Unpacking the CEO-Board relationship: How strategy making happens in entrepreneurial firms

Academy of Management Journal

Volumn 60, Issue 5, 2017, Pages 1828-1858

  Garg, Sam ^a   Eisenhardt, Kathleen M ^b  

^a HONG KONG UNIVERSITY OF SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY   (Hong Kong)

^b STANFORD UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 85034825772     PISSN: 00014273     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.5465/amj.2014.0599     Document Type: Article

References (129)

1. Amit, R., MacCrimmon, K. R., Zietsma, C., & Oesch, J. M. 2001. Does money matter?: Wealth attainment as the motive for initiating growth-oriented technology ventures. Journal of Business Venturing, 16: 119-143.
2. Arthurs, J. D., & Busenitz, L. W. 2003. The boundaries and limitations of agency theory and stewardship theory in the venture capitalist/entrepreneur relationship. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 28: 145-162.
3. Arthurs, J. D., Hoskisson, R. E., Busenitz, L. W., & Johnson, R. A. 2008. Managerial agents watching other agents: multiple agency conflicts regarding underpricing in IPO firms. Academy of Management Journal, 51: 277-294.
4. Bagley, C. E., & Dauchy, C. E. 2008. The entrepreneur's guide to business law (3rd ed.). Mason, OH: South- Western Cengage Learning.
5. Baker, T., & Nelson, R. E. 2005. Creating something from nothing: Resource construction through entrepreneurial bricolage. Administrative Science Quarterly, 50: 329-366.
6. Balliet, D., & Van Lange, P. A. 2013. Trust, conflict, and cooperation: A meta-Analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 139: 1090-1112.
7. Battilana, J., & Dorado, S. 2010. Building sustainable hybrid organizations: The case of commercial microfinance organizations. Academy of Management Journal, 53: 1419-1440.
8. Beckman, C., Schoonhoven, C., Rottner, R., & Kim, S.-J. 2014. Relational pluralism in de novo organizations: Boards of directors as bridges or barriers? Academy of Management Journal, 57: 460-483.
9. Beckman, C. M., &Burton, M. D. 2008. Founding the future: Path dependence in the evolution of top management teams from founding to IPO. Organization Science, 19: 3-24.
10. Bendersky, C., & Hays, N. A. 2012. Status conflict in groups. Organization Science, 23: 323-340.
11. Berle, A. A., & Means, G. C. 1932. The modern corporation and private property. New York, NY: Macmillan.
12. Bingham, C. B., & Davis, J. P. 2012. Learning sequences: Their existence, effect, and evolution. Academy of Management Journal, 55: 611-641.
13. Boivie, S., Bednar, M. K., Aguilera, R. V., & Andrus, J. L. 2016. Are boards designed to fail? The implausibility of effective board monitoring. The Academy of Management Annals, 10: 319-407.
14. Boivie, S., Lange, D., McDonald, M. L., & Westphal, J. D. 2011. Me or we: The effects of CEO organizational identification on agency costs. Academy of Management Journal, 54: 551-576.
15. Boyd, B. 1990. Corporate linkages and organizational environment:Atest of the resource dependence model. Strategic Management Journal, 11: 419-430.
16. Brooks, A.W., Gino, F., &Schweitzer, M.E.2015.Smart people ask for (my) advice: Seeking advice boosts perceptions of competence. Management Science, 61: 1421-1435.
17. Cable, D. M., & Shane, S. 1997. A prisoner's dilemma approach to entrepreneur-venture capitalist relationships. Academy of Management Review, 22: 142- 176.
18. Carpenter, M. A., & Westphal, J. D. 2001. The strategic context of external network ties: Examining the impact of director appointments on board involvement in strategic decision making. Academy of Management Journal, 44: 639-660.
19. Charan, R. 2005. Boards that deliver: Advancing corporate governance from compliance to competitive advantage (1st ed.). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
20. Chen, E. L., Katila, R., McDonald, R., & Eisenhardt, K. M. 2010. Life in the fast lane: Origins of competitive interaction in new vs. established markets. Strategic Management Journal, 31: 1527-1547.
21. Chen, G., Hambrick, D. C., & Pollock, T. G. 2008. Puttin' on the ritz: Pre-IPO enlistment of prestigious affiliates as deadline-induced remediation. Academy of Management Journal, 51: 954-975.
22. Corley, K. G., & Gioia, D. A. 2004. Identity ambiguity and change in the wake of a corporate spin-off. Administrative Science Quarterly, 49: 173-208.
