Perspectives on innovation processes

Academy of Management Annals

Volumn 7, Issue 1, 2013, Pages 775-819

  Garud, Raghu ^a   Tuertscher, Philipp ^b   Van De Ven, Andrew H ^c  

^a PENNSYLVANIA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b VIENNA UNIVERSITY OF ECONOMICS AND BUSINESS   (Austria)

^c UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 85018193136     PISSN: 19416520     EISSN: 19416067     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/19416520.2013.791066     Document Type: Article

References (294)

1. 3M. (1998). Innovation chronicles. St. Paul, MN: 3M Company.
2. Abernathy, W.J., & Clark, K.B. (1985). Innovation-mapping the winds of creative destructions. Research Policy, 14(1), 3-22.
3. Abernathy, W.J., Clark, K.B., & Kantrow, A.M. (1983). Industrial renaissance: Producing a competitive future for America. New York: Basic Books.
4. Abrahamson, E. (1991). Managerial fads and fashions-the diffusion and rejection of innovations. Academy of Management Review, 16(3), 586-612.
5. Adler, P.S., Kwon, S.-W., & Heckscher, C. (2008). Professional work: The emergence of collaborative community. Organization Science, 19(2), 359-376.
6. Adner, R., & Kapoor, R. (2010). Value creation in innovation ecosystems: How the structure of technological interdependence affects firm performance in new technology generations. Strategic Management Journal, 31(3), 306-333.
7. Ahuja, G. (2000). Collaboration networks, structural holes, and innovation: A longitudinal study. Administrative Science Quarterly, 45(3), 425-455.
8. Aldrich, H.E., & Fiol, C.M. (1994). Fools rush in-the institutional context of industry creation. Academy of Management Review, 19(4), 645-670.
9. Amabile, T.M. (1996). Creativity in context: Update to the social psychology of creativity. Boulder, CO: Westview.
10. Anderson, P. (1999). Complexity theory and organization science. Organization Science, 10(3), 216-232.
11. Anderson, P., & Tushman, M. (1990). Technological discontinuities and dominant designs: A cyclical model of technological change. Administrative Science Quarterly, 35, 604-633.
12. Angle, H.L. (1989). Psychology and organizational innovation. In A.H. Van de Ven, H.L. Angle, & M.S. Poole (Eds.), Research on the management of innovation: The Minnesota studies (pp. 135-170). New York: Harper and Row.
13. Ansari, S., & Garud, R. (2009). Inter-generational transitions in socio-technical systems: The case of mobile communications. Research Policy, 38(2), 382-392.
14. Argote, L., & Epple, D. (1990). Learning-curves in manufacturing. Science, 247(4945), 920-924.
15. Armstrong, M. (2006). Competition in two-sided markets. Rand Journal of Economics, 37(3), 668-691.
16. Arthur, W.B. (1989). Competing technologies, increasing returns, and lock-in by historical events. Economic Journal, 99(394), 116-131.
17. Aspan, M. (2007, December 10). TiVo shifts to help companies it once threatened. The New York Times.
18. Bacon, F., Boyd, J.R., & Whately, R. (1867). Lord Bacon’s essays, with a sketch of his life and character, reviews of his philosophical writings, critical estimates of his essays, analysis, notes, and queries for students, and select portions of the annotations of archbishop whately. New York: A.S. Barnes.
19. Baker, T., Miner, A.S., & Eesley, D.T. (2003). Improvising firms: Bricolage, account giving and improvisational competencies in the founding process. Research Policy, 32(2), 255-276.
20. Baker, T., & Nelson, R.E. (2005). Creating something from nothing: Resource construction through entrepreneurial bricolage. Administrative Science Quarterly, 50(3), 329-366.
21. Baldwin, C.Y., & Clark, K.B. (2000). Design rules, Vol. 1: The power of modularity. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
22. Baldwin, C.Y., & Clark, K.B. (2006). The architecture of participation: Does code architecture mitigate free riding in the open source development model? Management Science, 52(7), 1116-1127.
23. Baldwin, C.Y., Hienerth, C., & von Hippel, E. (2006). How user innovations become commercial products: A theoretical investigation and case study. Research Policy, 35(9), 1291-1313.
24. Barnett, W.P., & Hansen, M.T. (1996). The Red Queen in organizational evolution. Strategic Management Journal, 17, 139-157.
25. Bartel, C.A., & Garud, R. (2009). The role of narratives in sustaining organizational innovation. Organization Science, 20(1), 107-117.
26. Basalla, G. (1988). The evolution of technology. New York: Cambridge University Press.
27. Benner, M.J., & Tushman, M. (2002). Process management and technological innovation: A longitudinal study of the photography and paint industries. Administrative Science Quarterly, 47, 676-706.
28. Bijker, W.E. (1995). Of bicycles, bakelites, and bulbs: Toward a theory of sociotechnical change. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
29. Bijker, W.E., Hughes, T.P., & Pinch, T.J. (Eds.). (1987). The social construction of technological systems: New directions in the sociology and history of technology. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
30. Boland, R.J., & Collopy, F. (2004). Design matters for management. In R.J. Boland & F. Collopy (Eds.), Managing as designing (pp. 3-18). Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
31. Boland, R.J., Lyytinen, K., & Yoo, Y. (2007). Wakes of innovation in project networks: The case of digital 3-D representations in architecture, engineering, and construction. Organization Science, 18(4), 631-647.
32. Bookstaber, R. (2007). A demon of our own design: Markets, hedge funds, and the perils of financial innovation. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.
33. Boudreau, K.J., Lacetera, N., & Lakhani, K.R. (2011). Incentives and problem uncertainty in innovation contests: An empirical analysis. Management Science, 57(5), 843-863.
