Erratum to: Lost in the problem: the role of boundary organisations in the governance of climate change (WIREs Clim Change, (2013), 4, (283-300), 10.1002/wcc.225);Lost in the problem: The role of boundary organisations in the governance of climate change

Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Climate Change

Volumn 4, Issue 4, 2013, Pages 283-300

  Hoppe, Rob ^a   Wesselink, Anna ^b   Cairns, Rose ^c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TWENTE   (Netherlands)

^b UNIVERSITY OF LEEDS   (United Kingdom)

^c UNIVERSITY OF SUSSEX   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

INTERNATIONAL LAW; PUBLIC POLICY; WIRE;

BOUNDARY ORGANIZATIONS; CONFLICT OF INTEREST; CONFLICTS OF INTEREST; EUROPEAN COMMISSION; INTERGOVERNMENTAL PANEL ON CLIMATE CHANGES; POLICY INSTRUMENTS; QUALITY ASSESSMENT; SCIENTIFIC RESEARCHES;

CLIMATE CHANGE;

CLIMATE CHANGE; ENVIRONMENTAL POLICY; GOVERNANCE APPROACH; INSTITUTIONAL FRAMEWORK; INTERGOVERNMENTAL PANEL ON CLIMATE CHANGE; UNITED NATIONS FRAMEWORK CONVENTION ON CLIMATE CHANGE;

ANNA;

EID: 84879230478     PISSN: 17577780     EISSN: 17577799     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/wcc.501     Document Type: Erratum

References (109)

