Potential to curb the environmental burdens of American beef consumption using a novel plant-based beef substitute

PLoS ONE

Volumn 12, Issue 12, 2017, Pages

  Goldstein, Benjamin ^a   Moses, Rebekah ^b   Sammons, Norman ^b   Birkved, Morten ^a  

^a TECHNICAL UNIVERSITY OF DENMARK   (Denmark)

^b Impossible Foods   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CARBON DIOXIDE; PLANT PROTEIN;

ARTICLE; BEEF; BEEF CATTLE; CARBON FOOTPRINT; ENVIRONMENT; ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT; ENVIRONMENTAL SUSTAINABILITY; FLUID INTAKE; FOOD; FOOD COMPOSITION; FOOD INTAKE; LAND USE; LEGUME; LIFE CYCLE ASSESSMENT; PLANT BASED BEEF SUBSTITUTE; RANGELAND; TOFU; VEGETARIAN DIET; WATER USE; ANIMAL; BOVINE; DIET; GREENHOUSE EFFECT; HUMAN; MEAT; UNITED STATES;

ANIMALS; CATTLE; DIET; GREENHOUSE EFFECT; HUMANS; MEAT PRODUCTS; PLANT PROTEINS; UNITED STATES;

EID: 85037079238     PISSN: None     EISSN: 19326203     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0189029     Document Type: Article

References (92)

