The relationship between metacognition and the ability to pose questions in chemical education

Contemporary Trends and Issues in Science Education

Volumn 40, Issue , 2012, Pages 165-195

  Herscovitz, Orit ^a   Kaberman, Zvia ^a   Saar, Liora ^b   Dori, Yehudit Judy ^a,c  

^a TECHNION ISRAEL INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY   (Israel)

^b Hemda Center for Science Education   (Israel)

^c MASSACHUSETTS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY   (United States)

Author keywords

Metacognitive Knowledge; Metacognitive Process; Metacognitive Skill; Metacognitive Strategy; Scientific Article

Indexed keywords

EID: 85028336952     PISSN: 18780482     EISSN: 18780784     Source Type: Book Series    
DOI: 10.1007/978-94-007-2132-6_8     Document Type: Chapter

References (67)

1. Anderson, D., Nashon, S. M., & Thomas, G. P. (2008). Evolution of research methods for probing and understanding metacognition. Research in Science Education, 39, 181–195.
2. Arzi, H., & White, R. T. (1986). Questions on students’ questions. Research in Science Education, 16, 82–91.
3. Avargil, S., Herscovitz, O., & Dori, Y. J. (2011). Teaching thinking skills in context-based learning: Teachers’ challenges and assessment knowledge. Journal of Science Education and Technology. Online first doi:10.1007/s10956-011-9302-7.
4. Bandura, A. (1997). Self-efficacy: The exercise of control. New York: Freeman.
5. Barak, M., & Dori, Y. J. (2005). Enhancing undergraduate students’ chemistry understanding through project-based learning in an IT environment. Science Education, 89(1), 117–139.
6. Barnea, N., Dori, Y. J., & Hofstein, A. (2010). Development and implementation of Inquiry-based and computerized-based laboratories: Reforming high school chemistry in Israel. Chemistry Education Research and Practice, 11, 218–228.
7. Becker, R. (2000). The critical role of students’ questions in literacy development. The Educational Forum, 64, 261–271.
8. Bloom, B. S. (1956). Taxonomy of educational objectives: Handbook 1 the cognitive domain. New York: Mckay.
9. Brown, A. L. (1987). Metacognition, executive control, self regulation and other more mysterious mechanisms. In F. E. Weiner & R. H. Kluwe (Eds.), Metacognition, motivation, and understanding. Hillsdale: Erlbaum.
10. Butler, D. L., & Winne, P. H. (1995). Feedback and self-regulated learning: A theoretical synthesis. Review of Educational Research, 65, 245–282.
11. Denzin, N. K., & Lincoln, Y. S. (2000). The discipline and the practice of qualitative research. In N. K. Denzin & Y. S. Lincoln (Eds.), Handbook of qualitative research. London: SAGE Publications LTD.
12. Dillon, J. T. (1988). The remedial status of student questioning. Journal of Curriculum studies, 20, 197–210.
13. Dori, Y. J., Barak, M., Herscovitz, O., & Carmi, M. (2005). Preparing pre-and in-service teachers to teach high school science in a technology-rich environment. In C. Vrasidas & G. V. Glass (Eds.), Current perspectives on applied information technologies: Preparing teachers to teach with technology (pp. 303–321). Greenwich: Information Age Publication.
14. Dori, Y. J., & Hameiri, M. (2003). Multidimensional analysis system for quantitative chemistry problems – Symbol, macro, micro and process aspects. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 40(3), 278–302.
15. Dori, Y. J., & Herscovitz, O. (1999). Question posing capability as an alternative evaluation method: Analysis of an environment case study. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 36, 411–430.
16. Dori, Y. J., & Herscovitz, O. (2005). Case-based long-term professional development of science teachers. International Journal of Science Education, 27, 1413–1446.
17. Dori, Y. J., & Sasson, I. (2008). Chemical understanding and graphing skills in an honors case-based computerized chemistry laboratory environment: The value of bidirectional visual and textual representations. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 45(2), 219–250.
18. Dori, Y. J., & Tal, R. T. (2000). Formal and informal collaborative projects: Engaging in industry with environmental awareness. Science Education, 84(1), 95–113.