1. Gupta J. A history of international climate change policy. WIREs: Clim Change 2010, 1:636-653.
2. Guston DH. Boundary organizations in environmental policy and science: an introduction. Sci Technol Hum Values 2001, 26:339-408.
3. Nerlich B. 'Climategate': Paradoxical Metaphors and Political Paralysis. Environ Values 2010, 19:419-442.
4. Schiermeier Q. IPCC flooded by criticism. Nature 2010, 463:596.
5. Gieryn TF. Boundary-work and the demarcation of science from non-science: strains and interests in professional ideologies of scientists. Am Sociol Rev 1983, 48:781-795.
6. Hoppe R. From 'knowledge use' towards 'boundary work'. Sketch of an emerging new agenda for inquiry into science-policy interaction. In: In 't Veld R, ed. Knowledge Democracy. Consequences for Science, Politics and Media. Heidelberg: Springer; 2010.
7. Hoppe R. Lost in translation? Boundary work in making climate change governable. In: Driessen PJ, Leroy P, Van Vierssen W, eds. From Climate Change to Social Change. Perspectives on Science-Policy Interactions. Utrecht: International Books; 2010.
8. Weiss CH. The many meanings of research utilization. Public Adm Rev 1979, 39:426-431.
9. Landry R, Amara N, Lamari M. Climbing the ladder of knowledge utilization. Sci Commun 2001, 22:396-422.
10. Nutley SM, Walter I, Davies HTO. Using Evidence. How Research Can Inform Public Services. Bristol: The Policy Press; 2007.
11. Jasanoff S, ed. States of Knowledge: The Co-Production of Science and Social Order. Abingdon: Routledge; 2004.
12. Weingart P. Scientific expertise and political accountability: paradoxes of science in politics. Sci Public Policy 1999, 26:151-161.
13. Halffman W. Boundaries of Regulatory Science: Eco/toxicology and Aquatic Hazards of Chemicals in the US, England and the Netherlands. Amsterdam: University of Amsterdam; 2003.
14. Jasanoff S. The Fifth Branch: Science Advisers as Policymakers. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press; 1990.
15. Miller CA. Hybrid management: boundary organizations, science policy, and environmental governance in the climate regime. Sci Technol Hum Values 2001, 26:478-500.
16. Hoppe R. Rethinking the science-policy nexus: from knowledge utilization and science technology studies to types of boundary arrangements. Poiesis Prax 2005, 3:199-215.
17. Cash D, Clark W, Alcock F, Dickson N, Eckley N, Jäger J. Salience, Credibility, Legitimacy and Boundaries: Linking Research, Assessment and Decision Making. Faculty Research Working Papers Series, John F. Kennedy School of Government, Harvard University, Cambridge MA; 2002.
18. Cash D, Clark W, Alcock F, Dickson N, Eckley N, Guston DH, Jäger J, Mitchell RB. Knowledge systems for sustainable development. Proc Natl Acad Sci 2003, 100:8086-8091.
19. Guston DH, Clark W, Keating T, Cash DW, Moser S, Miller C, Powers C. Report of the workshop on boundary organizations in environmental policy and science. Boustein School of Planning and Public Policy, Rutgers University; 2000.
20. Clark WC, Tomich TP, Van Noordwijk M, Guston D, Catacutan D, Dickson NM, McNie E. Boundary work for sustainable development: natural resource management at the Consultative Group on International Agricultural Research (CGIAR). Proc Natl Acad Sci 2011. doi: 10:1073/pnas.0900231108.
21. Petersen A. Simulating Nature: A Philosophical Study of Computer-Model Uncertainties and their Role in Climate Science and Policy Advice. 2nd ed. Abingdon, UK: CRC Press; 2012.
22. Shaw A. Imbued Meaning: Science-Policy Interactions in the IPCC. Vancouver: University of British Columbia; 2005.
23. Scott A. The Dissemination of the Results of Environmental Research: A Scoping Report for the European Environment Agency. Copenhagen: European Environment Agency; 2000.
24. De Vries A. Towards Do-Ability: Dealing with Uncertainty in the Science-Policy Interface. Enschede: Twente University; 2008.
25. Bijker WE, Bal R, Hendriks R. The Paradox of Scientific Authority: The Role of Scientific Advice in Democracies. Cambridge MA: MIT Press; 2009.
26. Hoppe R. Scientific advice and public policy: expert advisers' and policymakers' discourses on boundary work. Poiesis Prax 2008, 6:235-263.
27. Star SL, Griesemer JR. R Institutional ecology, 'translations' and boundary objects: amateurs and professionals in Berkeley's Museum of Vertebrate Zoology, 1907-39. Soc Stud Sci 1989, 19:387-420.
