Evaluating Sentinel-2 and Landsat-8 data to map sucessional forest stages in a subtropical forest in Southern Brazil

Remote Sensing

Volumn 9, Issue 8, 2017, Pages

  Sothe, Camile ^a   de Almeida, Cláudia Maria ^a   Liesenberg, Veraldo ^b   Schimalski, Marcos Benedito ^b  

^a INSTITUTO NACIONAL DE PESQUISAS ESPACIAIS   (Brazil)

^b SANTA CATARINA STATE UNIVERSITY   (Brazil)

Author keywords

Multitemporal information; Random forest; Support vector machine; Textural features; Vegetation indices

Indexed keywords

DECISION TREES; FORESTRY; LEARNING ALGORITHMS; LEARNING SYSTEMS; REFLECTION; SUPPORT VECTOR MACHINES; TROPICS; VEGETATION;

CLASSIFICATION METHODS; CLASSIFICATION PROCESS; ENVIRONMENTAL CONSERVATION; MULTI-TEMPORAL; RANDOM FORESTS; TEXTURAL FEATURE; TROPICAL ENVIRONMENTS; VEGETATION INDEX;

CLASSIFICATION (OF INFORMATION);

EID: 85027469296     PISSN: None     EISSN: 20724292     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3390/rs9080838     Document Type: Article

References (102)

