Anticipatory Life Cycle Analysis of In Vitro Biomass Cultivation for Cultured Meat Production in the United States

Environmental Science and Technology

Volumn 49, Issue 19, 2015, Pages 11941-11949

  Mattick, Carolyn S ^a   Landis, Amy E ^b   Allenby, Braden R ^c   Genovese, Nicholas J ^d  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS   (United States)

^b Clemson University   (United States)

^c Arizona State University   (United States)

^d UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA MEDICAL SCHOOL   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

AGRICULTURE; BIOMASS; CULTIVATION; ECONOMIC AND SOCIAL EFFECTS; ENERGY UTILIZATION; ENVIRONMENTAL TECHNOLOGY; MEATS; STEM CELLS;

BIOLOGICAL FUNCTIONS; EMERGING TECHNOLOGIES; ENERGY USE; ENVIRONMENTAL IMPLICATIONS; LARGE SCALE CULTIVATIONS; LIFE CYCLE ANALYSIS; MEAT PRODUCTION; TRADE OFF;

LIFE CYCLE;

AGRICULTURAL LAND; BIOMASS; ENERGY USE; INDUSTRIALIZATION; LIFE CYCLE ANALYSIS; LIVESTOCK; LIVESTOCK FARMING; MEAT; TRADE-OFF;

ANALYTIC METHOD; ANIMAL CELL; ANTICIPATORY LIFE CYCLE ANALYSIS; ARTICLE; BEEF; BIOLOGICAL FUNCTIONS; BIOMASS; BIOMASS PRODUCTION; BIOREACTOR; CONTROLLED STUDY; DIGESTION; ENERGY; ENERGY CONSUMPTION; ENERGY CONVERSION; ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT; EUTROPHICATION; INDUSTRIALIZATION; LIVESTOCK; MEAT; NONHUMAN; NUTRIENT; PORK; POULTRY; SENSITIVITY ANALYSIS; UNITED STATES; ANIMAL; ENERGY CONSERVATION; GREENHOUSE EFFECT; INDUSTRY;

UNITED STATES;

ANIMALIA;

ANIMALS; BIOMASS; CONSERVATION OF ENERGY RESOURCES; EUTROPHICATION; GREENHOUSE EFFECT; INDUSTRY; MEAT; UNITED STATES;

EID: 84943408129     PISSN: 0013936X     EISSN: 15205851     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1021/acs.est.5b01614     Document Type: Article

References (41)