28. Fujimura JH. Crafting science: standardized packages, boundary objects, and 'translation'. In: Pickering A, ed. Science as Culture and Practice. Chicago: Chicago University Press; 1992.
29. Hoppe R. The Governance of Problems: Puzzling, Powering and Participation. Bristol: The Policy Press; 2010.
30. Haas PM. Introduction: epistemic communities and international policy coordination. Int Organ 1992, 46:1-35.
31. Keller AC. Science in Environmental Policy. The Politics of Objective Advice. Cambridge MA: MIT Press; 2009.
32. Renn O. The role of social science in environmental policy making: experiences and outlook. Sci Public Policy 1995, 28:427-437.
33. Halffman W. Science-policy boundaries: national styles? Sci Public Policy 2005, 32:457-467.
34. Jasanoff S. Designs on Nature: Science and Democracy in Europe and the United States. Princeton: Princeton University Press; 2005.
35. Jasanoff S. Cosmopolitan knowledge: climate science and global civic epistemology. In: Dryzek JS, Norgaard RB, Schlosberg D, eds. The Oxford Handbook of Climate Change and Society. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2011, 129-143.
36. Lentsch J, Weingart P, eds. Scientific Advice to Policy Making: International Comparison. Farmington Mills, ME: Barbara Budrich; 2009.
37. Miller CA. Democratization, international knowledge institutions, and global governance. Governance 2007, 20:325-357.
38. Costa O. Is climate change changing the EU? The second image reversed in climate politics. Camb Rev Int Aff 2008, 21:527-544.
39. Jasanoff S, Martello ML. Earthly Politics: Local and Global in Environmental Governance. Cambridge MA: The MIT Press; 2004.
40. Strassheim H. Kulturen der expertise und politischen Wissensproduktion im Wandel: vergleichende Beobachtungen. In: Gosewinkel D, Schuppert GF, eds. Politische Kultur im Wandel von Staatlichkeit. Berlin: Edition Sigma; 2007, 281-301.
41. Keohane RO, Victor DG. The Regime Complex for Climate Change. The Harvard Project on International Climate Agreements. Cambridge MA: Harvard University Press; 2010.
42. Hulme M, Mahony M. Climate change: What do we know about the IPCC? Prog Phys Geog 2010, 34:705-718.
43. Siebenhüner B. The changing role of nation states in international environmental assessments-the case of the IPCC. Glob Environ Change 2003, 13:113-123.
44. Beck S. Das Klimaexperiment und der IPCC. Schnittstellen Zwischen Wissenschaft und Politik in den Internationalen Beziehungen. Marburg: Metropolis Verlag; 2009.
45. Busch PO. The climate secretariat: making a living in a straitjacket. In: Biermann F, Siebenhuner B, eds. Managers of Global Change. The Influence of International Environmental Bureaucracies. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press; 2009.
46. Hulme M. Problems with making and governing global kinds of knowledge. Glob Environ Change 2010, 20:558-564.
47. Jungcurt S. Taking boundary work seriously: towards a systemic approach to the analysis of interactions between knowledge production and decision making on sustainable development. In: Meuleman L, ed. Transgovernance: Advancing Sustainability Governance. Heidelberg: Springer; 2012, 255-274.
48. Fogel C. Biotic carbon sequestration and the Kyoto Protocol: the construction of global knowledge by the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. International Environmental Agreements: Politics, Law and Economics 2005, 5:191-210.
49. Gusfield J. The Culture of Public Problems: Drinking-Driving and the Symbolic Order. Chicago: Chicago Univeristy Press; 1981.
50. Hoppe R. Cultures of problem definition. J Comp Policy Anal: Res Pract 2002, 4:305-326.
51. Miller CA. Climate science and the making of a global political order. In: Jasanoff S, ed. States of Knowledge: the Co-Production of Science and Social Order. Routledge: Abingdon; 2004, 46-66.
52. Hulme M. Why we disagree about climate change. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2009.
53. Demeritt D. The construction of global warming and the politics of science. Ann Assoc Am Geogr 2001, 91:307-337.
54. Pielke JR. The Climate Fix. What Scientists and Politicians Won't Tell You about Climate Change. New York: Basic Books; 2010.
55. Prins G, Rayner S. Time to ditch Kyoto. Nature 2007, 449:973-975.
