Travel and the built environment

Journal of the American Planning Association

Volumn 76, Issue 3, 2010, Pages 265-294

  Ewing, Reid ^a   Cervero, Robert ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF UTAH   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

built environment; effect sizes; transit; vehicle miles traveled (VMT); walking

Indexed keywords

ACCESSIBILITY; CAR USE; CONFIDENCE INTERVAL; LAND USE PLANNING; META-ANALYSIS; PLANNING METHOD; SIZE EFFECT; SPATIAL ANALYSIS; TRAVEL BEHAVIOR; TRAVEL DEMAND; TRAVEL TIME; URBAN DESIGN;

EID: 77954069125     PISSN: 01944363     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/01944361003766766     Document Type: Article

References (158)

1. Babisch, W. (2008). Road traffic noise and cardiovascular risk. Noise & Health, 10(38), 27-33.
2. Badland, H., & Schofield, G. (2005). Transport, urban design, and physical activity: An evidence-based update. Transportation Research D, 10(3), 177-196. (Pubitemid 40717241)
3. Badoe, D. A., & Miller, E. J. (2000). Transportation-land-use interaction: Empirical findings in North America, and the implications for modeling. Transportation Research D, 5(4), 235-263.
4. Bagley, M., & Mokhtarian, P. (2002). The impact of residential neighborhood type on travel behavior: A structural equations modeling approach. Annals of Regional Science, 36(2), 279-297. (Pubitemid 41525997)
5. Bartholomew, K., & Ewing, R. (2008). Land use-transportation scenarios and future vehicle travel and land consumption: A metaanalysis. Journal of the American Planning Association, 75(1), 1-15.
6. Bauman, A. E., & Bull, F. C. (2007). Environmental correlates of physical activity and walking in adults and children: A review of reviews. London, UK: National Institute of Health and Clinical Excellence.
7. Bento, A. M., Cropper, M. L., Mobarak, A. M., & Vinha, K. (2003). The impact of urban spatial structure on travel demand in the United States. (World Bank policy research working paper #3007).
8. Besser, L., & Dannenberg, A. (2005). Walking to public transit: Steps to help meet physical activity recommendations. American Journal of Preventive Medicine, 29(4), 273-280. (Pubitemid 41483532)
9. Bhat, C. R., & Eluru, N. (2009). A Copula-based approach to accommodate residential self-selection effects in travel behavior modeling. Transportation Research B, 43(7), 749-765.
10. Bhat, C. R., Sen, S., & Eluru, N. (2009). The impact of demographics, built environment attributes, vehicle characteristics, and gasoline prices on household vehicle holdings and use. Transportation Research B, 43(1), 1-18.
11. Bhatia, R. (2004, June). Land use: A key to livable transportation. Paper presented at the 40th International Making Cities Livable conference, London, UK.
12. Boarnet, M. G., & Crane, R. (2001). The influence of land use on travel behavior: Specification and estimation strategies. Transportation Research A, 35(9), 823-845. (Pubitemid 32931565)
13. Boarnet, M. G., Greenwald, M., & McMillan, T. (2008). Walking, urban design, and health: Toward a cost-benefit analysis framework. Journal of Planning Education and Research, 27(3), 341-358.
14. Boarnet, M. G., Joh, K., Siembab, W., Fulton, W., & Nguyen, M. T. (in press). Retrofitting the suburbs to increase walking: Evidence from a land use-travel study. Urban Studies.
15. Boarnet, M. G., Nesamani, K. S., & Smith, C. S. (2004, January). Comparing the influence of land use on nonwork trip generation and vehicle distance traveled: An analysis using travel diary data. Paper presented at the 83rd annual meeting of the Transportation Research Board, Washington, DC.
16. Boer, R., Zheng, Y., Overton, A., Ridgeway, G. K., & Cohen, D. A. (2007). Neighborhood design and walking trips in ten U.S. metropolitan areas. American Journal of Preventive Medicine, 32(4), 298-304. (Pubitemid 46441736)
17. Borenstein, M., Hedges, L.V., Higgins, J. P. T., & Rothstein, H. R (2009). Introduction to meta-analysis. Chichester, UK: Wiley.
