“Contextualizing Context”: Reconciling Environmental Exposures, Social Networks, and Location Preferences in Health Research

Current environmental health reports

Volumn 4, Issue 1, 2017, Pages 51-60

  Kestens, Yan ^a,b   Wasfi, Rania ^a,b   Naud, Alexandre ^a,b   Chaix, Basile ^c,d  

^a CENTRE HOSPITALIER DE L UNIVERSITÉ DE MONTRÉAL   (Canada)

^b UNIVERSITÉ DE MONTRÉAL   (Canada)

^c INSTITUT PIERRE LOUIS D EPIDÉMIOLOGIE ET DE SANTÉ PUBLIQUE   (France)

^d SORBONNE UNIVERSITÉ   (France)

Author keywords

Causality; Daily mobility; Environmental exposure; Neighborhood effects; Social networks; Spatial decision making

Indexed keywords

DEMOGRAPHY; ENVIRONMENTAL EXPOSURE; ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH; HUMAN; MEDICAL RESEARCH; PROCEDURES; SOCIAL ENVIRONMENT; SOCIAL SUPPORT; SPATIOTEMPORAL ANALYSIS;

BIOMEDICAL RESEARCH; ENVIRONMENTAL EXPOSURE; ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH; HUMANS; RESIDENCE CHARACTERISTICS; SOCIAL ENVIRONMENT; SOCIAL SUPPORT; SPATIO-TEMPORAL ANALYSIS;

EID: 85033493127     PISSN: None     EISSN: 21965412     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s40572-017-0121-8     Document Type: Review

References (126)

