What REALLY Works: Optimizing Classroom Discussions to Promote Comprehension and Critical-Analytic Thinking

Policy Insights from the Behavioral and Brain Sciences

Volumn 3, Issue 1, 2016, Pages 27-35

  Murphy, P Karen ^a   Firetto, Carla M ^a   Wei, Liwei ^a   Li, Mengyi ^a   Croninger, Rachel M V ^a  

^a PENNSYLVANIA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

critical analytic thinking; policy recommendations; small group discussion; text comprehension

Indexed keywords

EID: 85030867485     PISSN: 23727322     EISSN: 23727330     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/2372732215624215     Document Type: Article

References (73)

1. Abrami P., Bernard R., Borokhovski E., Waddington D., Wade C., Persson T., (2015). Strategies for teaching students to think critically: A meta-analysis. Review of Educational Research, 85, 275-314
2. Alexander P. A., Jetton T. L., (2000). Learning from text: A multidimensional and developmental perspective. In Kamil M. L., Mosenthal P. B., Pearson P. D., Barr R., (Eds.), Handbook of reading research (Vol. 3, pp. 285-310). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum
3. Anderson R. C., Chinn C., Chang J., Waggoner J., Nguyen K., (1998). Intellectually stimulating story discussions. In Osborn F., (Ed.), Literacy for all: Issues in teaching and learning (pp. 170-186). New York, NY: Guilford Press
4. Anderson R. C., Nguyen-Jahiel K., McNurlen B., Archodidou A., Kim S., Reznitskaya A... Gilbert L., (2001). The snowball phenomenon: Spread of ways of talking and ways of thinking across groups of children. Cognition and Instruction, 19, 1-46
5. Chesser W. D., Gellalty G. B., Hale M. S., (1997). Do Paideia Seminars explain higher writing scores? Middle School Journal, 29, 40-44
6. Chickering A. W., Gamson Z. F., (1987). Seven principles for good practice in undergraduate education. AAHE Bulletin, 39(7), 3-7
7. Chinn C. A., Anderson R. C., Waggoner M. A., (2001). Patterns of discourse in two kinds of literature discussion. Reading Research Quarterly, 36, 378-411
8. Chinn C. A., O’Donnell A. M., Jinks T. S., (2000). The structure of discourse in collaborative learning. Journal of Experimental Education, 69, 77-97
9. Civil Rights Act of 1964, Pub. L. No. 88–352, 78 Stat. 241 (1964)
10. Cohen E. G., (1994). Restructuring the classroom: Conditions for productive small groups. Review of Educational Research, 64(1), 1-35
11. Desimone L. M., Porter A. C., Garet M. S., Yoon K. S., Birman B. F., (2002). Effects of professional development on teachers’ instruction: Results from a three-year longitudinal study. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 24, 81-112. doi:10.3102/01623737024002081
12. Dihoff R. E., Brosvic G. M., Epstein M. L., Cook M. J., (2003). The role of feedback during academic testing: The delay retention test revisited. The Psychological Record, 53, 533-548
13. Duke N. K., (2000). 3.6 minutes per day: The scarcity of informational texts in first grade. Reading Research Quarterly, 35, 202-224
14. Ebersöhn L., (2015). Making sense of place in school-based intervention research. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 40, 121-130
15. Elmore R., Burney D., (1997). Investing in teacher learning: Staff development and instructional improvement in Community School District# 2, New York City. Retrieved from http://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED416203.pdf
16. Epstein M. L., Epstein B. B., Brosvic G. M., (2001). Immediate feedback during academic testing. Psychological Reports, 88, 889-894
17. Firetto C. M., Murphy P. K., Greene J. A., Li M., Wei L., (2015, August). Enhancing students’ written argumentation through Quality Talk. Paper presented at the biennial meeting of the European Association for Research on Learning and Instruction, Limassol, Cyprus
18. Garet M. S., Porter A. C., Desimone L., Birman B. F., Yoon K. S., (2001). What makes professional development effective? Results from a national sample of teachers. American Educational Research Journal, 38, 915-945
19. Hattie J., Timperley H., (2007). The power of feedback. Review of Educational Research, 77, 81-112
20. Institute of Education Sciences. (n.d.). What works clearinghouse. Retrieved from http://ies.ed.gov/ncee/wwc/default.aspx
21. Jadallah M., Anderson R. C., Nguyen-Jahiel K., Miller B., Kim I.-H., Kuo L... Wu X., (2011). Influence of a teacher’s scaffolding moves during child-led small-group discussions. American Educational Research Journal, 48, 194-230
22. Kennedy M., (1998). Form and substance in inservice teacher education (Research Monograph No. 13). Retrieved from http://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED472719.pdf