18. Bunn, F., Collier, T., Frost, C., Ker, K., Roberts, I. & Wentz, R. (2003). Traffic calming for the prevention of road traffic injuries: Systematic review and meta-analysis. Injury Prevention, 9(3), 200-204.
19. Button, K., & Kerr, J. (1996). Effectiveness of traffic restraint policies: A simple meta-regression analysis. International Journal of Transport Economics, 23(2), 213-225. (Pubitemid 27162623)
20. Button, K., & Nijkamp, P. (1997). Environmental policy analysis and the usefulness of meta-analysis. Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, 31(3), 231-240. (Pubitemid 127437267)
21. Cao, X. (2010). Exploring causal effects of neighborhood type on walking behavior using stratification on the propensity score. Environment and Planning A, 42(2), 487-504.
22. Cao, X., Handy, S. L., & Mokhtarian, P. L. (2006). The influences of the built environment and residential self-selection on pedestrian behavior: Evidence from Austin, TX. Transportation, 33(1), 1-20. (Pubitemid 43118692)
23. Cao, X., Mokhtarian, P. L., & Handy, S. L. (2007). Do changes in neighborhood characteristics lead to changes in travel behavior? A structural equations modeling approach. Transportation, 34(5), 535-556. (Pubitemid 47288740)
24. Cao, X., Mokhtarian, P. L., & Handy, S. L. (2009a). Examining the impacts of residential self-selection on travel behaviour: A focus on empirical findings. Transport Reviews, 29(3), 359-395.
25. Cao, X., Mokhtarian, P. L. & Handy, S. L. (2009b). The relationship between the built environment and nonwork travel: A case study of northern California. Transportation Research Part A, 43(5), 548-559.
26. Cao, X., Xu, Z., & Fan, Y. (2009, January). Exploring the connections among residential location, self-selection, and driving behavior: A case study of Raleigh, NC. Paper presented at the 89th annual meeting of the Transportation Research Board.
27. Cervero, R. (2001). Walk-and-ride: Factors influencing pedestrian access to transit. Journal of Public Transportation, 3(4), 1-23.
28. Cervero, R. (2002a). Built environments and mode choice: Toward a normative framework. Transportation Research D, 7(4), 265-284. (Pubitemid 34589738)
29. Cervero, R. (2002b). Induced travel demand: Research design, empirical evidence, and normative policies. Journal of Planning Literature, 17(1), 3-20.
30. Cervero, R. (2003). The built environment and travel: Evidence from the United States. European Journal of Transport and Infrastructure Research, 3(2), 119-137.
31. Cervero, R. (2006). Alternative approaches to modeling the travel-demand impacts of smart growth. Journal of the American Planning Association, 72(3), 285-295. (Pubitemid 44509208)
32. Cervero, R. (2007). Transit oriented development's ridership bonus: A product of self-selection and public policies. Environment and Planning Part A, 39(9), 2068-2085. (Pubitemid 47491137)
33. Cervero, R., & Duncan, M. (2003). Walking, bicycling, and urban landscapes: Evidence from the San Francisco Bay Area. American Journal of Public Health, 93(9), 1478-1483. (Pubitemid 38477672)
34. Cervero, R., & Duncan, M. (2006). Which reduces vehicle travel more: Jobs-housing balance or retail-housing mixing? Journal of the American Planning Association, 72(4), 475-490. (Pubitemid 46343986)
35. Cervero, R., & Kockelman, K. (1997). Travel demand and the 3Ds: Density, diversity, and design. Transportation Research D, 2(3), 199-219. (Pubitemid 127423667)
36. Cervero, R., & Murakami, J. (2010). Effects of built environments on vehicle miles traveled: Evidence from 370 U.S. metropolitan areas. Environment and Planning A, 42(2), 400-418.
37. Chapman, J., & Frank, L. (2004). Integrating travel behavior and urban form data to address transportation and air quality problems in Atlanta, Georgia (Research Project No. 9819, Task Order 97-13). Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Transportation.