34. Boudreau, K.J., & Lakhani, K.R. (2009). How to manage outside innovation. MIT Sloan Management Review, 50(4), 69-76.
35. Bowker, G.C., & Star, S.L. (1999). Sorting things out: Classification and its consequences. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
36. Brown, J.S. (1997). Changing the game of corporate research: Learning to thrive in the fog of reality. In R. Garud, P.R. Nayyar, & Z. Shapira (Eds.), Technological innovation: Oversights and foresights (pp. 95-110). New York: Cambridge University Press.
37. Brown, J.S., & Duguid, P. (1991). Organizational learning and communities-of-practice: Toward a unified view of working, learning, and innovation. Organization Science, 2(1), 40-57.
38. Brown, S.L., & Eisenhardt, K.A. (1998). Competing on the edge. Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press.
39. Brown, S.L., & Eisenhardt, K.M. (1997). The art of continuous change: Linking complexity theory and time-paced evolution in relentlessly shifting organizations. Administrative Science Quarterly, 42(1), 1-34.
40. Brown, T. (2008). Design thinking. Harvard Business Review, 86(6), 84-92.
41. Burgelman, R.A. (1983). A process model of internal corporate venturing in the diversified major firm. Administrative Science Quarterly, 28(2), 223-244.
42. Burgelman, R.A. (1991). Intraorganizational ecology of strategy making and organizational adaptation: Theory and field research. Organization Science, 2(3), 239-262.
43. Burgelman, R.A. (1994). Fading memories-a process theory of strategic business exit in dynamic environments. Administrative Science Quarterly, 39(1), 24-56.
44. Burgelman, R.A. (2002). Strategy as vector and the inertia of coevolutionary lock-in. Administrative Science Quarterly, 47, 325-357.
45. Burt, R.S. (2004). Structural holes and good ideas. American Journal of Sociology, 110(2), 349-399.
46. Callon, M. (1986). Some elements of a sociology of translation: Domestication of the scallops and the fishermen of St Brieuc Bay. In J. Law (Ed.), Power, action & belief. A new sociology of knowledge? (pp. 196-229). London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.
47. Callon, M. (Ed.). (1998). The laws of the markets. Oxford: Blackwell.
48. Callon, M., Lascoumes, P., & Barthe, Y. (2009). Acting in an uncertain world: An essay on technical democracy. Cambrdige, MA: MIT Press.
49. Carlile, P.R. (2002). A pragmatic view of knowledge and boundaries: Boundary objects in new product development. Organization Science, 13(4), 442-455.
50. Carlile, P.R. (2004). Transferring, translating, and transforming: An integrative framework for managing knowledge across boundaries. Organization Science, 15(5), 555-568.
51. Cattani, G. (2005). Preadaptation, firm heterogeneity, and technological performance: A study on the evolution of fiber optics, 1970-1995. Organization Science, 16(6), 563-580.
52. Chesbrough, H. (2003). Open innovation. Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press.
53. Christensen, C.M. (1997). The innovator’s dilemma. Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press.
54. Christensen, C.M., Kaufman, S.P., & Shih, W.C. (2008). Innovation killers: How financial tools destroy your capacity to do new things. Harvard Business Review, 86(1), 98-105.
55. Clark, K.B. (1985). The interaction of design hierarchies and market concepts in technological evolution. Research Policy, 14(5), 235-251.
56. Cohen, M.D., March, J.G., & Olsen, J.P. (1972). Garbage can model of organizational change. Administrative Science Quarterly, 17(1), 1-25.
57. Cohen, W.M., & Levinthal, D.A. (1990). Absorptive-capacity-a new perspective on learning and innovation. Administrative Science Quarterly, 35(1), 128-152.
58. Cooper, R.G. (1990). Stage gate systems: A new tool for managing new products. Business Horizons, 33(3), 44-53.
59. Cooper, R.G. (2001). Winning at new products (3rd ed.). New York: Basic Books.
60. Czarniawska, B., & Sevon, G. (Eds.). (1996). Translating organizational change. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter and Co.
61. Damanpour, F. (1991). Organizational innovation: A meta-analysis of effects of determinants and moderators. Academy of Management Journal, 34(3), 555-590.
62. D’Aveni, R.A., Dagnino, G.B., & Smith, K.G. (2010). The age of temporary advantage. Strategic Management Journal, 31(13), 1371-1385.
63. David, P.A. (1985). Clio and the economics of qwerty. American Economic Review, 75, 332-337.
64. David, P.A., & Greenstein, S. (1990). The economics of compatibility standards: An introduction to recent research. Economics of Innovation and New Technology, 1(1-2), 3-41.
65. Davis, J.P., Eisenhardt, K.M., & Bingham, C.B. (2009). Optimal structure, market dynamism, and the strategy of simple rules. Administrative Science Quarterly, 54(3), 413-452.
66. Deuten, J.A., & Rip, A. (2000). Narrative infrastructure in product creation processes. Organization, 7(1), 69-93.
67. Dew, N., Sarasvathy, S.D., & Venkataraman, S. (2004). The economic implications of exaptation. Journal of Evolutionary Economics, 14(1), 69-84.
68. Doganova, L., & Eyquem-Renault, M. (2009). What do business models do? Innovation devices in technology entrepreneurship. Research Policy, 38(10), 1559-1570.
69. Dooley, K.J., & Van de Ven, A.H. (1999). Explaining complex organizational dynamics. Organization Science, 10(3), 358-372.
70. Dosi, G. (1982). Technological paradigms and technological trajectories: A suggested interpretation of the determinants and directions of technical change. Research Policy, 11(3), 147-162.
