Discovering Driver-vehicle Coordination Problems in Future Automated Control Systems: Evidence from Verbal Commentaries

Procedia Manufacturing

Volumn 3, Issue , 2015, Pages 2497-2504

  Banks, Victoria A ^a   Stanton, Neville A ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHAMPTON   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Automation surprise; Coordination problems; Driver stress; Mode error; Verbal protocol analysis; Workload

Indexed keywords

EID: 85009985669     PISSN: None     EISSN: 23519789     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1016/j.promfg.2015.07.511     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (39)

1. [1] Khan, A.M., Bacchus, A., Erwin, S., Policy challenges of increasing automation in driving. International Association of Traffic and Safety Sciences Research 35:2 (2012), 79–89.
2. [2] Lützhöft, M.H., Dekker, S.W.A., On your watch: automation on the bridge. Journal of Navigation 55:1 (2002), 83–96.
3. [3] Ward, N.J., Automation of task processes: an example of intelligent transportation systems. Human Factors and Ergonomics in Manufacturing 10:4 (2000), 395–408.
4. [4] Kaber, D.B., Endsley, M.R., The effects of level of automation and adaptive automation on human performance, situation awareness and workload in a dynamic control task. Theoretical Issues in Ergonomics Science 5:2 (2004), 113–153.
5. [5] Parasuraman, R., Sheridan, T.B., Wickens, C.D., A model for types and levels of human interaction with automation. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics. Part A, Systems and humans: A publication of the IEEE Systems, Man, and Cybernetics Society 30:3 (2000), 286–297.
6. [6] Young, M.S., Stanton, N.A., Malleable attentional resources theory: a new explanation for the effects of mental underload on performance. Human Factors 44:3 (2002), 365–375.
7. [7] Stanton, N.A., Marsden, P.P., From fly-by-wire to drive-by-wire: safety implications of automation in vehicles. Safety Science 24:1 (1996), 35–49.
8. [8] Cuevas, H.M., Fiore, S.M., Caldwell, B.S., Strater, L., Augmenting team cognition in human–automation teams performing in complex operational environments. Aviation, Space, and Environmental Medicine 78 (2007), 63–70.
9. [9] Rajaonah, B., Tricot, N., Anceaux, F., Millot, P., The role of intervening variables in driver–ACC cooperation. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies 66:3 (2008), 185–197.
10. [10] Rudin-Brown, C.M., Parker, H.A., Behavioural adaptation to adaptive cruise control (ACC): implications for preventive strategies. Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour 7:2 (2004), 59–76.
11. [11] Grote, G., Weik, S., Wafler, T., Zolch, M., Criteria for the complementary allocation of functions in automated work systems and their use in simulta- neous engineering projects. International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics 16 (1995), 326–382.
12. [12] V. A. Banks, N.A. Stanton, C. Harvey, What the crash dummies don't tell you: the interaction between driver and automation in emergency situations. Proceedings of the IEEE Intelligent Transportation Systems for All Transport Modes 2013, The Hague, The Netherlands, 6-9 October 2013.
13. [13] Banks, V.A., Stanton, N.A., Harvey, C., Sub-systems on the road to vehicle automation: hands and feet free but not ‘mind’ free driving. Safety Science 62 (2014), 505–514.
14. [14] V. A. Banks, N.A. Stanton, Hands and feet free driving: ready or not? Proceedings of the 5th International Conference on Applied Human Factors and Ergonomics AHFE 2014, Kraków, Poland 19-23 July 2014.
15. [15] E. Hutchins, Cognition in the wild. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 1995.
16. [16] Sarter, N.B., Woods, D.D., Billings, C.E., Automation surprises. Handbook of Human Factors and Ergonomics 2 (1997), 1926–1943.
17. th International Symposium on Aviation Psychology 1995, Columbus, Ohio.
18. [18] Metzger, U., Parasuraman, R., Automation in future air traffic management: effects of decision aid reliability on controller performance and mental workload. Human Factors 47 (2005), 35–49.
