Co-production in climate change research: reviewing different perspectives

Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Climate Change

Volumn 8, Issue 6, 2017, Pages

  Bremer, Scott ^a   Meisch, Simon ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF BERGEN   (Norway)

^b UNIVERSITY OF TÜBINGEN   (Germany)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

HUMANITIES COMPUTING;

CO-PRODUCTION; HUMANITIES RESEARCH; SCIENTIFIC PUBLICATIONS;

CLIMATE CHANGE;

EID: 85030974751     PISSN: 17577780     EISSN: 17577799     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/wcc.482     Document Type: Article

References (241)

1. Prokopy LS, Carlton JS, Haigh T, Lemos MC, Mase AS, Widhalm M. Useful to usable: developing usable climate science for agriculture. Clim Risk Manag 2016, 15:1–7.
2. Lövbrand E. Co-producing European climate science and policy: a cautionary note on the making of useful knowledge. Sci Public Policy 2011, 38:225–236.
3. Webb B. The use of urban climatology in local climate change strategies: a comparative perspective. Int Plan Stud 2016, 22:68–84.
4. Future Earth Blog. ‘To be inclusive, you need more voices’—Q&A with Sheila Jasanoff. March, 2014. Available at: http://www.futureearth.org/blog/2014-jul-23/be-inclusive-you-need-more-voices-qa-sheila-jasanoff. (Accessed May 30, 2017)
5. Ostrom E. Metropolitan reform: propositions derived from two traditions. Soc Sci Q 1972, 53:474–493.
6. Ostrom E. Crossing the great divide: co-production, synergy, and development. World Dev 1996, 24:1073–1087.
7. Lemos MC, Morehouse BJ. The co-production of science and policy in integrated climate assessments. Glob Environ Change 2005, 15:57–68.
8. Lemos MC, Kirchhoff CJ, Kalafatis SE, Scavia D, Rood RB. Moving climate information off the shelf: boundary chains and the role of RISAs as adaptive organizations. Weather Clim Soc 2014, 6:273–285.
9. Dilling L, Lemos MC. Creating usable science: opportunities and constraints for climate knowledge use and their implications for science policy. Glob Environ Change 2011, 21:680–689.
10. Lemos MC. Usable climate knowledge for adaptive and co-managed water governance. Curr Opin Environ Sustain 2015, 12:48–52.
11. Jasanoff S, ed. States of Knowledge: The Co-Production of Science and Social Order. London: Routledge; 2004.
12. Latour B. We Have Never Been Modern. Cambridge: Harvard University Press; 1993.
13. Jasanoff S, Wynne B. Science and decisionmaking. In: Rayner S, Malone EL, eds. Human Choice and Climate Change: The Societal Framework. Columbus, OH: Battelle Memorial Institute; 1998, 1–87.
14. Wynne B. SSK's identity parade: signing up, off-and-on. Soc Stud Sci 1996, 26:357–391.
15. Jasanoff S. Ordering knowledge, ordering society. In: Jasanoff S, ed. States of Knowledge: The Co-Production of Science and Social Order. London: Routledge; 2004b, 13–45.
16. Lane S, Odoni N, Landström C, Whatmore S. Doing flood risk science differently: an experiment in radical scientific method. Trans Inst Br Geogr 2011, 36:15–36.
17. van der Hel S. New science for global sustainability? The institutionalisation of knowledge co-production in future Earth. Environ Sci Policy 2016, 61:165–175.
18. Rudiak-Gould P. “We have seen it with our own eyes”: why we disagree about climate change visibility. Weather Clim Soc 2013, 5:120–132.
19. Hulme M. Climate and its changes: a cultural appraisal. Geo 2015, 2:1–11.
20. Hetland J, Anantharaman R. Carbon capture and storage (CCS) options for co-production of electricity and synthetic fuels from indigenous coal in an Indian context. Energy Sustain Dev 2009, 13:56–63.
21. Vaughan C, Dessai S. Climate services for society: origins, institutional arrangements, and design elements for an evaluation framework. WIREs Clim Change 2014, 5:587–603.
22. Aykut SC. Taking a wider view on climate governance: moving beyond the ‘iceberg,’ the ‘elephant’ and the ‘forest’. WIREs Clim Change 2016, 7:318–328.
23. Hulme M, Mahony M. Climate change: what do we know about the IPCC? Prog Phys Geogr 2010, 34:705–718.
24. Mahony M. Boundary spaces: science, politics and the epistemic geographies of climate change in Copenhagen, 2009. Geoforum 2013, 49:29–39.
25. Carrozza C. Democratizing expertise and environmental governance: different approaches to the politics of science and their relevance for policy analysis. J Environ Policy Plan 2015, 17:108–126.
26. Jasanoff S. A new climate for society. Theory Cult Soc 2010, 27:233–253.
27. Smith J. Dangerous news: media decision making about climate change risk. Risk Anal 2005, 25:1471–1482.
28. Boykoff MT. From convergence to contention: United States mass media representations of anthropogenic climate change science. Trans Inst Br Geogr 2007, 32:477–489.
29. Zehr SC. Public representations of scientific uncertainty about global climate change. Public Underst Sci 2000, 9:85–103.
30. Coronel G, Pasten M, Baez J, Domecq RM, Bidegain M, Nagy GJ. Improving capacities and communication on climate threats for water resources adaptation in Paraguay. In: Leal Filho W, ed. Handbook of Climate Change Adaptation. Berlin: Springer; 2015, 1–16.
31. Kofinas G, McPherson F, with the communities of Aklavik, Arctic Village, Old Crow. Community contributions to ecological monitoring: knowledge co-production in the US-Canada Arctic borderlands. In: Krupnik I, Jolly D, eds. The Earth is Faster Now: Indigenous Observations of Arctic Environmental Change. Fairbanks: Arctic Research Consortium; 2002, 54–91.