23. Daily, C. M., McDougall, P. P., Covin, J. G., & Dalton, D. R. 2002. Governance and strategic leadership in entrepreneurial firms. Journal of Management, 28: 387-412.
24. Dalton, D. R., Hitt, M. A., Certo, S. T., & Dalton, C. M. 2007. The fundamental agency problem and its mitigation. The Academy of Management Annals, 1: 1-64.
25. Davis, J. P., & Eisenhardt, K. M. 2011. Rotating leadership and collaborative innovation recombination processes in symbiotic relationships. Administrative Science Quarterly, 56: 159-201.
26. Davis, J. P., Eisenhardt, K. M., & Bingham, C. B. 2009. Optimal structure, market dynamism, and the strategy of simple rules. Administrative Science Quarterly, 54: 413-452.
27. Diestre, L., & Rajagopalan, N. 2012. Are all sharks' dangerous? new biotechnology ventures and partner selection in R&D alliances. Strategic Management Journal, 33: 1115-1134.
28. Diestre, L., Rajagopalan, N., & Dutta, S. 2015. Constraints in acquiring and utilizing directors' experience: An empirical study of new-market entry in the pharmaceutical industry. Strategic Management Journal, 36: 339-359.
29. Eisenhardt, K. M. 1989a. Agency theory: An assessment and review. Academy of Management Review, 14: 57-74.
30. Eisenhardt, K. M. 1989b. Making fast strategic decisions in high-velocity environments. Academy of Management Journal, 32: 543-576.
31. Eisenhardt, K. M. 1989c. Building theories from case study research. Academy of Management Review, 14: 532-550.
32. Eisenhardt, K. M., & Bourgeois, L. J. 1988. Politics of strategic decision making in high-velocity environments: Toward a midrange theory. Academy of Management Journal, 31: 737-770.
33. Eisenhardt, K. M., & Graebner, M. 2007. Theory building from cases: Opportunities and challenges. Academy of Management Journal, 50: 25-32.
34. Eisenhardt, K. M., Graebner, M. E., & Sonenshein, S. 2016. Grand challenges and inductive methods: Rigor without rigor mortis. Academy of Management Journal, 59: 1113-1123.
35. Eisenhardt, K. M., Kahwajy, J. L., & Bourgeois, L. J. 1997. How management teams can have a good fight. Harvard Business Review, 75: 77-85.
36. Emerson, R. 1962. Power-dependence relations. American Sociological Review, 17: 31-41.
37. Fama, E. F., & Jensen, M. C. 1983. Separation of ownership and control. The Journal of Law & Economics, 26: 301-326.
38. Feld, B., & Ramsinghani, M. 2013. Startup boards: Getting the most out of your board of directors. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons.
39. Finkelstein, S., & Mooney, A. C. 2003. Not the usual suspects: How to use board process to make boards better. The Academy of Management Executive, 17: 101-113.
40. Forbes, D. P., Korsgaard, M. A., & Sapienza, H. J. 2009. Financing decisions as a source of conflict in venture boards. Journal of Business Venturing, 25: 579-592.
41. Forbes, D. P., & Milliken, F. J. 1999. Cognition and corporate governance: Understanding boards of directors as strategic decision-making groups. Academy of Management Review, 24: 489-505.
42. Fried, V. H., Bruton, G. D., & Hisrich, R. D. 1998. Strategy and the board of directors in venture capital-backed firms. Journal of Business Venturing, 13: 493-503.
43. Furr, N. R., Cavarretta, F., & Garg, S. 2012. Who changes course? The role of domain knowledge and novel framing in making technology changes. Strategic Entrepreneurship Journal, 6: 236-256.
44. Gabrielsson, J., &Huse, M. 2002. The venture capitalist and the board of directors in SMEs: Roles and processes. Venture Capital, 4: 125-146.
45. Garg, S. 2013. Venture boards: Distinctive monitoring and implications for firm performance. Academy of Management Review, 38: 90-108.
46. Garg, S. 2014. Microfoundations of board monitoring: The case of entrepreneurial firms. Academy of Management Review, 39: 114-117.
47. Garg, S., & Furr, N. 2017. Venture boards: Past insights and future directions. Strategic Entrepreneurship Journal. Published online ahead of print.
48. Garg, S., Li, Q., & Shaw, J. 2017a. Board Evolution, HKUST Working Paper.
49. Garg, S., Li, Q., & Shaw, J. 2017b. Board undervaluation and turnover in IPO boards. Strategic Management Journal. Published online ahead of print.
50. Gladstein, D. L. 1984. Groups in context: A model of task group effectiveness. Administrative Science Quarterly, 29: 499-517.
