Predicting and economically exploiting utility thresholds with utility-based recommendation systems

ECIS 2013 - Proceedings of the 21st European Conference on Information Systems

Volumn , Issue , 2013, Pages

  Verena, Dorner ^a   Michael, Scholz ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF PASSAU   (Germany)

Author keywords

E Commerce; Economic Implications; Recommender Systems

Indexed keywords

COST BENEFIT ANALYSIS; DECISION SUPPORT SYSTEMS; ELECTRONIC COMMERCE; INFORMATION SYSTEMS;

BUSINESS DECISION SUPPORTS; ECONOMIC IMPLICATIONS; EMPIRICAL EVALUATIONS; ONLINE PRODUCTS; PRODUCT CONFIGURATION; SEARCH COSTS; WILLINGNESS TO PAY; WILLINGNESS-TO-PAY ESTIMATES;

RECOMMENDER SYSTEMS;

EID: 84905860804     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (39)

1. Adomavicius, G., and Tuzhilin, A. (2005). Towards the Next Generation of Recommender Systems: A Survey of the State-of-the-Art and Possible Extensions, IEEE Transactions on Knowledge &Data Engineering, 17(6), 734-749.
2. Aksoy, L., Bloom, P.N., Lurie, N.H., and Cooil, B. (2006). Should Recommendation Agents Think Like People?, Journal of Service Research, 8(4), 297-315.
3. Andrews, R. L., and Srinivasan, T.C. (1995). Studying Consideration Effects in Empirical Choice Models Using Scanner Panel Data, Journal of Marketing Research, 32(1), 30-41.
4. Ansari, A., Essegaier, S., and Kohli, R. (2000). Internet Recommendation Systems, Journal of Marketing Research, 37(3), 363-375.
5. Bettman, J.R., Luce, M.F., and Payne, J.W. (1998). Constructive Consumer Choice Processes, Journal of Consumer Research, 25(3), 187-217.
6. Burke, R. (2002). Hybrid Recommender Systems: Survey and Experiments, User Modeling and User-Adapted Interaction, 12(4), 331-370.
7. Butler, J., Morrice, D.J., and Mullarkey, P. (2001). A Multiple Attribute Utility Theory Approach to Ranking and Selection, Management Science, 47(6), 800-816.
8. Chernev, A. (2003). When More is Less and Less is More: The Role of Ideal Point Availability and Assortment in Consumer Choice, Journal of Consumer Research, 30(2), 170-183.
9. Darley, W.K., and Smith, R.E. (1995). Gender Differences in Information Processing Strategies: An Empirical Test of the Selectivity Model in Advertising Response, Journal of Advertising, 24(1), 41-56.
10. De Bruyn, A., Liechty, J.C., Huizingh, E.K.R.E., and Lilien, G.L. (2008). Offering Online Recommendations with Minimum Customer Input Through Conjoint-Based Decision Aids, Marketing Science, 27(3), 443-460.
11. Diehl, K., Kornish, L.J., and Lynch, J.G. (2003). Smart Agents: When Lower Search Costs for Quality Information Increase Price Sensitivity, Journal of Consumer Research, 30(1), 56-71.
12. Farag, N., Smith, M., and Krishnan, M. (2003). The Consumer Online Purchase Decision: A Model of Consideration Set Formation and Buyer Conversion Rate Across Market Leaders and Market Followers, Proceedings of the ICIS 2003, Seattle, USA.
13. Gensler, S., Hinz, O., Skiera, B., and Theysohn, S. (2012). Willingness-to-pay Estimation with Choice-based Conjoint Analysis: Addressing Extreme Response Behavior with Individually Adapted Designs, European Journal of Operational Research, 219(2), 368-378.
14. Gilbride, T., and Allenby, G. (2004). A Choice Model with Conjunctive, Disjunctive, and Compensatory Screening Rules, Marketing Sciences, 23(3), 391-406.
15. Green, P.E., Krieger, A.M., and Agarwal, M.K. (1993). A Cross Validation Test of Four Models for Quantifying Multiattribute Preferences, Marketing Letters, 4(4), 369-380.
16. Gu, B., Konana, P., and Chen, H. (2011). Consumer Product Consideration and Choice at Purchase Time at Online Retailers, Proceedings of the ICIS 2011, Shanghai, China.