1. Tilman D, Clark M. Global diets link environmental sustainability and human health. Nature. Nature Publishing Group; 2014; 515: 518–522. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature13959 PMID: 25383533
2. Springmann M, Godfray HCJ, Rayner M, Scarborough P. Analysis and valuation of the health and climate change cobenefits of dietary change. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2016; 113: 4146–4151. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1523119113 PMID: 27001851
3. Heller MC, Keoleian G a. Greenhouse Gas Emission Estimates of U.S. Dietary Choices and Food Loss. J Ind Ecol. 2015; 19: 391–401. https://doi.org/10.1111/jiec.12174
4. OECD. Meat consumption [Internet]. 2016 [cited 21 Sep 2016]. Available: https://data.oecd.org/agroutput/meat-consumption.htm
5. Jones CM, Kammen DM. Quantifying carbon footprint reduction opportunities for U.S. households and communities. Environ Sci Technol. 2011; 45: 4088–4095. https://doi.org/10.1021/es102221h PMID: 21449584
6. Smith P, Bustamante M, Ahammad H, Clark H, Dong H, Elsiddig EA, et al. Agriculture, Forestry and Other Land Use (AFOLU). In: Edenhofer O, Pichs-Madruga R, Sokona Y, Farahani E, Kadner S, Sey-both K, et al., editors. Climate Change 2014: Mitigation of Climate Change Contribution of Working Group III to the Fifth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. New York City, NY, US: Cambridge University Press; 2014.
7. Nijdam D, Rood T, Westhoek H. The price of protein: Review of land use and carbon footprints from life cycle assessments of animal food products and their substitutes. Food Policy. 2012; 37: 760–770. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodpol.2012.08.002
8. Mekonnen MM, Hoekstra AY. A Global Assessment of the Water Footprint of Farm Animal Products. Ecosystems. 2012; 15: 401–415. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10021-011-9517-8
9. Gerber PJ, Steinfeld H, Henderson B, Mottet A, Opio C, Dijkman J, et al. Tacking climate change through livestock. Rome, IT; 2013.
10. Weber CL, Matthews HS. Food-miles and the relative climate impacts of food choices in the United States. Environ Sci Technol. 2008; 42: 3508–3513. https://doi.org/10.1021/es702969f PMID: 18546681
11. Eshel G, Shepon A, Makov T, Milo R. Land, irrigation water, greenhouse gas, and reactive nitrogen burdens of meat, eggs, and dairy production in the United States. Proc Natl Acad Sci. 2014; 111: 11996–12001. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1402183111 PMID: 25049416
12. Eshel G, Shepon A, Noor E, Milo R. Environmentally Optimal, Nutritionally Aware Beef Replacement Plant-Based Diets. Environ Sci Technol. 2016; 50: 8164–8168. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est. 6b01006 PMID: 27387141
13. Wells H, Buzby J. Dietary Assessment of Major Trends in U.S. Food Consumption, 1970–2005 [Internet]. 2008. Available: http://www.ers.usda.gov/media/210681/eib33_1_.pdf
14. USDA. Food Availability (Per Capita) Data System—Summary Findings [Internet]. 2016 [cited 21 Sep 2016]. Available: http://www.ers.usda.gov/data-products/food-availability-(per-capita)-data-system/summary-findings.aspx
15. Daniel CR, Cross AJ, Koebnick C, Sinha R. Trends in meat consumption in the United States. Public Heal Nutr. 2011; 14: 575–583. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1368980010002077.Trends
16. IPCC. Agriculture, Forestry and Other Land Use (AFOLU). Climate Change 2014: Mitigation of Climate Change Contribution of Working Group III to the Fifth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. 2014.
17. Herrero M, Havlik P, Valin H, Notenbaert A, Rufino MC, Thornton PK, et al. Biomass use, production, feed efficiencies, and greenhouse gas emissions from global livestock systems. Proc Natl Acad Sci. 2013; 110: 20888–20893. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1308149110 PMID: 24344273
18. Steinfeld H, Gerber P. Livestock production and the global environment: consume less or produce better? Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2010; 107: 18237–18238. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1012541107PMID: 20935253
19. Pimentel M. Sustainability of meat-based and plant based diets and the environment. Am J Clin Nutr. 2003; 78(suppl): 660–663. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956247808089156
20. Shepon A, Eshel G, Noor E, Milo R. Energy and protein feed-to-food conversion efficiencies in the US and potential food security gains from dietary changes. Environ Res Lett. 2016; 11.
21. Wilkinson JM. Re-defining efficiency of feed use by livestock. animal. 2011; 5: 1014–1022. https://doi.org/10.1017/S175173111100005X PMID: 22440097
22. Van Kernebeek HRJ, Oosting SJ, Van Ittersum MK, Bikker P, De Boer IJM. Saving land to feed a growing population: consequences for consumption of crop and livestock products. Int J Life Cycle Assess. Springer Berlin Heidelberg; 2016; 21: 677–687. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11367-015-0923-6
23. Matthews K, Johnson R. Alternative beef production systems: Issues and implications. 2013.
