Correction: Knowing right from wrong in mental arithmetic judgments: calibration of confidence predicts the development of accuracy (PLoS ONE (2014) 9, 7 (e98663) DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0098663);Knowing right from wrong in mental arithmetic judgments: Calibration of confidence predicts the development of accuracy

PLoS ONE

Volumn 9, Issue 7, 2014, Pages

  Rinne, Luke F ^a   Mazzocco, Michèle M M ^b  

^a JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ACCURACY; ACHIEVEMENT; ARTICLE; CALIBRATION; CHILD; COGNITIVE DEVELOPMENT; CONFIDENCE; CONTROLLED STUDY; DECISION MAKING; ERROR; EXECUTIVE FUNCTION; FEMALE; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; LEARNING; LONGITUDINAL STUDY; MALE; MATHEMATICS; MENTAL ARITHMETIC; MENTAL PERFORMANCE; PREDICTION; PROSPECTIVE STUDY; EDUCATION; PROBLEM SOLVING; REINFORCEMENT; STATISTICAL MODEL; WECHSLER INTELLIGENCE SCALE;

CALIBRATION; CHILD; FEMALE; HUMANS; JUDGMENT; KNOWLEDGE OF RESULTS (PSYCHOLOGY); LOGISTIC MODELS; LONGITUDINAL STUDIES; MALE; MATHEMATICS; PROBABILITY LEARNING; PROBLEM SOLVING; WECHSLER SCALES;

EID: 84903772746     PISSN: None     EISSN: 19326203     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0109512     Document Type: Erratum

References (48)

