Is partially automated driving a bad idea? Observations from an on-road study

Applied Ergonomics

Volumn 68, Issue , 2018, Pages 138-145

  Banks, Victoria A ^a   Eriksson, Alexander ^a,b   O'Donoghue, Jim ^c   Stanton, Neville A ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHAMPTON   (United Kingdom)

^b SWEDISH NATIONAL ROAD AND TRANSPORT RESEARCH INSTITUTE   (Sweden)

^c JAGUAR LAND ROVER   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Automated driving; Driver role; Level of automation; Mode transitions; Partial automation; Transitions of control

Indexed keywords

ROADS AND STREETS;

AUTOMATED DRIVING; DRIVER ROLE; LEVEL OF AUTOMATIONS; MODE TRANSITIONS; PARTIAL AUTOMATION;

AUTOMATION;

AUTOMATION; DRIVER; FOOT; HUMAN; MONITORING; RESPONSIBILITY; THEMATIC ANALYSIS; TRUST; VIDEORECORDING; ADULT; ATTENTION; CAR DRIVING; FEMALE; MALE; MAN MACHINE INTERACTION; MIDDLE AGED; PERSONAL AUTONOMY; PSYCHOLOGY; YOUNG ADULT;

ADULT; ATTENTION; AUTOMATION; AUTOMOBILE DRIVING; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; MAN-MACHINE SYSTEMS; MIDDLE AGED; PERSONAL AUTONOMY; TRUST; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 85035324754     PISSN: 00036870     EISSN: 18729126     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.apergo.2017.11.010     Document Type: Article

References (56)