17. Guest, L. (1964). Brand Loyalty Revisited: A Twenty Year Report, Journal of Applied Psychology, 48, 93-99.
18. Häubl, G., and Trifts, V. (2000). Consumer Decision Making in Online Shopping Environments: The Effects of Interactive Decision Aids, Marketing Science, 19(1), 4-21.
19. Hauser, J.R., and Wernerfelt, B. (1990). An Evaluation Cost Model of Consideration Sets, Journal of Consumer Research, 16(4), 393-408.
20. Helmig, B. (1997). Variety-seeking behaviour im Konsumgüterbereich, Wiesbaden, Gabler.
21. Herlocker, J.L., Konstan, J.A., Terveen, L.G., and Riedl, J.T. (2004). Evaluating Collaborative Filtering Recommender Systems, ACM Transactions on Information Systems, 22(1), 5-53.
22. Huang, S. (2011). Designing Utility-based Recommender Systems for E-Commerce: Evaluation of Preference-elicitation Methods, Electronic Commerce Research and Applications, 10(4), 398-407.
23. Jedidi, K., Kohli, R., and DeSarbo, W. (1996). Consideration Sets in Conjoint Analysis, Journal of Marketing Research, 33(3), 364-372.
24. Jedidi, K., and Zhang, Z.J. (2002). Augmenting Conjoint Analysis to Estimate Consumer Reservation Price, Management Science, 48(10), 1350-1368.
25. Johnson, E.J., and Payne, J.W. (1985). Effort and Accuracy in Choice, Management Science, 31(4), 395-414.
26. Karjaluoto, H., Karvonen, J., Kesti, M., Koivumäki, T., Manninen, M., Pakola, J., Ristola, A., and Salo, J. (2005). Factors Affecting Consumer Choice of Mobile Phones: Two Studies from Finland, Journal of Euromarketing, 14(3), 59-82.
27. Lin, F.-R., Huang, S.-L., and Yang, Y.-C (2005). Using radial basis function networks to model multi-attribute utility functions, Proceedings of the 4th Workshop on e-Business, Las Vegas, USA.
28. Miller, K.M., Hofstetter, R., Krohmer, H., and Zhang, Z.J. (2011). How Should Consumers' Willingness to Pay Be Measured? An Empirical Comparision of State-of-the-Art Approaches, Journal of Marketing Research, 48(1), 172-184.
29. Mitchell, V.-W., and Walsh, G. (2004). Gender Differences in German Consumer Decision-making Styles, Journal of Consumer Behaviour, 3(4), 331-346.
30. Moore, W.L. (2004). A Cross-Validity Comparison of Rating-based and Choice-based Conjoint Analysis Models, International Journal of Research in Marketing, 21(3), 299-312.
31. Pfeiffer, J. (2012). Interactive Decision Aids in E-Commerce, Springer, Heidelberg.
32. Resnick, P., and Varian, H.R. (1997). Recommender Systems, Communications of the ACM, 40(3), 56-58.
33. Sambandam, R., and Lord, K.R. (1995). Switching Behavior in Automobile Markets: A Consideration-Sets Model, Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 23(1), 57-65.
34. Schafer, J.B., Konstan, J.A., and Riedl, J.T. (2001). E-Commerce Recommendation Applications, Data Mining Knowledge Discovery, 5(1), 115-153.
35. Scholz, M. and Dorner, V. (2012). Estimating Optimal Recommendation Set Sizes for Individual Consumers, Proceedings of the ICIS 2012, Orlando, USA.
36. Tanner, W., and Swets, J. (1954). A Decision-making Theory of Visual Detection, Psychological Review, 61(6), pp. 401-409.
37. Wallenius, J., Dyer, J.S., Fishburn, P.C., Steuer, R.E., Zionts, S. and Deb, K. (2008). Multiple Criteria Decision Making, Multiattribute Utility Theory: Recent Accomplishments and What Lies Ahead, Management Science, 54(7), 1336-1349.
38. White, C.M., and Hoffrage, U. (2009). Testing the Tyranny of Too Much Choice Against the Allure of More Choice, Psychology &Marketing, 26(3), 280-298.
39. Xiao, B., and Benbasat, I. (2007). E-Commerce Product Recommendation Agents: Use, Characteristics, and Impact, MIS Quarterly, 31(1), 137-209.