Factors affecting the impact of professional development programs on teachers' knowledge, practice, student outcomes & efficacy

Education Policy Analysis Archives

Volumn 13, Issue , 2005, Pages 1-28

  Ingvarson, Lawrence ^a,b   Meiers, Marion ^a   Beavis, Adrian ^a  

^a Australian Cncl Educ Research   (Australia)

^b ACER   (Australia)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 14744288153     PISSN: 10682341     EISSN: 10682341     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.14507/epaa.v13n10.2005     Document Type: Review

References (18)

1. Cohen, D., and Hill, H. (2000). Instructional policy and classroom performance: The mathematics reform in California. Teachers College Record, 102(2), 294-343.
2. rd Edition. New York Teachers College Press.
3. Garet, M, Porter, A, Desimone, L., Birman, B., & Yoon, K. (2001). What Makes Professional Development Effective? Results From a National Sample of Teachers. American Educational Research Journal, 38(3), 915-945.
4. Guskey, T.R. (1985). Staff development and the process of teacher change. Educational Researcher, 15(5), 5-12.
5. Guskey T.R., & Sparks, D. (2002). Linking professional development to improvements in student learning. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, April 2002
6. Hawley D., & Valli, L. (1999). The essentials of effective professional development: A new consensus. In L. Darling-Hammond & G. Sykes (Eds.) Teaching as the Learning Profession Handbook of Policy and Practice, (pp. 127-150). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass Publishers.
7. Heller, J.I., Daehler, K.R., & Shinohara, M (2003). Connecting all the pieces. Journal of Staff Development. 24(4), 36-41.
8. Huberman, M, & Miles, M (1984). Innovation up dose. New York Plenum Press.
9. Ingvarson, L.C. (1998). Teaching standards: foundations for the reform of professional development. In A. Hargreaves, A. Lieberman, M. Fullan & D. Hopkins (Eds). International handbook of educational change. Dordrecht: Kluwer.
10. Ingvarson, L.C. (2002). Building a Learning Profession Paper No 1, Commissioned Research Series, Australian College of Education. Canberra: Australian College of Education. (http://www.acer.edu.au/publications/ policybriefs.html)
11. Joyce, B., & Showers, B. (1995). Student achievement through staff development: Fundamentals of school renewal. Second Edition. White Plains, NY: Longman.
12. Kennedy, M. (1998). Form and substance in in-service teacher education (Research monograph No. 13). Arlington, VA: National Science Foundation.
13. Killion, J. (2003). Solid footwork makes evaluation of staff development a song. Journal of Staff Development. 24 (4), 14-21.
14. Loucks-Horsley, S., Hewson, P., Love, N., and Stiles, K. (1998). Designing professional development for teachers of mathematics and science. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press.
15. Mayer, D. (1999). Measuring instructional practice: Can policymakers trust survey data? Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis. 22(1), 29-45.
16. Supovitz, J. (2001). Translating teaching practice into improved student achievement. In S. Fuhrman (Ed). From the capitol to the classroom: Standards-based reform in the states. The one hundredth yearbook of the National Society for the Study of Education, Part Two(pp. 81-98). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
17. Sykes, G. (2002). Professional development for teachers: principles, practices and contexts. Paper prepared for the Learning First Alliance (Draft).
18. Wilson, S., & Berne, J. (1999). Teacher learning and the acquisition of professional knowledge: An examination of research on contemporary professional development. In A. Iran-Nejad and P. D. Pearson (Eds.). Review of Research in Education, Vol. 24 (pp. 173-209). Washington, DC: American Educational Research Association.