38. Chatman, D. G. (2003). How density and mixed uses at the workplace affect personal commercial travel and commute mode choice. Transportation Research Record, 1831, 193-201.
39. Chatman, D. G. (2008) Deconstructing development density: Quality, quantity and price effects on household non-work travel. Transportation Research Part A, 42(7), 1009-1031.
40. Chatman, D. G. (2009). Residential self-selection, the built environment, and nonwork travel: Evidence using new data and methods. Environment and Planning A, 41(5), 1072-1089.
41. Chen, C., & McKnight, C. E. (2007). Does the built environment make a difference? Additional evidence for the daily activity and travel behavior of homemakers living in New York City and suburb. Journal of Transport Geography, 15(5), 380-395. (Pubitemid 47209220)
42. Craig, C. L., Brownson, R C., Cragg, S. E., & Dunn, A. L. (2002). Exploring the effect of the environment on physical activity: A study examining walking to work. American Journal of Preventive Medicine, 23(2), 36-43.
43. Crane, R. (1996). On form versus function: Will the new urbanism reduce traffic, or increase it? Journal of Planning Education and Research, 15(2), 117-126. (Pubitemid 27071386)
44. Crane, R. (2000). The influence of urban form on travel: An interpretive review. Journal of Planning Literature, 15(1), 3-23.
45. Cunningham, G. O., & Michael, Y L. (2004). Concepts guiding the study of the impact of the built environment on physical activity for older adults: A review of the literature. American Journal of Health Promotion, 18(6), 435-443.
46. Debrezion, G., Pels, E., & Rietveld, P. (2003). The impact of railway stations on residential and commercial property value: A meta analysis (Tinbergen Institute Discussion Paper No. TI-2004-023/3). Amsterdam, The Netherlands: Tinbergen Institute.
47. DKS Associates. (2007). Assessment of local models and tools for analyzing smart-growth strategies: Final report. Sacramento, CA: California Department of Transportation.
48. Duncan, M. J., Spence, J. C., & Mummery, W. K. (2005). Perceived environment and physical activity: A meta-analysis of selected environmental characteristics. International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity, 2(11). doi:10.1186/1479-5868-2-11. (Pubitemid 41522360)
49. Edwards, R. D. (2008). Public transit, obesity, and medical costs: Assessing the magnitudes. Preventive Medicine, 46(1), 14-21.
50. Estupinan, N., & Rodriguez, D. A. (2008). The relationship between urban form and station boardings for Bogota's BRT. Transportation Research A, 42(2), 296-306. (Pubitemid 351180979)
51. Ewing, R., & Cervero, R. (2001). Travel and the built environment. Transportation Research Record, 1780, 87-114.
52. Ewing, R., DeAnna, M. & Li, S. (1996). Land use impacts on trip generation rates. Transportation Research Record, 1518, 1-7. (Pubitemid 126520693)
53. Ewing, R., Greenwald, M. J., Zhang, M., Walters, J., Feldman, M., Cervero, R., ... Thomas, J. (2009). Measuring the impact of urban form and transit access on mixed use site trip generation rates - Portland pilot study. Washington, DC: U.S. Environmental Protection Agency.
54. Ewing, R., Schroeer, W., Greene, W. (2004). School location and student travel: Analysis of factors affecting mode choice. Transportation Research Record, 1895, 55-63. (Pubitemid 40536446)
55. Fan, Y. (2007). The built environment, activity space, and time allocation: An activity-based framework for modeling the land use and travel connection. (Unpublished doctoral dissertation.) University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC.
56. Frank, L. D. (2000). Land use and transportation interaction: Implications on public health and quality of life. Journal of Planning Education and Research, 20(1), 6-22.