24. Herrero M, Thornton PK. Livestock and global change: Emerging issues for sustainable food systems. Proc Natl Acad Sci. 2013; 110: 20876–20881. https://doi.org/10.1613/jair.301
25. Peters CJ, Picardy J, Darrouzet-Nardi AF, Wilkins JL, Griffin TS, Fick GW. Carrying capacity of U.S. agricultural land: Ten diet scenarios. Elem Sci Anthr. 2016; 4: 116. https://doi.org/10.12952/journal.elementa.000116
26. Piazza J, Ruby MB, Loughnan S, Luong M, Kulik J, Watkins HM, et al. Rationalizing meat consumption. The 4Ns. Appetite. 2015; 91: 114–128. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.appet.2015.04.011 PMID: 25865663
27. Macdiarmid JI, Douglas F, Campbell J. Eating like there’s no tomorrow: Public awareness of the environmental impact of food and reluctance to eat less meat as part of a sustainable diet. Appetite. 2016; 96: 487–493. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.appet.2015.10.011 PMID: 26476397
28. Rothgerber H. Real Men Don’t Eat (Vegetable) Quiche: Masculinity and the Justification of Meat Consumption. Psychol Men Masc. 2012; 14: No Pagination Specified. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0030379
29. de Boer J, Hoogland CT, Boersema JJ. Towards more sustainable food choices: Value priorities and motivational orientations. Food Qual Prefer. 2007; 18: 985–996. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodqual.2007.04.002
30. Fellet M. A Fresh Take on Fake Meat. ACS Cent Sci. 2015; 1: 347–349. https://doi.org/10.1021/acscentsci.5b00307 PMID: 27162992
31. Mattick CS, Landis AE, Allenby BR, Genovese NJ. Anticipatory Life Cycle Analysis of In Vitro Biomass Cultivation for Cultured Meat Production in the United States. Environ Sci Technol. 2015; 49: 11941–11949. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.5b01614 PMID: 26383898
32. Tuomisto HL, Teixeira De Mattos MJ. Environmental impacts of cultured meat production. Environ Sci Technol. 2011; 45: 6117–6123. https://doi.org/10.1021/es200130u PMID: 21682287
33. Fraser R, Brown P, Karr J, Holz-Schietinger C, Cohn E. Method and compositions for affecting the flavor and aroma profile of consumables. United States: U.S. Patent Office; US 9,700,067 B2, 2017.
34. Sammons N, Moses R, Brown P, Davis S, Davis A. Environmental Impact Reduction from Integration of Plant-Based Hamburger Production to Replace Animal Farming. Proceedings of the 2016 LCA Food Conference. Dublin; 2016.
35. Finnveden G, Hauschild MZ, Ekvall T, Guinée J, Heijungs R, Hellweg S, et al. Recent developments in Life Cycle Assessment. J Environ Manage. 2009; 91: 1–21. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2009.06. 018 PMID: 19716647
36. Hellweg S, Milà i Canals L. Emerging approaches, challenges and opportunities in life cycle assessment. Science (80-). 2014; 344: 1109–13. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1248361 PMID: 24904154
37. Meier T, Christen O. Environmental impacts of dietary recommendations and dietary styles: Germany as an example. Environ Sci Technol. 2013; 47: 877–88. https://doi.org/10.1021/es302152v PMID: 23189920
38. Davis J, Sonesson U, Baumgartner DU, Nemecek T. Environmental impact of four meals with different protein sources: Case studies in Spain and Sweden. Food Res Int. Elsevier Ltd; 2010; 43: 1874–1884. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodres.2009.08.017
39. Muñoz I, Milà i Canals L, Fernández-Alba AR. Life cycle assessment of the average Spanish diet including human excretion. Int J Life Cycle Assess. 2010; 15: 794–805. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11367-010-0188-z
40. Garnett T. Where are the best opportunities for reducing greenhouse gas emissions in the food system (including the food chain)? Food Policy. 2011; 36: S23–S32. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodpol.2010.10. 010
41. USDA. Food Availability (Per Capita) Data System [Internet]. 2016 [cited 23 Sep 2016]. Available: http://www.ers.usda.gov/data-products/food-availability-(per-capita)-data-system/.aspx
42. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services and U.S. Department of Agriculture. 2015–2020 Dietary Guidelines for Americans. 8th Edition [Internet]. 2015. Available: http://health.gov/dietaryguidelines/2015/guidelines/
43. Haddad EH, Tanzman JS. What do vegetarians in the United States eat? American Journal of Clinical Nutrition. 2003.
44. Cattlemen’s Beef Board and Cattlemen’s Beef Association. Total Beef Category Breakdown. In: Beef Retail Marketing [Internet]. 2016 [cited 23 Sep 2016]. Available: http://bit.ly/2deLws4
45. Hoekstra AY, Mekonnen MM, Chapagain AK, Mathews RE, Richter BD. Global monthly water scarcity: Blue water footprints versus blue water availability. PLoS One. 2012; 7. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0032688 PMID: 22393438
46. Jolliet O, Margni M, Charles R, Humbert S, Payet J, Rebitzer G, et al. IMPACT 2002+: A new life cycle impact assessment methodology. Int J Life Cycle Assess. 2003; 8: 324–330. https://doi.org/10.1007/ BF02978505
47. Baroni L, Cenci L, Tettamanti M, Berati M. Evaluating the environmental impact of various dietary patterns combined with different food production systems. Eur J Clin Nutr. 2007; 61: 279–86. https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.ejcn.1602522 PMID: 17035955