1. Zhang, Z., Zang, R., Wang, G., Huang, X. Classification of landscape types based on land cover, successional stages and plant functional groups in a species-rich forest in Hainan Island, China. Trop. Conserv. Sci. 2016, 9, 135-152.
2. Viana, V., Tabanez, A.J. Biology and Conservation of Forest Fragments in Brasilian Atlantic Moist Forest. In Forest Patches in Tropical Landscapes; Scheilas, J., Greenberg, R., Eds., Island Press: Washington, DC, USA, 1996.
3. Ribeiro, M.C., Metzger, J.P., Martensen, A.C., Ponzoni, F.J., Hirota, M.M. The Brazilian Atlantic Forest: How much is left, and how is the remaining forest distributed? Implications for conservation. Biol. Conserv. 2009, 142, 1141-1153.
4. Colombo, A.F., Joly, C.A. Brazilian Atlantic Forest lato sensu: The most ancient Brazilian forest, and a biodiversity hotspot, is highly threatened by climate change. Braz. J. Biol. 2010, 70, 697-708.
5. Myers, N., Mittermeier, R.A., Mittermeier, C.G., Fonseca, G.A.B., Kent, J. Biodiversity hotspots for conservation priorities. Nature 2000, 403, 853-858.
6. Mausel, P., Wu, Y., Li, Y., Moran, E.F., Brondizio, E.S. Spectral identification of successional stages following deforestation in the Amazon. Geocarto Int. 1993, 8, 61-71.
7. Lu, D., Mausel, P., Brondízio, E., Moran, E. Classification of Successional Forest Stages in the Brazilian Amazon Basin. Forest Ecol. Manag. 2003, 181, 301-312.
8. Lu, D., Batistella, M., Li, G., Moran, E., Hetrick, S., Freitas, C., Dutra, L., Sant'Anna, S.J.S. Land use/Cover Classification in the Brazilian Amazon using Satellite Images. Braz. J. Agric. Res. 2012, 47, 1185-1208.
9. Lu, D., Li, G., Moran, E., Kuang, W. A comparative analysis of approaches for successional vegetation classification in the Brazilian Amazon. GISci. Remote Sens. 2014, 51, 695-709.
10. Dispõe Sobre a Utilização e Proteção da Vegetação Nativa do Bioma Mata Atlântica, e dá Outras Providências. Available online: http://www2.ib.unicamp.br/profs/cjoly/0-NE4412013/2aAULA/Lei11428de22-12-2006. pdf (accessed on 7 June 2017).
11. Adam, E., Mutanga, O., Odindi, J., Abdel-Rahman, E.M. Land-use/cover classification in a heterogeneous coastal landscape using RapidEye imagery: Evaluating the performance of random forest and support vector machines classifiers. Int. J. Remote Sens. 2014, 35, 3440-3458.
12. Janoth, J., Eisl, M., Klaushofer, F., Luckel,W. Procedimentos Baseados em Segmentação para a Análise de Mudanças e Classificação Florestais com Dados de Satélite de Alta Resolução. In Sensoriamento Remoto e SIG Avançados, 2nd ed., Blaschke, T., Kux, H., Eds., Oficina de Textos: São Paulo, Brazil, 2007.
13. Vieira, I.C.G., Almeida, A.S., Davidson, E.A., Stone, T.A., Carvalho, C.J.R., Guerrero, J.B. Classifying successional forests using Landsat spectral properties and ecological characteristics in Eastern Amazônia. Remote Sens. Environ. 2003, 87, 470-481.
14. Ponzoni, F.J., Rezende, A.N.P. Caracterização espectral de estágios sucessionais de vegetação secundária arbórea em Altamira (PA), através de dados orbitais. Rev. árvore 2004, 28, 535-545.
15. Galvão, L.S., Ponzoni, F.J., Liesenberg, V., Santos, J.R.D. Possibilities of Discriminating Tropical Secondary Succession in Amazônia using Hyperspectral and Multiangular CHRIS/PROBA Data. Int. J. Appl. Earth Obs. Geoinf. 2009, 11, 8-14.
16. Amaral, M.V.F., de Souza, A.L., Soares, V.P., Soares, C.P.B., Leite, H.G., Martins, S.V., Filho, E.I.F., Lana, J.M. Avaliação e comparação de métodos de classificação de imagens de satélites para o mapeamento de estádios de sucessão florestal. Rev. árvore 2009, 33, 575-582.
17. Li, G., Lu, D., Moran, E., Hetrick, S. Land-Cover Classification in a Moist Tropical Region of Brazil with Landsat Thematic Mapper Imagery. Int. J. Remote Sens. 2011, 32, 8207-8230.
18. Lu, D., Li, G., Moran, E., Dutra, L., Batistella, M. A Comparison of Multisensor Integration Methods for Land-cover Classification in the Brazilian Amazon. GISci. Remote Sens. 2011, 48, 345-370.
19. Sothe, C., Schimalski, M.B., Liesenberg, V., de Almeida, C.M., de Souza, C.F., de Souza, J.B. Applying data mining techniques to the classification of successional forest stages mixed shade tolerant forest environments. Sci. For. 2016, 44, 863-873.