32. Kirchhoff CJ, Lemos MC, Dessai S. Actionable knowledge for environmental decision making: broadening the usability of climate science. Annu Rev Environ Resour 2013, 38:393–414.
33. Lorenzoni I, Jones M, Turnpenny J. Climate change, human genetics, and post-normality in the UK. Futures 2007, 39:65–82.
34. Miller CA. Climate science and the making of a global political order. In: Jasanoff S, ed. States of Knowledge: The Co-Production of Science and Social Order. New York, NY: Routledge; 2004, 46–66.
35. Latour B. Reassembling the Social: An Introduction to Actor-Network-Theory. Oxford: Oxford university press; 2005.
36. Mayer M. Chaotic Climate Change and Security. Int Polit Soc 2012, 6:165–185.
37. Dahan A, Aykut SC. After Copenhagen, revisiting both the scientific and political framings of the climate change regime. In: Saulnier JB, Varella MD, eds. Global Change, Energy Issues and Regulation Policies. Dordrecht: Springer; 2013, 221–237.
38. Rayner S. Domesticating nature: commentary on the anthropological study of weather and climate discourse. In: Strauss S, Orlove B, eds. Weather, Climate Culture. Berg: Oxford; 2003, 277–290.
39. Buzinde CN, Manuel-Navarrete D, Kersetter D, Redclift M. Respresentations and adaptation to climate change. Ann Tour Res 2010, 37:581–603.
40. Ryghaug M. Obstacles to sustainable development: the destabilization of climate change knowledge. Sustain Dev 2011, 19:157–166.
41. Shapin S, Schaffer S. Leviathan and the Air-Pump: Hobbes, Boyle, and the Experimental Life. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press; 1985.
42. Funtowicz S, Ravetz J. Science for the post-normal age. Futures 1993, 31:735–755.
43. Bremer S. Have we given up too much? On yielding climate representation to experts. Futures 2007. In press. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.futures.2017.01.008.
44. Grundmann R. Climate change and knowledge politics. Env Polit 2007, 16:414–432.
45. Wynne B. Strange weather, again: climate science as political art. Theory Cult Soc 2010, 27:289–305.
46. Flanagan C. Is History Repeating Itself? A Critical Discourse Analysis of the Representation of Women in Climate Change Campaigns. London: London School of Economics and Political Science; 2013.
47. McNie E. Reconciling the supply of scientific information with user demands: an analysis of the problem and review of the literature. Environ Sci Policy 2007, 10:17–38.
48. Cash DW, Borck JC, Patt AG. Countering the Loading-dock approach to linking science and decision making: comparative analysis of El Niño/Southern Oscillation (ENSO) forecasting systems. Sci Technol Human Values 2006, 31:465–494.
49. National Research Council. Climate Change Science: An Analysis of Some Key Questions. Washington, DC: National Academy Press; 2001.
50. Cash DW, Adger WN, Berkes F, Garden P, Lebel L, Olsson P, Pritchard L, Young O. Scale and cross-scale dynamics: governance and information in a multilevel world. Ecol Soc 2006, 11:8–19.
51. Tribbia J, Moser SC. More than information: what coastal managers need to plan for climate change. Environ Sci Policy 2008, 11:312–328.
52. Sarewitz D, Pielke RA. The neglected heart of science policy: reconciling supply of and demand for science. Environ Sci Policy 2007, 10:5–16.
53. Scott A, Skea J, Robinson J, Shove E. Designing ‘interactive’ environmental research for wider social relevance. Special Briefing no. 4, Economic and Social Research Council/Global Environmental Change Programme, Brighton, UK, 1999.
54. Gibbons M, Limoges C, Nowotny H, Schwartzman S, Scott P, Trow M. The New Production of Knowledge: The Dynamics of Science and Research in Contemporary Societies. London: Sage; 1994.
55. Guston D. Stabilizing the boundary between US politics and science: the role of the office of technology transfer as a boundary organization. Soc Stud Sci 1999, 29:87–111.
56. Bartels WL, Furman CA, Diehl DC, Royce FS, Dourte DR, Ortiz BV, Zierden DF, Irani TA, Fraisse CW, Jones JW. Warming up to climate change: a participatory approach to engaging with agricultural stakeholders in the Southeast US. Reg Environ Change 2013, 13:S45–S55.
57. Briley L, Brown D, Kalafatis SE. Overcoming barriers during the co-production of climate information for decision-making. Clim Risk Manag 2015, 9:41–49.
58. McNie E. Delivering climate services: organizational strategies and approaches for producing useful climate-science information. Weather Clim Soc 2012, 5:14–26.
59. Meadow AM, Ferguson DB, Guido Z, Horangic A, Owen G. Moving toward the deliberate co-production of climate science knowledge. Weather Clim Soc 2015, 7:179–191.
60. Moss RH, Meehl GA, Lemos MC, Smith JB, Arnold JR, Arnott JC, Behar D, Brasseur GP, Broomell SB, Busalacchi AJ, et al. Hell and high water: practice-relevant adaptation science. Science 2013, 8:753.
61. Buizer J, Jacobs K, Cash DW. Making short-term climate forecasts useful: linking science and action. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2016, 113:4597–4602.
62. Buontempo C, Hewitt CD, Dolblas-Reyes FJ, Dessai S. Climate service development, delivery and use in Europe at monthly to inter-annual timescales. Clim Risk Manag 2014, 6:1–5.
