Co-production of knowledge in transdisciplinary doctoral theses on landscape development-An analysis of actor roles and knowledge types in different research phases

Landscape and Urban Planning

Volumn 105, Issue 1-2, 2012, Pages 106-117

  Enengel, Barbara ^a   Muhar, Andreas ^a   Penker, Marianne ^a   Freyer, Bernhard ^a   Drlik, Stephanie ^a   Ritter, Florian ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF NATURAL RESOURCES AND LIFE SCIENCES   (Austria)

Author keywords

Co production of knowledge; Doctoral studies; Knowledge types; Transdisciplinarity

Indexed keywords

CONSERVATION; ECOLOGY;

CO-PRODUCTION OF KNOWLEDGE; COMPLEX PROBLEM SOLVING; DOCTORAL STUDIES; EXPERIENTIAL KNOWLEDGE; KNOWLEDGE TYPES; PROFESSIONAL PRACTICES; SHARED RESPONSIBILITY; TRANSDISCIPLINARITY;

SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT;

ACADEMIC RESEARCH; LANDSCAPE CHANGE; LANDSCAPE PLANNING; LEARNING; PARADIGM SHIFT; SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT;

AUSTRIA;

EID: 84857443082     PISSN: 01692046     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2011.12.004     Document Type: Article

References (63)