20. Sothe, C., Schimalski, M.B., Liesenberg, V., de Almeida, C.M. Approaches for classifying successional forest stages in São Joaquim National Park using Landsat-8 and RapidEye images. Bol. Ciênc. Geod. 2017, 23. in press.
21. Piazza, A.G., Vibrans, A.C., Liesenberg, V., Refosco, J.C. Object-oriented and pixel-based classification approaches to classify tropical successional stages using airborne high-spatial resolution images. GISci. Remote Sens. 2016, 53, 206-226.
22. Zhu, Z.;Woodcock, C.E. Continuous change detection and classification of land cover using all available Landsat data. Remote Sens. Environ. 2014, 144, 152-171.
23. Roy, D.P., Wulder, M.A., Loveland, T.R., Woodcock, C.E., Allen, R.G., Anderson, M.C., Scambos, T.A. Landsat-8: Science and product vision for terrestrial global change research. Remote Sens. Environ. 2014, 145, 154-172.
24. Irons, J.R., Dwyer, J.L., Barsi, J.A. The next Landsat satellite: The Landsat Data Continuity Mission. Remote Sens. Environ. 2012, 122, 11-21.
25. Drusch, M., Bello, U.D., Carlier, S., Colin, O., Fernandez, V., Gascon, F., Hoersch, B., Isola, C., Laberinti, P., Martimort, P., et al. Sentinel-2: ESA's Optical High-Resolution Mission for GMES Operational Services. Remote Sens. Environ. 2012, 120, 25-36.
26. Frampton, W.J., Dash, J., Watmough, G., Milton, E.J. Evaluating the capabilities of Sentinel-2 for quantitative estimation of biophysical variables in vegetation. ISPRS J. Photogramm. Remote Sens. 2013, 82, 83-92.
27. Immitzer, M., Vuolo, F., Clement Atzberger, C. First Experience with Sentinel-2 Data for Crop and Tree Species Classifications in Central Europe. Remote Sens. 2016, 8, 166.
28. Addabbo, P., Focareta, M., Marcuccio, S., Votto, C., Ullo, S.L. Contribution of Sentinel-2 data for applications in vegetation monitoring. Acta IMEKO 2016, 5, 44-54.
29. Lu, D.;Weng, Q. A Survey of Image Classification Methods and Techniques for Improving Classification Performance. Int. J. Remote Sens. 2007, 28, 823-870.
30. Deng, S., Katoh, M., Xiaowei, Y., Hyyppä, J., Gao, T. Comparison of Tree Species Classifications at the Individual Tree Level by Combining ALS Data and RGB Images Using Different Algorithms. Remote Sens. 2016.
31. Prasad, A.M., Iverson, L.R., Liaw, A. Newer classification and regression tree techniques: Bagging and random forests for ecological prediction. Ecosystems 2006, 9, 181-199.
32. Naidoo, L., Cho, M.A., Mathieu, R., Asner, G. Classification of savanna tree species, in the Greater Kruger National Park region, by integrating hyperspectral and LiDAR data in a Random Forest data mining environment. ISPRS J. Photogramm. Remote Sens. 2012, 69, 167-179.
33. Breiman, L. Random Forests. Mach. Learn. 2001, 45, 5-32.
34. Li, M., Ma, L., Blaschke, T., Cheng, L., Tiede, D. A systematic comparison of different object-based classification techniques using high spatial resolution imagery in agricultural environments. Int. J. Appl. Earth Obs. Geoinf. 2016, 49, 87-98.
35. Dalponte, M., Bruzzone, L., Gianelle, D. Tree species classification in the Southern Alps based on the fusion of very high geometrical resolution multispectral/hyperspectral images and LiDAR data. Remote Sens. Environ. 2012, 123, 258-270.
36. Féret, J., Asner, G.P. Tree species discrimination in tropical forests using airborne imaging spectroscopy. IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote Sens. 2013, 51, 73-84.
37. Gosh, A., Fassnacht, E.F., Joshi, P.K., Koch, B. A framework for mapping tree species combining hyperspectral and LiDAR data: Role of selected classifiers and sensor across three spatial scales. Int. J. Appl. Earth Obs. Geoinf. 2014, 26, 49-63.
38. Ma, L., Li, M., Ma, X., Cheng, L., Du, P., Liu, Y. A review of supervised object-based land-cover image classification. ISPRS J. Photogramm. Remote Sens. 2017, 130, 277-293.
39. Clark, M.L., Roberts, D.A., Clark, D.B. Hyperspectral discrimination of tropical rain forest tree species at leaf to crown scales. Remote Sens. Environ. 2005, 96, 375-398.