71. Dosi, G., & Lovallo, D. (1997). Rational entrepreneurs or optimistic martyrs? Some considerations on technological regimes, corporate entries, and the evolutionary role of decision biases. In R. Garud, P.R. Nayyar, & Z. Shapira (Eds.), Technological innovation: Oversights and foresights (pp. 41-70). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
72. Dougherty, D. (1992). Interpretive barriers to successful product innovation in large firms. Organization Science, 3(2), 179-202.
73. Dougherty, D., & Dunne, D.D. (2011). Organizing ecologies of complex innovation. Organization Science, 22(5), 1214-1223.
74. Dougherty, D., & Hardy, C. (1996). Sustained product innovation in large, mature organizations: Overcoming innovation-to-organization problems. Academy of Management Journal, 39(5), 1120-1153.
75. Dougherty, D., & Heller, T. (1994). The illegitimacy of successful product innovation in established firms. Organization Science, 5(2), 200-218.
76. Dutton, J.M., & Thomas, A. (1984). Relating technological change and learning by doing. In R.S. Rosenbloom (Ed.), Research on technological innovation, management and policy (Vol. 2, pp. 187-224). Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.
77. Dyer, J.H., & Nobeoka, K. (2000). Creating and managing a high-performance knowledge-sharing network: The toyota case. Strategic Management Journal, 21(3), 345-367.
78. Dyer, J.H., & Singh, H. (1998). The relational view: Cooperative strategy and sources of interorganizational competitive advantage. Academy of Management Review, 23(4), 660-679.
79. Eggers, J.P., & Kaplan, S. (2009). Cognition and renewal: Comparing ceo and organizational effects on incumbent adaptation to technical change. Organization Science, 20(2), 461-477.
80. Eisenhardt, K.M., & Martin, J.A. (2000). Dynamic capabilities: What are they? Strategic Management Journal, 21(10-11), 1105-1121.
81. Emirbayer, M., & Mische, A. (1998). What is agency? American Journal of Sociology, 103(4), 962-1023.
82. Faraj, S., Jarvenpaa, S.L., & Majchrzak, A. (2011). Knowledge collaboration in online communities. Organization Science, 22(5), 1224-1239.
83. Farjoun, M. (2010). Beyond dualism: Stability and change as a duality. Academy of Management Review, 35(2), 202-225.
84. Feldman, M.S., & Pentland, B.T. (2003). Reconceptualizing organizational routines as a source of flexibility and change. Administrative Science Quarterly, 48(1), 94-118.
85. Fellner, W. (1951). The influence of market structure on technological progress. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 556-577.
86. Fjeldstad, O.D., Snow, C.C., Miles, R.E., & Lettl, C. (2012). The architecture of collaboration. Strategic Management Journal, 33(6), 734-750.
87. Florida, R. (2002). The rise of the creative class: And how it’s transforming work, leisure, community and everyday life. New York: Basic Books.
88. Franke, N., & Shah, S.K. (2003). How communities support innovative activities: An exploration of assistance and sharing among end-users. Research Policy, 32(1), 157-178.
89. Freeman, C. (1974). The economics of industrial innovation. London: Penguin Books.
90. Galunic, D.C., & Rodan, S. (1998). Resource recombinations in the firm: Knowledge structures and the potential for Schumpeterian innovation. Strategic Management Journal, 19(12), 1193-1201.
91. Garud, R. (2008). Conferences as venues for the configuration of emerging organizational fields: The case of cochlear implants. Journal of Management Studies, 45(6), 1061-1088.
92. Garud, R., & Gehman, J. (2012). Metatheoretical perspectives on sustainability journeys: Evolutionary, relational and durational. Research Policy, 41(6), 980-995.
93. Garud, R., Gehman, J., & Kumaraswamy, A. (2011). Complexity arrangements for sustained innovation: Lessons from 3M corporation. Organization Studies, 32(6), 737-767.
94. Garud, R., Jain, S., & Kumaraswamy, A. (2002). Institutional entrepreneurship in the sponsorship of common technological standards: The case of Sun Microsystems and Java. Academy of Management Journal, 45(1), 196-214.
95. Garud, R., Jain, S., & Tuertscher, P. (2008). Designing for incompleteness and incomplete by design. Organization Studies, 29(3), 351-371.
96. Garud, R., & Karnoe, P. (2001). Path creation as a process of mindful deviation. In R. Garud & P. Karnoe (Eds.), Path dependence and creation (pp. 1-38). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
97. Garud, R., & Karnoe, P. (2003). Bricolage versus breakthrough: Distributed and embedded agency in technology entrepreneurship. Research Policy, 32(2), 277-300.
98. Garud, R., & Kumaraswamy, A. (1993). Changing competitive dynamics in network industries-an exploration of Sun Microsystems’ open systems strategy. Strategic Management Journal, 14(5), 351-369.
99. Garud, R., & Kumaraswamy, A. (1995). Technological and organizational designs for realizing economies of substitution. Strategic Management Journal, 16, 93-109.
100. Garud, R., Kumaraswamy, A., & Karnoe, P. (2010). Path dependence or path creation? Journal of Management Studies, 47(4), 760-774.
101. Garud, R., & Munir, K. (2008). From transactions to transformation costs: The case of Polaroid’s SX-70 camera. Research Policy, 37(4), 690-705.
102. Garud, R., & Nayyar, P.R. (1994). Transformative capacity-continual structuring by intertemporal technology-Transfer. Strategic Management Journal, 15(5), 365-385.
103. Garud, R., Nayyar, P.R., & Shapira, Z. (Eds.). (1997). Technological innovation: Oversights and foresights. New York: Cambridge University Press.
104. Garud, R., & Rappa, M.A. (1994). A socio-cognitive model of technology evolution: The case of cochlear implants. Organization Science, 5(3), 344-362.
105. Garud, R., & Van de Ven, A.H. (1992). An empirical evaluation of the internal corporate venturing process. Strategic Management Journal, 13, 93-109.