63. Nowotny H, Scott P, Gibbons M. ‘Mode 2’ revisited: the new production of knowledge. Minerva 2003, 41:179–194.
64. Lubchenco J. Entering the century of the environment: a new social contract for science. Science 1998, 279:491–497.
65. Gibbons M. Science's new social contract with society. Nature 1999, 402(Supp):C81–C84.
66. Bäckstrand K. Civic science for sustainability: reframing the role of experts, policy-makers and citizens in environmental governance. Glob Environ Polit 2003, 3:24–41.
67. Bolson J, Broad K. Early adoption of climate information: lessons learned from South Florida water resource management. Weather Clim Soc 2013, 5:266–281.
68. Hegger D, Dieperrink C. Toward successful joint knowledge production for climate change adaptation: lessons from six regional projects in the Netherlands. Ecol Soc 2014, 18:34.
69. Kettle NP, Dow K, Tuler S, Webler T, Whitehead J, Miller KM. Integrating scientific and local knowledge to inform risk-based management approaches for climate adaptation. Clim Risk Manag 2014, 4–5:17–31.
70. Swart R, Biesbroek R, Capela Lourenco T. Science of adaptation to climate change and science for adaptation. Front Environ Sci 2014, 2:1–8.
71. Ison R, Collins K, Colvin J, Jiggins J, Roggero PP, Seddaiu G, Steyaert P, Toderi M, Zanolla C. Sustainable catchment managing in a climate changing world: new integrative modalities for connecting policy makers, scientists and other stakeholders. Water Resour Manag 2011, 25:3977–3992.
72. Enengel B, Muhar A, Penker M, Freyer B, Drlik S, Ritter F. Co-production of knowledge in transdisciplinary doctoral theses on landscape development—an analysis of actor roles and knowledge types in different research phases. Landsc Urban Plan 2012, 105:106–117.
73. Brace C, Geoghegan H. Human geographies of climate change: landscape, temporality, and lay knowledges. Prog Hum Geogr 2010, 35:284–302.
74. Lahsen M. The social status of climate change knowledge: an editorial essay. WIREs Clim Change 2010, 1:162–171.
75. Vedeld T, Coly A, Ndour NM, Hellevik S. Climate adaptation at what scale? Multi-level governance, resilience, and co-production in Saint Louis, Senegal. Nat Hazards 2016, 82:S173–S199.
76. Vedeld T, Kombe WJ, Msale CK, Hellevik SB. Multilevel governance and co-production in urban flood-risk management. In: Inderberg TH, Eriksen S, O'Brien K, Sygna L, eds. Climate Change Adaptation and Development: Transforming Paradigms and Practices. New York, NY: Routledge; 2015, 117–138.
77. Tompkins EL, Eakin H. Managing private and public adaptation to climate change. Glob Environ Change 2012, 22:3–11.
78. Lowrey JL, Ray AJ, Webb RS. Factors influencing the use of climate information by Colorado municipal water managers. Climate Res 2009, 40:103–119.
79. Armitage D, Berkes F, Dale A, Kocho-Schellenberg E, Patton E. Co-management and the co-production of knowledge: learning to adapt in Canada's Arctic. Glob Environ Change 2011, 21:995–1004.
80. Smit B, Wandel J. Adaptation, adaptive capacity and vulnerability. Glob Environ Change 2006, 16:282–292.
81. Wilder M, Scott CA, Pablos NP, Varady RG, Garfin GM, McEvoy J. Adapting across boundaries: climate change, social learning, and resilience in the U.S.–Mexico border region. Ann Am Assoc Geogr 2010, 100:917–928.
82. Rodima-Taylor D, Olwig MF, Chhetri N. Adaptation as innovation, innovation as adaptation: an institutional approach to climate change. Appl Geogr 2012, 33:107–111.
83. Tschakert P, Dietrich KA, Tamminga K, Prins E, Shaffer J, Liwenga E, Asiedu A. Learning and envisioning under climatic uncertainty: an African experience. Environ Plan A 2014, 46:1049–1068.
84. Huntjens P, Pahl-Wostl C, Rihoux B, Schluter M, Flachner Z, Neto S, Koskova R, Dickens C, Kiti IN. Adaptive water management and policy learning in a changing climate: a formal comparative analysis of eight water management regimes in Europe, Africa and Asia. Environ Policy Gov 2011, 21:145–163.
85. Bowen KJ, Miller FP, Dany V, Graham S. The relevance of a coproductive capacity framework to climate change adaptation: investigating the health and water sectors in Cambodia. Ecol Soc 2015, 20:13–24.
86. Chhetri N, Chaudhary P, Tiwari PR, Yadaw RB. Institutional and technological innovation: understanding agricultural adaptation to climate change in Nepal. Appl Geogr 2012, 33:142–150.
87. Newsham AJ, Thomas DSG. Knowing, farming and climate change adaptation in North-Central Namibia. Glob Environ Change 2011, 21:761–770.
88. Argyris C, Schön D. Organizational Learning: A Theory of Action Perspective. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley; 1978.
89. Sabatier P. An advocacy coalition framework of policy change and the role of policy-oriented learning therein. Policy Sci 1988, 21:129–168.
90. Sabatier P, Jenkins-Smith H. Policy Change and Learning: An Advocacy Coalition Approach. Boulder, CO: Westview Press; 1993.
91. Pahl-Wostl C. A conceptual framework for analysing adaptive capacity and multi-level learning processes in resource governance regimes. Glob Environ Change 2009, 19:354–365.
92. Hargrove R. Masterful Coaching. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass; 2002.
93. Armitage D. Social-ecological change in Canada's Arctic: coping, adapting, and learning for an uncertain future. In: Glavovic BC, Kelly M, Kay R, Travers A, eds. Climate Change and the Coast: Building Resilient Communities. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press; 2015, 103–124.