1. Gigerenzer G, Hoffrage U, Kleinbölting H. (1997) Probabilistic mental models: A Brunswikian theory of confidence. Psychol Rev 98: 506-528.
2. Keren G. (1991) Calibration and probability judgements: Conceptual and methodological issues. Acta Psychol 77: 217-273.
3. Lichtenstein S, Fischhoff B, Phillips L. (1982) Calibration of probabilities: The state of the art to 1980. In: Kahneman D, Slovic P, Tversky A, editors. Judgment under uncertainty: Heuristics and biases. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. pp. 306-334.
4. Dunlosky J, Thiede KW. (2013) Four cornerstones of calibration research: Why understanding students' judgments can improve their achievement. Learning and Instruction: 58-61.
5. Pieschl S. (2009) Metacognitive calibration - an extended conceptualization and potential applications. Metacogn Learn 4: 3-31.
6. Flavell JH. (1979) Metacognition and cognitive monitoring: A new area of cognitive-developmental inquiry. Am Psychol 34: 906-911.
7. Veenman MV, Van Hout-Wolters BH, Afflerbach P. (2006) Metacognition and learning: Conceptual and methodological considerations. Metacogn Learn 1: 3-14. (Pubitemid 44124098)
8. Schoenfeld AH. (1992) Learning to think mathematically: Problem solving, metacognition, and sense-making in mathematics. In: Grouws D, editor. Handbook for research on mathematics teaching and learning. New York: MacMillan. pp. 334-370.
9. Begg IM, Martin LA, Needham DR. (1992) Memory monitoring: How useful is self-knowledge about memory? Eur J Cogn Psychol 4: 195-218.
10. Price GR, Mazzocco MMM, Ansari D. (2013) Why mental arithmetic counts: Brain activation during single digit arithmetic predicts high school math scores. J Neurosci 33: 156-163.
11. Bol L, Riggs R, Hacker D, Nunnery J. (2010) The calibration accuracy of middle school students in math classes. Journal of Research in Education 21: 81-96.
12. Butterfield B, Metcalfe J. (2006) The correction of errors committed with high confidence. Metacogn Learn 1: 69-84. (Pubitemid 44124102)
13. Butler AC, Karpicke JD, Roediger III HL. (2008) Correcting a metacognitive error: Feedback increases retention of low-confidence correct responses. J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn 34: 918-928.
14. Butler DL, Winne PH (1995) Feedback and self-regulated learning: A theoretical synthesis. Rev Educ Res 65: 245-281.
15. Dunlosky J, Rawson KA (2012) Overconfidence produces underachievement: Inaccurate self evaluations undermine students' learning and retention. Learning and Instruction 22: 271-280.
16. Bol L, Hacker DJ, Walck CC, Nunnery JA. (2012) The effects of individual or group guidelines on the calibration accuracy and achievement of high school biology students. Contemp Educ Psychol 37: 280-287.
17. Nietfeld JL, Cao L, Osborne JW. (2006) The effect of distributed monitoring exercises and feedback on performance, monitoring accuracy, and self-efficacy. Metacogn Learn 1: 159-179. (Pubitemid 44505865)
18. Yeung N, Botvinick MM, Cohen JD. (2004) The neural basis of error detection: Conflict monitoring and the error-related negativity. Psychol Rev 111: 931-959. (Pubitemid 39375082)
19. Wessel JR. (2012) Error awareness and the error-related negativity: Evaluating the first decade of evidence. Front Hum Neurosci 6: 88.
20. Themanson JR, Rosen PJ, Pontifex MB, Hillman CH, McAuley E. (2012) Alterations in error-related brain activity and post-error behavior over time. Brain Cogn 80: 257-265.
21. Desmet C, Imbo I, De Brauwer J, Brass M, Fias W, et al. (2012) Error adaptation in mental arithmetic. Q J Exp Psychol 65: 1059-1067.
22. Ansari D, Grabner RH, Koschutnig K, Reishofer G, Ebner F. (2011) Individual differences in mathematical competence modulate brain responses to arithmetic errors: An fMRI study. Learn Individ Differ 21: 636-643.
23. Miller AE, Watson JM, Strayer DL. (2012) Individual differences in working memory capacity predict action monitoring and the error-related negativity. J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn 38: 757-763.
24. Braet W, Johnson KA, Tobin CT, Acheson R, Bellgrove MA, et al. (2009) Functional developmental changes underlying response inhibition and error-detection processes. Neuropsychologia 47: 3143-3151.
25. Luna B, Padmanabhan A, O'Hearn K. (2010) What has fMRI told us about the development of cognitive control through adolescence? Brain Cogn 72: 101-113.
26. Garrett AJ, Mazzocco MMM, Baker L. (2006) Development of the metacognitive skills of prediction and evaluation in children with or without math disability. Learn Disabil Res Pract 21: 77-88.
27. Rosenzweig C, Krawec J, Montague M. (2011) Metacognitive strategy use of eighth-grade students with and without learning disabilities during mathematical problem solving: A think-aloud analysis. J Learn Disabil 44: 508-520.
28. Bull R, Scerif G. (2001) Executive functioning as a predictor of children's mathematics ability: Inhibition, switching, and working memory. Dev Neuropsychol 19: 273-293. (Pubitemid 33089773)
29. Halberda J, Mazzocco MMM, Feigenson L. (2008) Individual differences in non-verbal number acuity correlate with maths achievement. Nature 455: 665-668.
30. Mazzocco MMM, Murphy MM, Brown E, Rinne L, Herold KH. (2013) Persistent consequences of atypical early number concepts. Front Psychol 4: 486.
31. Geary DC, Hoard MK, Nugent L, Bailey DH. (2013) Adolescents' functional numeracy is predicted by their school entry number system knowledge. PLoS One 8: e54651.
32. Jordan NC, Kaplan D, Ramineni C, Locuniak MN. (2009) Early math matters: Kindergarten number competence and later mathematics outcomes. Dev Psychol 45: 850-867.
33. Mazzocco MMM, Thompson RE. (2005) Kindergarten predictors of math learning disability. Learn Disabil Res and Pract 20: 142-155.
34. Siegler RS, Duncan GJ, Davis-Kean PE, Duckworth K, Claessens A, et al. (2012) Early predictors of high school mathematics achievement. Psychol Sci 23: 691-697.
35. Mazzocco MMM, Myers GF. (2002) Maximizing efficiency of enrollment for school-based educational research. J Appl Soc Psychol 32: 1577-1587.
36. Mazzocco MMM, Myers GF. (2003) Complexities in identifying and defining mathematics learning disability in the primary school-age years. Ann Dyslexia 53: 218-253. (Pubitemid 38148525)
37. Mazzocco MMM, Devlin KT. (2008) Parts and 'holes': Gaps in rational number sense among children with vs. without mathematical learning disabilities. Dev Sci 11: 681-691.
38. Woodcock RW, Johnson MB. (1989) Woodcock-Johnson psycho-educational battery-revised. Allen: DLM Teaching Resources.
39. Murphy MM, Mazzocco MMM. (2008) Mathematics learning disabilities in girls with fragile X or Turner syndrome during late elementary school. J Learn Disabil 41: 29-46.
40. Wechsler D. (1999) Wechsler abbreviated scale of intelligence. San Antonio: The Psychological Corporation.
41. Anderson P, Anderson V, Northam E, Taylor H. (2000) Standardization of the contingency naming test for school-aged children: A new measure of reactive flexibility. Clinical Neuropsychological Assessment 1: 247-273.
42. rd edition. College Station: StataCorp LP.
43. Hyde JS, Fennema E, Lamon SJ. (1990) Gender differences in mathematics performance: A meta-analysis. Psychol Bull 107: 139-155.
44. Lachance JA, Mazzocco MMM. (2006) A longitudinal analysis of sex differences in math and spatial skills in primary school age children. Learn and Individ Differ 16: 195-216. (Pubitemid 44283636)
45. Schneider W. (2008) The development of metacognitive knowledge in children and adolescents: Major trends and implications for education. Mind Brain Educ 2: 114-121.
46. Brenner LA, Koehler DJ, Liberman V, Tversky A. (1996) Overconfidence in probability and frequency judgments: A critical examination. Organ Behav Hum Decis Process 65: 212-219. (Pubitemid 126169114)
47. Lichtenstein S, Fischhoff B. (1977) Do those who know more also know more about how much they know? Organ Behav Hum Perform 20: 159-183.
48. Zbrodoff NJ, Logan GD. (2004) What everyone finds: The problem size effect. In: Campbell J, editor. Handbook of mathematical cognition. New York: Psychology Press. pp. 331-345.