106. Gavetti, G., & Levinthal, D.A. (2000). Looking forward and looking backward: Cognitive and experiential search. Administrative Science Quarterly, 45(1), 113-137.
107. Gawer, A., & Cusumano, M.A. (2002). Platform leadership. Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press.
108. Geels, F.W. (2005). The dynamics of transitions in socio-technical systems: A multilevel analysis of the transition pathway from horse-drawn carriages to automobiles (1860-1930). Technology Analysis & Strategic Management, 17(4), 445-476.
109. Gersick, C.J.G. (1989). Making time-predictable transitions in task groups. Academy of Management Journal, 32(2), 274-309.
110. Glasmeier, A. (1991). Technological discontinuities and flexible production networks: The case of Switzerland and the world watch industry. Research Policy, 20(5), 469-485.
111. Govindarajan, V., & Trimble, C. (2012). Reverse innovation: Create far from home, win everywhere. Boston, MA: Harvard Business Review Press.
112. Granovetter, M. (1973). The strength of weak ties. American Journal of Sociology, 78(6), 1360-1380.
113. Grant, R.M. (1996). Toward a knowledge-based theory of the firm. Strategic Management Journal, 17, 109-122.
114. Green, S.E. (2004). A rhetorical theory of diffusion. Academy of Management Review, 29(4), 653-669.
115. Grove, A.S. (1996). Only the paranoid survive. New York: Doubleday.
116. Gulati, R., Nohria, N., & Zaheer, A. (2000). Strategic networks. Strategic Management Journal, 21(3), 203-215.
117. Gulati, R., & Singh, H. (1998). The architecture of cooperation: Managing coordination costs and appropriation concerns in strategic alliances. Administrative Science Quarterly, 43(4), 781-814.
118. Hamel, G., Doz, Y.L., & Prahalad, C.K. (1989). Collaborate with your competitors-and win. Harvard Business Review, 67(1), 133-139.
119. Hansen, M.T. (1999). The search-transfer problem: The role of weak ties in sharing knowledge across organization subunits. Administrative Science Quarterly, 44(1), 82-111.
120. Hardin, G. (1968). The tragedy of the commons. Science, 162(3859), 1243-1248.
121. Hargadon, A.B. (2003). How breakthroughs happen: The surprising truth about how companies innovate. Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press.
122. Hargadon, A.B., & Bechky, B.A. (2006). When collections of creatives become creative collectives: A field study of problem solving at work. Organization Science, 17(4), 484-500.
123. Hargadon, A.B., & Douglas, Y. (2001). When innovations meet institutions: Edison and the design of the electric light. Administrative Science Quarterly, 46(3), 476-501.
124. Hargadon, A.B., & Sutton, R.I. (1997). Technology brokering and innovation in a product development firm. Administrative Science Quarterly, 42(4), 716-749.
125. Hargrave, T.J., & Van de Ven, A.H. (2006). A collective action model of institutional innovation. Academy of Management Review, 31(4), 864-888.
126. Harianto, F., & Pennings, J.M. (1994). Technological convergence and scope of organizational innovation. Research Policy, 23(3), 293-304.
127. Harris, M. (1988). Culture, people, nature: An introduction to general anthropology (5th ed.). New York: Harper and Row.
128. Helfat, C.E., & Winter, S.G. (2011). Untangling dynamic and operational capabilities: Strategy for the (n)ever-changing world. Strategic Management Journal, 32(11), 1243-1250.
129. Henderson, R.M. (1995). Of life cycles real and imaginary: The unexpected long old age of optical lithography. Research Policy, 24(4), 631-643.
130. Henderson, R.M., & Clark, K.B. (1990). Architectural innovation-the reconfiguration of existing product technologies and the failure of established firms. Administrative Science Quarterly, 35(1), 9-30.
131. Henderson, R.M., & Cockburn, I. (1996). Scale, scope, and spillovers: The determinants of research productivity in drug discovery. Rand Journal of Economics, 27(1), 32-59.
132. Hess, E.D., & Kazanjian, R.K. (Eds.). (2006). The search for organic growth. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
133. von Hippel, E. (1994). Sticky information and the locus of problem-solving-implications for innovation. Management Science, 40(4), 429-439.
134. von Hippel, E., & von Krogh, G. (2003). Open source software and the "Privatecollective" innovation model: Issues for organization science. Organization Science, 14(2), 209-223.
135. Hughes, T.P. (1969). Technological momentum in history: Hydrogenation in Germany 1898-1933. Past & Present, 44, 106-132.
136. Iansiti, M. (1998). Technology integration. Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press.
137. Irvine, J., & Martin, B.R. (1984). Foresight in science: Picking the winners. London: Pinter.
138. Jacobides, M.G. (2005). Industry change through vertical disintegration: How and why markets emerged in mortgage banking. Academy of Management Journal, 48(3), 465-498.
139. Jaffe, A.B., & Palmer, K. (1997). Environmental regulation and innovation: A panel data study. Review of Economics and Statistics, 79(4), 610-619.
140. Jain, S. (2012). Pragmatic agency in technology standards setting: The case of Ethernet. Research Policy, 41(9), 1643-1654.
141. Kahneman, D., & Lovallo, D. (1993). Timid choices and bold forecasts-a cognitive perspective on risk-taking. Management Science, 39(1), 17-31.
142. Kanigel, R. (1997). The one best way: Frederick Winslow Taylor and the enigma of efficiency. New York: Viking.
143. Kanter, R.M.K. (1988). When a thousand flowers bloom. In B. Staw & L.L. Cummings (Eds.), Research in organizational behavior (pp. 169-211). Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.
