Critical assessment of methods of protein structure prediction (CASP)—Round XII

Proteins: Structure, Function and Bioinformatics

Volumn 86, Issue , 2018, Pages 7-15

  Moult, John ^a   Fidelis, Krzysztof ^b   Kryshtafovych, Andriy ^b   Schwede, Torsten ^c   Tramontano, Anna ^d  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MARYLAND   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF BASEL   (Switzerland)

^d SAPIENZA UNIVERSITY OF ROME   (Italy)

Author keywords

CASP; community wide experiment; protein structure prediction

Indexed keywords

ACCURACY; AMINO ACID SEQUENCE; ARTICLE; COMPUTER MODEL; COMPUTER PREDICTION; CRITICAL ASSESSMENT OF STRUCTURE PREDICTION; INDEPENDENT VARIABLE; LIGAND BINDING; MUTATION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROTEIN ANALYSIS; PROTEIN CROSS LINKING; PROTEIN QUATERNARY STRUCTURE; PROTEIN SECONDARY STRUCTURE; PROTEIN TARGETING; BIOLOGY; CHEMISTRY; HUMAN; MOLECULAR MODEL; PROCEDURES; PROTEIN CONFORMATION; STATISTICAL MODEL; X RAY DIFFRACTION;

PROTEIN;

COMPUTATIONAL BIOLOGY; HUMANS; MODELS, MOLECULAR; MODELS, STATISTICAL; PROTEIN CONFORMATION; PROTEINS; X-RAY DIFFRACTION;

EID: 85037523874     PISSN: 08873585     EISSN: 10970134     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/prot.25415     Document Type: Article

References (44)

