Professional learning as a predictor for instructional quality: a secondary analysis of TALIS

School Effectiveness and School Improvement

Volumn 29, Issue 1, 2018, Pages 64-90

  Doğan, Selçuk ^a,b   Yurtseven, Nihal ^c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA   (United States)

^b MARMARA UNIVERSITY   (Turkey)

^c YILDIZ TECHNICAL UNIVERSITY   (Turkey)

Author keywords

Instructional quality; professional development; professional learning; professional learning communities; TALIS

Indexed keywords

EID: 85030564071     PISSN: 09243453     EISSN: 17445124     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/09243453.2017.1383274     Document Type: Article

References (120)

1. Anderson, J. C., & Gerbing, D. W., (1988). Structural equation modeling in practice: A review and recommended two-step approach. Psychological Bulletin, 103, 411–423. doi:10.1037/0033-2909.103.3.411
2. Antoniou, P., & Kyriakides, L., (2011). The impact of a dynamic approach to professional development on teacher instruction and student learning: Results from an experimental study. School Effectiveness and School Improvement, 22, 291–311. doi:10.1080/09243453.2011.577078
3. Austin, B., Adesope, O. O., French, B. F., Gotch, C., Bélanger, J., & Kubacka, K., (2015). Examining school context and its influence on teachers: Linking TALIS 2013 with PISA 2012 student data (OECD Education Working Paper No. 115). Paris, France: OECD.
4. Banilower, E. R., Heck, D. J., & Weiss, I. R., (2007). Can professional development make the vision of standards a reality? The impact of the national science foundation’sLocal Systemic Change Through Teacher Enhancement Initiative. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 44, 375–395. doi:10.1002/tea.20145
5. Baumert, J., Kunter, M., Blum, W., Brunner, M., Voss, T., Jordan, A., … Tsai, Y., (2010). Teachers’ mathematical knowledge, cognitive activation in the classroom, and student progress. American Educational Research Journal, 47, 133–180. doi:10.3102/0002831209345157
6. Blank, R. K., Birman, B., Garet, M., Yoon, K. S., Jacobson, R., Smithson, J., & Minor, A., (2005). Longitudinal study of the effects of professional development on improving mathematics and science instruction (MSP PD study): Year 2 progress report. Washington, DC: Council of Chief State School Officers, American Institutes for Research and Madison, WI: Wisconsin Center for Education Research.
7. Blazar, D., (2015). Effective teaching in elementary mathematics: Identifying classroom practices that support student achievement. Economics of Education Review, 48, 16–29. doi:10.1016/j.econedurev.2015.05.005
8. Bolam, R., McMahon, A., Stoll, L., Thomas, S., & Wallace, M., (with Greenwood, A., Hawkey, K., Ingram, M., Atkinson, A., & Smith, M.). (2005). Creating and sustaining effective professional learning communities (Research Report RR 637). London, UK: Department for Education and Skills.
9. Borich, G. D., (2007). Effective teaching methods: Research-based practice (6th ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson Merrill/Prentice Hall.
10. Borko, H., (2004). Professional development and teacher learning: Mapping the terrain. Educational Researcher, 33(8), 3–15. doi:10.3102/0013189X033008003
11. Brown, T. A., (2015). Confirmatory factor analysis for applied research (2nd ed.). New York, NY: The Guilford Press.
12. Bryk, A. S., Camburn, E., & Louis, K. S., (1999). Professional community in Chicago elementary schools: Facilitating factors and organizational consequences. Educational Administration Quarterly, 35, 751–781. doi:10.1177/0013161X99355004
13. Bryk, A. S., Sebring, P. B., Allensworth, E., Luppescu, S., & Easton, J. Q., (2010). Organizing schools for improvement: Lessons from Chicago. Chicago, IL: The University of Chicago Press.
14. Clarke, D., & Hollingsworth, H., (2002). Elaborating a model of teacher professional growth. Teaching and Teacher Education, 18, 947–967. doi:10.1016/S0742-051X(02)00053-7
15. Cohen, D. K., & Ball, D. L., (1999). Instruction, capacity, and improvement (CPRE Research Report No. RR-43). Philadelphia, PA: University of Pennsylvania, Consortium for Policy Research in Education (CPRE).
16. Cole, P., (2012). Linking effective professional learning with effective teaching practice. Melbourne, Australia: The Australian Institute for Teaching and School Leadership.