144. Kaplan, S. (2008). Framing contests: Strategy making under uncertainty. Organization Science, 19(5), 729-752.
145. Kaplan, S., & Orlikowski, W.J. (2012). Temporal work in strategy making. Organization Science, Articles in Advance, 1-31.
146. Kaplan, S., & Tripsas, M. (2008). Thinking about technology: Applying a cognitive lens to technical change. Research Policy, 37(5), 790-805.
147. Karnoe, P., & Garud, R. (2012). Path creation: Co-creation of heterogeneous resources in the emergence of the danish wind turbine cluster. European Planning Studies, 12(5), 733-752.
148. Kauffman, S.A. (1993). The origins of order: Self-organization and selection in evolution. New York: Oxford University Press.
149. Kirsch, D.A. (2000). The electric vehicle and the burden of history. New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press.
150. Kline, S.J., & Rosenberg, N. (1986). An overview of innovation. In R. Landau & N. Rosenberg (Eds.), The positive sum strategy: Harnessing technology for economic growth (pp. 275-305). Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
151. Knorr-Cetina, K. (1999). Epistemic cultures: How the sciences make knowledge. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
152. Koestler, A. (1964). The act of creation. New York: Macmillan.
153. Kogut, B., & Metiu, A. (2001). Open-source software development and distributed innovation. Oxford Review of Economic Policy, 17(2), 248-264.
154. Kogut, B., & Zander, U. (1992). Knowledge of the firm, combinative capabilities, and the replication of technology. Organization Science, 3(3), 383-397.
155. von Krogh, G., Spaeth, S., & Lakhani, K.R. (2003). Community, joining, and specialization in open source software innovation: A case study. Research Policy, 32(7), 1217-1241.
156. Lakhani, K.R., & Panetta, J.A. (2007). The principles of distributed innovation. Innovations: Technology, Governance, Globalization, 2(3), 97-112.
157. Lampel, J. (2001). Show and tell: Product demonstrations and path creation of technological change. In R. Garud & P. Karnoe (Eds.), Path dependence and creation (pp. 303-328). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
158. Lampel, J., & Meyer, A.D. (2008). Field-configuring events as structuring mechanisms: How conferences, ceremonies, and trade shows constitute new technologies, industries, and markets-introduction. Journal of Management Studies, 45(6), 1025-1035.
159. Lane, H. (1992). The mask of benevolence: Disabling the deaf community. New York: Alfred A. Knopf.
160. Lane, P.J., & Lubatkin, M. (1998). Relative absorptive capacity and interorganizational learning. Strategic Management Journal, 19(5), 461-477.
161. Latour, B. (1987). Science in action: How to follow scientists and engineers through society. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
162. Latour, B. (2004). Why has critique run out of steam? From matters of fact to matters of concern. Critical Inquiry, 30(2), 225-248.
163. Latour, B. (2005). Reassembling the social. New York: Oxford University Press.
164. Lave, J., & Wenger, E. (1991). Situated learning: Legitimate peripheral participation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
165. van Lente, H. (2000). Forceful futures: From promise to requirement. In N. Brown, B. Rappert, & A. Webster (Eds.), Contested futures. A sociology of prospective technoscience (pp. 43-64). London: Ashgate.
166. van Lente, H., & Rip, A. (1998). Expectations in technological developments: An example of prospective structures to be filled in by agency. In C. Disco & B.J.R. van der Meulen (Eds.), Getting new technologies together (pp. 195-220). Berlin: Walter de Gruyter.
167. Leonard-Barton, D. (1992). Core capabilities and core rigidities: A paradox in managing new product development. Strategic Management Journal, 13, 111-125.
168. Lettl, C., Herstatt, C., & Gemuenden, H.G. (2006). Users’ contributions to radical innovation: Evidence from four cases in the field of medical equipment technology. R&D Management, 36(3), 251-272.
169. Levinthal, D.A. (1997). Adaptation on rugged landscapes. Management Science, 43(7), 934-950.
170. Levinthal, D.A. (1998). The slow pace of rapid technological change: Gradualism and punctuation in technological change. Industrial and Corporate Change, 7(2), 217-247.
171. Lindahl, L. (1988). Spence Silver: A scholar and a gentleman. 3M Today, 15, 12-17.
172. Lounsbury, M., & Crumley, E.T. (2007). New practice creation: An institutional perspective on innovation. Organization Studies, 28(7), 993-1012.
173. Lounsbury, M., & Glynn, M.A. (2001). Cultural entrepreneurship: Stories, legitimacy, and the acquisition of resources. Strategic Management Journal, 22(6-7), 545-564.
174. Lovas, B., & Ghoshal, S. (2000). Strategy as guided evolution. Strategic Management Journal, 21(9), 875-896.
175. Lundvall, B.A. (Ed.). (1992). National systems of innovation: Towards a theory of innovation and interactive learning. London: Pinter.
176. March, J.G. (1982). The technology of foolishness. In J.G. March & J.P. Olsen (Eds.), Ambiguity and choice in organizations (pp. 69-81). Bergen: Universitetsforlaget.
177. March, J.G. (1991). Exploration and exploitation in organizational learning. Organization Science, 2(1), 71-87.
178. March, J.G. (1999). Research on organizations: Hopes for the past and lessons from the future. Nordiske Organisasjonsstudier, 1, 69-83.
179. March, J.G., Sproull, L.S., & Tamuz, M. (1991). Learning from samples of one or fewer. Organization Science, 2(1), 1-13.
180. Markard, J., Raven, R., & Truffer, B. (2012). Sustainability transitions: An emerging field of research and its prospects. Research Policy, 41(6), 955-967.
181. Martin, R. (2009). The design of business: Why design thinking is the next competitive advantage. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
182. McAfee, A. (2002). The impact of enterprise information technology adoption on operational performance: An empirical investigation. Production and Operations Management, 11(1), 33-53.