1. Kryshtafovych A, Monastyrskyy B, Fidelis K. CASP11 statistics and the prediction center evaluation system. Proteins. 2016;84(suppl 1):15–19.
2. Kryshtafovych, Albrecht R, Baslé A, et al. Target highlights from the first post-PSICASP experiment (CASP12, May-August 2016). Proteins. 2017; CASP12 issue.
3. Kryshtafovych A, Fidelis K, Moult J. CASP10 results compared to those of previous CASP experiments. Proteins. 2014;82:164–174.
4. Abriata LA, Kinch LN, Tamo GE, Monastyrskyy B, Kryshtafovych A, Dal Peraro M. Definition and classification of evaluation units for tertiary structure prediction in CASP12 facilitated through semi-automated metrics. Proteins. 2018;86:000–000. https://doi.org/10.1002/prot.25403.
5. Haas J, Barbato A, Studer G, Behringer D, Roth S, Mostaguir K, Bertoni M, Schwede T. Continuous automated model evaluation (CAMEO) complementing the critical assessment of techniques for structure prediction. Proteins. 2017;CASP12 issue.
6. Moult J, Fidelis K, Kryshtafovych A, Schwede T. A tribute to Anna Tramontano. Proteins. 2017;CASP12 issue.
7. Thornton JM, Valencia A, Schwede T. Anna Tramontano 1957–2017. Nat Struct Mol Biol. 2017;24(5):431–432.
8. de Juan D, Pazos F, Valencia A. Emerging methods in protein co-evolution. Nat Rev Genet. 2013;14(4):249–261.
9. Kinch LN, Li W, Monastyrskyy B, Kryshtafovych A, Grishin NV. Evaluation of free modeling targets in CASP11 and ROLL. Proteins. 2016;84:51–66.
10. Schaarschmidt J, Monastyrskyy B, Kryshtafovych A, Bonvin AM. Assessment of contact predictions in CASP12: Co-evolution and deep learning coming of age. Proteins. 2017;CASP issue.
11. Bonneau R, Baker D. Ab initio protein structure prediction: Progress and prospects. Annu Rev Biophys Biomol Struct. 2001;30(1):173–189.
12. Remmert M, Biegert A, Hauser A, Soding J. HHblits: Lightning-fast iterative protein sequence searching by HMM-HMM alignment. Nat Methods. 2011;9(2):173–175.
13. Abriata LA, Tamo GE, Monastyrskyy B, Kryshtafovych A, Dal Peraro M. Assessment of hard target modeling in CASP12 reveals an emerging role of alignment-based contact prediction methods. Proteins. 2018;86:000–000. https://doi.org/10.1002/prot.25423
14. Kryshtafovych A, Fidelis K, Moult J. CASP9 results compared to those of previous CASP experiments. Proteins. 2011;79(S10):196–207.
15. Kryshtafovych A, Monastyrskyy B, Fidelis K, Moult J, Tramontano A. Evaluation of template-based modeling in CASP12. Proteins. 2017;CASP12 issue.
16. Cozzetto D, Kryshtafovych A, Ceriani M, Tramontano A. Assessment of predictions in the model quality assessment category. Proteins. 2007;69(S8):175–183.
17. Cozzetto D, Kryshtafovych A, Tramontano A. Evaluation of CASP8 model quality predictions. Proteins. 2009;77(S9):157–166.
18. Kryshtafovych A, Fidelis K, Tramontano A. Evaluation of model quality predictions in CASP9. Proteins. 2011;79(suppl10):91–106.
19. Kryshtafovych A, Barbato A, Fidelis K, Monastyrskyy B, Schwede T, Tramontano A. Assessment of the assessment: Evaluation of the model quality estimates in CASP10. Proteins. 2014;82(Suppl2):112–126.
20. Kryshtafovych A, Barbato A, Monastyrskyy B, Fidelis K, Schwede T, Tramontano A. Methods of model accuracy estimation can help selecting the best models from decoy sets: Assessment of model accuracy estimations in CASP11. Proteins. 2016;84:349–369.
21. Kryshtafovych A, Monastyrskyy B, Fidelis K, Schwede T, Tramontano A. Assessment of model accuracy estimations in CASP12. Proteins. 2017;CASP12 issue.
22. Sali A, Berman HM, Schwede T, et al. Outcome of the first wwPDB hybrid/integrative methods task force workshop. Structure. 2015;23(7):1156–1167.
23. Ogorzalek TL, Hura GL, Belsom A, Burnett KH, Kryshtafovych A, Tainer JA, Rappsilber J, Tsutakawa SE, Fidelis K. Small angle X-ray scattering and cross-linking for data assisted protein structure prediction in CASP 12 with prospects for improved accuracy. Proteins. 2017;CASP12 issue.
24. Schneider M, Belsom A, Rappsilber J, Brock O. Blind testing of cross-linking/mass spectrometry hybrid methods in CASP11. Proteins. 2016;84:152–163.
25. Dal Peraro M. al. e. [data assisted assessment paper. PROTEINS 2017;CASP12 issue.
26. MacCallum JL, Hua L, Schnieders MJ, Pande VS, Jacobson MP, Dill KA. Assessment of the protein-structure refinement category in CASP8. Proteins. 2009;77(S9):66–80.
27. Modi V, Dunbrack RL Jr. Assessment of refinement of template-based models in CASP11. Proteins. 2016;84(Suppl 1):260–281.
28. Hovan L, Oleinikovas V, Yalinca H, Kryshtafovych A, Saladino G, Luigi Gervasio F. Assessment of the model refinement category in CASP12. Proteins. 2018;86:000–000. https://doi.org/10.1002/prot.25409.
29. Krogan NJ, Cagney G, Yu H, et al. Global landscape of protein complexes in the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Nature. 2006;440(7084):637–643.
30. Orchard S, Ammari M, Aranda B, et al. The MIntAct project–IntAct as a common curation platform for 11 molecular interaction databases. Nucleic Acids Res. 2014;42(Database issue):D358–D363.
31. David A, Razali R, Wass MN, Sternberg MJ. Protein-protein interaction sites are hot spots for disease-associated nonsynonymous SNPs. Hum Mutat. 2012;33(2):359–363.
32. Brender JR, Zhang Y, Jernigan RL. Predicting the effect of mutations on protein-protein binding interactions through structure-based interface profiles. PLoS Comput Biol. 2015;11(10):e1004494
33. Mariani V, Kiefer F, Schmidt T, Haas J, Schwede T. Assessment of template based protein structure predictions in CASP9. Proteins. 2011;79(Suppl 10):37–58.
34. Moult J, Fidelis K, Kryshtafovych A, Schwede T, Tramontano A. Critical assessment of methods of protein structure prediction: Progress and new directions in round XI. Proteins. 2016;84:4–14.
35. Lensink MF, Velankar S, Kryshtafovych A, et al. Prediction of homoprotein and heteroprotein complexes by protein docking and template-based modeling: A CASP-CAPRI experiment. Proteins. 2016;84(Suppl 1):323–348.
36. Lafita A, Bliven S, Kryshtafovych A, et al. Assessment of protein assembly prediction in CASP12. Proteins. 2018;86:000–000. https://doi.org/10.1002/prot.25408.
37. Lensink MF, Velankar S, Baek M, Heo L, Seok C, Wodak SJ. The challenge of modeling protein assemblies: The CASP12-CAPRI experiment. Proteins. 2017;CASP12 issue.
38. Baker D, Sali A. Protein structure prediction and structural genomics. Science. 2001;294(5540):93–96.
39. Moult J. Comparative modeling in structural genomics. Structure. 2008;16(1):14–16.
40. Huwe PJ, Xu Q, Shapovalov MV, Modi V, Andrake MD, Dunbrack RL Jr. Biological function derived from predicted structures in CASP11. Proteins. 2016;84:370–391.
41. Liu T, Ish-Shalom S, Wen T, Lafita A, Bock C, Mort M, Cooper DN, Bliven S, Capitani G, Mooney SD, Altman RB. Biological and functional relevance of CASP predictions. Proteins. 2017;CASP12 issue.
42. Liu T, Altman RB, Beard DA. Using multiple microenvironments to find similar ligand-binding sites: Application to kinase inhibitor binding. PLoS Comput Biol. 2011;7(12):e1002326
43. Hildebrand A, Remmert M, Biegert A, Soding J. Fast and accurate automatic structure prediction with HHpred. Proteins. 2009;77(S9):128–132.
44. Bienert S, Waterhouse A, de Beer TA, et al. The SWISS-MODEL repository-new features and functionality. Nucleic Acids Res. 2017;45(D1):D313–D319.