1. Cultured beef: The event. http://culturedbeef.net/event/.
2. Post, M. J. Cultured Beef: Medical Technology to Produce Food J. Sci. Food Agric. 2014, 94, 1039-1041 10.1002/jsfa.6474
3. Tuomisto, H. L.; Teixeira de Mattos, M. J. Environmental Impacts of Cultured Meat Production Environ. Sci. Technol. 2011, 45, 6117-6123 10.1021/es200130u
4. Pelletier, N.; Pirog, R.; Rasmussen, R. Comparative Life Cycle Environmental Impacts of Three Beef Production Strategies in the Upper Midwestern United States Agric. Syst. 2010, 103, 380-389 10.1016/j.agsy.2010.03.009
5. Pelletier, N.; Lammers, P.; Stender, D.; Pirog, R. Life Cycle Assessment of High- and Low-Profitability Commodity and Deep-Bedded Niche Swine Production Systems in the Upper Midwestern United States Agric. Syst. 2010, 103, 599-608 10.1016/j.agsy.2010.07.001
6. Pelletier, N. Environmental Performance in the US Broiler Poultry Sector: Life Cycle Energy Use and Greenhouse Gas, Ozone Depleting, Acidifying and Eutrophying Emissions Agric. Syst. 2008, 98, 67-73 10.1016/j.agsy.2008.03.007
7. Hu, W.-S. Cell Culture Bioprocess Engineering; Wei-Shou Hu: Minneapolis, MN, 2012.
8. Brunner, D.; Frank, J.; Appl, H.; Schöffl, H.; Pfaller, W.; Gstraunthaler, G. Serum-Free Cell Culture: The Serum-Free Media Interactive Online Database ALTEX 2010, 27, 53-62
9. Girón-Calle, J.; Vioque, J.; Pedroche, J.; Alaiz, M.; Yust, M. M.; Megías, C.; Millán, F. Chickpea Protein Hydrolysate as a Substitute for Serum in Cell Culture Cytotechnology 2008, 57, 263-272 10.1007/s10616-008-9170-z
10. Whitford, W. G. Fed-Batch Mammalian Cell Culture in Bioproduction Bioprocess Int. 2006, 4, 30-40
11. Post, M. J. Cultured Meat from Stem Cells: Challenges and Prospects Meat Sci. 2012, 92, 297-301 10.1016/j.meatsci.2012.04.008
12. Sung, Y. H.; Lim, S. W.; Chung, J. Y.; Lee, G. M. Yeast Hydrolysate as a Low-Cost Additive to Serum-Free Medium for the Production of Human Thrombopoietin in Suspension Cultures of Chinese Hamster Ovary Cells Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2004, 63, 527-536 10.1007/s00253-003-1389-1
13. PRé Consultants. SimaPro 7.3.3; http://www.pre-sustainability.com/software.
14. Cheng, C. S.; Davis, B. N. J.; Madden, L.; Bursac, N.; Truskey, G. A. Physiology and Metabolism of Tissue-Engineered Skeletal Muscle Exp. Biol. Med. 2014, 239, 1203-1214 10.1177/1535370214538589
15. Frischknecht, R.; Jungbluth, N.; Althaus, H. J.; Doka, G.; Dones, R.; Hischier, R.; Hellweg, S.; Humbert, S.; Margni, M.; Nemecek, T.; et al., Implementation of Life Cycle Impact Assessment Methods; Final report ecoinvent 2000; ecoinvent: Duebendorf, Switzerland, 2003.
16. Frischknecht, R.; Jungbluth, N.; Althaus, H. J.; Doka, G.; Dones, R.; Hischier, R.; Hellweg, S.; Humbert, S.; Margni, M.; Nemecek, T.; et al., Implementation of Life Cycle Impact Assessment Methods: Data v2.0; ecoinvent report no. 3; ecoinvent: Duebendorf, Switzerland, 2007.
17. United States Department of Agriculture. Cattle & beef: Background. http://www.ers.usda.gov/topics/animal-products/cattle-beef/background.aspx#.U2B9lfldXh4.
18. US Environmental Protection Agency. Poultry production phases. http://www.epa.gov/oecaagct/ag101/poultryphases.html (accessed Jun 18, 2015).
19. Kim, D. Y.; Chaudhry, M. A.; Kennard, M. L.; Jardon, M. a; Braasch, K.; Dionne, B.; Butler, M.; Piret, J. M. Fed-Batch CHO Cell T-PA Production and Feed Glutamine Replacement to Reduce Ammonia Production Biotechnol. Prog. 2013, 29, 165-175 10.1002/btpr.1658
20. Altamirano, C.; Berrios, J. Advances in Improving Mammalian Cells Metabolism for Recombinant Protein Production. Electron. J. Biotechnol. 2013, 16, DOI: 10.2225/vol16-issue3-fulltext-2.
