Animation principles in multimedia learning

The Cambridge Handbook of Multimedia Learning, Second Edition

Volumn , Issue , 2014, Pages 513-546

  Lowe, Richard K ^a   Schnotz, Wolfgang ^b  

^a CURTIN UNIVERSITY   (Australia)

^b University of Koblenz   (Germany)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84947506290     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.1017/CBO9781139547369.026     Document Type: Chapter

References (45)

1. Ayres, P., & Paas, F. (2007). Making instructional animations more effective: A cognitive load approach. Applied Cognitive Psychology,21, 695-700.
2. Berney, S., & Bétrancourt, M. (2009). When and why does animation enhance learning? A meta-analysis. In Proceedings of the 13TheARLI Biennial Conference on Research on Learning and Instruction, Amsterdam, Aug. 28-Sept. 1.
3. Bétrancourt, M. (2005). The animation and interactivity principles. In R. E. Mayer (Ed.), Cambridge handbook of multimedia learning(pp. 287-296). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
4. Bétrancourt, M., & Borer, R. (2008). Does interactivity benefit learning from dynamic visualizations when learning in individual or collaborative setting? In Proceedings of the International Congress of Psychology-ICP 2008, International Congress of Psychology, Berlin, July 20-26.
5. Bétrancourt, M., & Chassot, A. (2008). Making sense of animation: How do children explore multimedia instruction? In R. Lowe and W. Schnotz (Eds.), Learning with animation(pp. 141-164). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
6. Bodemer, D., Ploetzner, R., Feuerlein, I., & Spada, H. (2004). The active integration of information during learning with dynamic and interactive visualizations. Learning and Instruction,14, 325-341.
7. Boucheix, J.-M., & Lowe, R. K. (2010). An eye tracking comparison of external pointing cues and internal continuous cues in learning with complex animations. Learning and Instruction20, 123-135.
8. Boucheix, J.-M., Lowe, R. K., Putri, D. K., & Groff, J. (2013). Cueing animations: Dynamic signaling aids information extraction and comprehension. Learning and Instruction,25, 71-84.
9. de Koning, B. B., Tabbers, H. K., Rikers, R. M. J. P., & Paas, F. (2009). Towards a framework for attention cueing in instructional animations: Guidelines for research and design. Educational Psychology Review,21, 113-140.
10. de Koning, B. B., Tabbers, H. K., Rikers, R. M. J. P., & Paas, F. (2010). Attention guidance in learning from a complex animation: Seeing is understanding? Learning and Instruction,201, 111-122.
11. Fischer, S., Lowe, R. K., & Schwan, S. (2008). Effects of presentation speed of a dynamic visualization on the understanding of a mechanical system. Applied Cognitive Psychology,22, 1126-1141.
12. Frechette, C., & Moreno, R. (2010). The roles of animated pedagogical agents’ presence and nonverbal communication in multimedia learning environments. Journal of Media Psychology: Theories, Methods and Applications,22, 61-72.
13. Gentner, D. (1983). Structure-mapping: A theoretical framework for analogy. Cognitive Science,7, 155-170.
14. Hasler, B. S., Bernd, K., & Sweller, J. (2007). Learner control, cognitive load and instructional animation. Applied Cognitive Psychology,21, 713-729.
15. Hegarty, M. (1992). Mental animation: Inferring motion from static diagrams of mechanical systems.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition,18, 1084-1102.
16. Hegarty, M., Narayanan, N. H., & Freitas, P. (2002). Understanding machines from multimedia and hypermedia presentations. In J. Otero, J. A. Leon, & A. Graesser (Eds.), The psychology of science text comprehension (pp. 357-384).Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum
17. Höfler, T. N., & Leutner, D. (2007). Instructional animation versus static pictures: A meta-analysis. Learning and Instruction,17, 722-738.
18. Houghton, H. A., & Willows, D. M. (Eds.). (1987). The psychology of illustration, vol. 2: Instructional issues. New York: Springer.
19. Kombartzky, U., Ploetzner, R., Schlag, S., & Metz, B. (2010). Developing and evaluating a strategy for learning from animation. Learning and Instruction,20(5), 424-433.
20. Kriz, S., & Hegarty, M. (2007). Top-down and bottom-up inl uences on learning from animations. International Journal of Human Computer Studies,65, 911-930.
21. Lowe, R. K. (1999). Extracting information from an animation during complex visual learning. European Journal of Psychology of Education,14, 225-244.