56. Wilson JQ. Bureaucracy: What Government Agencies Do and Why They Do It. London: Basic Books; 1989.
57. Hayes MT. The Limits of Policy Change: Incrementalism, Worldview, and the Rule of Law. Washington DC: Georgetown University Press; 2001.
58. Oreskes N, Conway EM. Merchants of Doubt: How a Handful of Scientists Obscured the Truth on Issues from Tobacco Smoke to Global Warming. New York: Bloomsbury Press; 2010.
59. Friman M, Linnér B. Technology obscuring equity: historical responsibility in UNFCCC negotiations. Clim Policy 2008, 8:339-354.
60. Biermann F. Science as power in international environmental negotiations: global environmental assessments between North and South. Belfer Center for Science and International Affairs (BCSIA) Discussion Paper 2000-17, John F. Kennedy School of Government, Harvard University Press, Cambridge MA, 2000.
61. Hisschemöller M, Hoppe R. Coping with intractable controversies: the case for problem structuring in policy design and analysis. Knowl Policy: Int J Knowl. Transf Util 1996, 8:40-60.
62. Lahsen M, Nobre CA. Challenges of connecting international science and local level sustainability efforts: the case of the large-scale biosphere-atmosphere experiment in Amazonia. Environ Sci Policy 2007, 10:62-74.
63. Stirling A. "Opening up" and "closing down": Power, participation, and pluralism in the social appraisal of technology. Sci Technol Hum Values 2008, 33:262-294.
64. Ho-Lem C, Zerriffi H, Kandlikar M. Who participates in the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change and why: a quantitative assessment of the national representation of authors in the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Glob Environ Change 2011, 21:1308-1317.
65. Yearley S. Sociology and Climate Change after Kyoto. Curr Sociol 2009, 57:389-405.
66. O'Neill SJ, Hulme M, Turnpenny J, Screen JA. Disciplines, geography, and gender in the framing of climate change. Bull Amer Met Soc 2010, 91:997-1002.
67. Lynch AH, Tryhorn L, Abramson R. Working at the boundary: facilitating interdisciplinarity in climate change adaptation research. Bull Amer Met Soc 2008, 89:169-179.
68. Bjurström A, Polk M. Physical and economic bias in climate change research: a scientometric study of IPCC Third Assessment Report. Clim Change 2011, 108:1-22.
69. Roe E. Narrative Policy Analysis. Theory and Practice. Durham, NC: Duke University Press; 1994.
70. Selin H, Vandeveer SD. US climate change politics and policymaking. WIREs: Clim Change 2011, 2:121-127.
71. Grundmann R. Climate change and knowledge politics. Environ Polit 2007, 16:414-432.
72. Shackley S. Epistemic lifestyles in climate change modeling. In: Miller C, Edwards P, eds. Changing the Atmosphere: Expert Knowledge and Environmental Governance. MIT Press: Cambridge MA; 2001, 107-133.
73. Sarewitz D. Does climate change knowledge really matter? WIREs: Clim Change 2011, 2:475-481.
74. Oberthür S, Roche Kelly C. EU leadership in international climate policy: achievements and challenges. Int Spect 2008, 43:35-50.
75. Radaelli CM. The public policy of the European Union: whither politics of expertise? J Eur Public Policy 1999, 6:757-774.
76. Dammann S, Gee D. Science into policy: The European Environment Agency. In: Lentsch J, Weingart P, eds. The Politics of Scientific Advice Institutional Design for Quality Assurance. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2011, 238-258.
77. Lövbrand E. Co-producing European climate science and policy: a cautionary note on the making of useful knowledge. Sci Public Policy 2011, 38:225-236.
78. Swart R, Biesbroek R, Binnerup S, Carter TR, Cowan C, Henrichs T, Loquen S, Mela H, Morecroft M, Reese M, et al. Europe adapts to Climate change. Comparing National Adaptation Strategies. Helsinki: PEER; 2009.
79. Engels A, Hisschemöller M, Von Moltke K. When supply meets demand, yet no market emerges: the contribution of integrated environmental assessment to the rationalisation of EU environmental policy-making. Sci Public Policy 2006, 33:519-528.
80. Jordan AD, Benson D, Wurzel R, Zito A. Policy instruments in practice. In: Dryzek JS, Norgaard RB, Schlosberg D, eds. The Oxford Handbook of Climate Change and Society. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2011, 536-549.
81. Wynne B. Implementation of greenhouse gas reduction of the European Community: institutional and cultural factors. Glob Environ Change 1993, 3:101-128.