19. Dori, Y. J., Tal, R. T., & Tsaushu, M. (2003). Teaching biotechnology through case studies. Can we improve higher order thinking skills of non – science majors? Science Education, 87, 767–793.
20. Dori, Y. J., Sasson, I., Kaberman, Z., & Herscovitz, O. (2004). Integrating case-based computerized laboratories into high school chemistry. The Chemical Educator, 9, 1–5.
21. Duffy, G. D., Roehler, L. R., Meloth, M. S., Polin, R., & Rackliffee, G. (1987). Developing and evaluation measures associated with strategic reading. Journal of Reading Behavior, 14, 223–247.
22. Falk, H., & Yarden, A. (2009). “Here the scientists explain what I said.” Coordination practices elicited during the enactment of the results and discussion sections of adapted primary literature. Research in Science Education, 39, 349–383.
23. Flavell, J. H. (1976). Metacognitve aspects of problem solving. In L. B. Resnick (Ed.), The nature of intelligence (pp. 231–235). Hillsdale: Erlbaum.
24. Flavell, J. H. (1979). Metacognition and cognitive monitoring: A new area of cognitive-developmental inquiry. American Psychologist, 34, 906–911.
25. Flavell, J. H. (1981). Cognitive monitoring. In W. P. Dickson (Ed.), Children’s oral communication skills. New York: Academic.
26. Flavell, J. H. (1987). Speculations about the nature and development of metacognition. In F. E. Weiner & R. H. Kluwe (Eds.), Metacognition, motivation, and understanding (pp. 21–29). Hillsdale: Lawrence Erlbaum.
27. Flavell, J. H., Miller, P. H., & Miller, S. A. (2002). Cognitive development (4th ed., pp. 163–167). Englewood Cliffs: Prentice Hall.
28. Georghiades, P. (2004). From the general to the situated: Three decades of metacognition. International Journal of Science Education, 26, 365–383.
29. Hartman, H. J. (1994). From reciprocal teaching to reciprocal education. Journal of Developmental Education, 18(1), 2–8. 32.
30. Herscovitz, O., Kaberman, Z., & Dori, Y. J. (2007a). Taste of chemistry. Holon: Yessod Publishing House (In Hebrew).
31. Herscovitz, O., Saar, L., & Dori, Y. J. (2007b). It’s all chemistry – Analyzing adapted scientific articles and case studies. Holon: Yessod Publishing House (In Hebrew).
32. Jacobs, J. E., & Paris, S. G. (1987). Children’s metacognition about reading: Issues in definition, measurement and instruction. Educational Psychologist, 22, 255–278.
33. Johnson, R. B., & Onwuegbuzie, A. J. (2004). Mixed method research: A research paradigm whose time has come. Educational Researcher, 33, 14–26.
34. Kaberman, Z., & Dori, Y. J. (2009a). Metacognition in chemical education: Question posing in the case-based computerized learning environment. Instructional Science, 37, 403–436.
35. Kaberman, Z., & Dori, Y. J. (2009b). Question posing, inquiry, and modeling skills of high school chemistry students in the case-based computerized laboratory environment. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 7, 597–625.
36. Kipnis, M., & Hofstein, A. (2007). The inquiry laboratory as a source for development of metacognitive skills. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 6, 601–627.
37. Koch, A. (2001). Training in metacognition and comprehension of physics texts. Science Education, 85, 758–768.
38. Kuhn, D. (1989). Children and adults as intuitive scientists. Psychology Review, 96, 674–689.
39. Kuhn, D. (1999). Metacognitive development. In L. Balter & C. S. Tamis-LeMonda (Eds.), Child psychology: Handbook of contemporary issues (pp. 259–286). Philadelphia: Psychology Press.
40. Kuhn, D. (2000). Metacognitive development. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 9, 178–181.
41. Kuhn, D., Black, J., Keselman, A., & Kaplan, D. (2000). The development of cognitive skills to support inquiry learning. Cognition and Instruction, 18, 495–523.
42. Montgomery, D. E. (1992). Young children’s theory of knowing: The development of folk epistemology. Developmental Review, 12, 410–430.
43. National Research Council. (1996). National science education standards. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