17. Cook, T. D., Shadish, W. R., & Wong, V. C., (2008). Three conditions under which experiments and observational studies produce comparable causal estimates: New findings from within-study comparisons. Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, 27, 724–750. doi:10.1002/pam.20375
18. Creemers, B. P. M., & Kyriakides, L., (2008). The dynamics of educational effectiveness: A contribution to policy, practice and theory in contemporary schools. New York, NY: Routledge.
19. Creemers, B., Kyriakides, L., & Antoniou, P., (2009). Teacher professional development for improving quality of teaching. New York, NY: Springer.
20. Creemers, B. P. M., & Reezigt, G. J., (1996). School level conditions affecting the effectiveness of instruction. School Effectiveness and School Improvement, 7, 197–228. doi:10.1080/0924345960070301
21. Darling-Hammond, L., (1997). The right to learn: A blueprint for creating schools that work. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
22. Darling-Hammond, L., Barron, B., Pearson, P. D., Schonfeld, A. H., Stage, E. K., Zimmerman, T. D., … Tilson, J. L., (2008). Powerful learning: What we know about teaching for understanding. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
23. Darling-Hammond, L., Holtzman, D. J., Gatlin, S. J., & Vazquez Heilig, J., (2005). Does teacher preparation matter? Evidence about teacher certification, Teach for America, and teacher effectiveness. Education Policy Analysis Archives, 13(42). doi:10.14507/epaa.v13n42.2005
24. Dean, C. B., Hubbell, E. R., Pitler, H., & Stone, B., (2012). Classroom instruction that works: Research-based strategies for increasing student achievement (2nd ed.). Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.
25. Desimone, L. M., (2005). Toward a more refıned theory of school effects: A study of the relationship between professional community and mathematics teaching in early elementary school. In C., Miskel & W., Hoy (Eds.), Research and theory in educational administration. Greenwich, CT: Information Age. Retrieved from http://www.gse.upenn.edu/pdf/desimone/Desimone_Refined_Theory_School_Effects.pdf
26. Desimone, L. M., (2009). Improving impact studies of teachers’ professional development: Toward better conceptualizations and measures. Educational Researcher, 38(3), 181–199. doi:10.3102/0013189X08331140
27. Desimone, L. M., Porter, A. C., Garet, M. S., Yoon, K. S., & Birman, B. F., (2002). Effects of professional development on teachers’ instruction: Results from a three-year longitudinal study. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 24, 81–112. doi:10.3102/01623737024002081
28. Diaz-Maggioli, G., (2004). Teacher-centered professional development. Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.
29. Doğan, S., & Adams, A., (2016, April). Do professional learning communities (PLCs) impact teacher practice and student learning? An analysis of recent studies. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Washington, DC.
30. DuFour, R., (2004). What is a professional learning community? Educational Leadership, 61(8), 6–11.
31. DuFour, R., & Eaker, R., (1998). Professional learning communities at work: Best practices for enhancing student achievement. Bloomington, IN: Solution Tree Press.
32. Fishman, B. J., Marx, R. W., Best, S., & Tal, R. T., (2003). Linking teacher and student learning to improve professional development in systemic reform. Teaching and Teacher Education, 19, 643–658. doi:10.1016/S0742-051X(03)00059-3
33. Frank, T. H., (2013). The handbook for developing supportive learning environments. New York, NY: Routledge.
34. Fraser, C. A., (2010). Continuing professional development and learning in primary science classrooms. Teacher Development, 14, 85–106. doi:10.1080/13664531003696626
35. Fuchs, C., & Diamantopoulos, A., (2009). Using single-item measures for construct measurement in management research: Conceptual issues and application guidelines. Die Betriebswirtschaft, 69(2), 195–210.
36. Gamoran, A., Porter, A. C., Smithson, J., & White, P. A., (1997). Upgrading high school mathematics instruction: Improving learning opportunities for low-achieving, low-income youth. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 19, 325–338. doi:10.3102/01623737019004325