57. Frank, L. D., Bradley, M., Kavage, S., Chapman, J., & Lawton, K. (2008). Urban form, travel time, and cost relationships with tour complexity and mode choice. Transportation, 35(1), 37-54. (Pubitemid 350162628)
58. Frank, L. D., & Engelke, P. (2001). The built environment and human activity patterns: Exploring the impacts of urban form on public health. Journal of Planning Literature, 16(2), 202-218. (Pubitemid 33102274)
59. Frank, L. D., & Engelke, P. (2005). Multiple impacts of the built environment on public health: Walkable places and the exposure to air pollution. International Regional Science Review, 28(2), 193-216. (Pubitemid 40505397)
60. Frank, L. D., Kavage, S., Greenwald, M., Chapman, J., & Bradley, M. (2009). I-PLACE3S health & climate enhancements and their application in King County. Seattle, WA: King County HealthScape.
61. Frank, L. D., Kerr, J., Chapman, J., & Sallis, J. (2007). Urban form relationships with walk trip frequency and distance among youth. American Journal of Health Promotion, 21(4), 305-311. (Pubitemid 46411267)
62. Frank, L. D., Saelens, B. E., Powell, K. E., & Chapman, J. E. (2007). Stepping towards causation: Do built environments or neighborhood and travel preferences explain physical activity, driving, and obesity? Social Science & Medicine, 65(9), 1898-1914.
63. Gebel, K., Bauman, A. E., & Petticrew, M. (2007). The physical environment and physical activity. A critical appraisal of review articles. American Journal of Preventive Medicine, 32(5), 361-369. (Pubitemid 46660450)
64. Graham, D., & Glaister, S. (2002). Review of income and price elasticities of demand for road traffic. London, UK: Centre for Transport Studies Imperial College of Science, Technology and Medicine.
65. Greenwald, M. J. (2009). SACSIM modeling-elasticity results: Draft. Unpublished manuscript, Fehr & Peers Associates, Walnut Creek, CA.
66. Greenwald, M. J., & Boarnet, M. G. (2001). The built environment as a determinant of walking behavior: Analyzing non-work pedestrian travel in Portland, Oregon. Transportation Research Record, 1780, 33-43.
67. Hamer, M., & Chida, Y. (2008). Active commuting and cardiovascular risk: A meta-analytic review. Preventive Medicine, 46(1), 9-13.
68. Handy, S. L. (1993). Regional versus local accessibility: Implications for non-work travel. Transportation Research Record, 1400, 58-66.
69. Handy, S. L. (2004). Critical assessment of the literature on the relationships among transportation, land use, and physical activity. Davis, CA: Department of Environmental Science and Policy, University of California, Davis. Prepared for the Transportation Research Board and Institute of Medicine Committee on Physical Activity, Health, Transportation, and Land Use.
70. Handy, S. L., Cao, X., & Mokhtarian, P. L. (2005). Correlation or causality between the built environment and travel behavior? Evidence from Northern California. Transportation Research D, 10(6), 427-444. (Pubitemid 41283320)
71. Handy, S. L., Cao, X., & Mokhtarian, P. L. (2006). Self-selection in the relationship between the built environment and walking - Empirical evidence from Northern California. Journal of the American Planning Association, 72(1), 55-74.
72. Handy, S. L., & Clifton, K. J. (2001). Local shopping as a strategy for reducing automobile travel. Transportation, 28(4), 317-346.
73. Heath, G. W., Brownson, R. C., Kruger, J., Miles, R, Powell, K. E., Ramsey, L. T., & the Task Force on Community Preventive Services. (2006). The effectiveness of urban design and land use and transport policies and practices to increase physical activity: A systematic review. Journal of Physical Activity and Health, 3(1), 55-76.
74. Hedel, R., & Vance, C. (2007, January). Impact of urban form on automobile travel: Disentangling causation from correlation. Paper presented at the 86th annual meeting of the Transportation Research Board, Washington, DC. (Pubitemid 47288742)