23. Kim I.-H., Anderson R. C., Miller B., Jeong J., Swim T., (2011). Influence of cultural norms and collaborative discussions on children’s reflective essays. Discourse Processes, 48, 501-528
24. King M. L., Jr. (1947, January/February). The purpose of education. The Maroon Tiger, p. 10
25. Kintsch W., (1988). The role of knowledge in discourse comprehension: A construction-integration model. Psychological Review, 95, 163-182. doi:10.1037/0033-295X.95.2.163
26. Leal D., (1992). The nature of talk about three types of text during peer group discussions. Journal of Reading Behavior, 24, 313-338
27. Leaper C., Smith T. E., (2004). A meta-analytic review of gender variations in children’s talk: Talkativeness, affiliative speech, and assertive speech. Developmental Psychology, 40, 993-1027
28. Li M., Murphy P. K., Firetto C. M., (2014). Examining the effects of text genre and structure on 4th- and 5th-grade students’ high-level comprehension as evidenced in small group discussions. International Journal of Educational Psychology, 3, 205-234
29. Lin T. J., Jadallah M., Anderson R. C., Baker A. R., Nguyen-Jahiel K., Kim I.-H... Wu X., (2015). Less is more: Teachers’ influence during peer collaboration. Journal of Educational Psychology, 107, 609-629
30. Linden M., Wittrock M. C., (1981). The teaching of reading comprehension according to the model of generative learning. Reading Research Quarterly, 17(1), 44-57
31. Matsumura L. C., Garnier H. E., Spybrook J., (2012). The effect of content-focused coaching on the quality of classroom text discussions. Journal of Teacher Education, 63, 214-228. doi:10.1177/0022487111434985
32. McAlpine L., (2004). Designing learning as well as teaching: A research-based model for instruction that emphasizes learner practice. Learning in Higher Education, 5, 119-134
33. McKeown D., FitzPatrick E., Sandmel K., (2014). SRSD in practice: Creating a professional development experience for teachers to meet the writing needs of students with EBD. Behavioral Disorders, 40, 15-25
34. McNamara D., Kintsch W., (1996). Learning from texts: Effects of prior knowledge and text coherence. Discourse Processes, 22, 247-288
35. Mercer N., (1995). The guided construction of knowledge: Talk amongst teachers and learners. Philadelphia, PA: Multilingual Matters
36. Mercer N., (2000). Words and minds: How we use language to think together. London England: Routledge
37. Mercer N., Dawes L., Wegerif R., Sams C., (2004). Reasoning as a scientist: Ways of helping children to use language to learn science. British Educational Research Journal, 30, 359-378
38. Meyer B. J. F., (1975). The organization of prose and its effects on memory. Amsterdam, The Netherlands: North-Holland
39. Meyer B. J. F., Freedle R. O., (1984). Effects of discourse type on recall. American Educational Research Journal, 21, 121-143
40. Murphy P. K., (2015). Marking the way: School-based interventions that “work.” Contemporary Educational Psychology, 40, 1-4
41. Murphy P. K., Greene J. A., Firetto C. M., (2015). Quality Talk: Developing students’ discourse to promote critical-analytic thinking, epistemic cognition, and high-level comprehension (Technical Report No. 2). University Park: The Pennsylvania State University
42. Murphy P. K., Mason L., (2006). Changing knowledge and changing beliefs. In Alexander P. A., Winne P., (Eds.), Handbook of educational psychology (2nd ed., pp. 305-326). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum
43. Murphy P. K., Wilkinson I. A. G., Soter A. O., Hennessey M. N., Alexander J. F., (2009). Examining the effects of classroom discussion on students’ high-level comprehension of text: A meta-analysis. Journal of Educational Psychology, 101, 740-764
44. National Center for Education Statistics. (2015). The nation’s report card: 2015 reading state snapshot report (nation). Washington, DC: National Center for Education Statistics, Institute of Education Sciences, U.S. Department of Education. Retrieved from http://nces.ed.gov/nationsreportcard/subject/publications/stt2015/pdf/2016008NP4.pdf
45. National Governors Association Center for Best Practices & Council of Chief State School Officers. (2010). Common Core State Standards for English language arts and literacy in history/social studies, science, and technical subjects. Washington, DC: Author
46. Nystrand M., (with Gamoran A., Kachur R., Prendergast C.,). (1997). Opening dialogue: Understanding the dynamics of language and learning in the English classroom. New York, NY: Teachers College Press
47. Nystrand M., Gamoran A., (1991). Instructional discourse, student engagement, and literature achievement. Research in the Teaching of English, 25, 261-290