94. Collins K, Ison R. Jumping off Arnstein's ladder: social learning as a new policy paradigm for climate change adaptation. Environ Policy Gov 2009, 19:358–373.
95. Colston NM, Vadjunec JM. A critical political ecology of consensus: on “Teaching Both Sides” of climate change controversies. Geoforum 2015, 65:255–265.
96. Levi-Strauss C. La Pensée sauvage. Paris: Librairie Plon; 1962.
97. Feyerabend P. Farewell to Reason. London: Verso; 1987.
98. Jasanoff S. Designs on Nature: Science and Democracy in Europe and the United States. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press; 2007.
99. Berkes F. Indigenous ways of knowing and the study of environmental change. J Royal Soc N Z 2009, 39:151–156.
100. Agrawal A. Dismantling the divide between indigenous and western knowledge. Dev Change 1995, 26:413–439.
101. Agrawal A. Indigenous and scientific knowledge: some critical comments. In: Dc N, ed. Re-discovering Rural Development: A Reflection on Potential and Prospects. New Delhi: Sarun & Sons; 2008, 402–411.
102. Xu J, Grumbine RE. Integrating local hybrid knowledge and state support for climate change adaptation in the Asian Highlands. Clim Change 2014, 124:93–104.
103. Tyler NJC, Turi JM, Sundset MA, Strøm Bull K, Sara MN, Reinert E, Oskal N, Nellemann C, McCarthy JJ, Mathiesen SD, et al. Saami reindeer pastoralism under climate change: applying a generalized framework for vulnerability studies to a sub-arctic social–ecological system. Glob Environ Change 2007, 17:191–206.
104. Ignatowski JA, Rosales J. Identifying the exposure of two subsistence villages in Alaska to climate change using traditional ecological knowledge. Clim Change 2013, 121:285–299.
105. Cochran P, Huntington OH, Pungowiyi C, Tom S, Chapin FS III, Huntington HP, Maynard NG, Trainor SF. Indigenous frameworks for observing and responding to climate change in Alaska. Clim Change 2013, 120:557–567.
106. Cvitanovic C, Crimp S, Fleming A, Bell J, Howden M, Hobday AJ, Taylor M, Cunningham R. Linking adaptation science to action to build food secure Pacific Island communities. Clim Risk Manag 2016, 11:53–62.
107. Gieryn T. Boundary-work and the demarcation of science from non-science: strains and interests in professional ideologies of scientists. Am Sociol Rev 1983, 48:781–795.
108. Hoppe R. Rethinking the science-policy nexus: from knowledge utilization and science technology studies to types of boundary arrangements. Poiesis Prax 2005, 3:199–215.
109. Kemp R, Rotmans J. Transitioning policy: co-production of a new strategic framework for energy innovation policy in the Netherlands. Policy Sci 2009, 42:303–322.
110. Feldman D, Ingram H. Making Science useful to decision makers: climate forecasts, water management, and knowledge networks. Weather Clim Soc 2009, 1:9–21.
111. Armitage D, Berkes F, Dale A, Kocho-Schellenberg E, Patton E. Co-management and the co-production of knowledge: learning to adapt in Canada's Arctic. Glob Environ Change 2011, 21:995–1004.
112. Armitage D. Social-ecological change in Canada's Arctic: coping, adapting, and learning for an uncertain future. In: Glavovic BC, Kelly M, Kay R, Travers A, eds. Climate Change and the Coast: Building Resilient Communities. CRC Press; 2015, 103–124.
113. Aykut SC. Taking a wider view on climate governance: moving beyond the ‘iceberg,’ the ‘elephant’ and the ‘forest. WIREs Clim Change 2016, 7:318–328.
114. Bartels WL, Furman CA, Diehl DC, Royce FS, Dourte DR, Ortiz BV, Zierden DF, Irani TA, Fraisse CW, Jones JW. Warming up to climate change: a participatory approach to engaging with agricultural stakeholders in the Southeast US. Reg Environ Change 2013, 13:S45–S55.
115. Bassett TJ, Fogelman C. Déjà vu or something new? The adaptation concept in the climate change literature. Geoforum 2013, 48:42–53.
116. Berkes F. Indigenous ways of knowing and the study of environmental change. J Royal Soc N Z 2009, 39:151–156.
117. Berman M, Kofinas G. Hunting for models: grounded and rational choice approaches to analyzing climate effects on subsistence hunting in an Arctic community. Ecol Econ 2004, 49:31–46.
118. Bolson J, Broad K. Early Adoption of climate information: lessons learned from South Florida water resource management. Weather Clim Soc 2013, 5:266–281.
119. Bowen KJ, Miller FP, Dany V, Graham S. The relevance of a coproductive capacity framework to climate change adaptation: investigating the health and water sectors in Cambodia. Ecol Soc 2015, 20:13–24.
120. Boykoff MT. From convergence to contention: United States mass media representations of anthropogenic climate change science. Trans Inst Br Geogr 2007, 32:477–489.
121. Brace C, Geoghegan H. Human geographies of climate change: landscape, temporality, and lay knowledges. Prog Hum Geogr 2010, 35:284–302.
122. Briley L, Brown D, Kalafatis SE. Overcoming barriers during the co-production of climate information for decision-making. Clim Risk Manag 2015, 9:41–49.
123. Brugger J, Crimmins M. Designing Institutions to support local-level climate change adaptation: insights from a case study of the U.S. Cooperative Extension System. Weather Clim Soc 2015, 7:18–38.
124. Brugnach M, Craps M, Dewulf A. Including indigenous peoples in climate change mitigation: addressing issues of scale, knowledge and power. Clim Change 2014, 140:19–32.
