
83. Kotlar, J., A. De Massis, F. Frattini, M. Bianchi, and H. Fang. 2013. Technology acquisition in family and non-family firms: A longitudinal analysis of Spanish manufacturing firms. Journal of Product Innovation Management 30 (6): 1073–88.
84. Kotlar, J., A. De Massis, F. Hanqing, and F. Frattini. 2014. Strategic reference points in family firms. Small Business Economics 43 (3): 597–619.
85. Kotlar, J., A. Signori, A. De Massis, and S. Vismara. 2017. Financial wealth, socioemotional wealth and IPO underpricing in family firms: A two-stage gamble model. Academy of Management Journal, in press. https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2016.0256.
86. Kraus, S., M. Pohjola, and A. Koponen. 2012. Innovation in family firms: An empirical analysis linking organizational and managerial innovation to corporate success. Review of Managerial Science 6 (3): 265–86.
87. Laforet, S. 2013. Innovation characteristics of young and old family-owned businesses. Journal of Small Business and Enterprise Development 20 (1): 204–24.
88. Laforet, S. 2016. Effects of organisational culture on organisational innovation performance in family firms. Journal of Small Business and Enterprise Development 23 (2): 379–407.
89. Lawler, E. J. 2001. An affect theory of social exchange. American Journal of Sociology 107 (2): 321–52.
90. Le Breton-Miller, I., and D. Miller. 2006. Why do some family businesses out-compete? Governance, long-term orientations, and sustainable capability. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice 30 (6): 731–46.
91. Levenburg, N. M., T. V. Schwarz, and S. Almallah. 2002. Innovation: A recipe for success among family-owned firms in west Michigan? Seidman Business Review 8 (1): 21–22.
92. Litz, R. A., and R. F. Kleysen. 2001. Your old man shall dream dreams, your young man shall see visions: Toward a theory of family firm innovation with help from the Brubeck family. Family Business Review 14 (4): 335–51.
93. Mairesse, J., and P. Mohnen. 2002. Accounting for innovation and measuring innovativeness: An illustrative framework and an application. The American Economic Review 92 (2): 226–30.
94. March, J. G., and Z. Shapira. 1987. Managerial perspectives on risk and risk taking. Management Science 33 (11): 1404–18.
95. Matzler, K., V. Veider, J. Hautz, and C. Stadler. 2015. The impact of family ownership, management, and governance on innovation. Journal of Product Innovation Management 32 (3): 319–33.
96. Memili, E., H. Fang, J. J. Chrisman, and A. De Massis. 2015. The impact of small- and medium-sized family firms on economic growth. Small Business Economics 45 (4): 771–85.
97. Messeni Petruzzelli, A., and V. Albino. 2012. When tradition turns into innovation. How firms can create and appropriate value through tradition. Oxford, UK: Woodhead Publishing Limited.
98. Miller, D., and I. Le Breton-Miller. 2005. Managing for the long run: Lessons in competitive advantage from great family businesses. Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press.
99. Miller, D., and I. Le Breton-Miller. 2014. Deconstructing socioemotional wealth. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice 38 (4): 713–20.
100. Miller, D., I. Le Breton-Miller, and B. Scholnick. 2008. Stewardship vs. Stagnation: An empirical comparison of small family and non-family businesses. Journal of Management Studies 45 (1): 51–78.
101. Mustakallio, M. E., E. Autio, and S. A. Zahra. 2002. Relational and contractual governance in family firms: Effects on strategic decision making. Family Business Review 15 (3): 205–22.
102. Naldi, L., M. Nordqvist, K. Sjöberg, and J. Wiklund. 2007. Entrepreneurial orientation, risk taking, and performance in family firms. Family Business Review 20 (1): 33–47.
103. Naranjo-Valencia, J. C., D. Jiménez-Jiménez, and R. Sanz-Valle. 2011. Innovation or imitation? The role of organizational culture. Management Decision 49 (1): 55–72.
104. Neff, J. E. 2015. Shared vision promotes family firm performance. Frontiers in Psychology 6 (646): 1–16.
105. Olson, P., V. Zuiker, S. Danes, K. Stafford, R. Heck, and K. Duncan. 2003. The impact of the family and the business on family business sustainability. Journal of Business Venturing 18 (5): 639–66.
106. O'Reilly, C., and J. Chatman. 1991. People and organizational culture: A profile comparison approach to assessing person-environment fit. Academy of Management Journal 34 (3): 487–516.
107. Philbrick, C. A., and M. A. Fitzgerald. 2007. Women in business-owning families: A comparison of roles, responsibilities and predictors of family functionality. Journal of Family and Economic Issues 28 (4): 618–34.
108. Podsakoff, P. M., S. B. MacKenzie, J.-Y. Lee, and N. P. Podsakoff. 2003. Common method biases in behavioral research: A critical review of the literature and recommended remedies. Journal of Applied Psychology 88 (5): 879–903.
109. Popenoe, D. 1996. Life without father: Compelling new evidence that fatherhood and marriage are indispensable for the good of children and society. New York, NY: Simon & Schuster.