37. Garet, M. S., Birman, B. F., Porter, A. C., Desimone, L., & Herman, R., (1999). Designing effective professional development: Lessons from the Eisenhower program and technical appendices (Report No. ED/OUS99-3). Washington, DC: American Institutes for Research.
38. Garet, M. S., Porter, A. C., Desimone, L., Birman, B. F., & Yoon, K. S., (2001). What makes professional development effective? Results from a national sample of teachers. American Educational Research Journal, 38, 915–945. doi:10.3102/00028312038004915
39. Garrett, T., (2014). Effective classroom management: The essentials. New York, NY: Teachers College Press.
40. Glatthorn, A. A., (1987). Cooperative professional development: Peer-centered options for teacher growth. Educational Leadership, 45(3), 31–35.
41. Grossman, P., Wineburg, S., & Woolworth, S., (2001). Toward a theory of teacher community. Teachers College Record, 103, 942–1012.
42. Groves, E., Sr. (2009). The everything classroom management book: A teacher’s guide to an organized, productive, and calm classroom. Avon, MA: Adams Media.
43. Guskey, T. R., (2002). Professional development and teacher change. Teachers and Teaching: Theory and Practice, 8, 381–391. doi:10.1080/135406002100000512
44. Guskey, T. R., & Yoon, K. S., (2009). What works in professional development? Phi Delta Kappan, 90, 495–500. doi:10.1177/003172170909000709
45. Hattie, J., (2009). Visible learning: A synthesis of over 800 meta-analyses relating to achievement. New York, NY: Routledge.
46. Hattie, J., (2012). Visible learning for teachers: Maximizing impact on learning. New York, NY: Routledge.
47. Heck, D. J., Banilower, E. R., Weiss, I. R., & Rosenberg, S. L., (2008). Studying the effects of professional development: The case of the NSF’s Local Systemic Change Through Teacher Enhancement Initiative. Journal of Research in Mathematics Education, 39, 113–152. Retrieved from http://www.jstor.org/stable/30034894
48. Heck, R. H., & Thomas, S. L., (2015). An introduction to multilevel modeling techniques: MLM and SEM approaches using Mplus (3rd ed.). New York, NY: Routledge.
49. Hord, S. M., (1997). Professional learning communities: Communities of continuous inquiry and improvement. Austin, TX: Southwest Educational Development Laboratory.
50. Hord, S. M., (2004). Professional learning communities: An overview. In S., Hord (Ed.), Learning together, leading together: Changing schools through professional learning communities (pp. 5–14). New York, NY: Teachers College Press and Oxford, OH: National Staff Development Council.
51. Hox, J. J., & Maas, C. J. M., (2002). Sample sizes for multilevel modeling. In J., Blasius, J., Hox, E., de Leeuw, & P., Schmidt (Eds.), Social science methodology in the new millennium: Proceedings of the fifth international conference on logic and methodology (2nd expanded ed., pp. 45–69). Opladen, Germany: Leske + Budrich.
52. Hu, L., & Bentler, P. M., (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling, 6, 1–55. doi:10.1080/10705519909540118
53. Ingvarson, L., Meiers, M., & Beavis, A., (2005). Factors affecting the impact of professional development programs on teachers’ knowledge, practice, student outcomes & efficacy. Education Policy Analysis Archives, 13(10). doi:10.14507/epaa.v13n10.2005
54. International Association for the Evaluation of Educational Achievement. (2009). IDB Analyzer II (Version 2) [Computer software]. Hamburg, Germany: IEA Data Processing and Research Center.
55. Kennedy, M., (2016). Parsing the practice of teaching. Journal of Teacher Education, 67, 6–17. doi:10.1177/0022487115614617
56. King, F., (2014). Evaluating the impact of teacher professional development: An evidence-based framework. Professional Development in Education, 40, 89–111. doi:10.1080/19415257.2013.823099
57. Klieme, E., Lipowsky, F., Rakoczy, K., & Ratzka, N., (2006). Qualitätsdimensionen und Wirksamkeit von Mathematikunterricht: Theoretische Grundlagen und ausgewählte Ergebnisse des Projekts “Pythagoras” [Quality dimensions and effectiveness of mathematics instruction: Theoretical background and selected findings of the Pythagoras project]. In M., Prenzel & L., Allolio-Näcke (Eds.), Untersuchungen zur Bildungsqualität von Schule: Abschlussbericht des DFG-Schwerpunktprogramms [Studies on the educational quality of school: Final report of DFG priority program] (pp. 127–146). Münster, Germany: Waxmann.
