Author Correction: Revealing hidden complexities of genomic rearrangements generated with Cas9 (Scientific Reports DOI: 10.1038/s41598-017-12740-6);Revealing hidden complexities of genomic rearrangements generated with Cas9

Scientific Reports

Volumn 7, Issue 1, 2017, Pages

  Boroviak, Katharina ^a   Fu, Beiyuan ^a   Yang, Fengtang ^a   Doe, Brendan ^a   Bradley, Allan ^a  

^a WELLCOME TRUST SANGER INSTITUTE   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

REDUCED NICOTINAMIDE ADENINE DINUCLEOTIDE PHOSPHATE OXIDASE 4;

ANIMAL; C57BL MOUSE; CHROMOSOME INVERSION; FEMALE; FLUORESCENCE IN SITU HYBRIDIZATION; GENE DELETION; GENE DUPLICATION; GENE REARRANGEMENT; GENETICS; GENOME; METABOLISM;

ANIMALS; CRISPR-ASSOCIATED PROTEIN 9; FEMALE; GENE DUPLICATION; GENE REARRANGEMENT; GENOME; IN SITU HYBRIDIZATION, FLUORESCENCE; MICE, INBRED C57BL; NADPH OXIDASE 4; SEQUENCE DELETION; SEQUENCE INVERSION;

EID: 85031013206     PISSN: None     EISSN: 20452322     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1038/s41598-018-23232-6     Document Type: Erratum

References (30)

1. Ji, Y., Eichler, E. E., Schwartz, S. & Nicholls, R. D. Structure of chromosomal duplicons and their role in mediating human genomic disorders. Genome Research 10, 597-610 (2000).
2. Stankiewicz, P. & Lupski, J. R. Genome architecture, rearrangements and genomic disorders. Trends in Genetics 18, 74-82 (2002).
3. Szatmari, P. et al. Mapping autism risk loci using genetic linkage and chromosomal rearrangements. Nat. Genet. 39, 319-28 (2007).
4. Ramírez-Solis, R., Liu, P. & Bradley, A. Chromosome engineering in mice. Nature 378, 720-4 (1995).
5. Smith, A. J. et al. A site-directed chromosomal translocation induced in embryonic stem cells by Cre-loxP recombination. Nat. Genet. 9, 376-385 (1995).
6. Hérault, Y., Rassoulzadegan, M., Cuzin, F. & Duboule, D. Engineering chromosomes in mice through targeted meiotic recombination (TAMERE). Nat. Genet. 20, 381-384 (1998).
7. Lindsay, E. A. et al. Congenital heart disease in mice deficient for the DiGeorge syndrome region. Nature 401, 379-383 (1999).
8. Walz, K. et al. Modeling del(17)(p11.2p11.2) and dup(17)(p11.2p11.2) contiguous gene syndromes by chromosome engineering in mice: phenotypic consequences of gene dosage imbalance. Mol. Cell. Biol. 23, 3646-3655 (2003).
9. Nakatani, J. et al. Abnormal Behavior in a Chromosome-Engineered Mouse Model for Human 15q11-13 Duplication Seen in Autism. Cell 137, 1235-1246 (2009).
10. Yu, T. et al. A mouse model of Down syndrome trisomic for all human chromosome 21 syntenic regions. Hum. Mol. Genet. 19, 2780-2791 (2010).
11. Mali, P. et al. RNA-guided human genome engineering via Cas9. Science (80-.) 339, 823-826 (2013).
12. Cong, L. et al. Multiplex Genome Engineering Using CRISPR/Cas System. Science (80-.). 339, 819-824 (2013).
13. Balmus, G. et al. Synthetic lethality between PAXX and XLF in mammalian development. Genes Dev. 30, 2152-2157 (2016).
14. Cader, M. Z. et al. C13orf31 (FAMIN) is a central regulator of immunometabolic function. Nat. Immunol. 31, 1-15 (2016).
15. Li, J. et al. Efficient inversions and duplications of mammalian regulatory DNA elements and gene clusters by CRISPR/Cas9. J. Mol. Cell Biol. 7, 284-298 (2015).
16. Wang, L. et al. Large genomic fragment deletion and functional gene cassette knock-in via Cas9 protein mediated genome editing in one-cell rodent embryos. Sci. Rep. 5, 17517 (2015).
17. Zhang, L. et al. Large genomic fragment deletions and insertions in mouse using CRISPR/Cas9. PLoS One 10 (2015).
18. Boroviak, K., Doe, B., Banerjee, R., Yang, F. & Bradley, A. Chromosome engineering in zygotes with CRISPR/Cas9. genesis n/a-n/a. https://doi.org/10.1002/dvg.22915 (2016).
19. Birling, M.-C. et al. Efficient and rapid generation of large genomic variants in rats and mice using CRISMERE. Sci. Rep. 7, 43331 (2017).
20. Yu, Y. & Bradley, A. Engineering chromosomal rearrangements in mice. Nat. Rev. Genet. 2, 780-90 (2001).
21. Jinek, M. et al. A programmable dual-RNA-guided DNA endonuclease in adaptive bacterial immunity. Science 337, 816-21 (2012).
22. Horvath, P. & Barrangou, R. CRISPR/Cas, the immune system of bacteria and archaea. Science 327, 167-170 (2010).
23. Garneau, J. E. et al. The CRISPR/Cas bacterial immune system cleaves bacteriophage and plasmid DNA. Nature 468, 67-71 (2010).
24. Yang, H. et al. One-step generation of mice carrying reporter and conditional alleles by CRISPR/cas-mediated genome engineering. Cell 154, (2013).
25. Wang, H. et al. One-step generation of mice carrying mutations in multiple genes by CRISPR/cas-mediated genome engineering. Cell 153, 910-918 (2013).
26. Doench, J. G. et al. Rational design of highly active sgRNAs for CRISPR-Cas9-mediated gene inactivation. Nat. Biotechnol. 32, 1262-7 (2014).
27. Behringer, R., Gertsenstein, M., Vintersten Nagy, K. & Nagy, A. Manipulating the Mouse Embryo: A Laboratory Manual, 4th ed. CSH Laboratory press (2014).
28. Gribble, S. M. et al. Massively Parallel Sequencing Reveals the Complex Structure of an Irradiated Human Chromosome on a Mouse Background in the Tc1 Model of Down Syndrome. PLoS One 8 (2013).
29. Perry, G. H. et al. Copy number variation and evolution in humans and chimpanzees. Genome Res 18, 1698-1710 (2008).
30. Sandra Louzada, Jun Komatsu, F. Y. Fluorescence In Situ Hybridisation (FISH). in Springer Protocols Handbooks 275-293 (2017).