A low-effort recommendation system with high accuracy: A new approach with ranked pareto-fronts

Business and Information Systems Engineering

Volumn 5, Issue 6, 2013, Pages 397-408

  Pfeiffer, Jella ^a   Scholz, Michael ^b  

^a JOHANNES GUTENBERG UNIVERSITY   (Germany)

^b UNIVERSITY OF PASSAU   (Germany)

Author keywords

Accuracy; Effort; Pareto front; Preference measurement; Recommendation systems; Simulation

Indexed keywords

EID: 85027946052     PISSN: None     EISSN: 18670202     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s12599-013-0295-z     Document Type: Article

References (52)

1. Adomavicius G, Tuzhilin A (2005) Toward the next generation of recommender systems: a survey of the state-of-the-art and possible extensions. IEEE Trans Knowl Data Eng 17(6): 734-749
2. Aksoy L, Cooil B, Lurie NH (2011) Decision quality measures in recommendation agents research. J Interact Mark 25(2): 110-122
3. Ansari A, Essegaier S, Kohli R (2000) Internet recommendation systems. J Mark Res 37(3): 363-375
4. Bettman JR, Johnson EJ, Payne JW (1990) A componential analysis of cognitive effort in choice. Organ Behav Hum Decis Process 45(1): 111-129
5. Biggs SF, Bedard JC, Gaber BG, Linsmeier TJ (1985) The effect of task size and similarity on the decision behavior of bank loan officers. Manage Sci 31(8): 970-987
6. Bröder A, Schiffer S (2003) Bayesian strategy assessment in multi-attribute decision research. J Behav Decis Mak 16(3): 193-213
7. Burke R (2002) Hybrid recommender systems: survey and experiments. User Model User-Adapt Interact 12(4): 331-370
8. Butler JC, Dyer JS, Jia J, Tomak K (2008) Enabling e-transactions with multiattribute preference models. Eur J Oper Res 186(2): 748-765
9. Butler JC, Morrice DJ, Mullarkey PW (2001) A multiple attribute utility theory approach to ranking and selection. Manage Sci 47(6): 800-816
10. Cao Y, Li Y (2007) An intelligent fuzzybased recommendation system for consumer electronic products. Expert Syst Appl 33(1): 230-240
11. De Bruyn A, Liechty JC, Huizingh EK, Lilien GL (2008) Offering online recommendations with minimum customer input through conjoint-based decision aids. Mark Sci 27(3): 443-460
12. Denstadli JM, Lines R (2007) Conjoint respondents as adaptive decision makers. Int J Mark Res 49(1): 117-132
13. Dorner V, Scholz M (2013) Predicting and economically exploiting utility thresholds with utility-based recommendation systems. In: Proc of the 21st eur conf inform syst
14. Fiebig DG, Keane MP, Louviere J, Wasi N (2010) The generalized multinomial logit model: accounting for scale and coefficient heterogeneity. Mark Sci 29(3): 393-421
15. Fritz M, Schlereth C, Figge S (2011) Empirical evaluation of fair use flat rate strategies for mobile Internet. Bus Inf Syst Eng 3(5): 269-277
16. Gensler S, Hinz O, Skiera B, Theysohn S (2012) Willingness-to-pay estimation with choice-based conjoint analysis: addressing extreme response behavior with individually adapted designs. Eur J Oper Res 219(2): 368-378
17. Godfrey P, Shipley R, Gryz J (2006) Algorithms and analyses for maximal vector computation. VLDB J 16(1): 5-28
18. Green PE, Krieger AM, Winder Y (2001) Thirty years of conjoint analysis: reflections and prospects. Interfaces 31(3): 56-73
19. Häubl G, Trifts V (2000) Consumer decision making in online shopping environments: the effects of interactive decision aids. Mark Sci 19(1): 4-21
20. Hevner AR, March ST, Park J, Ram S (2004) Design science in information systems research. MIS Q 28(1): 75-105
21. Hey JD (1982) Search for rules for search. J Econ Behav Organ 3: 65-81
22. Hinz O, Eckert J (2010) The impact of search and recommendation systems on sales in electronic commerce. Bus Inf Syst Eng 2(2): 66-77
23. Hostler RE, Yoon VY, Guo Z, Guimaraes T, Forgionne G (2011) Assessing the impact of recommender agents on on-line consumer unplanned purchase behavior. Inf Manag 48(8): 336-343