125. Buizer J, Jacobs K, Cash DW. Making short-term climate forecasts useful: linking science and action. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2016, 113:4597–4602.
126. Buontempo C, Hewitt CD, Dolblas-Reyes FJ, Dessai S. Climate service development, delivery and use in Europe at monthly to inter-annual timescales. Clim Risk Manag 2014, 6:1–5.
127. Buzinde CN, Manuel-Navarrete D, Kersetter D, Redclift M. Respresentations and adaptation to climate change. Ann Tour Res 2010, 37:581–603.
128. Carrozza C. Democratizing expertise and environmental governance: different approaches to the politics of science and their relevance for policy analysis. J Environ Policy Plan 2015, 17:108–126.
129. Cash DW, Borck JC, Patt AG. Countering the loading-dock approach to linking science and decision making: comparative analysis of El Niño/Southern Oscillation (ENSO) forecasting systems. Sci Technol Human Values 2006, 31:465–494.
130. Cash DW, Adger WN, Berkes F, Garden P, Lebel L, Olsson P, Pritchard L, Young O. Scale and cross-scale dynamics: governance and information in a multilevel world. Ecol Soc 2006, 11:8–19.
131. Chhetri N, Chaudhary P, Tiwari PR, Yadaw RB. Institutional and technological innovation: understanding agricultural adaptation to climate change in Nepal. Appl Geogr 2012, 33:142–150.
132. Cochran P, Huntington OH, Pungowiyi C, Tom S, Chapin FS III, Huntington HP, Maynard NG, Trainor SF. Indigenous frameworks for observing and responding to climate change in Alaska. Clim Change 2013, 120:557–567.
133. Collins K, Ison R. Jumping off Arnstein's ladder: social learning as a new policy paradigm for climate change adaptation. Environ Policy Gov 2009, 19:358–373.
134. Colston NM, Vadjunec JM. A critical political ecology of consensus: on “Teaching Both Sides” of climate change controversies. Geoforum 2015, 65:255–265.
135. Corburn J. Cities, climate change and urban heat island mitigation: localising global environmental science. Urban Stud 2009, 46:413–427.
136. Coronel G, Pasten M, Baez J, Domecq RM, Bidegain M, Nagy GJ. Improving capacities and communication on climate threats for water resources adaptation in Paraguay. In: Leal Filho W, ed. Handbook of Climate Change Adaptation. Berlin: Springer; 2015, 1–16.
137. Cutts BB, White DD, Kinzig AP. Participatory geographic information systems for the co-production of science and policy in an emerging boundary organization. Environ Sci Policy 2011, 14:977–985.
138. Cvitanovic C, Crimp S, Fleming A, Bell J, Howden M, Hobday AJ, Taylor M, Cunningham R. Linking adaptation science to action to build food secure Pacific Island communities. Clim Risk Manag 2016, 11:53–62.
139. Dahan A, Aykut SC. After Copenhagen, revisiting both the scientific and political framings of the climate change regime. In: Saulnier JB, Varella MD, eds. Global Change, Energy Issues and Regulation Policies. Dordrecht: Springer; 2013, 221–237.
140. Diehl DC, Sloan NL, Galindo-Gonzalez S, Bartels WL, Dourte DR, Furman CA, Fraisse CW. Toward engagement in climate training: findings from interviews with agriculture extension professionals. J Rural Soc Sci 2015, 30:25–50.
141. Dilling L, Lemos MC. Creating usable science: opportunities and constraints for climate knowledge use and their implications for science policy. Glob Environ Change 2011, 21:680–689.
142. Enengel B, Muhar A, Penker M, Freyer B, Drlik S, Ritter F. Co-production of knowledge in transdisciplinary doctoral theses on landscape development—an analysis of actor roles and knowledge types in different research phases. Landsc Urban Plan 2012, 105:106–117.
143. Evans S, Hills S, Orme J. Doing more for less? Developing sustainable systems of social care in the context of climate change and public spending cuts. Br J Soc Work 2012, 42:744–764.
144. Feldman DL, Ingram HM. Making science useful to decision makers: climate forecasts, water management, and knowledge networks. Weather Clim Soc 2009, 1:9–21.
145. Flanagan C. Is History Repeating Itself? A Critical Discourse Analysis of the Representation of Women in Climate Change Campaigns. London: London School of Economics and Political Science; 2013.
146. Forbes BC, Stammler F. Arctic climate change discourse: the contrasting politics of research agendas in the West and Russia. Polar Res 2009, 28:28–42.
147. Ford JD, Knight M, Pearce T. Assessing the ‘usability’ of climate change research for decision- making: a case study of the Canadian International Polar Year. Glob Environ Change 2013, 23:1317–1326.
148. Fresco N, Timm K. Fostering resilience in the face of an uncertain future: using scenario planning to communicate climate change risks and collaboratively develop adaptation strategies. In: Drake JL, Kontar YY, Eichelberger JC, Rupp S, Taylor KM, eds. Communicating Climate-Change and Natural Hazard Risk and Cultivating Resilience. New York: Springer; 2016.
149. Furman CA, Roncoli C, Bartels WL, Boudreau M, Crockett H, Gray H, Hoogenboom G. Social justice in climate services: engaging African American farmers in the American South. Clim Risk Manag 2014, 2:11–25.
150. Furman CA, Roncoli C, Crane T, Hoogenboom G. Beyond the “fit”: introducing climate forecasts among organic farmers in Georgia (United States). Clim Change 2011, 109:791–799.
151. Gramberger M, Zellmer K, Kok K, Metzger MJ. Stakeholder integrated research (STIR): a new approach tested in climate change adaptation research. Clim Change 2015, 128:201–214.