75. Hedges, L. V., & Olkin, I. (1985). Statistical methods for meta-analysis. Orlando, FL: Academic Press.
76. Hess, P. M., Moudon, A. V., Snyder, M. C., & Stanilov, K. (1999). Site design and pedestrian travel. Transportation Research Record, 1674, 9-19. (Pubitemid 30552681)
77. Holtzclaw, J., Clear, R., Dittmar, H., Goldstein, D., & Haas, P. (2002). Location efficiency: Neighborhood and socioeconomic characteristics determine auto ownership and use-studies in Chicago, Los Angeles, and San Francisco. Transportation Planning and Technology, 25(1), 1-27. (Pubitemid 38225532)
78. Humpel, N., Owen, N, & Leslie, E. (2002). Environmental factors associated with adults' participation in physical activity: A review. American Journal of Preventative Medicine, 22(3), 188-199. (Pubitemid 34207825)
79. Hunter, J. E., & Schmidt, F.L. (2004). Methods of meta-analysis: Correcting error and bias in research findings. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
80. Joh, K., Boarnet, M. G, & Nguyen, M. T. (2009, January). Interactions between race/ethnicity, attitude, and crime: Analyzing walking trips in the South Bay Area. Paper presented at the 88th annual meeting of the Transportation Research Board, Washington, DC.
81. Johnston, R. (2004). The urban transportation planning process. In S. Hanson and G. Guiliano (Eds.), The geography of urban transportation (pp. 115-140). New York, NY: Guilford.
82. Kahn, E. B., Ramsey, L. T., Brownson, R C., Heath, G. W., Howze, E. H., Powell, K., & Stone, E. (2002). The effectiveness of interventions to increase physical activity: A systematic review. American Journal of Preventive Medicine, 22(4), 73-107. (Pubitemid 34441035)
83. Khattak, A. J., & Rodriquez, D. (2005). Travel behavior in neotraditional neighborhood developments: A case study in USA. Transportation Research A, 39(6), 481-500.
84. Kitamura, R., Mokhtarian, P. L., & Laidet, L. (1997). A micro-analysis of land use and travel in five neighborhoods in San Francisco Bay Area. Transportation, 24(2), 125-158. (Pubitemid 27476844)
85. Kockelman, K. M. (1997). Travel behavior as a function of accessibility, land use mixing, and land use balance: Evidence from the San Francisco Bay Area. Transportation Research Record, 1607, 116-125.
86. Krahnstoever-Davison, K., & Lawson, C. T. (2006). Do attributes in the physical environment influence children's physical activity? A review of the literature. International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity, 3(19). doi: 10.1186/1479-5868-3-19. (Pubitemid 44322352)
87. Kuby, M., Barranda, A., & Upchurch, C. (2004). Factors influencing light-rail station boardings in the United States. Transportation Research A, 38(3), 223-258. (Pubitemid 38185068)
88. Kuzmyak, R. (2009a). Estimating the travel benefits of blueprint land use concepts. Unpublished manuscript, Southern California Association of Governments, Los Angeles, CA.
89. Kuzmyak, R. (2009b). Estimates of point elasticities. Phoenix, AZ: Maricopa Association of Governments.
90. Kuzmyak, R., Baber, C., & Savory, D. (2006). Use of a walk opportunities index to quantify local accessibility. Transportation Research Record, 1977, 145-153. (Pubitemid 46479327)
91. Lau, J., Ioannidis, J. P. A., Terrin, N., Schmid, C. H., & Olkin, I. (2006). The case of the misleading funnel plot. British Medical Journal, 333(7568), 597-600. (Pubitemid 44433638)
92. Lauria, M., & Wagner, J. A. (2006). What can we learn from empirical studies of planning theory? A comparative case analysis of extant literature. Journal of Planning Education and Research, 25(4), 364-381.
93. Leck, E. (2006). The impact of urban form on travel behavior: A metaanalysis. Berkeley Planning Journal, 19, 37-58. (Pubitemid 46978465)
94. Lee, C., & Moudon, A. V. (2004). Physical activity and environment research in the health field: Implications for urban and transportation planning practice and research. Journal of Planning Literature, 19(2), 147-181. (Pubitemid 40106594)
95. Lee, C., & Moudon, A. V. (2006a). Correlates of walking for transportation or recreation purposes. Journal of Physical Activity and Health. 3(1), 77-98.
96. Lee, C., & Moudon, A. V. (2006b). The 3Ds + R: Quantifying land use and urban form correlates of walking. Transportation Research Part D, 11(3), 204-215.