1. Gordon D. Area-based deprivation measures—a U.K. perspective. In: Kawachi I, Berkman L, editors. Neighbourhoods and health. Oxford: Oxford university press; 2003. p. 179–207.
2. Susser M, Susser E. Choosing a future for epidemiology: I. Eras and paradigms. Am J Public Health. 1996;86(5):668–73.
3. Meade M, Earickson R. Medical geography. New York: Guilford Press; 2000.
4. Dorling D. Death in Britain. How local mortality rates have changed 1950s-1990s. York: Joseph Rowntree Foundation; 1997.
5. Duncan C, Jones K, Moon G. Psychiatric morbidity: a multi level approach to regional variations in the UK. J Epidemiol Community Health. 1995;49:290–5.
6. Slogget A, Joshi H. Deprivation indicators as predictors of life events. J Epidemiol Community Health. 1998;52:228–33.
7. Diez Roux A. Investigating neighborhood and area effects on health. Am J Public Health. 2001;91(11):1783–9.
8. Leventhal T, Brooks-Gunn J. The neighborhoods they live in: the effects of neighborhood residence on child and adolescent outcomes. Psychol Bull. 2000;126(2):309–37.
9. Sampson RJ, Morenoff JD, Gannon-Rowley T. Assessing “neighborhood effects”: social processes and new directions in research. Annu Rev Sociol. 2002;28:443–78.
10. Cummins S, et al. Understanding and representing ‘place’ in health research: a relational approach. Soc Sci Med. 2007;65:1825–38.
11. Macintyre S, Ellaway A, Cummins S. Place effects on health: how can we conceptualise, operationalise, and measure them? Soc Sci Med. 2002;55:125–39.
12. Marmot M. Improvement of social environment to improve health. Lancet. 1998;351:57–60.
13. Ross C, Mirowsky J. Neighbourhood socioeconomic status and health: context or composition? City & Community. 2008;7(2):163–79.
14. Siergrist J. Place, social exchange and health: proposed sociological framework. Soc Sci Med. 2000;51:1283–93.
15. Frohlich K, Ross N, Richmond C. Health disparities in Canada today: some evidence and a theoretical framework. Health Policy. 2006;79(2–3):132–43.
16. Axhausen P, Urry P, Larsen PJ. Mobilities, networks, geographies. Hampshire: Ashgate Publishing, Ltd; 2012.
17. •• Berkman LF, Krishna A. Social network epidemiology. In: Berkman LF, Kawachi I, Glymour M, editors. Social Epidemiology. New York: Oxford University Press; 2014.This book chapter reviews key concepts of social relations and social networks and their relevance for social epidemiology
18. Marmot M, et al. Employment grade and coronary heart disease in British civil servants. J Epidemiol Community Health. 1978;32:244–9.
19. Curtis S, Jones IR. Is there a place for geography in the analysis of health inequality? Sociology of Health & Illness. 1998;20(5):645–72.
20. Jones K, Moon G. Health, disease and society. London: Routledge; 1987.
21. Bernard P, et al. Health inequalities and place: a theoretical conception of neighbourhood. Soc Sci Med. 2007;65(9):1839–52.
22. Sewell W. A theory of structure: duality, agency, and transformation. Amercian Journal of Sociology. 1992;98:1–29.
23. Rainham D, et al. Conceptualizing the healthscape: contributions of time geography, location technologies and spatial ecology to place and health research. Soc Sci Med. 2010;70:668–76.
24. Ward Thompson C. Linking landscape and health: the recurring theme. Landsc Urban Plan. 2011;99(3–4):187–95.
25. Kearns RA, Gesler WM. Introduction. In: Kearns RA, Gesler WM, editors. Putting heath into place: landscape, identity and well being. Syraacse: Syracuse Urniversity Press; 1998. p. 1–1.
26. Smyth F. Medical geography: therapeutic places spaces and networks. Prog Hum Geogr. 2005;29(4):488–95.
27. Braveman PA, et al. Socioeconomic disparities in health in the United States: what the patterns tell us. Am J Public Health. 2010;100(S1):S186–96.
28. Evans GW, Kantrowitz E. Socioeconomic status and health: the potential role of environmental risk exposure. Annu Rev Public Health. 2002;23(1):303–31.
29. Brulle RJ, Pellow DN. Environmental justice: human health and environmental inequalities. Annu Rev Public Health. 2006;27:103–24.
30. Macintyre S, Maciver S, Sooman A. Area, class and health: should we be focusing on places or people? Journal of Social Policy. 1993;22(2):213–34.
31. Larsen K, Merlo J. Appropriate assessment of neighborhood effects on individual health: integrating random and fixed effects in multilevel logistic regression. Am J Epidemiol. 2005;161(1):81–8.
32. Li F, et al. Multilevel modelling of built environment characteristics related to neighbourhood walking activity in older adults. J Epidemiol Community Health. 2005;59:558–64.
33. Pickett KE, Pearl M. Multilevel analyses of neighbourhood socioeconomic context and health outcomes: a critical review. J Epidemiol Community Health. 2001;55:111–22.
34. Merlo J, et al. A brief conceptual tutorial of multilevel analysis in social epidemiology: using measures of clustering in multilevel logistic regression to investigate contextual phenomena. J Epidemiol Community Health. 2006;60:290–7.
35. Diez-Roux A. Multilevel analysis in public health research. Annu Rev Public Health. 2000;21:171–92.
36. Hajna, S., et al., Associations between neighbourhood walkability and daily steps in adults: a systematic review and meta-analysis. BMC Public Health, 2015. 15(1).