24. Hoyer WD (1984) An examination of consumer decision making for a common repeat purchase product. J Consum Res 11(3): 822-829
25. Huang S (2011) Designing utility-based recommender systems for e-commerce: evaluation of preference-elicitation methods. Electron Commer Res Appl 10(4): 398-407
26. Jedidi K, Kohli R, DeSarbo WS (1996) Consideration sets in conjoint analysis. J Mark Res 33(3): 364-372
27. Johnson EJ, Payne JW (1985) Effort and accuracy in choice. Manage Sci 31(4): 395-414
28. Kamis A, Koufaris M, Stern T (2008) Using an attribute-based decision support system for user-customized products online: an experimental investigation. MIS Q 32(1): 159-177
29. Kanninen BJ (2002) Optimal design for multinomial choice experiments. J Mark Res 39(2): 214-227
30. Kumar N, Benbasat I (2006) The influence of recommendations and consumer reviews on evaluations of websites. Inf Syst Res 17(4): 425-439
31. Lohse GL, Johnson EJ (1996) A comparison of two process tracing methods for choice tasks. Organ Behav Hum Decis Process 68(1): 28-43
32. Loomes G, Sugden R (1982) Regret theory: an alternative theory of rational choice under uncertainty. Econ J 92(368): 805-824
33. Montgomery A, Hosanagar K, Krishnan R, Clay K (2004) Designing a better shopbot. Manage Sci 50: 189-206
34. Moore WL (2004) A cross-validity comparison of rating-based and choice-based conjoint analysis models. Int J Res Mark 21(3): 299-312
35. Moore WL, Gray-Lee J, Louviere JJ (1998) A cross-validity comparison of conjoint analysis and choice models at different levels of aggregation. Mark Lett 9(2): 195-207
36. Olshavsky RW (1979) Task complexity and contingent processing in decision making: a replication and extension. Organ Behav Hum Perform 24: 300-316
37. Payne JW, Bettman JR, Johnson EJ (1993) The adaptive decision maker. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
38. Pfeiffer J (2012) Interactive decision aids in e-commerce. Springer, Berlin
39. Rand W, Rust RT (2011) Agent-based modeling in marketing: guidelines for rigor. Int J Mark Res 28(3): 181-193
40. Rieskamp J, Hoffrage U (2008) Inferences under time pressure: how opportunity costs affect strategy selection. Acta Psychol 127(2): 258-276
41. Rossi PE, Allenby GM, McCulloch R (2005) Bayesian statistics and marketing. Wiley, West Sussex
42. Schlereth C, Eckert C, Skiera B (2012) Using discrete choice experiments to estimate willingness-to-pay intervales. Mark Lett 23(3): 761-776
43. Scholz M, Dorner V (2012) Estimating optimal recommendation set sizes for individual consumers. In: Proc of the 33rd int conf inform syst
44. Svenson O (1979) Process descriptions of decision making. Organ Behav Hum Perform 23: 86-112
45. Todd PA, Benbasat I (1992) An experimental investigation of the impact of computer based decision aids on processing effort. MIS Q 16(3): 373-393
46. Todd PA, Benbasat I (1994) The influence of decision aids on choice strategies and conditions of high cognitive load. IEEE Trans Syst Man Cybern 24(4): 537-547
47. van Ittersum K, Pennings J (2012) Attributevalue functions as global interpretations of attribute importance. Organ Behav Hum Decis Process 119(1): 89-102
48. Wallenius J, Dyer JS, Fishburn PC, Steuer RE, Zionts S, Deb K (2008) Multiple criteria decision making, multiattribute utility theory: recent accomplishments and what lies ahead. Manage Sci 54(7): 1336-1349
49. Wang W, Benbasat I (2009) Interactive decision aids for consumer decision making in e-commerce: the influence of perceived strategy restrictiveness. MIS Q 33(2): 293-320
50. Wohlin C, Runeson P, Höst M, Ohlsson MC, Regnell B, Wesslén A (2012) Experimentation in software engineering. Springer, Berlin
51. Xiao B, Benbasat I (2007) E-commerce product recommendation agents: use, characteristics, and impact. MIS Q 31(1): 137-209
52. Yee M, Dahan E, Hauser JR, Orlin J (2007) Greedoid-based noncompensatory inference. Mark Sci 26(4): 532-549