Definition and classification of evaluation units for tertiary structure prediction in CASP12 facilitated through semi-automated metrics

Proteins: Structure, Function and Bioinformatics

Volumn 86, Issue , 2018, Pages 16-26

  Abriata, Luciano A ^a   Kinch, Lisa N ^b   Tamò, Giorgio E ^a   Monastyrskyy, Bohdan ^c   Kryshtafovych, Andriy ^c   Dal Peraro, Matteo ^a  

^a EPFL   (Switzerland)

^b UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS SOUTHWESTERN MEDICAL CENTER   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

contact prediction; critical assessment of structure prediction; homology modeling; residue coevolution; sequence alignment; structural bioinformatics

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; AUTOMATION; CLASSIFICATION; PREDICTION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROTEIN DATA BANK; PROTEIN DOMAIN; PROTEIN TERTIARY STRUCTURE; SEQUENCE ALIGNMENT; STRUCTURAL BIOINFORMATICS; BIOLOGY; CHEMISTRY; HUMAN; MOLECULAR DYNAMICS; MOLECULAR MODEL; PROCEDURES; PROTEIN DATABASE;

PROTEIN;

COMPUTATIONAL BIOLOGY; DATABASES, PROTEIN; HUMANS; MODELS, MOLECULAR; MOLECULAR DYNAMICS SIMULATION; PROTEIN STRUCTURE, TERTIARY; PROTEINS;

EID: 85042264653     PISSN: 08873585     EISSN: 10970134     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/prot.25403     Document Type: Article

References (26)

1. Moult J, Fidelis K, Kryshtafovych A, Schwede T, Tramontano A. Critical assessment of methods of protein structure prediction (casp): progress and new directions in round XI. Proteins. 2016; 84:4–14
2. Kryshtafovych A, Monastyrskyy B, Fidelis K. CASP11 statistics and the prediction center evaluation system. Proteins. 2016;84(Suppl 1):15–19.
3. Cheng H, Schaeffer RD, Liao Y, et al. ECOD: an evolutionary classification of protein domains. PLoS Comput Biol. 2014;10(12):e1003926
4. Söding J, Biegert A, Lupas AN. The HHpred interactive server for protein homology detection and structure prediction. Nucleic Acids Res. 2005;33:W244–W248.
5. Zemla A. LGA: a method for finding 3D similarities in protein structures. Nucleic Acids Res. 2003;31(13):3370–3374.
6. Zemla A, Venclovas C, Moult J, Fidelis K. Processing and analysis of CASP3 protein structure predictions. Proteins. 1999;(Suppl 3):22–29.
7. Kinch LN, Wrabl JO, Krishna SS, et al. CASP5 assessment of fold recognition target predictions. Proteins. 2003;53(Suppl 6):395–409.
8. Kinch LN, Shi S, Cheng H, et al. CASP9 target classification. Proteins. 2011;79(Suppl 10):21–36.
9. Kinch LN, Li W, Schaeffer RD, et al. CASP 11 target classification. Proteins. 2016;84(Suppl 1):20–33.
10. Taylor TJ, Tai C-H, Huang YJ, et al. Definition and classification of evaluation units for CASP10. Proteins. 2014;82(Suppl 2):14–25.
11. Guo J, Xu D, Kim D, Xu Y. Improving the performance of DomainParser for structural domain partition using neural network. Nucleic Acids Res. 2003;31(3):944–952.
12. Zhou H, Xue B, Zhou Y. DDOMAIN: dividing structures into domains using a normalized domain-domain interaction profile. Protein Sci Publ Protein Soc. 2007;16(5):947–955.
13. Altschul SF, Madden TL, Schaffer AA, Zhang J, Zhang Z, Miller W, Lipman DJ. Gapped BLAST and PSI-BLAST: a new generation of protein database search programs. Nucleic Acids Res. 1997;25:3389–3402.
14. Chen Y, Clarke OB, Kim J, et al. Structure of the STRA6 receptor for retinol uptake. Science. 2016;353(6302):aad8266.
15. Scorsato V, Lima TB, Righetto GL, et al. Crystal structure of the human Tip41 orthologue, TIPRL, reveals a novel fold and a binding site for the PP2Ac C-terminus. Sci Rep. 2016;6(1):30813.
16. Alva V, Koretke KK, Coles M, Lupas AN. Cradle-loop barrels and the concept of metafolds in protein classification by natural descent. Curr Opin Struct Biol. 2008;18(3):358–365.
17. Postel S, Deredge D, Bonsor DA, et al. Bacterial flagellar capping proteins adopt diverse oligomeric states. eLife. 2016;5. pii: e18857.
18. Johnson PM, Gucinski GC, Garza-Sánchez F, et al. Functional diversity of cytotoxic tRNase/immunity protein complexes from Burkholderia pseudomallei. J Biol Chem. 2016;291(37):19387–19400.
19. Wickles S, Singharoy A, Andreani J, et al. A structural model of the active ribosome-bound membrane protein insertase YidC. eLife. 2014;3:e03035
20. Tian P, Boomsma W, Wang Y, Otzen DE, Jensen MH, Lindorff-Larsen K. Structure of a functional amyloid protein subunit computed using sequence variation. J Am Chem Soc. 2015;137(1):22–25.
21. Kolly GS, Mukherjee R, Kilacsková E, et al. GtrA protein Rv3789 is required for arabinosylation of arabinogalactan in Mycobacterium tuberculosis. J Bacteriol. 2015;197(23):3686–3697.
22. Abriata LA. Homology- and coevolution-consistent structural models of bacterial copper-tolerance protein CopM support a “metal sponge” function and suggest regions for metal-dependent protein-protein interactions. bioRxiv. 2016. https://doi.org/10.1101/013581.
23. Antala S, Ovchinnikov S, Kamisetty H, Baker D, Dempski RE. Computation and functional studies provide a model for the structure of the zinc transporter hZIP4. J Biol Chem. 2015;290(29):17796–17805.
24. Abriata LA. Structural models and considerations on the COA6, COX18 and COX20 factors that assist assembly of human cytochrome C oxidase subunit II. bioRxiv. 2017. https://doi.org/10.1101/123349.
25. Ovchinnikov S, Kamisetty H, Baker D. Robust and accurate prediction of residue-residue interactions across protein interfaces using evolutionary information. eLife. 2014;3:e02030
26. Ovchinnikov S, Park H, Varghese N, et al. Protein structure determination using metagenome sequence data. Science. 2017;355(6322):294–298.