48. Nystrand M., Wu L., Gamoran A., Zeiser S., Long D., (2003). Questions in time: Investigating the structure and dynamics of unfolding classroom discourse. Discourse Processes, 35, 135-198
49. Pearson P. D., Gallagher M. C., (1983). The instruction of reading comprehension. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 8, 20-22
50. Peterson P. L., Swing S. R., (1985). Students’ cognitions as mediators of the effectiveness of small-group learning. Journal of Educational Psychology, 77, 299-312
51. Pintrich P., (1995). Understanding self-regulated learning. New Directions for Teaching and Learning, 63, 3-12
52. RAND Reading Study Group. (2002). Reading for understanding: Toward an R&D program in reading comprehension. Santa Monica, CA: RAND
53. Reynolds R. E., Taylor M. A., Steffensen M. S., Shirey L. L., Anderson R. C., (1982). Cultural schemata and reading comprehension. Reading Research Quarterly, 17, 353-366
54. Rosenblatt L. M., (1978). The reader, the text, the poem: The transactional theory of the literary work. Carbondale: Southern Illinois University Press
55. Rosenshine B., Meister C., Chapman S., (1996). Teaching students to generate questions: A review of the intervention studies. Review of Educational Research, 66, 181-221
56. Sailors M., Price L. R., (2010). Professional development that supports the teaching of cognitive reading strategy instruction. Elementary School Journal, 110, 301-322
57. Saleh M., Lazonder A. W., de Jong T., (2005). Effects of within-class ability grouping on social interaction, achievement, and motivation. Instructional Science, 22, 105-119
58. Saleh M., Lazonder A. W., de Jong T., (2007). Structuring collaboration in mixed-ability groups to promote verbal interaction, learning and motivation of average-ability students. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 32, 314-331
59. Schunk D. H., (1991). Self-efficacy and academic motivation. Educational Psychologist, 26, 207-231
60. Sinclair J. M., Coulthard M., (1975). Towards an analysis of discourse: The English used by teachers and pupils. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press
61. Soter A. O., Wilkinson I. A. G., Murphy P. K., Rudge L., Reninger K., Edwards M., (2008). What the discourse tells us: Talk and indicators of high-level comprehension. International Journal Educational Research, 47, 372-391
62. Stanulis R. N., Little S., Wibbens E., (2012). Intensive mentoring that contributes to change in beginning elementary teachers’ learning to lead classroom discussions. Teaching and Teacher Education, 28, 32-43
63. van Dijk T. A., Kintsch W., (1983). Strategies of discourse comprehension. San Diego, CA: Academic Press
64. Vygotsky L. S., (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher mental psychological processes. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press
65. Webb N. M., (1980). An analysis of group interaction and mathematical errors in heterogeneous ability groups. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 50, 266-276
66. Webb N. M., (1984). Microcomputer learning in small groups: Cognitive requirements and group processes. Journal of Educational Psychology, 76, 1076-1088
67. Webb N. M., (1989). Peer interaction and learning in small groups. International Journal of Educational Research, 13, 21-39
68. Webb N. M., Kenderski C. M., (1984). Student interaction and learning in small group and whole class settings. In Peterson P. L., Wilkinson L. C., Hallinan M., (Eds.), The social context of instruction: Group organization and group processes (pp. 153-170). New York, NY: Academic Press
69. Webb N. M., Kenderski C. M., (1985). Gender differences in small group interaction and achievement in high-achieving and low-achieving classrooms. In Wilkinson L. C., Marrett C. B., (Eds.), Gender related differences in classroom interaction (pp. 209-226). New York, NY: Academic Press
70. Webb N. M., Palinscar A. S., (1996). Group processes in the classroom. In Berliner D., Calfee R., (Eds.), Handbook of educational psychology (pp. 841-873). New York, NY: Macmillan
71. Wilkinson I. A. G., Soter A. O., Murphy P. K., (2010). Developing a model of Quality Talk about literary text. In McKeown M. G., Kucan L., (Eds.), Bringing reading research to life (pp. 142-169). New York, NY: Guilford Press
72. Wu X., Anderson R. C., Nguyen-Jahiel K., Miller B., (2013). Enhancing motivation and engagement through collaborative discussion. Journal of Educational Psychology, 105, 622-632
73. Yekovich F., Walker C., Ogle L., Thompson M., (1990). The influence of domain knowledge on inference in low-aptitude individuals. In Graesser A., Bower G., (Eds.), The psychology of learning and motivation (Vol. 25, pp. 175-196). New York, NY: Academic Press