37. Wasfi RA, et al. Exposure to walkable neighbourhoods in urban areas increases utilitarian walking: longitudinal study of Canadians. Journal of Transport & Health. 2016;3(4):440–7.
38. Wasfi RA, et al. Neighborhood walkability and body mass index trajectories: longitudinal study of Canadians. Am J Public Health. 2016;106(5):934–40.
39. Hirsch JA, et al. Change in walking and body mass index following residential relocation: the multi-ethnic study of atherosclerosis. Am J Public Health. 2014;104(3):e49.
40. Berry TR, et al. Changes in BMI over 6 years: the role of demographic and neighborhood characteristics. Int J Obes. 2010;34(8):1275.
41. Eid J, et al. Fat city: questioning the relationship between urban sprawl and obesity. J Urban Econ. 2008;63:385.
42. Riva M, Gauvin L, Barnett T. Toward the next generation of research into small area effects on health: a synthesis of multilevel investigations published since July 1998. J Epidemiol Community Health. 2007;61(10):853–61.
43. Gauvin L, et al. Conceptualizing and operationalizing neighbourhoods: the conundrum of identifying territorial units. Can J Public Health. 2007;98(Suppl 1):S18–26.
44. Owen G, Harris R, Jones K. Under examination: multilevel models, geography and health research. Prog Hum Geogr. 2016;40(3):394–412.
45. Næss Ø, Leyland AH. Analysing the effect of area of residence over the life course in multilevel epidemiology. Scandinavian Journal of Public Health. 2010;38(5 suppl):119–26.
46. Rasbash, J., Cross-Classified and Multiple Membership Models. Encyclopedia of Statistics in Behavioral Science, 2005. p. 1–9.
47. Anselin L. Exploring spatial data with GeoDaTM: a workbook. Illinois: Center for Spatially Integrated Social Science; 2005.
48. Fotheringham S, Brunsdon C, Charlton M. Geographically weighted regression: the analysis of spatially varying. Chichester: John Wiley & Sons Inc; 2002.
49. Feuillet, T., et al., Built environment in local relation with walking: why here and not there? Journal of Transport & Health, 2016.
50. Chaix B, et al. Comparison of a spatial perspective with the multilevel analytical approach in neighborhood studies: the case of mental and behavioral disorders due to psychoactive substance use in Malmö, Sweden, 2001. Am J Epidemiol. 2005;162(2):171–82.
51. Apparicio P, et al. Comparing alternative approaches to measuring the geographical accessibility of urban health services: distance types and aggregation-error issues. Int J Health Geogr. 2008;7(1):7.
52. Carlos HA, et al. Density estimation and adaptive bandwidths: a primer for public health practitioners. Int J Health Geogr. 2010;9(1):39.
53. Cummins S. Commentary: investigating neighbourhood effects on health—avoiding the ‘local trap’. Int J Epidemiol. 2007;36(2):355–7.
54. Chaix B, et al. Neighbourhoods in eco-epidemiologic research: delimiting personal exposure areas. A response to Riva, Gauvin, Apparicio and Brodeur. Soc Sci Med. 2009;69(9):1306–10.
55. Openshaw, S., The modifiable areal unit problem. CATMOG–Concepts and Techniques in Modern Geography, ed. o.t.I.o.B.G. Study Group in Quantitative methods. Vol. 38. 1984, Norwich: Geo Books, Regency House.
56. Kwan M-P. The uncertain geographic context problem. Ann Assoc Am Geogr. 2012;102(5):958–68.
57. Vallée, J., et al., The ‘constant size neighbourhood trap’ in accessibility and health studies. Urban Studies, 2014.
58. Hurvitz PM, Moudon AV. Home versus nonhome neighborhood: quantifying differences in exposure to the built environment. Am J Prev Med. 2012;42(4):411–7.
59. Duncan DT, et al. Quantifying spatial misclassification in exposure to noise complaints among low-income housing residents across New York City neighborhoods: a global positioning system (GPS) study. Ann Epidemiol. 2016; doi:10.1016/j.annepidem.2016.09.017.
60. Kestens Y, et al. Comments on Melis et al. the effects of the urban built environment on mental health: a cohort study in a large northern Italian city. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2015;12:14898–915. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 2016. 13(3): p. 250
61. Perchoux C, et al. Assessing patterns of spatial behavior in health studies: their socio-demographic determinants and associations with transportation modes (the RECORD cohort study). Soc Sci Med. 2014;119:64–73.
62. Manaugh K, El-Geneidy AM. What makes travel ‘local’: defining and understanding local travel behavior. The Journal of Transport and Land Use. 2012;5(3):15–27.
63. Hillier A, et al. How far do low-income parents travel to shop for food? Empirical evidence from two urban neighborhoods. Urban Geography. 2011;32(5):712–29.
64. Manaugh K, El-Geneidy AM. Validating walkability indices: how do different households respond to the walkability of their neighbourhood? Transportation research Part D: Tranport and Environment. 2011;16(4):309–15.
65. Setton E, et al. The impact of daily mobility on exposure to traffic-related air pollution and health effect estimates. J Expos Sci Environ Epidemiol. 2011;21(1):42–8.
66. Kwan M-P. Beyond space (as we knew it): toward temporally integrated geographies of segregation, health, and accessibility. Ann Assoc Am Geogr. 2013;103(5):1078–86.