82. Waterton C, Wynne B. Knowledge and political order in the European Environment Agency. In: Jasanoff S, ed. States of Knowledge: the Co-Production of Science and Social Order. Abingdon: Routledge; 2004.
83. Kandlikar M, Sagar A. Climate change research and analysis in India: an integrated assessment of a South-North divide. Glob Environ Change 1999, 9:119-138.
84. Yu H. Global Warming and China's Environmental Diplomacy. New York: Nova Science Publishers; 2008.
85. Heggelund G. China's climate change policy: domestic and international developments. Asian Perspect 2007, 31:155-191.
86. Gupta J. India and climate change policy: between diplomatic defensiveness and industrial transformation. Energy Environ 2001, 12:217-236.
87. Fischer S. India and climate change: energy, equity and development. In: Bailey I, Compston H, eds. Feeling the Heat: the Politics of Climate Policy in Rapidly Industrializing Countries. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan; 2012.
88. Billett S. Dividing climate change: global warming in the Indian mass media. Clim Change 2010, 99:1-16.
89. Agrawal A, Chopra R, Sharma K. 1991 Global Warming in an Unequal World: A Case of Environmental Colonialism. New Delhi: Centre for Science and Environment; 1991.
90. Jasanoff S. India at the crossroads in global environmental policy. Glob Environ Change 1993, 3:32-52.
91. http://www.climaterevolution.net/rti/#1 (Accessed April 20, 2012).
92. Stevenson H, Dryzek JS. The discursive democratisation of global climate governance. Environ Polit 2012, 21:189-210.
93. Fischer S. Policy storylines in Indian climate politics: opening new political spaces? Environ Plan C 2012, 30:109-127.
94. Agrawal A, Narain S. The State of India's Environm-ent: The First Citizens' Report. New Delhi: Centre for Science and Environment; 1982.
95. Beck S. The challenges of building cosmopolitan climate expertise: the case of Germany. WIREs: Clim Change 2011, 3:1-17.
96. Brunsson N. Ideas and actions: justification and hypocrisy as alternatives to control. Account Organ Soc 1993, 18:489-506.
97. Jasanoff S. A new climate for society Theory. Cult Soc 2010, 27:233-253.
98. Li TM. The Will to Improve. Governmentality, Development and the Practice of Politics. Durham NC: Duke University Press; 2007.
99. Van Asselt H, Zelli F. Connect the Dots: Managing the Fragmentation of Global Climate Governance. Earth System Governance Working Paper. Earth System Governance Project, Lund and Amsterdam; 2012.
100. Biermann F, Abbott K, Andresen S, Bäckstrand K, Bernstein S, Betsil M, Bulkeley H, Cashore B, Clapp J, Folke C. Navigating the anthropocene: improving earth system governance. Science 2012, 335:1306-1307.
101. Prins G, Galiana I, Green C, Grundmann R, Korhola A, Laird F, Nordhaus T, Pielke Jnr R, Rayner S, Sarewitz D. The Hartwell Paper: A New Direction for Climate Policy after the Crash of 2009. London: Institute for Science, Innovation & Society; 2010.
102. Atkinson R, Chhetri N, Freed J, Galiana I, Green C, Nordhaus T, Pielke Jnr R, Prins G, Rayner S, Sarewitz D, et al. Climate Pragmatism: Innovation, Resilience and No Regrets. The Hartwell Analysis in an American Context. Washington DC: The Hartwell Group; 2011.
103. Betsill MM. Regional governance of global climate change: the North American Commission for Environmental Cooperation. Glob Environ Polit 2007, 7:11-27.
104. In't Veld R. Transgovernance: The Quest for Governance of Sustainable Development. Postdam: IASS Institute for Advanced Sustainability Studies; 2011.
105. Biermann F, Pattberg P, Zelli F. Global Climate Governance Beyond 2012: Architecture, Agency and Adaptation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2010.
106. Turnhout E, Bloomfield B, Hulme M, Vogel J, Wynne B. Listen to the voices of experience. Nature 2012, 488:454-455.
107. Gross M. Ignorance and Surprise: Science, Society, and Ecological Design. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press; 2010.
108. Voß JP. Innovation processes in governance: the development of 'emissions trading' as a new policy instrument. Sci Public Policy 2007, 34:329-343.
109. Brewster R. Stepping Stone or Stumbling Block: Incrementalism and National Climate Change Legislation. Yale Law Policy Rev 2010, 28:245-312.