19. [19] Matthews, G., Campbell, S.E., Falconer, S.E.S., Joiyner, L.A., Huggins, J., Gilliand, K., Grier, R.J.S., Warm., Fundamental dimensions of subjective state in performance settings: task engagement, distress, and worry Emotion 2 (2002), 315–340.
20. [20] G. Matthews, J. Szalma, A.R. Panganiban, C. Neubauer, J.S. Warm. Profiling task stress with the Dundee Stress State Questionnaire in L. Cavalcanti, & S. Azevedo (Eds.), Psychology of Stress (pp. 49-91), Nova Science Publishers Inc, 2013.
21. [21] Hart, S.G., Staveland, L.E., Development of NASA-TLX (Task Load Index): results of empirical and theoretical research. advances in Psychology 52 (1988), 139–183.
22. [22] Walker, G.H., Stanton, N.A., Salmon, P.M., Cognitive compatibility of motorcyclists and car drivers. Accident Analysis & Prevention 43 (2011), 878–888.
23. [23] Sarter, N.B., Woods, D.D., How in the world did we ever get into that mode?. mode error and awareness in supervisory control. Human Factors 37 (1995), 5–19.
24. [24] Sarter, N.B., Investigating mode errors on automated flight decks: illustrating the problem-driven, cumulative, and inter-disciplinary nature of human factors research. Human Factors 50:3 (2008), 506–510.
25. [25] Sarter, N.B., Mummaw, R.J., Wickens, C.D., Pilots’ monitoring strategies and performance on automated flight decks: An empirical study combining behavioural and eye-tracking data. Human Factors 49:3 (2007), 347–357.
26. [26] Desmond, P.A., Matthews, G., Individual differences in stress and fatigue in two field studies of driving, Transportation Research Part F 12 (2009), 265–276.
27. [27] Hockey, G.R.J., Compensatory control in the regulation of human performance under stress and high workload: a cognitive energetical framework. Biological Psychology 45 (1997), 73–93.
28. [28] Hoc, J.M., Young, M.S., Blosseville, J.M., Cooperation between drivers and automation: implications for safety. Theoretical Issues in Ergonomics Science 10:2 (2009), 135–160.
29. [29] de Winter, J.C.F., Happee, R., Martens, M.H., Stanton, N.A., Effects of adaptive cruise control and highly automated driving on workload and situation awareness: a review of the empirical evidence. Transportation Research Part F 27:B (2014), 196–217.
30. [30] Baumeister, R.F., Vohs, K.D., Funder, D.C., Psychology as the science of self-reports and finger movements: whatever happened to actual behaviour. Perspectives on Psychological Science 2:4 (2007), 396–403.
31. [31] Boren, M.T., Ramey, J., Thinking aloud: reconciling theory and practice. IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication 43 (2000), 261–278.
32. [32] Ericsson, K.A., Towards a procedure for eliciting verbal expression of non-verbal experience without reactivity: interpreting the verbal overshadowing effect within the theoretical framework for protocol analysis. Applied Cognitive Psychology 16:8 (2002), 981–987.
33. [33] W. S. Helton, T.H. Shaw, J.S. Warm, G. Matthews, W.N. Dember, P.A. Hancock, Workload transitions: effects on vigilance performance, and stress. In D.A. Vincenzi, M. Mouloua, & P.A. Hancock (Eds.), Human performance, situation awareness and automation: current research and trends (pp. 258-262). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum, 2004.
34. [34] D. A. Norman, The “problem” with automation: inappropriate feedback and interaction, not “over-automation”. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London - Series B: Biological Sciences, 327(1241), (1990) 585-93.
35. [35] Larsson, A.F.L., Driver usage and understanding of adaptive cruise control. Applied Ergonomics 43:3 (2012), 501–506.
36. [36] M. R. Endsley, Situation awareness. In G. Salvendy (Eds.), Handbook of Human Factors and Ergonomics, pp. 528-542 (2006).
37. [37] Stanton, N.A., Young, M., McCaulder, B., Drive-by-wire: the case of driver workload and reclaiming control with adaptive cruise control. Safety Science 27:2 (1997), 149–159.
38. [38] Bainbridge, L., Ironies of Automation. Automatica 19:6 (1983), 775–779.
39. [39] Zheng, P., McDonald, M., Manual vs. adaptive cruise control – can driver's expectation be matched?. Transportation Research Part C 13 (2005), 421–431.