97. Li, F., Fisher, K. J., Brownson, R C., & Bosworth, M. (2005). Multilevel modelling of built environment characteristics related to neighbourhood walking activity in older adults. Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health, 59(7), 558-564. (Pubitemid 40904781)
98. Lipsey, M. W., & Wilson, D. B. (2001). Practical meta-analysis. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
99. Littell, J. H., Corcoran, J., & Pillai, V. (2008). Systematic reviews and meta-analysis. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
100. Livi Smith, A. D. (2009, January) Contribution of perception in analysis of walking behavior. Paper presented at the 88th annual meeting of the Transportation Research Board, Washington, DC.
101. Lund, H. M. (2003). Testing the claims of new urbanism: Local access, pedestrian travel, and neighboring behaviors. Journal of the American Planning Association, 69(4), 414-429.
102. Lund, H. M., Cervero, R., & Wilson, R. W. (2004). Travel characteristics of transit-oriented development in California. Sacramento, CA: California Department of Transportation.
103. Lund, H. M., Willson, R., & Cervero, R (2006). A re-evaluation of travel behavior in California TODs. Journal of Architectural and Planning Research, 23(3), 247-263. (Pubitemid 44445619)
104. Lyons, L. (2003). Meta-analysis: Methods of accumulating results across research domains. Retrieved June 26, 2009, from http://www.lyonsmorris.com/MetaA
105. Macaskill, P., Walter, S. D., & Irwig, L. (2001). A comparison of methods to detect publication bias in meta-analysis. Statistics in Medicine, 20(4), 641-654. (Pubitemid 32166424)
106. McCormack, G., Giles-Corti, B., Lange, A., Smith, T., Martin, K., & Pikora, T. J. (2004). An update of recent evidence of the relationship between objective and self-report measures of the physical environment and physical activity behaviours. Journal of Science and Medicine in Sport, 7(1), 81-92.
107. McGinn, A. P., Evenson, K. E., Herring, A. H., Huston, S. L., & Rodriguez, D. A. (2007). Exploring associations between physical activity and perceived and objective measures of the built environment. Journal of Urban Health, 84(2), 162-184.
108. McMillan, T. E. (2005). Urban form and a child's trip to school: The current literature and a framework for future research. Journal of Planning Literature, 19(4), 440-456.
109. McMillan T. E. (2007). The relative influence of urban form on a child's travel mode to school. Transportation Research A, 41(1), 69-79.
110. Melo, P. C., Graham, D. J., & Noland, R B. (2009). A meta-analysis of estimates of urban agglomeration economies. Regional Science and Urban Economics, 39(3), 332-342.
111. Mokhtarian, P. L., & Cao, X. (2008). Examining the impacts of residential self-selection on travel behavior: A focus on methodologies. Transportation Research B, 43(3), 204-228. (Pubitemid 351309074)
112. Naess, P. (2005). Residential location affects travel behavior - But how and why? The case of Copenhagen metropolitan area. Progress in Planning, 63(1), 167-257. (Pubitemid 40350725)
113. Newman, P. W. G., & Kenworthy, J. R. (2006). Urban design to reduce automobile dependence. Opolis: An International Journal of Suburban and Metropolitan Studies, 2(1), 35-52.
114. Nijkamp, P., & Pepping, G. (1998). A meta-analytical evaluation of sustainable city initiatives. Urban Studies, 35(9), 1481-1500. (Pubitemid 28441450)
115. Oakes, J. M., Forsyth, A., & Schmitz, K. H. (2007). The effects of neighborhood density and street connectivity on walking behavior: The Twin Cities walking study. Epidemiologic Perspectives & Innovations, 4(16). doi:10.1186/1742-5573-4-16. (Pubitemid 351207878)
116. Owen, N., Humpel, N., Leslie, E., Bauman, A., & Sallis, J. F. (2004). Understanding environmental influences on walking: Review and research agenda. American Journal of Preventive Medicine, 27(1), 67-76. (Pubitemid 38813187)
117. Pickrell, D., & Schimek, P. (1999). Growth in motor vehicle ownership and use: Evidence from the Nationwide Personal Transportation Survey. Journal of Transportation and Statistics, 2(1), 1-17.