67. Chaix B, et al. Neighborhood environments, mobility, and health: towards a new generation of studies in environmental health research. Rev Epidemiol Sante Publique. 2013;61(Suppl 3):S139–45.
68. Perchoux C, et al. Conceptualization and measurement of environmental exposure in epidemiology: accounting for activity space related to daily mobility. Health & Place. 2013;21:86–93.
69. Miller HJ. A measurement theory for time geography. Geogr Anal. 2005;37(1):17–45.
70. Hagerstrand T. What about people in regional science? Regional Science Association. 1970;24:7–21.
71. Ewing R, Cervero R. Travel and the built environment. J Am Plan Assoc. 2010;76(3):265–94.
72. Saelens B, Handy S. Built environment correlates of walking: a review. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2008;40(7):550–66.
73. Anton CE, Lawrence C. Home is where the heart is: the effect of place of residence on place attachment and community participation. J Environ Psychol. 2014;40:451–61.
74. Matthews SA, Detwiler JE, Burton LM. Geo-ethnography: coupling geographic information analysis techniques with ethnographic methods in urban research. Cartographica. 2005;40(4):75–90.
75. Golledge R, Stimson R. Spatial behavior: a geographic perspective. New York: The Guilford Press; 1997.
76. Matthews, S.A., Spatial polygamy and the heterogeneity of place: studying people and place via egocentric methods, in Communities, Neighborhoods, and Health, L. Burton, et al., Editors. 2010, Springer: New York. p. 35–55.
77. Wasfi, R.A., N.A. Ross, and A.M. El-Geneidy, Achieving recommended daily physical activity levels through commuting by public transportation: unpacking individual and contextual influences. Health Place, 2013. 23.
78. Steinmetz-Wood M, Kestens Y. Does the effect of walkable built environments vary by neighborhood socioeconomic status? Prev Med. 2015;81:262–7.
79. Besser LM, Dannenberg AL. Walking to public transit: steps to help meet physical activity recommendations. Am J Prev Med. 2005;29(4):273–80.
80. Kestens Y, et al. Association between activity space exposure to food establishments and individual risk of overweight. PLoS One. 2012;7(8):e41418.
81. Lebel A, et al. Local context influence, activity space, and foodscape exposure in two Canadian metropolitan settings: is daily mobility exposure associated with overweight? J Obes. 2012;2012:1–9.
82. Chaix B, et al. An interactive mapping tool to assess individual mobility patterns in neighborhood studies. Am J Prev Med. 2012;43(4):440–50.
83. Stewart T, et al. A novel assessment of adolescent mobility: a pilot study. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2015;12(1):18.
84. Haney WG, Knowles ES. Perception of neighborhoods by city and suburban residents. Hum Ecol. 1978;6(2):201–14.
85. Vallee J, et al. The combined effects of activity space and neighbourhood of residence on participation in preventive health-care activities: the case of cervical screening in the Paris metropolitan area (France). Health & Place. 2010;16(5):838–52.
86. Stewart, T., et al., Adolescent school travel: is online mapping a practical alternative to GPS-assessed travel routes? Journal of Transport & Health, 2016.
87. Birenboim A, Shoval N. Mobility research in the age of the smartphone. Annals of the American Association of Geographers. 2016;106(2):283–91.
88. Gustafson A, et al. Food venue choice, consumer food environment, but not food venue availability within daily travel patterns are associated with dietary intake among adults, Lexington Kentucky 2011. Nutr J. 2013;12(17):1–11.
89. Zenk SN, et al. Activity space environment and dietary and physical activity behaviors: a pilot study. Health & Place. 2011;17(5):1150–61.
90. Shearer C, et al. Measuring food availability and accessibility among adolescents: moving beyond the neighbourhood boundary. Soc Sci Med. 2015;133:322–30.
91. Kestens Y, et al. Using experienced activity spaces to measure foodscape exposure. Health & Place. 2010;16(6):1094–103.
92. Tribby CP, et al. Assessing built environment walkability using activity-space summary measures. J Transp Land Use. 2016;9(1):187–207.
93. Chaix B, et al. A GPS-based methodology to analyze environment-health associations at the trip level: case-crossover analyses of built environments and walking. Am J Epidemiol. 2016;184(8):570–8.
94. Shareck, M., et al., The added value of accounting for activity space when examining the association between tobacco retailer availability and smoking among young adults. Tobacoo Control, 2015: p. 1–7.
95. Vallée J, et al. The role of daily mobility in mental health inequalities: the interactive influence of activity space and neighbourhood of residence on depression. Soc Sci Med. 2011;73(8):1133–44.
96. Vallée J, et al. The combined effects of activity space and neighbourhood of residence on participation in preventive health-care activities: the case of cervical screening in the Paris metropolitan area (France). Health & Place. 2010;16(5):838–52.
97. Wang, D. and F. Li, Daily activity space and exposure: a comparative study of Hong Kong’s public and private housing residents’ segregation in daily life. Cities, 2015.