40. Clark, M.L., Roberts, D.A. Species-level differences in hyperspectral metrics among tropical rainforest trees as determined by a tree-based classifier. Remote Sens. 2012, 4, 1820-1855.
41. Weih, R.C., Riggan, N.D. Object-Based Classification vs. Pixel-Based Classification: Comparative Importance of Multi-Resolution Imagery. Available online: http://dfwm.ugent.be/geobia/proceedings/papers%20proceedings/Weih_81_Object_Based_Classification_vs_Pixel_Based_Classification_Comparitive_Importance:of_Multi_Resolution_Imagery.pdf (accessed on 7 June 2017).
42. Meroni, M., Ng, W-T., Rembold, F., Leonardi, U., Atzberger, C., Gadain, H., Shaiy, M. Mapping prosopis juliflora in west somaliland with landsat 8 satellite imagery and ground information. Land Degrad. Dev. 2017, 28, 494-506.
43. Faxina, T.C. Dilemas da regularização fundiária amigável no Parque Nacional de São Joaquim: Um estudo de caso-a valorização de áreas silvestres. Master's Thesis, Santa Catarina State University, Lages-SC, Brazil, 2014.
44. Morellato, L.P.C., Talora, D.C., Takahasi, A., Bencke, C.C., Romera, E.C., Zipparro, V.B. Phenology of Atlantic Rain Forest Trees: A Comparative Study. Blotroplca 2000, 32, 811-823.
45. Marques, M.C.M., Roper, J.J., Salvalaggio, A.P.B. Phenological patterns among plant life-forms in a subtropical forest in southern Brazil. Plant Ecol. 2004, 173, 203-213.
46. Song, C., Woodcock, C.E. Monitoring forest succession with multitemporal Landsat images: Factors of uncertainty. IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote Sens. 2003, 41, 2557-2567.
47. Resolução CONAMA no 04/94, de 4 de maio de 1994. Available online: http://www.mma.gov.br/port/ conama/legiano1.cfm?codlegitipo=3&ano=1994 (accessed on 7 June 2017).
48. Soares, R.V. Considerações sobre a regeneração natural da Araucaria angustifolia. Rev. Floresta 1979, 10, 11-18.
49. Haralick, R.M., Shanmugam, K., Dinstein, I.H. Textural features for image classification. IEEE Trans. Syst. Man Cybern. 1973, 3, 610-621.
50. Marceau, D.J., Howarth, P.J., Dubois, J.M., Gratton, D.J. Evaluation of the Grey-Level Co-occurrence Matrix Method for Land-cover Classification using SPOT Imagery. IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote Sens. 1990, 28, 513-519.
51. Johansen, K., Coops, N.C., Gergel, S.E., Stange, Y. Application of High Spatial Resolution Satellite Imagery for Riparian and Forest Ecosystem Classification. Remote Sens. Environ. 2007, 110, 29-44.
52. Yu, Q., Gong, P., Clinton, N., Biging, G., Kelly, M., Schirokauer, D. Object-based Detailed Vegetation Classification with Airborne High Spatial Resolution Remote Sensing Imagery. Photogramm. Eng. Remote Sens. 2006, 72, 799-811.
53. Furtado, L.F.A., Francisco, C.N., Almeida, C.M. Object-based image analysis for vegetation physiognomies classification in high spatial resolution images. Geociências 2013, 32, 441-451.
54. Lu, D., Batistella, M. Exploring TM image texture and its relationships with biomass estimation in Rondônia, Brazilian Amazon. Acta Amazonica 2005, 35, 249-257.
55. Attarchi, S., Gloaguen, R. Classifying Complex Mountainous Forests with L-Band SAR and Landsat Data Integration: A Comparison among Different Machine Learning Methods in the Hyrcanian Forest. Remote Sens. 2014, 6, 3624-3647.
56. Gitelson, A.A., Merzlyak, M.N. Quantitative estimation of chlorophyll-a using reflectance spectra: Experiments with autumn chestnut and maple leaves. J. Photochem. Photobiol. B Biol. 1994, 22, 247-252.
57. Hatfield, J.L., Gitelson, A.A., Schepers, J.S., WalthalL, C.L. Application of Spectral Remote Sensing for Agronomic Decisions. Agron. J. 2008, 100, 117-131.
58. Ji, L., Zhang, L.;Wylie, B.K., Rover, J. On the terminology of the spectral vegetation index (NIR - SWIR)/(NIR + SWIR). Int. J. Remote Sens. 2011, 32, 6901-6909.
59. Rouse, J.W., Haas, R.H., Schell, J.A., Deering,W.D. Monitoring vegetation systems in the Great Plains with ERTS. Third ERTS Sym. NASA SP-351 1973, 1, 309-317.
60. Richardson, A.J.;Wiegand, C.L. Distinguishing vegetation from soil background information. Photogramm. Eng. Remote Sens. 1977, 1, 1541-1552.
61. Gitelson, A.A., Kaufman, Y.J., Merzlyak, M.N. Use of a green channel in remote sensing of global vegetation from EOS-MODIS. Remote Sens. Environ. 1996, 58, 289-298.
