Looking across instead of back and forth: How the simultaneous presentation of multiple animation episodes facilitates learning

Learning from Dynamic Visualization: Innovations in Research and Application

Volumn , Issue , 2017, Pages 51-68

  Ploetzner, Rolf ^a   Lowe, Richard ^b,c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF EDUCATION FREIBURG   (Germany)

^b CURTIN UNIVERSITY   (Australia)

^c UNIVERSITÉ DE BOURGOGNE   (France)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 85033564762     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-56204-9_3     Document Type: Chapter

References (34)

1. Ayres, P., & Sweller, J. (2014). The split-attention principle in multimedia learning. In R. E. Mayer (Ed.), The Cambridge handbook of multimedia learning (2nd ed., pp. 206-226). New York: Cambridge University Press.
2. Bark, A. (2009). Sportküstenschifferschein [License for coastal sport skippers] (9. Aufl.). Bielefeld: Delius Klasing Verlag.
3. Blignaut, P., & Beelders, T. (2009). The effect of fixational eye movements on fixation identification with a dispersion-based fixation detection algorithm. Journal of Eye Movement Research, 2, 1-14.
4. Clark, R. E., Yates, K., Early, S., & Moulton, K. (2011). An analysis of the failure of electronic media and discovery-based learning: Evidence for the performance benefits of guided learning methods. In K. H. Silber & W. R. Foshay (Eds.), Handbook of improving performance in the workplace (pp. 263-297). San Francisco, CA: Pfeiffer.
5. de Jong, T., & Lazonder, A. W. (2014). The guided discovery principle in multimedia learning. In R. E. Mayer (Ed.), The Cambridge handbook of multimedia learning (2nd ed., pp. 371-390). New York: Cambridge University Press.
6. de Jong, T., & van Joolingen, W. R. (1998). Scientific discovery learning with computer simulations of conceptual domains. Review of Educational Research, 68, 179-201.
7. Ginns, P. (2005). Meta-analysis of the modality effect. Learning and Instruction, 15, 313-331.
8. Holland, J. H., Holyoak, K. J., Nisbett, R. E., & Thagard, P. R. (1986). Induction-Processes of inference, learning, and discovery. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
9. Holmqvist, K., Nyström, M., Andersson, R., Dewhurst, R., Jarodzka, H., & van de Weijer, J. (2011). Eye tracking-A comprehensive guide to methods and measures. New York: Oxford University Press.
10. Klauer, K. J., & Leutner, D. (2012). Lehren und Lernen-Einführung in die Instruktionspsychologie (2. Aufl.) [Teaching and learning-Introduction to the psychology of instruction]. Weinheim: Beltz Verlag.
11. Klauer, K. J., & Phye, G. D. (2008). Inductive reasoning: A training approach. Review of Educational Research, 78, 85-123.
12. Kombartzky, U., Ploetzner, R., Schlag, S., & Metz, B. (2010). Developing and evaluating a strategy for learning from animation. Learning and Instruction, 20, 424-433.
13. Low, R., & Sweller, J. (2014). The modality principle in multimedia learning. In R. E. Mayer (Ed.), The Cambridge handbook of multimedia learning (2nd ed., pp. 227-246). New York: Cambridge University Press.
14. Lowe, R. K. (1999). Extracting information from an animation during complex visual learning. European Journal of Psychology of Education, 14, 225-244.
15. Lowe, R. K. (2004). Interrogation of a dynamic visualization during learning. Learning and Instruction, 14, 257-274.
16. Lowe, R. K., & Boucheix, J.-M. (2008). Learning from animated diagrams: How are mental models built? In G. Stapleton, J. Howse, & J. Lee (Eds.), Diagrammatic representations and inference - Proceedings of the fifth international conference, diagrams 2008 (pp. 266-281). Berlin: Springer.
17. Lowe, R. K., & Boucheix, J.-M. (2011). Cueing complex animations: Does direction of attention foster learning processes? Learning and Instruction, 21, 650-663.
18. Lowe, R., & Boucheix, J.-M. (2017). A composition approach to design of educational animations. In R. Lowe, & R. Ploetzner (Eds.), Learning from dynamic visualization - Innovations in research and application. Berlin: Springer (this volume).
19. Lowe, R. K., & Schnotz, W. (2014). Animation principles in multimedia learning. In R. E. Mayer (Ed.), The Cambridge handbook of multimedia learning (2nd ed., pp. 513-546). New York: Cambridge University Press.
20. Lowe, R., Schnotz, W., & Rasch, T. (2011). Aligning affordances of graphics with learning task requirements. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 25, 452-459.
21. Mayer, R. E. (2009). Multimedia learning (2nd ed.). New York: Cambridge University Press.
22. Mayer, R. E. (2014). Cognitive theory of multimedia learning. In R. E. Mayer (Ed.), The Cambridge handbook of multimedia learning (2nd ed., pp. 43-71). New York: Cambridge University Press.
23. Mayer, R. E., & Fiorella, L. (2014). Principles for reducing extraneous processing in multimedia learning: Coherence, signaling, redundancy, spatial contiguity, and temporal contiguity principles. In R. E. Mayer (Ed.), The Cambridge handbook of multimedia learning (2nd ed., pp. 279-315). New York: Cambridge University Press.
24. Overschmidt, H., & Gliewe, R. (2009). Das Bodenseeschifferpatent A + D [Yachtmaster A + D for Lake Constance]. Bielefeld: Delius Klasing Verlag.
25. Plass, J. L., & Schwartz, R. N. (2014). Multimedia learning with simulations and microworlds. In R. E. Mayer (Ed.), The Cambridge handbook of multimedia learning (2nd ed., pp. 729-761). New York: Cambridge University Press.
26. Ploetzner, R. (2016). Understanding explanatory animation - An introduction to cognitive design and user support. Freiburg: eXplanatory!media.
27. Ploetzner, R., & Breyer, B. (2017). Strategies for learning from animation with and without narration. In R. Lowe, & R. Ploetzner (Eds.), Learning from dynamic visualization - Innovations in research and application. Berlin: Springer (this volume).
28. Ploetzner, R., & Lowe, R. K. (2012). A systematic characterisation of expository animations. Computers in Human Behavior, 28, 781-794.
29. Ploetzner, R., & Lowe, R. K. (2014). Simultaneously presented animations facilitate the learning of higher-order relationships. Computers in Human Behavior, 34, 12-22.
30. Ploetzner, R., Lowe, R., & Schlag, S. (2013). A systematic characterization of cognitive techniques for learning from textual and pictorial representations. Journal of Education and Learning, 2, 78-95.
31. Ploetzner, R., & Schlag, S. (2013). Strategic learning from expository animations: Short- and mid-term effects. Computers & Education, 69, 159-168.
32. Tversky, B., Heiser, J., Mackenzie, R., Lozano, S., & Morrison, J. (2008). Enriching animations. In R. K. Lowe & W. Schnotz (Eds.), Learning with animation: Research implications for design (pp. 263-285). New York: Cambridge University Press.
33. van Gog, T., Paas, F. G. W. C., & Sweller, J. (2010). Cognitive load theory: Advances in research on worked examples, animations, and cognitive load measurement. Educational Psychology Review, 22, 375-378.
34. Zhang, J., & Norman, D. A. (1994). Representations in distributed cognitive tasks. Cognitive Science, 18, 87-122.