152. Grundmann R. Climate change and knowledge politics. Environ Polit 2007, 16:414–432.
153. Hegger D, Dieperrink C. Toward successful joint knowledge production for climate change adaptation: lessons from six regional projects in the Netherlands. Ecol Soc 2014, 18:34.
154. Hegger D, Lamers M, Van Zeijl-Rozema A, Dieperink C. Conceptualising joint knowledge production in regional climate change adaptation projects: success conditions and levers for action. Environ Sci Policy 2012, 18:52–65.
155. Hirsch E. “It won't be any good to have democracy if we don't have a country”: climate change and the politics of synecdoche in the Maldives. Glob Environ Change 2015, 35:190–198.
156. Homsy GC, Warner ME. Climate change and the co-production of knowledge and policy in rural USA communities. Sociol Ruralis 2013, 53:291–310.
157. Hoppe R. Lost in translation? A boundary work perspective on making climate change governable. In: Driessen P, Leroy S, van Vierssen W, eds. From Climate Change to Social Change: Perspective on Science-Policy Interactions. Utrecht: International Books; 2010, 107–130.
158. Hoppe R, Wesselink A, Cairns R. Lost in the problem: the role of boundary organisations in the governance of climate change. WIREs Clim Change 2013, 4:283–300.
159. Huggel C, Scheel M, Albrecht F, Andres N, Calanca P, Jurt C, Khabarov N, Mira-Salama D, Rohrer M, Salzmann N, et al. A framework for the science contribution in climate adaptation: experiences from science-policy processes in the Andes. Environ Sci Policy 2015, 47:80–94.
160. Hulme M, Mahony M. Climate change: what do we know about the IPCC? Prog Phys Geogr 2010, 34:705–718.
161. Huntjens P, Pahl-Wostl C, Rihoux B, Schluter M, Flachner Z, Neto S, Koskova R, Dickens C, Kiti IN. Adaptive water management and policy learning in a changing climate: a formal comparative analysis of eight water management regimes in Europe, Africa and Asia. Environ Policy Gov 2011, 21:145–163.
162. Ignatowski JA, Rosales J. Identifying the exposure of two subsistence villages in Alaska to climate change using traditional ecological knowledge. Clim Change 2013, 121:285–299.
163. Ison R, Collins K, Colvin J, Jiggins J, Roggero PP, Seddaiu G, Steyaert P, Toderi M, Zanolla C. Sustainable catchment managing in a climate changing world: new integrative modalities for connecting policy makers, scientists and other stakeholders. Water Resour Manag 2011, 25:3977–3992.
164. Jacobs K, Buizer J. Building community, credibility and knowledge: the third US National Climate Assessment. Clim Change 2016, 135:9–22.
165. Jasanoff S, Wynne B. Science and decisionmaking. In: Rayner S, Malone EL, eds. Human Choice and Climate Change: The Societal Framework. Columbus, OH: Battelle Memorial Institute; 1998, 1–87.
166. Jasanoff S. A new climate for society. Theory Cult Soc 2010, 27:233–253.
167. Jerneck A, Olsson L. A smoke-free kitchen: initiating community based co-production for cleaner cooking and cuts in carbon emissions. J Clean Prod 2013, 60:208–215.
168. Kemp R, Rotmans J. Transitioning policy: co-production of a new strategic framework for energy innovation policy in the Netherlands. Policy Sci 2009, 42:303–322.
169. Kettle NP, Trainor S. The role of remote engagement in supporting boundary chain networks across Alaska. Clim Risk Manag 2015, 9:6–19.
170. Kettle NP, Dow K, Tuler S, Webler T, Whitehead J, Miller KM. Integrating scientific and local knowledge to inform risk-based management approaches for climate adaptation. Clim Risk Manag 2014, 4–5:17–31.
171. Kirchhoff CJ. Understanding and enhancing climate information use in water management. Clim Change 2013, 119:495–509.
172. Kirchhoff CJ, Lemos MC, Dessai S. Actionable knowledge for environmental decision making: broadening the usability of climate science. Annu Rev Environ Resour 2013, 38:393–414.
173. Kirchhoff CJ, Lemos MC, Kalafatis SE. Narrowing the gap between climate science and adaptation action: the role of boundary chains. Clim Risk Manag 2015, 9:1–5.
174. Kirchhoff CJ, Lemos MC, Kalafatis SE. Creating synergy with boundary chains: can they improve usability of climate information? Clim Risk Manag 2015, 9:77–85.
175. Knapp CN, Trainor SF. Adapting science to a warming world. Glob Environ Change 2013, 23:1296–1306.
176. Kofinas G, with the communities of Aklavik, Arctic Village, Old Crow, McPherson F. Community contributions to ecological monitoring: knowledge co-production in the US-Canada Arctic borderlands. In: Krupnik I, Jolly D, eds. The Earth is Faster Now: Indigenous Observations of Arctic Environmental Change. Arctic Research Consortium: Fairbanks; 2002.
177. Kuklickea C, Demeritt D. Adaptive and risk-based approaches to climate change and the management of uncertainty and institutional risk: the case of future flooding in England. Glob Environ Change 2016, 37:56–68.
178. Lahsen M. The social status of climate change knowledge: an editorial essay. WIREs Clim Change 2010, 1:162–171.
179. Leith P, Vanclay F. Translating science to benefit diverse publics: engagement pathways for linking climate risk, uncertainty, and agricultural identities. Sci Technol Human Values 2015, 40:939–964.
180. Lemos MC. Usable climate knowledge for adaptive and co-managed water governance. Curr Opin Environ Sustain 2015, 12:48–52.
181. Lemos MC, Morehouse BJ. The co-production of science and policy in integrated climate assessments. Glob Environ Change 2005, 15:57–68.