21. Doumit, M.; Cook, D.; Merkel, R. Testosterone up-Regulates Androgen Receptors and Decreases Differentiation of Porcine Myogenic Satellite Cells in Vitro Endocrinology 1996, 137, 1385-1394 10.1210/endo.137.4.8625915
22. Pomiès, P.; Rodriguez, J.; Blaquière, M.; Sedraoui, S.; Gouzi, F.; Carnac, G.; Laoudj-Chenivesse, D.; Mercier, J.; Préfaut, C.; Hayot, M. Reduced Myotube Diameter, Atrophic Signalling and Elevated Oxidative Stress in Cultured Satellite Cells from COPD Patients J. Cell. Mol. Med. 2015, 19, 175-186 10.1111/jcmm.12390
23. Chun, B.-H.; Kim, J.-H.; Lee, H.-J.; Chung, N. Usability of Size-Excluded Fractions of Soy Protein Hydrolysates for Growth and Viability of Chinese Hamster Ovary Cells in Protein-Free Suspension Culture Bioresour. Technol. 2007, 98, 1000-1005 10.1016/j.biortech.2006.04.012
24. Kosztin, I.; Vunjak-Novakovic, G.; Forgacs, G. Colloquium: Modeling the Dynamics of Multicellular Systems: Application to Tissue Engineering Rev. Mod. Phys. 2012, 84, 1791-1805 10.1103/RevModPhys.84.1791
25. Bardouille, C.; Lehmann, J.; Heimann, P.; Jockusch, H. Growth and Differentiation of Permanent and Secondary Mouse Myogenic Cell Lines on Microcarriers Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2001, 55, 556-562 10.1007/s002530100595
26. Wallin, P.; Hoglund, K.; Wildt-Persson, K.; Gold, J. Skeletal Myoblast Differentiation on Starch Microspheres for the Development of Cultured Meat J. Tissue Eng. Regen. Med. 2012, 6, 378
27. Nasser, A.; El-Moghaz Factors Effects the Growth of Chinese Hamster Ovary (CHO) Cell on Microcarriers Culture Adv. Biores. 2010, 1, 182-188
28. Tsiropoulos, I.; Cok, B.; Patel, M. K. Energy and Greenhouse Gas Assessment of European Glucose Production from Corn-a Multiple Allocation Approach for a Key Ingredient of the Bio-Based Economy J. Cleaner Prod. 2013, 43, 182-190 10.1016/j.jclepro.2012.12.035
29. Biogen's LSM plant; on line, on time, on budget. http://www.pharmamanufacturing.com/articles/2003/100/.
30. D&R International Ltd. 2011 Buildings Energy Data Book; D&R International Ltd: Silver Spring, MD, 2012.
31. Shuler; Michael, L.; Karki, F. Bioprocess Engineering, 2nd ed.; Prentice Hall: Upper Saddle River, NJ, 2002.
32. Heinzle, E.; Biwer, A. P.; Cooney, C. L. Development of Sustainable Bioprocesses: Modeling and Assessment; John Wiley & Sons: Chichester, England, 2006.
33. Chang, Y.; Reardon, D. J.; Kwan, P.; Boyd, G.; Brant, J.; Rakness, K. L.; Furukawa, D. Evaluation of Dynamic Energy Consumption of Advanced Water and Wastewater Treatment Technologies; American Water Works Association: Arnaudville, LA, 2008.
34. Xylem. Aeration products for energy-efficient biological treatment. http://www.wwdmag.com/sites/default/files/whitepapers/SB004-460-Sanitaire-Aeration-Products-brochure-sm-3.pdf.
35. Yang, S.-T.; Luo, J.; Chen, C. A Fibrous-Bed Bioreactor for Continuous Production of Monoclonal Antibody by Hybridoma. In Advances in Biochemical Engineering/Biotechnology; Zhong, J.-J., Ed.; Springer-Verlag: New York, 2004; pp 61-96.
36. Nienow, A. W. Reactor Engineering in Large Scale Animal Cell Culture Cytotechnology 2006, 50, 9-33 10.1007/s10616-006-9005-8
37. Chisti, Y.; Moo-Young, M. Clean-in-Place Systems for Industrial Bioreactors: Design, Validation and Operation J. Ind. Microbiol. 1994, 13, 201-207 10.1007/BF01569748
38. World Bank Group. Pollution Prevention and Abatement Handbook, 1998; World Bank Publications: Washington, DC, 1999.
39. Smil, V. Should We Eat Meat?; Wiley-Blackwell: West Sussex, UK, 2013.
40. Mattick, C. S.; Landis, A. E.; Allenby, B. R. A Case for Systemic Environmental Analysis of Cultured Meat J. Integr. Agric. 2015, 14, 249-254 10.1016/S2095-3119(14)60885-6
41. Mattick, C. S.; Wetmore, J. M.; Allenby, B. R. An Anticipatory Social Assessment of Factory-Grown Meat IEEE Technol. Soc. Mag. 2015, 34, 56-64 10.1109/MTS.2015.2395967