183. Mezias, S.J., & Kuperman, J.C. (2001). The community dynamics of entrepreneurship: The birth of the American film industry, 1895-1929. Journal of Business Venturing, 16(3), 209-233.
184. Mohr, L.B. (1982). Explaining organizational behavior: The limits and possibilities of theory and research. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
185. Mokyr, J. (1990). The lever of riches: Technological creativity and economic progress. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
186. Moore, J.F. (1996). The death of competition: Leadership & strategy in the age of business ecosystems. New York: Harper Business.
187. Mowery, D.C., & Rosenberg, N. (1979). The influence of market demand upon innovation: A critical review of some recent empirical studies. Research Policy, 8(2), 102-153.
188. Murmann, J.P. (2003). Knowledge and competitive advantage: The coevolution of firms, technology, and national institutions. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
189. Murtha, T.P., Lenway, S.A., & Hart, J.A. (2001). Managing new industry creation: Global knowledge formation and entrepreneurship in high technolog. Stanford, CA: Stanford Business Books.
190. Nayak, P.R., & Ketteringham, J.M. (1986). Breakthroughs! New York: Rawson.
191. Nelson, R.R. (1993). National innovation systems: A comparative analysis. New York: Oxford University Press.
192. Nelson, R.R. (1994). The co-evolution of technology, industrial structure, and supporting institutions. Industrial and Corporate Change, 3(1), 47-63.
193. Nelson, R.R., & Winter, S.G. (1982). An evolutionary theory of economic change. Boston, MA: Belknap.
194. Nerkar, A., & Paruchuri, S. (2005). Evolution of R&D capabilities: The role of knowledge networks within a firm. Management Science, 51(5), 771-785.
195. Nohria, N., & Gulati, R. (1996). Is slack good or bad for innovation? Academy of Management Journal, 39(5), 1245-1264.
196. Nonaka, I., & Takeuchi, H. (1995). The knowledge-creating company. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
197. Obstfeld, D. (2005). Social networks, the tertius lungens and orientation involvement in innovation. Administrative Science Quarterly, 50(1), 100-130.
198. Olson, M. (1965). The logic of collective action: Public goods and the theory of groups. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
199. O’Mahony, S. (2003). Guarding the commons: How community managed software projects protect their work. Research Policy, 32(7), 1179-1198.
200. O’Mahony, S., & Ferraro, F. (2007). The emergence of governance in an open source community. Academy of Management Journal, 50(5), 1079-1106.
201. Orlikowski, W.J., & Yates, J. (2002). It’s about time: temporal structuring in organizations. Organization Science, 13(6), 684-700.
202. Penrose, E.T. (1959). The theory of the growth of the firm. New York: Wiley.
203. Pettigrew, A.M. (1990). Longitudinal field research on change: Theory and practice. Organization Science, 1(3), 267-292.
204. Phelps, C.C. (2010). A longitudinal study of the influence of alliance network structure and composition of firm exploratory innovation. Academy of Management Journal, 53(4), 890-913.
205. Phillips, N., Lawrence, T.B., & Hardy, C. (2004). Discourse and institutions. Academy of Management Review, 29(4), 635-652.
206. Pickering, A. (1993). The mangle of practice-agency and emergence in the sociology of science. American Journal of Sociology, 99(3), 559-589.
207. Pinch, T.J., & Bijker, W.E. (1987). The social construction of facts and artifacts: Or how the sociology of science and the sociology of technology might benefit each other. In W.E. Bijker, T.P. Hughes, & T.J. Pinch (Eds.), Social construction of technological systems (pp. 17-50). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
208. Podolny, J.M. (2001). Networks as the pipes and prisms of the market. American Journal of Sociology, 107(1), 33-60.
209. Porac, J.F. (1997). Local rationality, global blunders, and the boundaries of technological choice: Lessons from IBM and DOS. In R. Garud, P.R. Nayyar, & Z. Shapira (Eds.), Technological innovation: Oversights and foresights (pp. 129-146). New York: Cambridge University Press.
210. Porter, M.E. (1990). The competitive advantage of nations. New York: The Free Press.
211. Powell, W.W. (1998). Learning from collaboration: Knowledge and networks in the biotechnology and pharmaceutical industries. California Management Review, 40(3), 228-240.
212. Powell, W.W., Koput, K.W., & Smith-Doerr, L. (1996). Interorganizational collaboration and the locus of innovation: Networks of learning in biotechnology. Administrative Science Quarterly, 41, 116-145.
213. Prahalad, C.K. (2010). The fortune at the bottom of the pyramid: Eradicating poverty through profits. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.
214. Prahalad, C.K., & Hamel, G. (1990). The core competence of the corporation. Harvard Business Review, 68(3), 79-91.
215. Radjou, N., Prabhu, J., & Ahuja, S. (2012). Jugaad innovation: Think frugal, be flexible, generate breakthrough growth. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
216. Rao, H. (2009). Market rebels: How activists make or break radical innovations. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
217. Ravasi, D., & Lojacono, G. (2005). Managing design and designers for strategic renewal. Long Range Planning, 38(1), 51-77.
218. Raymond, E.S. (1999). The cathedral and the bazaar. Sebastopol, CA: O’Reilly.
219. Rich, B.R., & Janos, L. (1994). Skunk works: A personal memoir of my years at lockheed. Boston, MA: Little, Brown & Co.
220. Ricoeur, P. (1984). Time and narrative. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
221. Ring, P.S., & Van de Ven, A.H. (1994). Developmental processes of cooperative interorganizational relationships. Academy of Management Review, 19(1), 90-118.
222. Roberts, E.B. (1988). What we’ve learned-managing invention and innovation. Research-Technology Management, 31(1), 11-29.