182. Lemos MC, Kirchhoff CJ, Kalafatis SE, Scavia D, Rood RB. Moving climate information off the shelf: boundary chains and the role of RISAs as adaptive organizations. Weather Clim Soc 2014, 6:273–285.
183. Lemos MC, Kirchhoff CJ, Ramprasad V. Narrowing the climate information usability gap. Nat Clim Change 2012, 2:789–794.
184. Lemos MC, Rood RB. Climate projections and their impact on policy and practice. WIREs Clim Change 2010, 1:670–682.
185. Lopez-Hoffman L, Quijada-Mascarenas A. Madrean Sky Islands, North America. In: Hilty JA, Chester CC, Cross MS, eds. Climate and conservation: landscape and seascape science, planning, and action. Washington, DC: Island Press; 2012.
186. Lorenz S, Dessai S, Forster PM, Paavola J. Tailoring the visual communication of climate projections for local adaptation practitioners in Germany and the UK. Phil Trans R Soc Lond A 2015, 373:1–17.
187. Lorenzoni I, Jones M, Turnpenny J. Climate change, human genetics, and post-normality in the UK. Futures 2007, 39:65–82.
188. Lovbrand E. Pure science or policy involvement? Ambiguous boundary-work for Swedish carbon cycle science. Environ Sci Policy 2007, 10:39–47.
189. Lovbrand E. Co-producing European climate science and policy: a cautionary note on the making of useful knowledge. Sci Public Policy 2011, 38:225–236.
190. Lowrey JL, Ray AJ, Webb RS. Factors influencing the use of climate information by Colorado municipal water managers. Climate Research 2009, 40:103–119.
191. Luck J, Wozniak A, Wessler H. Networks of co-production: how journalists and environmental NGOs create common interpretations of the UN Climate Change Conferences. Int J Press Polit 2016, 21:25–47.
192. Mahony M. Boundary spaces: science, politics and the epistemic geographies of climate change in Copenhagen, 2009. Geoforum 2013, 49:29–39.
193. Maldonado J. Engagement with indigenous peoples and honoring traditional knowledge systems. Clim Change 2016, 135:111–126.
194. Mayer M. Chaotic climate change and security. Int Polit Soc 2012, 6:165–185.
195. McNie E. Reconciling the supply of scientific information with user demands: an analysis of the problem and review of the literature. Environ Sci Policy 2007, 10:17–38.
196. McNie E. Delivering climate services: organizational strategies and approaches for producing useful climate-science information. Weather Clim Soc 2012, 5:14–26.
197. Meadow AM, Ferguson DB, Guido Z, Horangic A, Owen G. Moving toward the deliberate co-production of climate science knowledge. Weather Clim Soc 2015, 7:179–191.
198. Miller CA. Climate science and the making of a global political order. In: Jasanoff S, ed. States of Knowledge: The Co-Production of Science and Social Order. New York, NY: Routledge; 2004, 46–66.
199. Miller FP, Osbahr H, Boyd E, Thomalla F, Bjharwani S, Ziervogel G, Walker B, Birkmann J, van der Leeuw S, Rockström A, et al. Resilience and vulnerability: complementary or conflicting concepts? Ecology and Society 2010, 15:11–35.
200. Mitchell CL, Burch SL, Driscoll PA. (Mis)communicating climate change? Why online adaptation databases may fail to catalyze adaptation action. WIREs Clim Change 2016, 7:600–613.
201. Moore F. Costing adaptation: revealing tensions in the normative basis of adaptation policy in adaptation cost estimates. Sci Technol Human Values 2012, 37:171–198.
202. Moss RH. Assessing decision support systems and levels of confidence to narrow the climate information “usability gap”. Clim Change 2016, 135:143–155.
203. Moss RH, Meehl GA, Lemos MC, Smith JB, Arnold JR, Arnott JC, Behar D, Brasseur GP, Broomell SB, Busalacchi AJ, et al. Hell and high water: practice-relevant adaptation science. Science 2013, 8:753.
204. Newsham AJ, Thomas DSG. Knowing, farming and climate change adaptation in North-Central Namibia. Glob Environ Change 2011, 21:761–770.
205. Nilsson AE. A changing arctic climate: science and policy in the arctic climate impact assessment. In: Koivurova T Keskitalo ECH, Bankes N. eds. Climate Governance in the Arctic. Cham: Springer; 2009, 77–95.
206. O'Brien K, Hayward B, Berkes F. Rethinking social contracts: building resilience in a changing climate. Ecol Soc 2009, 14:12–28.
207. Podesta GP, Natenzon CE, Hidalgo C, Toranzo FR. Interdisciplinary production of knowledge with participation of stakeholders: a case study of a collaborative project on climate variability, human decisions and agricultural ecosystems in the Argentine Pampas. Environ Sci Policy 2013, 26:40–48.
208. Porter JJ, Demeritt D, Dessai S. The right stuff? Informing adaptation to climate change in British Local Government. Glob Environ Change 2015, 35:411–422.
209. Prokopy, L. S., Carlton, J. S., Haigh, T., Lemos, M. C., Mase, A. S., & Widhalm, M. (2016). Useful to usable: developing usable climate science for agriculture. Clim Risk Manag 2016, 15:1–7.
210. Rayner S. Domesticating nature: commentary on the anthropological study of weather and climate discourse. In: Strauss S, Orlove B, eds. Weather, Climate Culture. Berg: Oxford; 2003, 277–290.
211. Rip A, Kemp R. Technological change. In: Rayner S, Malone EL, eds. Human Choice and Climate Change: Resources and Technology. Columbus, OH: Battelle Memorial Institute; 1998, 327–399.