58. Klieme, E., Pauli, C., & Reusser, K., (2009). The Pythagoras Study: Investigating effects of teaching and learning in Swiss and German mathematics classrooms. In T., Janik & T., Seidel (Eds.), The power of video studies in investigating teaching and learning in the classroom (pp. 137–160). Münster, Germany: Waxmann.
59. Klieme, E., Schümer, G., & Knoll, S., (2001). Mathematikunterricht in der Sekundarstufe I: “Aufgabenkultur” und Unterrichtsgestaltung [Mathematics teaching in secondary level I: Task culture and teaching]. In E., Klieme & J., Baumert (Eds.), TIMSS–Impulse für schule und unterricht: Forschungsbefunde, Reforminitiativen, Praxisberichte und Video-Dokumente [Impulse for school and teaching: Research findings, reform, practice reports and video documents] (pp. 43–57). Bonn, Germany: Bundesministerium für Bildung und Forschung.
60. Kline, R. B., (2015). Principles and practice of structural equation modeling (4th ed.). New York, NY: The Guilford Press.
61. Ko, J., Sammons, P., & Bakkum, L., (2013). Effective teaching: A review of research and evidence. Reading, UK: CfBT Education Trust.
62. Kruse, S. D., & Louis, K. S., (1993). Developing professional community in new and restructuring urban schools. Madison, WI: Center on Organization and Restructuring of Schools.
63. Kruse, S. D., Louis, K. S., & Bryk, A. S., (1995). An emerging framework for analyzing school-based professional community. In K. S. Louis, S. Kruse, & Associates (Eds.), Professionalism and community: Perspectives on reforming urban schools (pp. 23–42). Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press.
64. Kyndt, E., Gijbels, D., Grosemans, I., & Donche, V., (2016). Teachers’ everyday professional development: Mapping informal learning activities, antecedents, and learning outcomes. Review of Educational Research, 86, 1111–1150. doi:10.3102/0034654315627864
65. Kyndt, E., Govaerts, N., Verbeek, E., & Dochy, F., (2014). Development and validation of a questionnaire on informal workplace learning outcomes: A study among socio-educational care workers. British Journal of Social Work, 44, 2391–2410. doi:10.1093/bjsw/bct056
66. Kyriakides, L., & Creemers, B. P. M., (2008). Using a multidimensional approach to measure the impact of classroom-level factors upon student achievement: A study testing the validity of the dynamic model. School Effectiveness and School Improvement, 19, 183–205. doi:10.1080/09243450802047873
67. Lieberman, A., & Miller, L. E., (2014). Teachers as professionals: Evolving definitions of staff development. In L. E., Martin, S., Kragler, D. J., Quatroche, & K. L., Bauserman (Eds.), Handbook of professional development in education: Successful models and practices, PreK-12 (pp. 3–21). New York, NY: The Guilford Press.
68. Lipowsky, F., Rakoczy, K., Pauli, C., Drollinger-Vetter, B., Klieme, E., & Reusser, K., (2009). Quality of geometry instruction and its short-term impact on students’ understanding of the Pythagorean Theorem. Learning and Instruction, 19, 527–537. doi:10.1016/j.learninstruc.2008.11.001
69. Little, J. W., (1993). Teachers’ professional development in a climate of educational reform. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 15, 129–151. doi:10.3102/01623737015002129
70. Little, J. W., (2006). Professional community and professional development in the learning-centered school. Arlington, VA: National Education Association.
71. Loucks-Horsley, S., Stiles, K. E., Mundry, S., Love, N., & Hewson, P. W., (2010). Designing professional development for teachers of science and mathematics (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press.
72. Louis, K. S., Kruse, S. D. (1995). Professionalism and community: Perspectives on reforming urban schools. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press.
73. Louis, K. S., Kruse, S. D., & Marks, H. M., (1996). Schoolwide professional community. In F. M. Newmann & Associates (Ed.), Authentic achievement: Restructuring schools for intellectual quality (pp. 179–203). San Francisco, CA: Jossey‐Bass.
74. Louis, K. S., & Marks, H. M., (1998). Does professional community affect the classroom? Teachers’ work and student experiences in restructuring schools. American Journal of Education, 106, 532–575. doi:10.1086/444197
75. Marsh, C., (1982). The survey method: The contribution of surveys to sociological explanation. London, UK: Allen & Unwin.
