Pure science or policy involvement? Ambiguous boundary-work for Swedish carbon cycle science

Environmental Science and Policy

Volumn 10, Issue 1, 2007, Pages 39-47

  Lövbrand, Eva ^a  

^a LUND UNIVERSITY   (Sweden)

Author keywords

Co production; Knowledge broker; Kyoto protocol; LULUCF; Regulatory science; Science policy interplay

Indexed keywords

CARBON;

ARTICLE; CARBON CYCLE; CARBON UTILIZATION; CLIMATE CHANGE; CORRELATION ANALYSIS; EMPIRICAL RESEARCH; ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT; EXPERT SYSTEM; GOVERNMENT REGULATION; INFORMATION DISSEMINATION; INFORMATION RETRIEVAL; INFORMATION SCIENCE; INTERPERSONAL COMMUNICATION; INTERVIEW; METHODOLOGY; NATURAL SCIENCE; POLICY; POLITICAL SYSTEM; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROGRAM DEVELOPMENT; SCIENTIST; SWEDEN; UNITED NATIONS; VALIDITY;

EID: 33845494684     PISSN: 14629011     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.envsci.2006.10.003     Document Type: Article

References (39)

1. Baes Jr. C.F., Goeller H.E., Olson J.S., and Rotty R.M. Carbon dioxide and climate: the uncontrollable experiment. Am. Sci. 65 (1977) 310-320
2. Bocking S. Nature's Experts: Science, Politics and the Environment (2004), Rutgers University Press, New Brunswick, New Jersey
3. Bodansky D. Prologue to the climate change convention. In: Mintzer I.M., and Leonard J.A. (Eds). Negotiating Climate Change: The Inside Story of the Rio Convention (1994), Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
4. CarboEurope. CarboEurope: A Cluster of Projects to Understand and Quantify the Carbon Balance of Europe (2001), CarboEurope European Office, Jena
5. Carbon Cycle Science Program (CCSP). Programs and Activities (2005), U.S. Carbon Cycle Science Program. http://www.carboncyclescience.gov/whats_new.php Available: http://www.carboncyclescience.gov/whats_new.php
6. Demeritt D. The construction of global warming and the politics of science. Ann. Assoc. Am. Geogr. 91 2 (2001) 307-337. http://real.geog.ucsb.edu/courses/205/pdf/Demeritt2001.pdf Available: http://real.geog.ucsb.edu/courses/205/pdf/Demeritt2001.pdf
7. Dyson F.J. Can we control the carbon dioxide in the atmosphere?. Energy 2 (1976) 287-291
8. Fogel C. Biotic carbon sequestration and the Kyoto protocol: the construction of global knowledge by the intergovernmental panel on climate change. Int. Environ. Agree. 5 2 (2005) 191-210
9. Gieryn T.F. Boundaries of science. In: Jasanoff S., Markle G.E., Petersen J.C., and Pinch T. (Eds). Handbook of Science and Technology Studies. Revised ed. (1995), Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks, CA
10. Hunt J., and Shackley S. Reconceiving science and policy: academic, fiducial and bureaucratic knowledge. Minerva 37 2 (1999) 141-164
11. Jasanoff S. The Fifth Branch. Science Advisers as Policymakers (1990), Harvard University Press, Cambridge and London
12. Jasanoff S. Technologies of humility: citizen participation in governing science. Minerva 41 3 (2003) 223-244
13. In: Jasanoff S. (Ed). States of Knowledge: The Co-production of Science and Social Order (2004), Routledge, London and New York
14. Jasanoff S., and Wynne B. Science and decision-making. In: Rayner S., and Malone E. (Eds). Human Choice and Climate Change: The Societal Framework (1998), Battelle Press, Columbus, OH 1-88
15. Latour B. Politics of Nature: How to Bring the Sciences into Democracy (2004), Harvard University Press, Cambridge
16. Lemos M.C., and Morehouse B.J. The co-production of science and policy in climate assessments. Global Environ. Change 15 1 (2005) 57-68
17. Litfin K. Ozone Discourses: Science and Politics in Global Environmental Cooperation (1994), Colombia University Press, New York
18. LUSTRA, 1999. LUSTRA-programmet 1999. Annual report, Ett Mistra Finansierat Forsknings Program. Available: http://www-lustra.slu.se/rapportermm/pdf/1999.pdf.
19. LUSTRA. Programme Plan. Land Use Strategies for Reducing Greenhouse Gas Emissions 2004 (2004), Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, Uppsala. http://www-lustra.slu.se/rapportermm/pdf/programplan2004s.pdf 18 February. Available: http://www-lustra.slu.se/rapportermm/pdf/programplan2004s.pdf