212. Rodima-Taylor D, Olwig MF, Chhetri N. Adaptation as innovation, innovation as adaptation: an institutional approach to climate change. Appl Geogr 2012, 33:107–111.
213. Ryghaug M. Obstacles to sustainable development: the destabilization of climate change knowledge. Sustain Dev 2011, 19:157–166.
214. Sarewitz D, Pielke RA. The neglected heart of science policy: reconciling supply of and demand for science. Environ Sci Policy 2007, 10:5–16.
215. Schuttenberg HZ, Guth HK. Seeking our shared wisdom: a framework for understanding knowledge co-production and coproductive capacities. Ecol Soc 2015, 20:15–25.
216. Shackley S, Deanwood R. Stakeholder perceptions of climate change impacts at the regional scale: implications for the effectiveness of regional and local responses. J Environ Plan Manage 2002, 45:381–402.
217. Shaw A, Sheppard S, Burch S, Flanders D, Wiek A, Carmichael J, Robinson J, Cohen S. Making local futures tangible—synthesizing, downscaling, and visualizing climate change scenarios for participatory capacity building. Glob Environ Change 2009, 19:447–463.
218. Soares MB, Dessai S. Exploring the use of seasonal climate forecasts in Europe through expert elicitation. Clim Risk Manag 2015, 10:8–16.
219. Smith J. Dangerous news: media decision making about climate change risk. Risk Anal 2005, 25:1471–1482.
220. Sorlin S. The anxieties of a science diplomat: field co-production of climate knowledge and the rise and fall of Hans Ahlmann's “Polar Warming”. Hist Sci Soc 2011, 26:66–88.
221. Steynor A, Padgham J, Jack C, Hewitson B, Lennard C. Co-exploratory climate risk workshops: Experiences from urban Africa. Clim Risk Manag 2016, 13:95–102.
222. Swart R, Biesbroek R, Capela Lourenco T. Science of adaptation to climate change and science for adaptation. Front Environ Sci 2014, 2:1–8.
223. Tangney P, Howes M. The politics of evidence- based policy: a comparative analysis of climate adaptation in Australia and the UK. Environ Plann C Gov Policy 2015, 0:1–20.
224. Thompson-Hall M, Carr ER, Pascual U. Enhancing and expanding intersectional research for climate change adaptation in agrarian settings. Ambio 2016, 45(Suppl. 3):S373–S382.
225. Tompkins EL, Eakin H. Managing private and public adaptation to climate change. Glob Environ Change 2012, 22:3–11.
226. Tribbia J, Moser SC. More than information: what coastal managers need to plan for climate change. Environ Sci Policy 2008, 11:312–328.
227. Tschakert P, Dietrich KA. Anticipatory learning for climate change adaptation and resilience. Ecol Soc 2010, 15:11–33.
228. Tschakert P, Dietrich KA, Tamminga K, Prins E, Shaffer J, Liwenga E, Asiedu A. Learning and envisioning under climatic uncertainty: an African experience. Environ Plan A 2014, 46:1049–1068.
229. Turner II, B. L. (2010). Vulnerability and resilience: coalescing or paralleling approaches for sustainability science?. Glob Environ Change, 20, 570–576.
230. Tyler NJC, Turi JM, Sundset MA, Strøm Bull K, Sara MN, Reinert E, Oskal N, Nellemann C, McCarthy JJ, Mathiesen SD, et al. Saami reindeer pastoralism under climate change: applying a generalized framework for vulnerability studies to a sub-arctic social–ecological system. Glob Environ Change 2007, 17:191–206.
231. Vaughan C, Dessai S. Climate services for society: origins, institutional arrangements, and design elements for an evaluation framework. WIREs Clim Change 2014, 5:587–603.
232. Vedeld T, Coly A, Ndour NM, Hellevik S. Climate adaptation at what scale? Multi-level governance, resilience, and co-production in Saint Louis, Senegal. Nat Hazards 2016, 82:S173–S199.
233. Vedeld T, Kombe WJ, Kweka-Msale C, Ndour NM, Coly A, Hellevik S. Multi-level governance, resilience to flood risks and co-production in Urban Africa. In: Pauleit S, Coly A, Fohlmeister S, Gasparini P, Jøgensen G, Kabisch S, Kombe WJ, Lindley S, Simonis I, Yeshitela K. eds. Urban Vulnerability and Climate Change in Africa. Cham: Springer; 2015, 287–318.
234. Vedeld T, Kombe WJ, Msale CK, Hellevik SB. Multilevel governance and co-production in urban flood-risk management. In: Inderberg TH, Eriksen S, O'Brien K, Sygna L, eds. Climate Change Adaptation and Development: Transforming Paradigms and Practices. New York, NY: Routledge; 2015, 117–138.
235. Webb B. The use of urban climatology in local climate change strategies: a comparative perspective. Int Plan Stud 2016, 22:68–84.
236. Webb J. Climate change and society: the chimera of behaviour change technologies. Sociology 2012, 46:109–125.
237. Wilder M, Scott CA, Pablos NP, Varady RG, Garfin GM, McEvoy J. Adapting Across boundaries: climate change, social learning, and resilience in the U.S.–Mexico border region. Ann Am Assoc Geogr 2010, 100:917–928.
238. Wynne B. SSK's identity parade: signing up, off-and-on. Soc Stud Sci 1996, 26:357–391.
239. Wynne B. Strange weather, again: climate science as political art. Theory Cult Soc 2010, 27:289–305.
240. Xu J, Grumbine RE. Integrating local hybrid knowledge and state support for climate change adaptation in the Asian Highlands. Clim Change 2014, 124:93–104.
241. Zehr SC. Public representations of scientific uncertainty about global climate change. Public Underst Sci 2000, 9:85–103.