1. Banks, V.A., Stanton, N.A., Discovering driver-vehicle coordination problems in future automated control systems: evidence from verbal commentaries. Procedia Manuf. 3 (2015), 2497–2504.
2. Banks, V.A., Stanton, N.A., Keep the driver in control: automating automobiles of the future. Appl. Ergon. 53:B (2016), 389–395.
3. Banks, V.A., Stanton, N.A., Analysis of driver roles: modelling the changing role of the driver in automated driving systems using EAST. Theor. Issues Ergon. Sci., 2017, 10.1080/1463922X.2017.1305465.
4. Banks, V.A., Stanton, N.A., Harvey, C., What the drivers do and do not tell you: using verbal protocol analysis to investigate driver behaviour in emergency situations. Ergonomics 57:3 (2014), 332–342.
5. Cabrall, C., Happee, R., de Winter, J., From Mackworth's clock to the open road: a literature review on driver vigilance task operationalization. Transp. Res. Part F Traffic Psychol. Behav. 40 (2016), 169–189.
6. Chapanis, A., The Chapanis Chronicles. 1999, Aegean, Santa Barbara.
7. Department for Transport, The Highway Code. 2015 Available at: https://www.gov.uk/guidance/the-highway-code. (Accessed 9 August 2017)
8. Department for Transport, Statistical release of the National travel survey: England 2016. Available at: https://www.gov.uk, 2017. (Accessed 17 October 2017)
9. Donmez, B., Boyle, L.N., Lee, J.D., Safety implications of providing real-time feedback to distracted drivers. Accid. Anal. Prev. 39:3 (2007), 581–590.
10. Dozza, M., What factors influence drivers' response time for evasive maneuvers in real traffic?. Accid. Anal. Prev. 58 (2012), 299–308.
11. Endsley, M.R., Autonomous driving systems: a preliminary naturalistic study of the Tesla Model S. J. Cognitive Eng. Decis. Mak., 2017, 10.1177/1555343417695197.
12. Eriksson, A., Control Transitions in Highly Automated Vehicles. Doctoral Dissertation, 2017, University of Southampton.
13. Eriksson, A., Banks, V.A., Stanton, N.A., Transition to Manual: comparing simulator with on-road control transitions. Accid. Anal. Prev. 102C (2017), 227–234.
14. Eriksson, Stanton, The Chatty Co-Driver: a linguistics approach applying lessons learnt from aviation incidents. Saf. Sci. 99 (2017), 94–101.
15. Eriksson, A., Stanton, N.A., Take-over time in highly automated vehicles: non-critical transitions to and from manual control. Hum. Factors 59:4 (2017), 689–705.
16. Gasser, T.M., Westoff, D., BASt-study: definitions of automation and legal issues in Germany. Presentation at the 2012 Road Vehicle Automation Workshop, 24–26 July 2012, Irvine, California, 2012.
17. Hancock, P.A., In search of vigilance. Am. Psychol. 68:2 (2013), 97–109.
18. Heikoop, D.D., de Winter, J.C., van Arem, B., Stanton, N.A., Effects of platooning on signal-detection performance, workload, and stress: a driving simulator study. Appl. Ergon. 60 (2017), 116–127.
19. Hollnagel and Woods, Joint Cognitive Systems Foundations of Cognitive Systems Engineering. 2005, CRC Press.
20. Johnson, J.D., Type of Automation Failure: the effects on trust and reliance in automation. Hum. Factors 48:18 (2004), 2163–2167.
21. Kalra, Paddock, Driving to safety: how many miles of driving would it take to demonstrate autonomous vehicle reliability?. Transp. Res. Part A Policy Pract. 94 (2016), 182–193.
22. Kyriakidis, M., de Winter, J.C.F., Stanton, N., Bellet, T., van Arem, B., Brookhuis, K., et al. A human factors perspective on automated driving. Theor. Issues Ergon. Sci., 2017, 1–27.
23. Lee, J.D., See, K.A., Trust in automation: designing for appropriate reliance. Hum. Factors 46 (2004), 50–80.
24. Lombard, M., Snyder-Duch, J., Bracken, C.C., Content analysis in mass communication. Assessment and reporting of intercoder reliability. Hum. Commun. Res. 28:4 (2002), 587–604.
25. Marques, J.F., McCall, C., The application of inter-rater reliability as a solidification instrument in a phenomenological study. Qual. Rep. 10:3 (2005), 439–462.
26. Merat, N., Jamson, A.H., Lai, F.F.C.H., Daly, M., Carsten, O.M.J., Transition to manual: driver behaviour when resuming control from a highly automated vehicle. Transp. Res. Part F Traffic Psychol. Behav. 26:Part A (2014), 1–9.
27. Mercedes-Benz, Distronic Plus with Steering Assist. 2013 Available at: https://www.mercedes-benz.com. (Accessed 17 October 2017)
28. Michon, J.A., A critical view of driver behavior models: what do we know, what should we do?. Evans, L., Schwing, R.C., (eds.) Human Behavior and Traffic Safety, 1985, Plenum Press, New York, 485–520.