1. Arbter K., Handler M., Purker E., Tappeiner G., Trattnigg R. The public participation manual. Shaping the future together 2005, Austrian Society for Environment and Technology (öGUT) and The Federal Ministry of Agriculture, Forestry, Environment and Water Management (BMLFUW), Wien.
2. Arnstein S.R. A ladder of citizen participation. Journal of the American Institute of Planners 1969, 35:216-224.
3. Balsiger P.W. Supradisciplinary research practices: History, objectives and rationale. Futures 2004, 36:407-421.
4. Bergmann M., Brohmann B., Hoffmann E., Loibl M.C., Rehaag R., Schramm E., et al. Quality criteria of transdisciplinary research - A guide for the formative evaluation of research projects 2005, Institute for Social-Ecological Research (ISOE) GmbH, Frankfurt am Main.
5. Bergmann M., Jahn T., Knobloch T., Krohn W., Pohl C., Schramm E. Methoden transdisziplinärer Forschung - Ein überblick mit Anwendungsbeispielen 2010, Campus Verlag, Frankfurt am Main, (in German).
6. Böhme G. Ethik im Kontext 1997, Verlag Surkamp, Frankfurt, (in German).
7. Braun, F. (2009). Sommer-Bergtourismus im Klimawandel - Szenarien und Handlungsbedarf am Beispiel des hochalpinen Wegenetzes [Summer mountain tourism in climate change - Scenarios and need for action using the example of the high Alpine trail network]. Dissertation. Wien: Universität für Bodenkultur (in German).
8. Breuer F. Reflexive grounded theory. Eine Einführung für die Forschungspraxis 2009, Verlag für Sozialforschung, Wiesbaden, (in German).
9. Callon M. The role of lay people in the production and dissemination of scientific knowledge. Science, Technology and Society 1999, 4:81-94.
10. Carlsson L., Berkes F. Co-management: Concepts and methodological implications. Journal of Environmental Management 2005, 75:65-76.
11. Collins H.M., Evans R. The third wave of science studies: Studies of expertise and experience. Social Studies of Science 2002, 32:235-296.
12. Defila R., Di Giulio A. Inter- and transdisciplinary processes - Experiences and lessons learnt. Changing things - Moving people. Strategies for promoting sustainable development at the local level 2001, 337-356. Birkhäuser, Basel. R. Kaufmann-Hayoz, H. Gutscher (Eds.).
13. Drlik, S. (2010). Klimawandelanpassung der Pflege und Erhaltung öffentlicher Grünanlagen in Großstädten unter Berücksichtigung des Konzepts der Nachhaltigen Entwicklung, untersucht am Fallbeispiel Wien [Climate change adaptation of maintenance systems in urban public parks considering the concept of sustainable development, using the example of Vienna]. Dissertation. Wien: Universität für Bodenkultur (in German).
14. Elzinga A. Participation. Handbook of transdisciplinary research 2008, 345-359. Springer, New York/Dordrecht. G. Hirsch Hadorn, H. Hoffmann-Riem, S. Biber-Klemm, W. Grossenbacher-Mansuy, D. Joye, C. Pohl, U. Wiesmann, E. Zemp (Eds.).
15. Enengel, B. (2009). Partizipative Landschaftssteuerung - Kosten-Nutzen-Risiken-Relationen aus Sicht der Beteiligten [Participatory landscape governance - Cost-benefit-risk-relations from the perspective of participants]. Dissertation. Wien: Universität für Bodenkultur (in German).
16. Enengel B., Penker M., Muhar A., Williams R. Benefits, efforts and risks of participants in landscape co-management: An analytical framework and results from two case studies in Austria. Journal of Environmental Management 2011, 92:1256-1267.
17. Fazey I., Fazey J.A., Salisbury J.G., Lindenmayer D.B., Dovers S. The nature and role of experiential knowledge for environmental conservation. Environmental Conservation 2006, 33:1-10.
18. Fiorino D.J. Citizen participation and environmental risk: A survey of institutional mechanisms. Science, Technology, & Human Values 1990, 15:226-243.
19. Flüeler T. Decision making for complex socio-technical systems. Robustness from lessons learned in long-term radioactive waste governance. Series: Environment and policy 2006, vol. 42. Springer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, The Netherlands.
20. Fry G.L.A., Tress B., Tress G. PhD students and integrative research. From landscape research to landscape planning - Aspects of integration, education and application. 2006, 193-205. Springer, Dordrecht. B. Tress, G. Tress, G.L.A. Fry, P. Opdam (Eds.).
21. Fuqua J., Stokols D., Gress J., Phillips K., Harvey R. Transdisciplinary collaboration as a basis for enhancing the science and prevention of substance use and "abuse" Substance Use & Misuse 2004, 39:1457-1514.
22. Graybill J.K., Shandas V. Doctoral student and early career academic perspectives. The Oxford handbook of interdisciplinarity 2010, 404-418. Oxford University Press, New York. R. Frodeman, J. Thompson Klein, C. Mitcham, B. Holbrook (Eds.).
23. Grunwald A. Strategic knowledge for sustainable development: The need for reflexivity and learning at the interface between science and society. International Journal of Foresight and Innovation Policy 2004, 1(1-2):150-167.
24. Häberli R., Bill A., Grossenbacher-Mansuy W., Thompson Klein J., Scholz R.W., Welti M. Synthesis. Transdisciplinarity: Joint problem solving among science, technology, and society. An effective way for managing complexity 2001, 5-22. Birkhäuser Verlag, Basel/Boston/Berlin. J. Thompson Klein, W. Grossenbacher-Mansuy, R. Häberli, A. Bill, R.W. Scholz, M. Welti (Eds.).
25. Hirsch Hadorn G., Biber-Klemm S., Grossenbacher-Mansuy W., Hoffmann-Riem H., Joye D., Pohl C., et al. The emergence of transdisciplinarity as a form of research. Handbook of transdisciplinary research 2008, 19-39. Springer, New York/Dordrecht. G. Hirsch Hadorn, H. Hoffmann-Riem, S. Biber-Klemm, W. Grossenbacher-Mansuy, D. Joye, C. Pohl, U. Wiesmann, E. Zemp (Eds.).
26. Hirsch Hadorn G., Hoffmann-Riem H., Biber-Klemm S., Grossenbacher-Mansuy W., Joye D., Pohl C., et al. Handbook of transdisciplinary research 2008, Springer, New York/Dordrecht.
27. Hirsch Hadorn G., Pohl C., Bammer G. Solving problems through transdisciplinary research. The Oxford handbook of interdisciplinarity 2010, 431-452. Oxford University Press, Oxford. R. Frodeman (Ed.).
28. Höppner C., Frick J., Buchecker M. Assessing psycho-social effects of participatory landscape planning. Landscape and Urban Planning 2007, 83:196-207.