48. Scarborough P, Appleby PN, Mizdrak A, Briggs ADM, Travis RC, Bradbury KE, et al. Dietary greenhouse gas emissions of meat-eaters, fish-eaters, vegetarians and vegans in the UK. Clim Change. 2014; 125: 179–192. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10584-014-1169-1 PMID: 25834298
49. Goldstein B, Hansen SF, Gjerris M, Laurent A, Birkved M. Ethical aspects of life cycle assessments of diets. Food Policy. 2016; 59: 139–151. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodpol.2016.01.006
50. Jalava M, Kummu M, Porkka M, Siebert S, Varis O. Diet change-a solution to reduce water use? Environ Res Lett. 2014; 9: 1–14. 074016 https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/9/7/074016
51. Gliessman S. Agroecology: The ecology of sustainable food systems. 3rd ed. Boca Raton: CRC Press; 2015.
52. Fleischner TL. Costs of Livestock Grazing in Western North America. Conserv Biol. 1994; 8: 629–644.
53. Noojipady P, Prince SD, Rishmawi K. Reductions in productivity due to land degradation in the drylands of the southwestern United States. Ecosyst Heal Sustain. 2015; 1: 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1890/EHS15-0020.1
54. Ceballos G, Ehrlich PR, Dirzo R. Biological annihilation via the ongoing sixth mass extinction signaled by vertebrate population losses and declines. Proc Natl Acad Sci. 2017; E6089–E6096. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1704949114 PMID: 28696295
55. van Dooren C, Marinussen M, Blonk H, Aiking H, Vellinga P. Exploring dietary guidelines based on ecological and nutritional values: A comparison of six dietary patterns. Food Policy. Elsevier Ltd; 2014; 44: 36–46. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodpol.2013.11.002
56. Dumont B, Fortun-Lamothe L, Jouven M, Thomas M, Tichit M. Prospects from agroecology and industrial ecology for animal production in the 21st century. animal. 2013; 7: 1028–1043. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1751731112002418 PMID: 23257276
57. Cunningham J. How many vegetarians are there? Veg J. 2009; 29. Available: http://www.vrg.org/journal/vj2009issue4/
58. United States Environmental Protection Agency. Average Annual Emissions and Fuel Consumption for Gasoline-Fueled Passenger Cars and Light Trucks [Internet]. 2008. Available: https://www3.epa.gov/otaq/consumer/420f08024.pdf
59. The United States Geological Survey. The USGS Water Science School [Internet]. 2016. Available: http://water.usgs.gov/edu/qa-home-percapita.html
60. Nijdam D, Rood T, Westhoek H. The price of protein: Review of land use and carbon footprints from life cycle assessments of animal food products and their substitutes. Food Policy. Elsevier Ltd; 2012; 37: 760–770. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodpol.2012.08.002
61. Oonincx DGAB, de Boer IJM. Environmental Impact of the Production of Mealworms as a Protein Source for Humans—A Life Cycle Assessment. PLoS One. 2012; 7. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0051145 PMID: 23284661
62. Boyd W. Making Meat: Science, Technology, and American Poultry Production. Technol Cult. 2001; 42. https://doi.org/10.2307/25147798
63. Sneeringer S, MacDonald J, Key N, McBride W, Mathews K. Economics of Antibiotic Use in U.S. Livestock Production, ERR-200. 2015.
64. Frieden T. Antibiotic resistance threats in the United States. Centers Dis Control Prev. 2013; 114. CS239559-B
65. Gilchrist MJ, Greko C, Wallinga DB, Beran GW, Riley DG, Thorne PS. The potential role of concentrated animal feeding operations in infectious disease epidemics and antibiotic resistance. Environ Health Perspect. 2007; 115: 313–316. https://doi.org/10.1289/ehp.8837 PMID: 17384785
66. Smith DL, Harris AD, Johnson J a, Silbergeld EK, Morris JG. Animal antibiotic use has an early but important impact on the emergence of antibiotic resistance in human commensal bacteria. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2002; 99: 6434–6439. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.082188899 PMID: 11972035
67. Selig ER, Turner WR, Troëng S, Wallace BP, Halpern BS, Kaschner K, et al. Global priorities for marine biodiversity conservation. PLoS One. 2014; 9. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0082898 PMID: 24416151
68. Worm B, Barbier EB, Beaumont N, Duffy JE, Folke C, Halpern BS, et al. Impacts of biodiversity loss on ocean ecosystem services. Science (80-). 2006; 314: 787–790. https://doi.org/10.1126/science. 1132294 PMID: 17082450
69. Gibbs H., Ruesch AS, Achard F, Clayton MK, Holmgren P, Ramankutty N, et al. Tropical forests were the primary sources of new agricultural land in the 1980s and 1990s. Proc Natl Acad Sci. 2010; 107: 16732–16737. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0910275107 PMID: 20807750
70. Boucher D, Elias P, Lininger K, Calen M-T, Roquemore S, Saxon E. The root of the problem what’s driving tropical deforestation today? Union Concerned Sci. 2011; 61: 5-8-28-110. https://doi.org/10.1007/ BF00351108