118. Plaut, P. O. (2005). Non-motorized commuting in the U.S. Transportation Research D, 10(5), 347-356.
119. Pont, K., Ziviani, J., Wadley, D., Bennett, S., & Abbott, R (2009). Environmental correlates of children's active transportation: A systematic literature review. Health & Place, 15(3), 827-840.
120. Pushkar, A. O., Hollingworth, B. J., & Miller, E. J. (2000, January). A multivariate regression model for estimating greenhouse gas emissions from alternative neighborhood designs. Paper presented at the 79th annual meeting of the Transportation Research Board, Washington, DC.
121. Rajamani, J., Bhat, C. R., Handy, S., Knaap, G., & Song, Y. (2003). Assessing the impact of urban form measures in nonwork trip mode choice after controlling for demographic and level-of-service effects. Transportation Research Record, 1831, 158-165.
122. Reilly, M. K. (2002, January). Influence of urban form and land use on mode choice: Evidence from the 1996 bay area travel survey. Paper presented at the 81st annual meeting of the Transportation Research Board, Washington, DC.
123. Rodenburg, R., Benjamin, A., de Roos, C., Meijer, A. M. & Stams, G. J. (2009). Efficacy of EMDR in children: A meta-analysis. Clinical Psychology Review, 29(7), 599-606.
124. Rodriguez, D. A., & Joo, J. (2004). The relationship between non-motorized mode choice and the local physical environment. Transportation Research D, 9(2), 151-173. (Pubitemid 38013280)
125. Rose, M. (2004). Neighborhood design and mode choice. (Unpublished doctoral dissertation.) Portland State University, Portland, OR.
126. Rothstein, H. R., Sutton, A. J., & Borenstein, M. (2005). Publication bias in meta-analysis. In Rothstein, H. R., Sutton, A. J. & Borenstein, M. (Eds.). Publication bias in meta-analysis: Prevention, assessment and adjustment (pp. 1-7). Chichester, UK: Wiley.
127. Ryan, S., & Frank, L. D. (2009). Pedestrian environments and transit ridership. Journal of Public Transportation, 12(1), 39-57.
128. Saelens, B. E., & Handy, S. (2008). Built environment correlates of walking: A review. Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise, 40(S), S550-S567.
129. Saelens, B. E., Sallis, J. F., & Frank, L. D. (2003). Environmental correlates of walking and cycling: Findings from the transportation, urban design, and planning literatures. Annals of Behavioral Medicine, 25(2), 80-91.
130. Salon, D. (2006). Cars and the city: An investigation of transportation and residential location choices in New York City. Davis, CA: Agricultural and Resource Economics, University of California, Davis.
131. Schimek, P. (1996). Household motor vehicle ownership and use: How much does residential density matter? Transportation Research Record, 1552, 120-125. (Pubitemid 127614650)
132. Schulze, R. (2004). Meta-analysis: A comparison of approaches. Cambridge, MA: Hogrefe & Huber.
133. Shadish, W. R., & Haddock, C. K. (1994). Combining estimates of effect size. In H. Cooper & L. V. Hedges (Eds.), The handbook of research synthesis (pp. 261-280). New York, NY: Russell Sage Foundation.
134. Shay, E., Fan, Y., Rodriguez, D. A., & Khattak, A. J. (2006). Drive or walk? Utilitarian trips within a neo-traditional neighborhood. Transportation Research Record, 1985, 154-161. (Pubitemid 46479418)
135. Shay, E., & Khattak, A. J. (2005). Auto ownership and use in neotraditional and conventional neighborhoods. Transportation Research Record, 1902, 18-25. (Pubitemid 41663951)
136. Shen, Q. (2000). Spatial and social dimensions of commuting. Journal of the American Planning Association, 66(1), 68-82. (Pubitemid 30178571)
137. Smith, V. K., & Huang, J. (1995). Can markets value air quality? A meta-analysis of hedonic property value models. Journal of Political Economy, 103(1), 209-227.