20. Merton R.K. The Sociology of Science: Theoretical and Empirical Investigations (1973), University of Chicago Press, Chicago
21. Miller C.A. Challenges in application of science to global affairs: contingency, trust and moral order. In: Miller C.A., and Edwards P. (Eds). Changing the Atmosphere: Expert Knowledge and Environmental Governance (2001), MIT Press, Cambridge (Chapter 8)
22. In: Miller C.A., and Edwards P. (Eds). Changing the Atmosphere: Expert Knowledge and Environmental Governance (2001), MIT Press, Cambridge
23. Noordwijk Declaration. The Noordwijk declaration on atmosphere pollution and climate change. Am. Univ. J. Int. Law Pol. 7 3 (1988) 185-205 (Reprint)
24. Nowotny H. Democratising expertise and socially robust knowledge. Sci. Publ. Pol. 30 3 (2003) 151-156
25. Nowotny H., Scott P., and Gibbons M. Re-thinking Science: Knowledge and the Public in an Age of Uncertainty (2001), Polity Press, Cambridge
26. Olsson, M., 2003. Satsning på Samverkan och Synteser. LUSTRA Annual Report 2003. SLU, Uppsala.
27. Ostrom E. Crossing the great divide: coproduction, synergy, and development. World Dev. 24 6 (1996) 1073-1087. http://repositories.cdlib.org/uciaspubs/research/94/5/ Available: http://repositories.cdlib.org/uciaspubs/research/94/5/
28. In: Penman J., Gytarsky M., Hiraishi T., Krug T., Kruger D., Pipatti R., Buendia L., Miwa K., Ngara T., Kiyoto T., and Wagner F. (Eds). Good Practice Guidance for Land Use, Land-Use Change and Forestry (2003), IPCC National Greenhouse Gas Inventories Programme, IGES, Japan
29. Salter L. Mandated Science: Science and Scientists in the Making of Standards (1988), Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, Holland
30. Sarewitz D. How science makes environmental controversies worse?. Environ. Sci. Pol. 7 (2004) 385-403. http://www.cspo.org/ourlibrary/documents/environ_controv.pdf Available: http://www.cspo.org/ourlibrary/documents/environ_controv.pdf
31. Sarewitz, D., Pielke Jr., R.A., this issue. The neglected heart of science policy: reconciling supply of and demand for science. Environ. Sci. Pol. 10.
32. Skodvin T., and Underdal A. Exploring the dynamics of science-politics interaction. In: Andreasen S., Skodvin T., Underdal A., and Wetterstad J. (Eds). Science and Politics in International Environmental Regimes: Between Integrity and Involvement (2000), Manchester University Press, New York
33. Sundqvist G. The environmental experts: on science's authority in environmental protection. In: Lundgren L.J. (Ed). Knowing and Doing: On Knowledge and Action in Environmental Protection (2000), Swedish Environmental Protection Agency, Kristianstad, Sweden
34. UNFCCC. Response from Parties on Issues Relating to Sinks (1997), United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change. http://unfccc.int/2860.php Comments by Parties, FCC/AGBM/1997/MISC.4. Available: http://unfccc.int/2860.php
35. UNFCCC. Kyoto Protocol to the Framework Convention on Climate Change (1997), United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change, Bonn UNEP/IUC/98/2
36. UNFCCC, 2002. Report of the Conference of the Parties on Its Seventh Session. Marrakesh, 29 October-10 November 2001, Decision 11/CP.7, Land use, land-use change and forestry, FCCC/CP/2001/13/Add.1. United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change.
37. In: Watson R., Noble I.R., Bolin B., Ravindranath N.H., Verardo D.J., and Dokken D.J. (Eds). Land Use Change and Forestry: A Special Report of the IPCC (2000), Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
38. Weinberg A. Science and trans-science. Minerva 10 (1972) 209-222
39. Whittaker R.H., and Likens G.E. Carbon in the biota. In: Woodwell G.M., and Pecan E.V. (Eds). Carbon and the Biosphere. Proceedings of the 24th Brookhaven Symposium in Biology. Upton, New York, 16-18 May 1972 (1973), United States Atomic Energy Commission, Springfield