51. Gompers, Paul A. 1996. Grandstanding in the venture capital industry. Journal of Financial Economics, 42: 133-156.
52. Graebner, M. E. 2009. Caveat venditor: Trust asymmetries in acquisitions of entrepreneurial firms. Academy of Management Journal, 52: 435-472.
53. Graebner, M. E., & Eisenhardt, K. M. 2004. The seller's side of the story: Acquisition as courtship and governance as syndicate in entrepreneurial firms. Administrative Science Quarterly, 49: 366-403.
54. Gulati, R., & Higgins, M. C. 2003. Which ties matter when? The contingent effects of interorganizational partnerships on IPO success. Strategic Management Journal, 24: 127-144.
55. Guler, I. 2007. Throwing good money after bad? Political and institutional influences on sequential decision making in the venture capital industry. Administrative Science Quarterly, 52: 248-285.
56. Hallen, B. L. 2008. The causes and consequences of the initial network positions of new organizations: From whom do entrepreneurs receive investments? Administrative Science Quarterly, 53: 685-718.
57. Hallen, B., & Eisenhardt, K. 2012. Catalyzing strategies and efficient tie formation: How entrepreneurial firms obtain investment ties. Academy of Management Journal, 1: 35-70.
58. Hambrick, D. C., Werder, A. V., & Zajac, E. J. 2008. New directions in corporate governance research. Organization Science, 19: 381-385.
59. Hamilton, R., Vohs, K. D., Sellier, A.-L., & Meyvis, T. 2011. Being of two minds: Switching mindsets exhausts selfregulatory resources. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 115: 13-24.
60. Haynes, K. T., & Hillman, A. 2011. The effect of board capital and CEO power on strategic change. Strategic Management Journal, 31: 1145-1163.
61. Hernandez, E., Sanders, G., & Tuschke, A. 2014. Network defense: Pruning, grafting, and closing to prevent leakage of strategic knowledge to rivals. Academy of Management Journal, 58: 1233-1260.
62. Hillman, A. J., Nicholson, G., & Shropshire, C. 2008. Directors' multiple identities, identification, and board monitoring and resource provision. Organization Science, 19: 441-456.
63. Hillman, A. J., Withers, M. C., & Collins, B. J. 2009. Resource dependence theory: A review. Journal of Management, 35: 1404-1427.
64. Hochberg, Y. V., Ljungqvist, A., & Liu, Y. 2007. Whom you know matters: Venture capital networks and investment performance. The Journal of Finance, 62: 251-301.
65. Horowitz, B. 2014. The hard thing about hard things: building a business when there are no easy answers. New York, NY: HarperCollins.
66. Huse, M., & Zattoni, A. 2008. Trust, firm life cycle, and actual board behavior: Evidence from "one of the lads" in the board of three small firms. International Studies of Management & Organization, 38: 71-97.
67. Janis, I. L. 1972. Groupthink (1st ed.). Boston, MA: Houghton Mifflin.
68. Jensen, M. C., & Meckling, W. H. 1976. The theory of the firm: Managerial behavior, agency costs, and ownership structure. Journal of Financial Economics, 3: 305-360.
69. Jick, T. D. 1979. Mixing qualitative and quantitative methods: Triangulation in action. Administrative Science Quarterly, 24: 602-611.
70. Johnson, S. G., Schnatterly, K., & Hill, A. D. 2012. Board composition beyond independence: Social capital, human capital, and demographics. Journal of Management, 39: 232-262.
71. Judge, W. Q., & Miller, A. 1991. Antecedents and outcomes of decision speed in different environmental context. Academy of Management Journal, 34: 449-463.
72. Judge, W. Q., & Zeithaml, C. P. 1992. Institutional and strategic choice perspectives on board involvement in the strategic decision process. Academy of Management Journal, 35: 766-794.
73. Kaplan, S. 2008. Framing contests: Strategy making under uncertainty. Organization Science, 19: 729-752.
74. Katila, R., Chen, E. L., & Piezunka, H. 2012. All the right moves: How entrepreneurial firms compete effectively. Strategic Entrepreneurship Journal, 6: 116-132.
75. Katila, R., Rosenberger, J. D., & Eisenhardt, K. M. 2008. Swimming with sharks: Technology ventures, defense mechanisms and corporate relationships. Administrative Science Quarterly, 53: 295-332.
76. Kerr, N. L., & Tindale, R. S. 2004. Group performance and decision making. Annual Review of Psychology, 55: 623-655.
77. Kor, Y. Y., &Misangyi, V.F. 2008.Outsidedirectors' industryspecific experience and firms' liability of newness. Strategic Management Journal, 29: 1345-1355.