76. Marzano, R. J., (1998). A theory-based meta-analysis of research on instruction. Aurora, CO: Mid-Continent Regional Educational Lab.
77. Marzano, R. J., Gaddy, B. B., Foseid, M. C., Foseid, M. P., & Marzano, J. S., (2005). A handbook for classroom management that works. Alexandria, VA: ASCD.
78. Mayer, D. P., (1999). Measuring instructional practice: Can policymakers trust survey data? Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 21, 29–45. doi:10.3102/01623737021001029
79. McLaughlin, M. W., & Talbert, J. E., (2006). Building school-based teacher learning communities: Professional strategies to improve student achievement. New York, NY: Teachers College Press.
80. Morrissey, M. S., (2000). Professional learning communities: An ongoing exploration. Retrieved from www.sedl.org/pubs/change45/plc-ongoing.pdf
81. Muijs, D., Kyriakides, L., Van Der Werf, G., Creemers, B., Timperley, H., & Earl, L., (2014). State of the art–Teacher effectiveness and professional learning. School Effectiveness and School Improvement, 25, 231–256. doi:10.1080/09243453.2014.885451
82. Muijs, D., & Reynolds, D., (2011). Effective teaching: Evidence and practice (3rd ed.). London, UK: Sage.
83. Muthén, B. O., & Satorra, A., (1995). Complex sample data in structural equation modeling. Sociological Methodology, 25, 267–316. doi:10.2307/271070
84. Muthén, L. K., & Muthén, B. O., (1998–2012). Mplus user’s guide (7th ed.). Los Angeles, CA: Authors.
85. Neuberger, J. A., (2010). Fostering effective mathematics teaching: Professional coaching and teachers’ instructional practices and beliefs (Doctoral dissertation). The State University of New Jersey, New Brunswick, NJ. Retrieved from https://rucore.libraries.rutgers.edu/rutgers-lib/27188/pdf/1
86. Newmann, F. M. (1996). Authentic achievement: Restructuring schools for intellectual quality. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
87. Opfer, V. D., & Pedder, D., (2011). Conceptualizing teacher professional learning. Review of Educational Research, 81, 376–407. doi:10.3102/0034654311413609
88. Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. (2009). Creating effective teaching and learning environments: First results from TALIS. Paris, France: Author.
89. Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. (2010). PISA 2009 results: What makes a school successful? Resources, policies and practices (Volume IV). Paris, France: Author.
90. Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. (2013). TALIS 2013 technical report. Paris, France: Author.
91. Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. (2014). TALIS 2013 results: An international perspective on teaching and learning. Paris, France: Author.
92. Orlovsky, C. K. B., (2014). Effects of professional development on the mathematical instructional practices of elementary school teachers: An action research study (Doctoral dissertation). Available from ProQuest Dissertations and Theses database. (UMI No. 3644290)
93. Parrett, W. H., & Budge, K. M., (2012). Turning high-poverty schools into high-performing schools. Alexandria, VA: ASCD.
94. Pedder, D., (2007). Profiling teachers’ professional learning practices and values: Differences between and within schools. Curriculum Journal, 18, 231–252. doi:10.1080/09585170701589801
95. Penuel, W. R., Fishman, B. J., Yamaguchi, R., & Gallagher, L. P., (2007). What makes professional development effective? Strategies that foster curriculum implementation. American Educational Research Journal, 44, 921–958. doi:10.3102/0002831207308221
96. Peugh, J. L., (2010). A practical guide to multilevel modeling. Journal of School Psychology, 48, 85–112. doi:10.1016/j.jsp.2009.09.002
97. Pianta, R. C., & Hamre, B., (2001). Students, teachers, and relationship support [STARS]: User’s guide. Lutz, FL: Psychological Assessment Resources.
98. Porter, A. C., Kirst, M. W., Osthoff, E. J., Smithson, J. L., & Schneider, S. A., (1993). Reform up close: An analysis of high school mathematics and science classrooms. Madison, WI: University of Wisconsin-Madison.
99. Putnam, R. T., & Borko, H., (2000). What do new views of knowledge and thinking have to say about research on teacher learning? Educational Researcher, 29(1), 4–15. doi:10.3102/0013189X029001004
100. Raudenbush, S. W., & Bryk, A. S., (2002). Hierarchical linear models: Applications and data analysis methods (2nd ed.). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