29. Molloy, R., Parasuraman, R., Monitoring an automated system for a single failure: vigilance and task complexity effects. Hum. Factors 38 (1996), 311–322.
30. National Highway Traffic Safety Administration, Preliminary Statement of Policy Concerning Automated Vehicles. 2013.
31. National Highway Traffic Safety Administration, ODI Resume. 2017 Available at: https://static.nhtsa.gov/odi/inv/2016/INCLA-PE16007-7876.PDF.
32. Naujoks, F., Purucker, C., Neukum, A., Secondary task engagement and vehicle automation–Comparing the effects of different automation levels in an on-road experiment. Transp. Res. Part F Traffic Psychol. Behav. 38 (2016), 67–82.
33. Norman, D.A., The “problem” with automation: inappropriate feedback and interaction, not “over-automation”. Philosophical Trans. R. Soc. Lond. - Ser. B Biol. Sci. 327:1241 (1990), 585–593.
34. Parasuraman, R., Molloy, R., Singh, I.L., Performance consequences of automation-induced ‘complacency’. Int. J. Aviat. Psychol. 3 (1993), 1–23.
35. Parasuraman, R., Riley, V., Humans and automation: use, misuse, disuse, abuse. Hum. Factors J. Hum. Factors Ergon. Soc. 39:2 (1997), 230–253.
36. Robert Bosch Gmbh, SMMT Connected - Automated Driving - Industry Perspective. 2015 Available at: https://www.smmt.co.uk. (Accessed 17 October 2017)
37. SAE J3016, Taxonomy and Definitions for Terms Related to Driving Automation Systems for On-Road Motor Vehicles, J3016_201609. 2016, SAE International.
38. Salmon, P.M., Stanton, N.A., Walker, G.H., Jenkins, D.P., Distributed Situation Awareness: Advances in Theory, Measurement and Application to Teamwork. 2009, Ashgate, Aldershot, UK.
39. Salmon, P.M., Walker, G.H., Stanton, N.A., Pilot error versus sociotechnical systems failure: a distributed situation awareness analysis of Air France 447. Theor. Issues Ergon. Sci. 17:1 (2016), 64–79.
40. Sarter, N.B., Woods, D.D., How in the world did we ever get into that mode? Mode error and awareness in supervisory control. Hum. Factors 37 (1995), 5–19.
41. Sarter, N.B., Woods, D.D., Billings, C.E., Automation surprises. Salvendy, G., (eds.) Handbook of Human Factors & Ergonomics, second ed., 1997, Wiley.
42. Saxby, D.J., Matthews, G., Hitchcock, E.M., Warm, J.S., Development of active and passive fatigue manipulations using a driving simulator. Hum. Factors 51:18 (2007), 1237–1241.
43. Stanton, N.A., Responses to autonomous vehicles. Ingenia, 9, 2015.
44. Stanton, N.A., Baber, C., Error by design: methods for predicting device usability. Des. Stud. 23 (2002), 363–384.
45. Stanton, N.A., Salmon, P.M., Human error taxonomies applied to driving: a generic driver error taxonomy and its implications for intelligent transport systems. Saf. Sci. 47:2 (2009), 227–237.
46. Stanton, N.A., Salmon, P.M., Walker, G.H., Hancock, P.A., Salas, E., State-of-science: situation awareness in individuals, teams and systems. Ergon. Manuscript 60:4 (2017), 449–466.
47. Stanton, N., Young, M., McCaulder, B., Drive-by-wire: the case of mental workload and the ability of the driver to reclaim control. Saf. Sci. 27:2–3 (1997), 149–159.
48. Stapel, J., Mullakkal-Babu, F.A., Happee, R., Driver behaviour and workload in an on-road automated vehicle. Road Safety & Simulation International Conference, 2017 17–19 Oct 2017, Hague, NL.
49. Tesla Motors, Model S Software Version 7.0. 2016 https://www.tesla.com/en_GB/presskit/autopilot.
50. Tesla Motors, Model S Owner's Manual. 2016 Available at: https://www.tesla.com/sites/default/files/model_s_owners_manual_north_america_en_us.pdf. (Accessed 9 August 2017)
51. United Nations, Vienna Convention on Road Traffic. 1968 Available at: https://www.unece.org/fileadmin/DAM/trans/conventn/crt1968e.pdf. (Accessed 15 May 2017)
52. Volvo Cars, Intellisafe Autopilot. 2016 http://www.volvocars.com/intl/about/our-innovation-brands/intellisafe/intellisafe-autopilot.
53. Walker, G.H., Stanton, N.A., Salmon, P.M., Human Factors in Automotive Engineering and Technology. 2015, Ashgate, Aldershot, UK.
54. Walker, G.H., Stanton, N.A., Salmon, P.M., Trust in vehicle technology. Int. J. Veh. Des. 70:2 (2016), 157–182.
55. Young, M.S., Stanton, N.A., Malleable Attentional Resources Theory: a new explanation for the effects of mental underload on performance. Hum. Factors 44:3 (2002), 365–375.
56. Young, M.S., Stanton, N.A., Harris, D., Driving automation: learning from aviation about design philosophies. Int. J. Veh. Des. 45:3 (2007), 323–338.