110. Powell, G. N., J. H. Greenhaus, P. Jaskiewicz, J. G. Combs, D. B. Balkin, and K. K. Shanine. 2017. Family science and the work-family interface: An interview with Gary Powell and Jeffrey Greenhaus. Human Resource Management Review, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hrmr.2017.05.009
111. Quinn, R. E., and J. Rohrbaugh. 1983. A spatial model of effectiveness criteria: Towards a competing values approach to organizational analysis. Management Science 29 (3): 363–77.
112. Roessl, D., M. Fink, and S. Kraus. 2010. Are family firms fit for innovation? Towards an agenda for empirical research. International Journal for Entrepreneurial Venturing 2 (3/4): 366–80.
113. Rubera, G., and A. H. Kirca. 2012. Firm innovativeness and its performance outcomes: A meta-analytic review and theoretical integration. Journal of Marketing 76 (3): 130–47.
114. Santamaría, L., and J. Surroca. 2011. Matching the goals and impacts of R&D collaboration. European Management Review 8 (2): 95–109.
115. Schulze, W. S., and F. W. Kellermanns. 2015. Reifying socioemotional wealth. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice 39 (3): 447–59.
116. Sciascia, S., M. Nordqvist, P. Mazzola, and A. De Massis. 2015. Family ownership and R&D intensity in small and medium-sized firms. Journal of Product Innovation Management 32 (3): 349–60.
117. Sharma, P., C. Salvato, and T. Reay. 2014. Temporal dimensions of family enterprise research. Family Business Review 27 (1): 10–19.
118. Sherony, K. M., and S. G. Green. 2002. Coworker exchange: Relationships between coworkers, leader-member exchange, and work attitudes. Journal of Applied Psychology 87 (3): 542–48.
119. Sirmon, D. G., and M. A. Hitt. 2003. Managing resources: Linking unique resources, management, and wealth creation in family firms. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice 27 (4): 339–58.
120. Smilkstein, G. 1978. The family APGAR: A proposal for a family function test and its use by physicians. The Journal of Family Practice 6 (6): 1231–39.
121. Songini, L., and L. Gnan. 2015. Family involvement and agency cost control mechanisms in family small and medium-sized enterprises. Journal of Small Business Management 53 (3): 748–79.
122. Speckbacher, G., and P. Wentges. 2007. The impact of firm size and family ownership on management control systems in small and medium-sized enterprises. Paper presented at Proceeding 4th Conference on Performance on Measurement and Management Control, Nice.
123. Spriggs, M., A. Yu, D. Deeds, and R. L. Sorenson. 2013. Too many cooks in the kitchen: Innovative capacity, collaborative network orientation, and performance in small family businesses. Family Business Review 26 (32): 32–50.
124. Stafford, K., K. Duncan, S. Danes, and M. Winter. 1999. A research model of sustainable family businesses. Family Business Review 12 (3): 197–208.
125. Stanley, L. J. 2010. Emotions and family business creation: An extension and implications. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice 34 (6): 1085–92.
126. Stevens, C. E., R. E. Kidwell, and R. Sprague. 2015. Bound by laws, or by values? A multi-level and cross-national approach to understanding the protection of minority owners in family firms. Corporate Governance: An International Review 23 (3): 203–15.
127. Stinchcombe, A. L. 1965. Social structure and organizations. In Handbook of organizations, ed. J. G. March, 142–93. Chicago, IL: Rand McNally.
128. Sundaramurthy, C. 2008. Sustaining trust within family businesses. Family Business Review 21 (1): 89–102.
129. Talke, K., S. Salomo, and K. Rost. 2010. How top management team diversity affects innovativeness and performance via the strategic choice to focus on innovation fields. Research Policy 39 (7): 907–18.
130. Teal, E. J., and C. W. Hofer. 2003. The determinants of new venture success: Strategy, industry structure, and the founding entrepreneurial team. Journal of Private Equity 6 (4): 38–51.
131. Uzzi, B. 1997. Social structure and competition in interfirm networks: The paradox of embeddedness. Administrative Science Quarterly 42 (1): 35–67.
132. Von Krogh, G., K. Ichijo, and I. Nonaka. 2000. Enabling knowledge creation. How to unlock the mystery of tacit knowledge and release the power of innovation. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
133. Zahra, S. A. 2005. Entrepreneurial risk taking in family firms. Family Business Review 18 (1): 23–40.
134. Zellweger, T. 2007. Time horizon, costs of equity capital, and generic investment strategies of firms. Family Business Review 20 (1): 1–15.
135. Zellweger, T., and P. Sieger. 2012. Entrepreneurial orientation in long-lived family firms. Small Business Economics 38 (1): 67–84.
136. Zellweger, T. M., F. W. Kellermanns, J. J. Chrisman, and J. H. Chua. 2012. Family control and family firm valuation by family CEOs: The importance of intentions for transgenerational control. Organization Science 23 (3): 851–68.