98. James P, et al. “Spatial energetics”: integrating data from GPS, accelerometry, and GIS to address obesity and inactivity. Am J Prev Med. 2016;51(5):792–800.
99. • Chaix, B., et al., GPS tracking in neighborhood and health studies: a step forward for environmental exposure assessment, a step backward for causal inference? Health Place, 2013. 21. This article discusses how selective daily mobility may limit causal inference in research on environmental exposure and health when using GPS and GIS technologies.
100. Berkman LF, Glass T. Social integration, social networks, social support, and health. Social epidemiology. 2000;1:137–73.
101. Levasseur M, et al. Inventory and analysis of definitions of social participation found in the aging literature: proposed taxonomy of social activities. Soc Sci Med. 2010;71(12):2141–9.
102. Cohen, S. and S.L. Syme, eds. Social support and health. 1985, Academic Press Social support and health: San Diego. xvii 390.
103. Kaplan BH, Cassel JC, Gore S. Social support and health. Med Care. 1977;15(5):47–58.
104. Cohen S. Social relationships and health. Am Psychol. 2004;59(8):676–84.
105. House J, Landis KR, Umberson D. Social relationships and health. Science. 1988;241(4865):540–5.
106. Seeman TE. Social ties and health: the benefits of social integration. Ann Epidemiol. 1996;6(5):442–51.
107. Seeman TE, et al. Social relationships, social support, and patterns of cognitive aging in healthy, high-functioning older adults: MacArthur studies of successful aging. Health Psychol. 2001;20(4):243–55.
108. Fratiglioni L, et al. Influence of social network on occurrence of dementia: a community-based longitudinal study. Lancet. 2000;355(9212):1315–9.
109. Axhausen K. Social networks and travel: some hypotheses. In: Donaghy K, Poppelreuter S, Rudinger G, editors. Social aspects of sustainable transport: transatlantic perspectives. England: Ashgate Publishing Limited; 2005. p. 90–110.
110. Carrasco JA, et al. Collecting social network data to study social activity-travel behavior: an egocentric approach. Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design. 2008;35(6):961–80.
111. Larsen J, Axhausen KW, Urry J. Geographies of social networks: meetings, travel and communications. Mobilities. 2006;1(2):261–83.
112. Huckfeldt RR. Social contexts, social networks, and urban neighborhoods: environmental constraints on friendship choice. Am J Sociol. 1983;89(3):651–69.
113. Axhausen KW. Social networks, mobility biographies, and travel: survey challenges. Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design. 2008;35(6):981–96.
114. Kestens Y, et al. Understanding the role of contrasting urban contexts in healthy aging: an international cohort study using wearable sensor devices (the CURHA study protocol). BMC Geriatr. 2016;16(96):1–12.
115. Auld J, et al. An automated GPS-based prompted recall survey with learning algorithms. Transportation Letters. 2009;1(1):59–79.
116. Paul MJ, Dredze M. A model for mining public health topics fromtwitter. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University; 2011. p. 1–7.
117. Paul, M.J. and M. Dredze. You are what you tweet: analyzing twitter for public health. in Fifth International AAAI Conference on Weblogs and Social Media. 2011. Barcelona, Spain: The AAAI Press, Menlo Park, California.
118. Barrat A, et al. Measuring contact patterns with wearable sensors: methods, data characteristics and applications to data-driven simulations of infectious diseases. Clin Microbiol Infect. 2014;20(1):10–6.
119. Slingsby A, Beecham R, Wood J. Visual analysis of social networks in space and time using smartphone logs. Pervasive and Mobile Computing. 2013;9(6):848–64.
120. Phithakkitnukoon, S., et al., Activity-aware map: identifying human daily activity pattern using mobile phone data. in Human Behavior Understanding: First International Workshop, HBU 2010, Istanbul, Turkey, August 22, 2010. Proceedings, A.A. Salah, et al., Editors. 2010, Springer Berlin Heidelberg: Berlin, Heidelberg. p. 14–25.
121. Jason Wiese, et al. You Never Call, You Never Write: Call and SMS Logs Do Not Always Indicate Tie Strength in Computer-Supported Cooperative Work and Social Computing (CSCW). 2015. Vancouver, BC, Canada.
122. Frank L, et al. Stepping towards causation: do built environments or neighborhood and travel preferences explain physical activity, driving, and obesity? Soc Sci Med. 2007;65:1898–914.
123. Handy S, Cao X, Mokhtarian PL. Self-selection in the relationship between the built environment and walking: empirical evidence from Northern California. J Am Plan Assoc. 2006;72(1):55–74.
124. Castiglione, J., M. Bradley, and J. Gliebe, Activity-based travel demand models: A primer, in the second strategic highway research program (SHRP 2). 2015, Transportation Research Board: Washington, DC.
125. Ramadier T, Lee-Gosselin M, Frenette A. Conceptaul perspectives for explainning spatio-temporal behaviour in urban areas. In: Lee-Gosselin M, Doherty S, editors. Integrated land use and transportation models: Behavioural foundations. Amsterdam; Boston: Elsevier; 2005.
126. Simon HA. Rational choice and the structure of the environment. Psychol Rev. 1956;63(2):129–38.