78. Korsgaard, M. A., Schweiger, D. M., & Sapienza, H. J. 1995. Building commitment, attachment, and trust in strategic decision-making teams: The role procedural justice. Academy of Management Journal, 38: 60-84.
79. Kortum, S., & Lerner, J. 2000. Assessing the contribution of venture capital to innovation. The Rand Journal of Economics, 31: 674-692.
80. Krause, R., Semadeni, M., & Cannella, A. A. 2013. External COO/presidents as expert directors: A new look at the service role of boards. Strategic Management Journal, 34: 1628-1641.
81. Kroll, M., Walters, B. A., & Wright, P. 2008. Board vigilance, director experience, and corporate outcomes. Strategic Management Journal, 29: 363-382.
82. Langley, A. 1999. Strategies for theorizing from process data. Academyof Management Review, 24: 691-710.
83. Langley, A., & Abdallah, C. 2011. Templates and turns in qualitative studies of strategy and management. Research methodology in strategy and management, 6: 201-235.
84. Lerner, J. 1995. Venture capitalists and the oversight of private firms. The Journal of Finance, 50: 301-318.
85. Lincoln, Y. S., & Guba, E. G. 1985. Naturalistic inquiry. Atlanta, GA: Sage.
86. Lorsch, J. W., & MacIver, E. 1989. Pawn and potentates: The reality of America's corporate boards. Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press.
87. Lowenstein, G., & Lerner, J. 2003. The role of affect in decision making. In R. J. Davidson, K. R. Scherer & H. H. Goldsmith (Eds.), Handbook of affective sciences, vol. xvii: 619-642. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
88. Lungeanu, R., & Zajac, E. J. 2015. How expert directors influence strategy in newly public firms: A reconceptualization and analysis. Working Paper. Penn State.
89. Lynall, M. D., Golden, B. R., & Hillman, A. J. 2003. Board composition from adolescence to maturity: A multitheoretic view. Academy of Management Review, 28: 416-431.
90. Mace, M. 1971. Directors: Myth and reality. Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press.
91. Martin, J. A., & Eisenhardt, K. M. 2010. Rewiring: Crossbusiness- unit collaborations in multibusiness organizations. Academy of Management Journal, 53: 265-301.
92. McDonald, M. L., & Westphal, J. D. 2010. A little help here? Board control, CEO identification with the corporate elite, and strategic help provided to CEOs at other firms. Academy of Management Journal, 53: 343-370.
93. McDonald, M. L., Westphal, J. D., & Graebner, M. E. 2008. What do they know? The effects of outside director acquisition experience on firm acquisition performance. Strategic Management Journal, 29: 1155-1177.
94. McNulty, T., & Pettigrew, A. 1999. Strategists on the board. Organization Studies, 20: 47-74.
95. Menon, T., & Pfeffer, J. 2003. Valuing internal vs. external knowledge: Explaining the preference for outsiders. Management Science, 49: 497-513.
96. Miles, M. B., & Huberman, A. M. 1994. Qualitative data analysis (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
97. Nijstad, B. A., Stroebe, W., & Lodewijkx, H. F. M. 2003. Production blocking and idea generation: Does blocking interfere with cognitive processes? Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 39: 531-548.
98. Ozcan, P., & Eisenhardt, K. 2009. Origin of alliance portfolios: Entrepreneurs, network strategies, and firm performance. Academy of Management Journal, 2: 246-279.
99. Pahnke, E., McDonald, R., Wang, D., & Hallen, B. 2015b. Exposed: Venture capital, competitor ties, and entrepreneurial innovation. Academy of Management Journal, 58: 1334-1360.
100. Pahnke, E. C., Katila, R., & Eisenhardt, K. M. 2015a. Who takes you to the dance? How partners' institutional logics influence innovation in young firms. Administrative Science Quarterly, 60: 596-633.
101. Park, S. H., Westphal, J. D., & Stern, I. 2011. Set up for a fall: The insidious effects of flattery and opinion conformity toward corporate leaders. Administrative Science Quarterly, 56: 257-302.
102. Pfeffer, J., & Salancik, G. 1978. The external control of organizations: A resource dependence perspective. New York, NY: Harper & Row Publishers.
103. Pugliese, A., Bezemer, P.-J., Zattoni, A., Huse, M., Van den Bosch, F. A. J., &Volberda, H.W.2009.Boardsof directors' contribution to strategy: A literature review and research agenda. Corporate Governance, 17: 292-306.
104. Rindova, V. P. 1999. What corporate boards have to do with strategy: A cognitive perspective. Journal of Management Studies, 36: 953-975.