71. Morton DC, DeFries RS, Shimabukuro YE, Anderson LO, Arai E, del Bon Espirito-Santo F, et al. Cropland expansion changes deforestation dynamics in the southern Brazilian Amazon. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2006; 103: 14637–14641. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0606377103 PMID: 16973742
72. Achard F, Beuchle R, Mayaux P, Stibig HJ, Bodart C, Brink A, et al. Determination of tropical deforestation rates and related carbon losses from 1990 to 2010. Glob Chang Biol. 2014; 20: 2540–2554. https://doi.org/10.1111/gcb.12605 PMID: 24753029
73. Gibbs HK, Munger J, L’Roe J, Barreto P, Pereira R, Christie M, et al. Did Ranchers and Slaughterhouses Respond to Zero-Deforestation Agreements in the Brazilian Amazon? Conservation Letters. 2016. pp. 32–42. https://doi.org/10.1111/conl.12175
74. Gibbs HK, Rausch L, Munger J, Schelly I, Morton DC, Noojipady P, et al. Environment and development. Brazil’s Soy Moratorium. Science (80-). 2015; 347: 377–8. https://doi.org/10.1126/science. aaa0181 PMID: 25613879
75. Young HS, McCauley DJ, Dunbar RB, Dirzo R. Plants cause ecosystem nutrient depletion via the interruption of bird-derived spatial subsidies. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2010; 107: 2072–7. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0914169107 PMID: 20133852
76. Magat SS, Canja LH, Rivera SM. Coconut productivity and profitability of two important Philippine PCA hybrids: A critical review. 2007; 23.
77. Barlow J, Sims RC, Quinn JC. Techno-economic and life-cycle assessment of an attached growth algal biorefinery. Bioresour Technol. 2016; 220: 360–368. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2016.08.091PMID: 27595701
78. Harnisch J, Moreira J, Atkins P, Colbourne D, Dieryckx M, Kaprwan H, et al. Methodologies. In: Midgley P, Sideridou M, editors. Safeguarding the Ozone Layer and the Global Climate System: Issues Related to Hydrofluorocarbons and Perfluorocarbons. IPCC; 2005. pp. 118–224.
79. Capper JL. The environmental impact of beef production in the United States: 1977 compared with 2007. J Anim Sci. 2011; 89: 4249–4261. https://doi.org/10.2527/jas.2010-3784 PMID: 21803973
80. Smil V. Worldwide transformation of diets, burdens of meat production and opportunities for novel food proteins. Enzyme and Microbial Technology. 2002. pp. 305–311. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0141-0229 (01)00504-X
81. Foley J a, Ramankutty N, Brauman K a, Cassidy ES, Gerber JS, Johnston M, et al. Solutions for a cultivated planet. Nature. 2011; 478: 337–42. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature10452 PMID: 21993620
82. Steinfeld H, Gerber P, Wassenaar T, Castel V, Rosales M, De Haan C. Livestock’s Long Shadow: Environmental Issues and Options. FAO, Rome, Italy,. 2006; 1–377. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10666-008-9149-3
83. Tilman D, Balzer C, Hill J, Befort BL. Global food demand and the sustainable intensification of agriculture. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2011; 108: 20260–4. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1116437108 PMID: 22106295
84. Pelletier N, Tyedmers P. Forecasting potential global environmental costs of livestock production 2000–2050. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2010; 107: 18371–4. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1004659107 PMID: 20921375
85. Ray DK, Mueller ND, West PC, Foley JA. Yield Trends Are Insufficient to Double Global Crop Production by 2050. PLoS One. 2013; 8. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0066428 PMID: 23840465
86. Gibbs H., Ruesch AS, Achard F, Clayton MK, Holmgren P, Ramankutty N, et al. Tropical forests were the primary sources of new agricultural land in the 1980s and 1990s. Proc Natl Acad Sci. 2010; 107: 16732–16737. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0910275107 PMID: 20807750
87. Laurance WF, Sayer J, Cassman KG. Agricultural expansion and its impacts on tropical nature. Trends in Ecology and Evolution. 2014. pp. 107–116. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tree.2013.12.001 PMID: 24388286
88. United States Department of Agriculture—Economic Research Service. Cattle & Beef Trade [Internet]. 2016 [cited 30 Sep 2016]. Available: http://www.ers.usda.gov/topics/animal-products/cattle-beef/trade.aspx
89. Alexandratos N, Bruinsma J. World agriculture: towards 2015/2030: an FAO perspective. Land use policy. 2003; 20: 375. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0264-8377(03)00047-4
90. Opio C, Gerber P, Mottet A, Falcucci A, Tempio G, MacLeod M, et al. Greenhouse gas emissions from ruminant supply chains–A global life cycle assessment. Food and agriculture organization of the United Nations (FAO), Rome. 2013.
91. de Vries M, de Boer IJM. Comparing environmental impacts for livestock products: A review of life cycle assessments. Livest Sci. Elsevier B.V.; 2010; 128: 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.livsci.2009.11.007
92. Pelletier N, Pirog R, Rasmussen R. Comparative life cycle environmental impacts of three beef production strategies in the Upper Midwestern United States. Agric Syst. 2010; 103: 380–389. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agsy.2010.03.009