44. National Research Council. (2005). National science education standards. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
45. Paris, S. G., & Oka, E. R. (1986). Children’s reading strategies, metacognition and motivation. Developmental Review, 6, 25–56.
46. Paris, S. G., & Winograd, P. (1990). How metacognition can promote academic learning and instruction. In B. F. Jones & L. Idol (Eds.), Dimensions of thinking and cognitive instruction (pp. 15–51). Hillsdale: Lawrence Erlbaum.
47. Pintrich, P. R. (2002). The role of metacognitive knowledge in learning, teaching and assessing. Theory into Practice, 41(4), 219–225.
48. Resnick, L. B. (1987). Education and learning to think. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
49. Sasson, I., & Dori, Y. J. (2006). Fostering near and far transfer in the chemistry case-based laboratory environment. In G. Clarebout & J. Elen (Eds.), Avoiding simplicity, confronting complexity: Advance in studying and designing powerful (computer-based) learning environments (pp. 275–286). Rotterdam: Sense Publishers.
50. Schraw, G. (1998). Promoting general metacognitive awareness. Instructional Sciences, 26, 113–125.
51. Schraw, G., & Moshman, D. (1995). Metacognitive theories. Psychology Review, 7, 351–371.
52. Schraw, G., Crippen, K. J., & Hartley, K. D. (2006). Promoting self-regulation in science education: Metacognition as part of a broader perspective on learning. Research in Science Education, 36, 111–139.
53. Schunk, D. H., & Zimmerman, B. J. (Eds.). (1994). Self-regulation of learning and performance: issues and educational applications. Hillsdale: Lawrence Erlbaum associates, Inc.
54. Schwartz, A. T. (2006). Contextualized chemistry education: The American experience. International Journal of Science Education, 28, 977–998.
55. Simons, K. D., & Klein, J. D. (2007). The impact of scaffolding and student achievement levels in a problem-based learning environment. Instructional Science, 35, 41–72.
56. Singer, H. (1978). Active comprehension: From answering to asking questions. Reading Teacher, 31, 901–908.
57. Thomas, G. P. (2003). Conceptualization, development and validation of an instrument for investigating the metacognitive orientation of science classroom learning environments: The metacognitive orientation learning environment scale—science (MOLES-S). Learning Environments Research, 6, 175–197.
58. Thomas, G. P., & McRobbie, C. J. (2001). Using a metaphor for learning to improve students’ metacognition in the chemistry classroom. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 38, 222–259.
59. Thomas, G. P., Anderson, D., & Nashon, S. (2008). Development of an instrument designed to investigate elements of science students’ metacognition, self-efficacy and learning processes: The SEMLI-S. International Journal of Science Education, 30, 1701–1724.
60. Tobin, K., & Gallagher, J. J. (1987). What happens in high school science classrooms? Journal of Curriculum Studies, 19, 549–560.
61. Wandersee, J. H. (1988). Ways students read texts. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 25, 69–84.
62. White, R. T. (1998). Decisions and problems in research on metacognition. In B. J. Fraser & K. G. Tobin (Eds.), International handbook of science education (pp. 1207–1213). Great Britain: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
63. Woodward, C. (1992). Raising and answering questions in primary science: Some considerations. Evaluation and Research in Education, 6, 145–153.
64. Yarden, A. (2009). Reading scientific texts: Adapting primary literature for promoting scientific literacy. Research in Science Education, 39, 307–311.
65. Zimmerman, B. J. (2000). Self-efficacy: An essential motive to learn. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 25, 82–91.
66. Zohar, A. (2004). Higher order thinking in science classrooms: Students’ thinking and teachers’ professional development. Dordrecht/Boston/London: Kluwer Academic Press.
67. Zoller, U. (1993). Are Lecture and Learning Compatible? Maybe for LOCS: Unlikely for HOCS. Journal of Chemical Education, 70(3), 195–197.