29. Hunt J., Bell L., Wei W., Ingle G. Monoculturalism to multiculturalism: Lessons from three public universities. Promoting diversity in college classrooms: Innovative responses for the curriculum 1992, 101-104. Jossey-Bass, San Francisco. M. Adams (Ed.).
30. Jantsch E. Towards interdisciplinarity and transdisciplinarity in education and innovation. Problems of teaching and research in universities 1972, 97-121. Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD) and Center for Educational Research and Innovation (CERI), Paris. L. Leo Apostel, G. Berger (Eds.).
31. Jasanoff S. Ordering knowledge, ordering society. States of knowledge: The co-production of science and social order 2004, 13-45. Routledge, London. S. Jasanoff (Ed.).
32. Krohn W. Learning from case studies. Handbook of transdisciplinary research 2008, 369-383. Springer, New York/Dordrecht. G. Hirsch Hadorn, H. Hoffmann-Riem, S. Biber-Klemm, W. Grossenbacher-Mansuy, D. Joye, C. Pohl, U. Wiesmann, E. Zemp (Eds.).
33. Krütli P., Stauffacher M., Flüeler T., Scholz R.W. Functional-dynamic public participation in technological decision making: Site selection processes of nuclear waste repositories. Journal of Risk Research 2010, 13:861-875.
34. Max-Neef M.A. Foundations of transdisciplinarity. Ecological Economics 2005, 53:5-16.
35. Mobjörk M. Consulting versus participatory transdisciplinarity: A refined classification of transdisciplinary research. Futures 2010, 42:866-873.
36. Muhar A., Vilsmaier U., Freyer B. The polarity field concept - A new approach for integrated regional planning and sustainability processes. GAIA 2006, 15:200-205.
37. Mühlmann, P. (2010). Zivilgesellschaftliches Engagement in der Landschaft - Das Modell freiwilliger Arbeit in der Landschaftspflege [Civic engagement for the landscape: The concept of voluntary work for landscape maintenance]. Dissertation. Wien: Universität für Bodenkultur (in German).
38. Nicolescu B. La transdisciplinarite. Manifeste 1996, Editions du Rocher, Monaco, Paris.
39. Nonaka I., Takeuchi H. Die Organisation des Wissens 1997, Campus Verlag, Frankfurt/New York, (in German).
40. Nowotny H., Scott P., Gibbons M. Re-thinking science - Knowledge and the public in an age of uncertainty 2001, Polity Press, Cambridge.
41. Pohl C. From science to policy through transdisciplinary research. Environmental Science & Policy 2008, 11:46-53.
42. Pohl C., Hirsch Hadorn G. Principles for designing transdisciplinary research 2007, Oekom Verlag, Gesellschaft für ökologische Kommunikation mbH, Munich.
43. Pohl C., Lorrae van Kerkhoff W., Hirsch Hadorn G., Bammer G. Integration. Handbook of transdisciplinary research 2008, 411-424. Springer, New York/Dordrecht. G. Hirsch Hadorn, H. Hoffmann-Riem, S. Biber-Klemm, W. Grossenbacher-Mansuy, D. Joye, C. Pohl, U. Wiesmann, E. Zemp (Eds.).
44. Pohl C., Rist S., Zimmermann A., Fry P., Gurung G.S., Schneider F., et al. Researchers' roles in knowledge co-production: Experience from sustainability research in Kenya, Switzerland, Bolivia and Nepal. Science and Public Policy 2010, 37:267-281.
45. Polanyi M. Implizites Wissen 1985, Verlag Suhrkamp, Frankfurt, (in German).
46. Pretty J.N., Guijt I., Thompson J., Scoones I. A trainer's guide for participatory learning and action 1995, International Institute for Environment and Development, London.
47. ProVision. (2010). Transdisciplinarity. Retrieved from Accessed 25.08.10. http://www.provision-research.at/cms/scripts/active.asp?sprache=2&id=280&vorlage=3&rubrik=280.
48. Raymond C.M., Fazey I., Reed M.S., Stringer L.C., Robinson G.M., Evely A.C. Integrating local and scientific knowledge for environmental management. Journal of Environmental Management 2010, 91:1766-1777.
49. Ritter F., Muhar A., Fiebig M. Wissenschaftliches Fachwissen und Erfahrungswissen im transdisziplinären Dialog über Sommer-Bergtourismus und Klimawandel. GAIA 2010, 19(3):194-203. (in German).
50. Rosenblum D. In the absence of a paradigm: The construction of interdisciplinary research. Issues in Integrative Studies 1997, 15:113-123.
51. Rowe G., Frewer L.J. A typology of public engagement mechanisms. Science, Technology, & Human Values 2005, 30:251-290.
52. Scholz R.W., Mieg H.A., Oswald J.E. Transdisciplinarity in groundwater management - Towards mutual learning of science and society. Water, Air, & Soil Pollution 2000, 123:477-487.
53. Scholz R.W., Tietje O. Embedded case study methods: Integrating quantitative and qualitative knowledge 2002, Sage, Thousand Oaks/London.
54. Sevenant M., Antrop M. Transdisciplinary landscape planning: Does the public have aspirations? Experiences from a case study in Ghent (Flanders, Belgium). Land Use Policy 2010, 27:373-386.
55. Stauffacher M., Flüeler T., Krütli P., Scholz R.W. Analytic and dynamic approach to collaboration: A transdisciplinary case study on sustainable landscape development in a Swiss prealpine region. Systemic Practice and Action Research 2008, 21:409-422.
56. Thompson Klein J. Transdisciplinarity: Joint problem solving among science, technology, and society 2001, Birkhäuser, Basel.
57. Tress B., Tress G., Fry G. Researchers' experiences, positive and negative, in integrative landscape projects. Environmental Management 2005, 36:792-807.
58. Tress G., Tress B., Fry G. Analysis of the barriers to integration in landscape research projects. Land Use Policy 2007, 24:374-385.
59. Tress B., Tress G., Fry G. Integrative research on environmental and landscape change: PhD students' motivations and challenges. Journal of Environmental Management 2009, 90:2921-2929.
60. Wickson F., Carew A.L., Russell A.W. Transdisciplinary research: Characteristics, quandaries and quality. Futures 2006, 38:1046-1059.
61. Wiek A. Challenges of transdisciplinary research as interactive knowledge generation experiences from transdisciplinary case study research. GAIA 2007, 16:52-57.
62. Wu J., Hobbs R. Key issues and research priorities in landscape ecology: An idiosyncratic synthesis. Landscape Ecology 2002, 17:355-365.
63. Zierhofer W., Burger R. Disentangling transdisciplinarity: An analysis of knowledge integration in problem-oriented research. Science Studies 2007, 20:51-74.