138. Soltani, A., & Alan, A. (2006). Analyzing the impacts of microscale urban attributes on travel: Evidence from suburban Adelaide, Australia. Journal of Urban Planning and Development, 132(3), 132-137. (Pubitemid 44227735)
139. Stamps, A. E. III. (1990). Use of photographs to simulate environments: A meta-analysis. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 71(3), 907-913.
140. Stamps, A. E. III. (1999). Demographic effects in environmental aesthetics: A meta-analysis. Journal of Planning Literature, 14(2), 155-175.
141. Stead, D., & Marshall, S. (2001). The relationships between urban form and travel patterns. An international review and evaluation. European Journal of Transport and Infrastructure Research, 1(2), 113-141.
142. Sun, X., Emany, M., Pendyala, R, & Wilmot, C. G. (1998). Household travel, household characteristics, and land-use: An empirical study from the 1994 Portland travel survey. Transportation Research Record, 1617, 10-17. (Pubitemid 128553689)
143. Talvitie, A. (1976). Disaggregate travel demand models with disaggregate data, not with aggregate data, and for what (Working Paper 7615). Berkeley, CA: Institute of Transportation Studies.
144. Targa, F., & Clifton, K. (2005). The built environment and trip generation for non-motorized travel. Journal of Transportation and Statistics, 8(3), 55-70.
145. Tompa, E., de Oliveira, C., Dolinschi, R & Irvin, E. (2008). A systematic review of disability management interventions with economic evaluations. Journal of Occupational Rehabilitation, 18(1), 16-26.
146. Train, K. (1986). Qualitative choice analysis: Theory, econometrics, and an application to automobile demand. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
147. Transportation Research Board & Institute of Medicine Committee on Physical Activity, Health, Transportation, and Land Use. (2005). Does the built environment influence physical activity? Examining the evidence (Special Report 282). Washington, DC: National Academy of Sciences.
148. Treadwell, J. R., Tregear, S. J., Reston, J. T., & Turkelson, C. H. (2006). A system for rating the stability and strength of medical evidence. Medical Research Technology, 6(52). doi:10.1186/1471-2288-6-52. (Pubitemid 44656358)
149. Trost, S. G., Owen, N, Bauman, A. E., Sallis, J. F., & Brown, W. (2002). Correlates of adults' participation in physical activity: Review and update. Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise, 34(12), 1996-2001. (Pubitemid 35440421)
150. van de Coevering, P., & Schwanen, T. (2006). Re-evaluating the impact of urban form on travel patterns in Europe and North-America. Transport Policy, 13(3), 229-239.
151. Walters, J., Ewing, R, & Allen, E. (2000). Adjusting computer modeling tools to capture effects of smart growth. Transportation Research Record, 1722, 17-26.
152. Waygood, E. O. D., Sun, Y., Kitamura, R. (2009, January). Children in transit oriented development: Travel patterns, independence, and exercise. Paper presented at the 88th annual meeting of the Transportation Research Board, Washington, DC.
153. Yarlagadda, A. K., & Srinivasan, S. (2008). Modeling children's school travel mode and parental escort decisions. Transportation, 35(2), 201-218.
154. Zegras, P. C. (2007, January). The built environment and motor vehicle ownership and use: Evidence from Santiago de Chile. Paper presented at the 86th annual meeting of the Transportation Research Board, Washington, DC.
155. Zhang, M. (2004). The role of land use in travel mode choice: Evidence from Boston and Hong Kong. Journal of the American Planning Association, 70(3), 344-361. (Pubitemid 39147016)
156. Zhang, M. (2009, January). Bus vs. rail: A meta-analysis of cost characteristics, carrying capacities, and land use impacts. Paper presented at the 88th annual meeting of the Transportation Research Board, Washington, DC.
157. Zheng, Y. (2008). The benefit of public transportation: Physical activity to reduce obesity and ecological footprint. Preventive Medicine, 46(1), 4-5.
158. Zhou, B., & Kockelman, K. (2008). Self-selection in home choice: Use of treatment effects in evaluating relationship between built environment and travel behavior. Transportation Research Record, 2077, 54-61.