101. Raykov, T., (1997). Scale reliability, Cronbach’s coefficient alpha, and violations of essential tau-equivalence with fixed congeneric components. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 32, 329–353. doi:10.1207/s15327906mbr3204_2
102. Raykov, T., (2004). Behavioral scale reliability and measurement invariance evaluation using latent variable modeling. Behavior Therapy, 35, 299–331. doi:10.1016/S0005-7894(04)80041-8
103. Rubin, D. B., (2007). The design versus the analysis of observational studies for causal effects: Parallels with the design of randomized trials. Statistics in Medicine, 26, 20–36. doi:10.1002/sim.2739/pdf
104. Rutkowski, L., von Davier, M, & Rutkowski, D., (Eds.). (2014). Handbook of international large-scale assessment: Background, technical issues, and methods of data analysis. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press, Taylor & Francis Group.
105. Scheerens, J., (with Luyten, H., Steen, R., & Luyten-de-Thouars, Y). (2008). Review and meta-analyses of school and teaching effectiveness. Berlin, Germany: Bundesministerium für Bildung und forschung.
106. Scheerens, J., (Ed.). (2010). Teachers’ professional development: Europe in international comparison: An analysis of teachers’ professional development based on the OECD’s Teaching and Learning International Survey (TALIS). Luxembourg, Luxembourg: Office for official publications of the European Union.
107. Seidel, T., & Shavelson, R. J., (2007). Teaching effectiveness research in the past decade: The role of theory and research design in disentangling meta-analysis results. Review of Educational Research, 77, 454–499. doi:10.3102/0034654307310317
108. Smith, C., & Gillespie, M., (2007). Research on professional development and teacher change: Implications for adult basic education (pp. 205–244). Retrieved from http://www.ncsall.net/fileadmin/resources/ann_rev/smith-gillespie-07.pdf
109. Smith, J. B., Lee, V. E., & Newmann, F. M., (2001). Instruction and achievement in Chicago elementary schools. Improving Chicago’s schools. Chicago, IL: Consortium on Chicago School Research.
110. Snijders, T. A. B., & Bosker, R. J., (1999). Multilevel analysis: An introduction to basic and advanced multilevel modeling. London, UK: Sage.
111. Stein, M. K., Smith, M. S., & Silver, E. A., (1999). The development of professional developers: Learning to assist teachers in new setting in new ways. Harvard Educational Review, 69, 237–269.
112. Stigler, J. W., & Hiebert, J., (2004). Improving mathematics teaching. Educational Leadership, 61(5), 12–17.
113. Stoll, L., Bolam, R., McMahon, A., Wallace, M., & Thomas, S., (2006). Professional learning communities: A review of the literature. Journal of Educational Change, 7, 221–258. doi:10.1007/s10833-006-0001-8
114. Supovitz, J. A., & Turner, H. M., (2000). The effects of professional development on science teaching practices and classroom culture. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 37, 963–980. doi:10.1002/1098-2736(200011)37:9<963::AID-TEA6>3.0.CO;2-0
115. Tschannen-Moran, M., & Woolfolk Hoy, A., (2007). The differential antecedents of self-efficacy beliefs of novice and experienced teachers. Teaching and Teacher Education, 23, 944–956. doi:10.1016/j.tate.2006.05.003
116. Vieluf, S., Kaplan, D., Klieme, E., & Bayer, S., (2012). Teaching practices and pedagogical innovation: Evidence from TALIS. Paris, France: OECD.
117. Wang, M. C., Haertel, G. D., & Walberg, H. J., (1993). Toward a knowledge base for school learning. Review of Educational Research, 63, 249–294. doi:10.3102/00346543063003249
118. Wayne, A. J., Yoon, K. S., Zhu, P., Cronen, S., & Garet, M. S., (2008). Experimenting with teacher professional development: Motives and methods. Educational Researcher, 37, 469–479. doi:10.3102/0013189X08327154
119. Yoon, K. S., Garet, M., Birman, B., & Jacobson, R., (2006). Examining the effects of mathematics and science professional development on teachers’ instructional practice: Using professional development activity log. Washington, DC: Council of Chief State School Officers.
120. Yoon, K. S., Jacobson, R., Garet, M., Birman, B., & Ludwig, M., (2004, April). Professional development activity log (PDAL): A new approach to design, measurement, data collection, and analysis. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association, San Diego, CA.