22. Lowe, R. K. (2003). Animation and learning: Selective processing of information in dynamic graphics. Learning and Instruction,13, 157-176.
23. Lowe, R. K. (2004). Interrogation of a dynamic visualization during learning. Learning and Instruction,14, 257-274.
24. Lowe, R. K. (2008). Learning from animation: Where to look, when to look. In R. K. Lowe & W. Schnotz (Eds.), Learning with animation: Research implications for design(pp. 49-68). New York: Cambridge University Press.
25. Lowe, R. K., & Boucheix, J.-M. (2008). Learning from animated diagrams: How are mental models built? In G. Stapleton, J. Howse & J. Lee (Eds.), Diagrammatic representation and inference(pp. 266-281). Berlin: Springer.
26. Lowe, R. K., & Boucheix, J.-M. (2010). Manipulatable models for investigating processing of dynamic diagrams. In A. K. Goel, M. Jamnik & N. H. Naryayanan (Eds.), Diagrammatic representation and inference(pp. 319-321). Berlin: Springer.
27. Lowe, R. K., & Boucheix, J.-M. (2011). Cueing complex animations: Does direction of attention foster learning processes? Learning and Instruction,21(5), 650-663.
28. Lowe, R. K., & Boucheix, J.-M. (2012a). Addressing challenges of biological animations. In E. de Vries & K. Scheiter (Eds.), Proceedings of the Meeting of the EARLI Special Interest Group on Comprehension of Text and Graphics(pp. 127-129). Grenoble: University of Grenoble.
29. Lowe, R. K., & Boucheix, J.-M. (2012b). Dynamic diagrams: A composition alternative. In P. Cox, B. Plimmer & P. Rogers (Eds.), Diagrammatic representation and inference(pp. 233-240). Berlin: Springer.
30. Lowe, R. K., & Pramono, H. (2006). Using graphics to support comprehension of dynamic information in texts. Information Design Journal,14, 22-34.
31. Lowe, R. K., Schnotz, W., & Rasch, T. (2010). Aligning affordances of graphics with learning task requirements. Applied Cognitive Psychology,25, 452-459.
32. Marey, E. J. (1874). Animal mechanism: A treatise on terrestrial and aerial locomotion. New York: Appleton.
33. Mayer, R. E. (2001). Multimedia learning. New York: Cambridge University Press.
34. Mayer, R. E. (Ed.) (2005). Cambridge handbook of multimedia learning. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
35. Mayer, R. E. (2008). Research-based principles for learning from animation. In R. K. Lowe & W. Schnotz (Eds.), Learning with animation: Research implications for design(pp. 30-48). New York: Cambridge University Press.
36. Mayer, R. E., Hegarty, M., Mayer, S., & Campbell, J. (2005). When static media promote active learning: Annotated illustrations versus narrated animations in multimedia learning. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied,11, 256-265.
37. Mayer, R. E., & Moreno, R. (2002). Animation as an aid to multimedia learning. Educational Psychology Review,14, 87-99.
38. Meyer, K., Rasch, T., & Schnotz, W. (2010). Effects of animation’s speed of presentation on perceptual processing and learning. Learning and Instruction,20, 136-145.
39. Morand, L., & Bétrancourt, M. (2010). Collaborative learning with single or multiple animations. In F. Maes, K. Scheiter & A. Sch ü ler (Eds.), Tracing the mind: How do we learn from text and graphics? Proceedings of the EARLI SIG 2 Conference. T ü bingen: Knowledge Media Research Center.
40. Ploetzner, R., & Lowe, R.K. (2012). A systematic characterization of expository animation. Computers in Human Behavior,28, 781-794.
41. Schnotz, W. (1993). On the relation between dual coding and mental models in graphics comprehension. Learning and Instruction,3, 247-249.
42. Schnotz, W., & Lowe, R. K. (2008). A unified view of learning from animated and static graphics. In R. K. Lowe, & W. Schnotz (Eds.), Learning with animation: Research implications for design(pp. 304-356). New York: Cambridge University Press.
43. Schwan, S., & Riempp, R. (2004). The cognitive benefits of interactive videos: Learning to tie nautical knots. Learning and Instruction,14, 293-305.
44. Tversky, B., Bauer-Morrison, J., & Bétrancourt, M. (2002) Animation: Can it facilitate? International Journal of Human-Computer Studies,57, 247-262.
45. Winn, W. (1993). Perception principles. In M. Fleming & W. H. Levie (Eds.), Instructional message design: Principles from the behavioral and cognitive sciences(pp. 55-126). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Educational Technology Publications.