223. Rochet, J.C., & Tirole, J. (2003). Platform competition in two-sided markets. Journal of the European Economic Association, 1(4), 990-1029.
224. Rochet, J.C., & Tirole, J. (2006). Two-sided markets: A progress report. Rand Journal of Economics, 37(3), 645-667.
225. Rogers, E.M. (1983). Diffusion of innovations (3rd ed.). New York: The Free Press.
226. Rosa, J.A., Porac, J.F., Runser-Spanjol, J., & Saxon, M.S. (1999). Sociocognitive dynamics in a product market. Journal of Marketing, 63, 64-77.
227. Rosenberg, N. (1976). On technological expectations. Economic Journal, 86(343), 523-535.
228. Rosenberg, N. (1982). Inside the black box: Technology and economics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
229. Rosenkopf, L., & Nerkar, A. (2001). Beyond local search: Boundary-spanning, exploration, and impact in the optical disk industry. Strategic Management Journal, 22(4), 287-306.
230. Rosenkopf, L., & Tushman, M. (1998). The coevolution of community networks and technology: Lessons from the flight simulation industry. Industrial and Corporate Change, 7, 311-346.
231. Runge, C.F., & Senauer, B. (2007). How biofuels could starve the poor. Foreign Affairs, 86(3), 41-53.
232. Ruttan, V.W., & Hayami, Y. (1994). Induced innovation theory and agricultural development: A personal account. In B. Koppel (Ed.), Induced innovation theory and international agricultural development: A reassessment (pp. 22-36). Baltimore, MA: The Johns Hopkins University Press.
233. Sanchez, R., & Mahoney, J.T. (1996). Modularity, flexibility, and knowledge management in product and organization design. Strategic Management Journal, 17, 63-76.
234. Sanderson, S., & Uzumeri, M. (1995). Managing product families-the case of the Sony Walkman. Research Policy, 24(5), 761-782.
235. Saxenian, A. (1996). Regional advantage: Culture and competition in Silicon Valley and Route 128. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
236. Schilling, M.A. (2002). Technology success and failure in winner-take-all markets: The impact of learning orientation, timing, and network externalities. Academy of Management Journal, 45(2), 387-398.
237. Schoonhoven, C.B., & Romanelli, E. (2001). The entrepreneurship dynamic: Origins of entrepreneurship and the evolution of industries. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
238. Schrage, M. (2000). Serious play: How the world’s best companies simulate to innovate. Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press.
239. Schumpeter, J.A. (1934). The theory of economic development. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
240. Senge, P.M., Lichtenstein, B.B., Kaeufer, K., Bradbury, H., & Carroll, J. (2007). Collaborating for systemic change. MIT Sloan Management Review, 48(2), 44-53.
241. Shah, S.K., & Tripsas, M. (2007). The accidental entrepreneur: The emergent and collective process of user entrepreneurship. Strategic Entrepreneurship Journal, 1(1-2), 123-140.
242. Shapiro, C., & Varian, H.R. (1999). The art of standards wars. California Management Review, 41(2), 8-32.
243. Simon, H.A. (1962). The architecture of complexity. Proceedings of the American Philosophical Society, 106, 467-482.
244. Sine, W.D., & Lee, B.H. (2009). Tilting at windmills? The environmental movement and the emergence of the US wind energy sector. Administrative Science Quarterly, 54(1), 123-155.
245. Sood, A., & Tellis, G.J. (2005). Technological evolution and radical innovation. Journal of Marketing, 69(3), 152-168.
246. Spender, J.C. (1989). Industry recipes: An enquiry into the nature and sources of managerial judgement. Oxford: Blackwell.
247. Star, S.L., & Griesemer, J.R. (1989). Institutional ecology, "translations" and boundary objects: Amateurs and professionals in Berkeley’s Museum of Vertebrate Zoology, 1907-39. Social Studies of Science, 19(3), 387-420.
248. Stark, D. (1999). Heterarchy: Distributing intelligence and organizing diversity. In J. Clippinger (Ed.), The biology of business: Decoding the natural laws of enterprise. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
249. Stinchcombe, A.S. (1965). Social structure and organizations. In J.G. March (Ed.), Handbook of organizations (pp. 153-193). Chicago, IL: Rand McNally.
250. Suarez, F.F. (2005). Network effects revisited: The role of strong ties in technology selection. Academy of Management Journal, 48(4), 710-720.
251. Suarez, F.F. (2012). Dethroning an established platform. MIT Sloan Management Review, 53(4), 35-41.
252. Sydow, J., Schreyogg, G., & Koch, J. (2009). Organizational path dependence: Opening the black box. Academy of Management Review, 34(4), 689-709.
253. Takeuchi, H., & Nonaka, I. (1986). The new product development game. Harvard Business Review, 64(1), 137-146.
254. Tarde, G. (1903). The laws of imitation. New York: Henry Holt.
255. Teece, D.J. (1986). Profiting from technological innovation-implications for integration, collaboration, licensing and public-policy. Research Policy, 15(6), 285-305.
256. Teece, D.J. (1988). Technological change and the nature of the firm. In G. Dosi, C. Freeman, R.R. Nelson, G. Silverberg, & L. Soete (Eds.), Technical change and economic theory (pp. 256-281). New York: Pinter.
257. Teece, D.J., Pisano, G., & Shuen, A. (1997). Dynamic capabilities and strategic management. Strategic Management Journal, 18(7), 509-533.
258. Thomke, S.H. (2003). Experimentation matters: Unlocking the potential of new technologies for innovation. Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press.
259. Tornatzky, L.G., Eveland, J.D., Boylan, M.G., Hetzner, W.A., Johnson, E.C., Roitman, D., & Schneider, J. (1983). Innovation processes and their management: A conceptual, empirical and policy review of innovation process research. Washington, DC: National Science Foundation.