105. Rosenstein, J., Bruno, A. V., Bygrave, W. D., & Taylor, N. T. 1993. The CEO, venture capitalists, and the board. Journal of Business Venturing, 8: 99-113.
106. Sapienza, H. J., & Gupta, A. K. 1994. Impact of agency risks and task uncertainty on venture capitalist-CEO interaction. Academy ofManagement Journal, 37: 1618.
107. Santos, F. M., & Eisenhardt, K. M. 2009. Constructing markets and shaping boundaries: Entrepreneurial power in nascent fields. Academy of Management Journal, 52: 643-671.
108. Schulze, W. S., Lubatkin, M. H., Dino, R. N., & Buchholtz, A. K. 2001. Agency relationships in family firms: Theory and evidence. Organization Science, 12: 99-116.
109. Shropshire, C. 2010. The role of the interlocking director and board receptivity in the diffusion of practices. Academy of Management Review, 35: 246-264.
110. Sorenson, O., & Stuart, T. E. 2001. Syndication networks and the spatial distribution of venture capital investments. American Journal of Sociology, 106: 1546-1588.
111. Stern, I., & Westphal, J. D. 2010. Stealthy footsteps to the boardroom: Executives' backgrounds, sophisticated interpersonal influence behavior, and board appointments. Administrative Science Quarterly, 55: 278-319.
112. Stuart, T. E., Hoang, H., & Hybels, R. C. 1999. Interorganizational endorsements and the performance of entrepreneurial ventures. Administrative Science Quarterly, 44: 315-349.
113. Sundaramurthy, C., & Lewis, M. 2003. Control and collaboration: Paradoxes of governance. Academy of Management Review, 28: 397-415.
114. Tuggle, C. S., Schnatterly, K., & Johnson, R. A. 2010. Attention patterns in the boardroom: How board composition and processes affect discussion of entrepreneurial issues. Academy of Management Journal, 53: 550-571.
115. Vandenbroucke, E., Knockaert, M., & Ucbasaran, D. 2014. Outside boardhumancapital and early stage high-Tech firm performance. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 40: 759-779.
116. Vandierendonck, A., Liefooghe, B., & Verbruggen, F. 2010. Task switching: Interplay of reconfiguration and interference control. Psychological Bulletin, 136: 601-626.
117. Wasserman, N. 2003. Founder-CEO succession and the paradox of entrepreneurial success. Organization Science, 14: 149-172.
118. Wasserman, N. 2006. Stewards, agents, and the founder discount: Executive compensation in new ventures. Academy of Management Journal, 49: 960-976.
119. Wasserman, N. 2016. The throne vs. the kingdom: Founder control and value creation in startups. Strategic Management Journal, 38: 255-277.
120. Westphal, J. D. 1998. Board games: How CEOs adapt to increases in structural board independence from management. Administrative Science Quarterly, 43: 511-537.
121. Westphal, J. D. 1999. Collaboration in the boardroom: Behavioral and performance consequences of CEO- board Social Ties. Academy of Management Journal, 42: 7-24.
122. Westphal, J. D., & Stern, I. 2007. Flattery will get you everywhere (especially if you are a male Caucasian): How ingratiation, boardroom behavior, and demographic minority status affect additional board appointments At U.S. companies. Academy of Management Journal, 50: 267-288.
123. Westphal, J. D., & Zajac, E. J. 2013. A behavioral theory of corporate governance: Explicating the mechanisms of socially situated and socially constituted agency. The Academy of Management Annals, 7: 607-661.
124. Wry, T., Cobb, J. A., & Aldrich, H. E. 2013. More than a metaphor: Assessing the historical legacy of resource dependence and its contemporary promise as a theory of environmental complexity. The Academy of Management Annals, 7: 441-488.
125. Yin, R. K. 2008. Case study research: Design and methods (4th ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
126. Zahra, S. A., & Filatotchev, I. 2004. Governance of the entrepreneurial threshold firm: A knowledge-based perspective. Journal of Management Studies, 41: 885-897.
127. Zhang, J. J., Baden-Fuller, C., & Pool, J. K. 2011. Resolving the tensions between monitoring, resourcing and strategizing: Structures and processes in high technology venture boards. Long Range Planning, 44:95-117.
128. Zhu, D. H., & Chen, G. 2015. CEO narcissism and the impact of prior board experience on corporate strategy. Administrative Science Quarterly, 60: 31-65.
129. Zott, C., & Huy, Q. N. 2007. How entrepreneurs use symbolic management to acquire resources. Administrative Science Quarterly, 52: 70-105.