260. Tripsas, M. (2009). Technology, identity, and inertia through the lens of "The Digital Photography Company". Organization Science, 20(2), 441-460.
261. Tripsas, M., & Gavetti, G. (2000). Capabilities, cognition, and inertia: Evidence from digital imaging. Strategic Management Journal, 21(10-11), 1147-1161.
262. Tsoukas, H. (1989). The validity of idiographic research explanations. Academy of Management Review, 14(4), 551-561.
263. Tuertscher, P. (2009). The emergence of architecture in modular systems: Coordination across boundaries at ATLAS, CERN (Unpublished Dissertation). University of St. Gallen.
264. Tushman, M.L., & Anderson, P. (1986). Technological discontinuities and organizational environments. Administrative Science Quarterly, 31(3), 439-465.
265. Tushman, M.L., & Murmann, J.P. (1998). Dominant designs, technology cycles, and organizational outcomes. Research in Organizational Behavior, 20, 231-266.
266. Tushman, M.L., & O’Reilly, C.A. (2006). Ambidextrous organizations: Managing evolutionary and revolutionary change. In D. Mayle (Ed.), Managing innovation and change (pp. 170-184). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
267. Tushman, M.L., & Romanelli, E. (1985). Organizational evolution: A metamorphosis model of convergence and reorientation. Research in Organizational Behavior, 7, 171-222.
268. Tyre, M.J., & von Hippel, E. (1997). The situated nature of adaptive learning in organizations. Organization Science, 8(1), 71-83.
269. Ulrich, K., & Eppinger, S.D. (1995). Product design and development. New York: McGraw-Hill.
270. Usher, A.P. (1954). A history of mechanical inventions (Revised ed.). Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
271. Utterback, J.M., & Abernathy, W.J. (1975). A dynamic model of process and product innovation. Omega, 3, 639-656.
272. Van de Ven, A.H. (1986). Central problems in the management of innovation. Management Science, 32(5), 590-607.
273. Van de Ven, A.H. (2004). The context-specific nature of competence and corporate development. Asia Pacific Journal of Management, 21, 123-147.
274. Van de Ven, A.H., Angle, H.L., & Poole, M.S. (Eds.). (1989). Research on the management of innovation: The Minnesota studies. New York: Harper and Row.
275. Van de Ven, A.H., & Garud, R. (1989). A framework for understanding the emergence of new industries. In R.S. Rosenbloom & R.A. Burgelman (Eds.), Research on technological innovation, management and policy (Vol. 4, pp. 195-225). Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.
276. Van de Ven, A.H., & Grazman, D.N. (1997). Technological innovation, learning and leadership. In R. Garud, P.R. Nayyar, & Z. Shapira (Eds.), Technological innovation: Oversights and foresights (pp. 345-354). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
277. Van de Ven, A.H., & Grazman, D.N. (1999). Evolution in a nested hierarchy-a genealogy of twin cities health care organizations, 1853-1995. In J.A.C. Baum & B. McKelvey (Eds.), Variations in organization science (pp. 185-209). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
278. Van de Ven, A.H., Polley, D., Garud, R., & Venkataraman, S. (1999). The innovation journey. New York: Oxford University Press.
279. Van de Ven, A.H., & Poole, M.S. (1995). Explaining development and change in organizations. Academy of Management Review, 20(3), 510-540.
280. Van Maanen, J., & Barley, S.R. (1984). Occupational communities-culture and control in organizations. Research in Organizational Behavior, 6, 287-365.
281. Venkataraman, S., & Van de Ven, A.H. (1998). Hostile environmental jolts, transaction set, and new business. Journal of Business Venturing, 13(3), 231-255.
282. Vergne, J.-P., & Durand, R. (2010). The missing link between the theory and empirics of path dependence: Conceptual clarification, testability issue, and methodological implications. Journal of Management Studies, 47(4), 736-759.
283. Weick, K.E. (1990). Technology as equivoque: Sensemaking in new technologies. In P.S. Goodman & L.S. Sproull (Eds.), Technology and organizations. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
284. Weick, K.E. (1995). Sensemaking in organizations. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
285. West, J. (2003). How open is open enough? Melding proprietary and open source platform strategies. Research Policy, 32(7), 1259-1285.
286. Wheelwright, S., & Clark, K.B. (1992). Revolutionizing product development: Quantum leaps in speed, efficiency, and quality. New York: Free Press.
287. White, H.C. (2002). Markets from networks: Socioeconomic models of production. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
288. Whittington, R., Pettigrew, A.M., Peck, S., Fenton, E., & Conyon, M. (1999). Change and complementarities in the new competitive landscape: A European panel study, 1992-1996. Organization Science, 10(5), 583-600.
289. Wry, T., Lounsbury, M., & Glynn, M.A. (2011). Legitimating nascent collective identities: Coordinating cultural entrepreneurship. Organization Science, 22(2), 449-463.
290. Wynne, B. (2006). Public engagement as a means of restoring public trust in science-hitting the notes, but missing the music? Public Health Genomics, 9(3), 211-220.
291. Yakura, E.K. (2002). Charting time: Timelines as temporal boundary objects. Academy of Management Journal, 45(5), 956-970.
292. Yoo, Y., Boland, R.J., Lyytinen, K., & Majchrzak, A. (2012). Organizing for innovation in the digitized world. Organization Science, 23(5), 1398-1408.
293. Yoo, Y., Henfridsson, O., & Lyytinen, K. (2010). The new organizing logic of digital innovations: An agenda for information systems research. Information Systems Research, 21(5), 724-735.
294. Zoglio, M., & Wathieu, L. (2001). TiVo. Case No 9-501-038. Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Case Service.