62. Tucker, C.J. Red and photographic infrared linear combinations for monitoring vegetation. Remote Sens. Environ. 1979, 8, 127-150.
63. Rondeaux, G., Steven, M., Baret, F. Optimization of soil-adjusted vegetation indices. Remote Sens. Environ. 1996, 55, 95-107.
64. Hardisky, M.A., Klemas, V., Smart, R.M. The influence of soil salinity, growth form, and leaf moisture on the spectral radiance of Spartina alterniflora canopies. Photogramm. Eng. Remote Sens. 1983, 49, 77-83.
65. Clark, M.L., Kilham, N.E. Mapping of land cover in northern California with simulated hyperspectral satellite imagery. ISPRS J. Photogramm. Rem. Sens. 2016, 119, 228-245.
66. Pal, M., Foody, G.M.P. Feature Selection for Classification of Hyperspectral Data by SVM. IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote Sens. 2010, 48, 2297-2307.
67. Ma, L., Fu, T., Blaschke, T., Li, M., Tiede, D., Zhou, Z., Chen, D. Evaluation of Feature Selection Methods for Object-Based Land Cover Mapping of Unmanned Aerial Vehicle Imagery Using Random Forest and Support Vector Machine Classifiers. ISPRS Int. J. Geo-Inf. 2017, 6, 51.
68. Duro, D.C., Franklin, S.E., Dubé, M.G. Multi-scale object-based image analysis and feature selection of multi-sensor earth observation imagery using random forests. Int. J. Remote Sens. 2012, 33, 4502-4526.
69. Hira, Z.M., Gillies, D.F. A Review of Feature Selection and Feature Extraction Methods Applied on Microarray Data. Adv. Bioinf. 2015.
70. Maldonado, S.;Weber, R. A wrapper method for feature selection using support vector machines. Inf. Sci. 2009, 179, 2208-2217.
71. Puissant, A., Rougier, S., Stumpf, A. Object-oriented mapping of urban trees using random forest classifiers. Int. J. Appl. Earth Obs. Geoinf. 2014, 26, 235-245.
72. Ma, L., Li, M., Gao, Y., Chen, T., Ma, X., Qu, L. A Novel Wrapper Approach for Feature Selection in Object-Based Image Classification Using Polygon-Based Cross-Validation. IEEE Geosci. Remote Sens. Lett. 2017, 14, 409-413.
73. Kohavi, R., John, G.H.Wrappers for feature subset selection. Artif. Intell. 1997, 97, 273-324.
74. Van der Linden, S., Rabe, A., Held, M.;Wirth, F., Suess, S., Okujeni, A., Hostert, P. ImageSVM Classification, Manual for Application: ImageSVM Version 3.0; Humboldt-Universität: Berlin, Germany, 2014.
75. Van der Linden, S., Rabe, A., Held, M., Jakimow, B., Leitão, P.J., Okujeni, A., Schwieder, S.S., Hostert, P. The EnMAP-Box-A Toolbox and Application Programming Interface for EnMAP Data Processing. Remote Sens. 2015, 7, 11249-11266.
76. Rodriguez-Galiano, V.F., Ghimire, B., Rogan, J., Chica-Olmo, M., Rigol-Sanchez, J.P. An assessment of the effectiveness of a random forest classifier for landcover classification. ISPRS J. Photogramm. Rem. Sens. 2012, 67, 93-104.
77. Jakimow, B., Oldenburg, C., Rabe, A.;Waske, B., van der Linden, S., Hostert, P. ImageRF Classification, Manual for Application: ImageRF Version 1.1; Humboldt-Universität: Berlin, Germany, 2014.
78. Cortes, C., Vapnik, V. Support-Vector Networks. Mach. Learn. 1995, 20, 273-297.
79. Huang, C., Davis, L.S., Townshend, J.R.G. An assessment of support vector machines for land cover classification. Remote Sens. 2002, 23, 725-749.
80. Duro, D.C., Franklin, S.E., Dube, M.G. A comparison of pixel-based and object-based image analysis with selected machine learning algorithms for the classification of agricultural landscapes using SPOT-5 HRG imagery. Remote Sens. Environ. 2012, 118, 259-272.
81. Burges, C.J. A tutorial on support vector machines for pattern recognition. Data Min. Knowl. Discov. 1998, 2, 121-167.
82. Li, W., Du, Q. Support vector machine with adaptive composite kernel for hyperspectral image classification. Proc. SPIE.
83. Congalton, R.G., Green, K. Assessing the Accuracy of Remotely Sensed Data: Principles and Practices; Lewis Publishers: New York, NY, USA, 1999.
84. Skidmore, A.K. Accuracy Assessment of Spatial Information. In Spatial Statistics for Remote Sensing; Stein, A., van der Meer, F.D., Gorte, B., Eds., Kluwer Academic Publishers: Dordrecht, The Netherlands, 1999; pp. 197-209.
85. Cetin, M., Kavzoglu, T., Musaoglu, N. Classification of multi-spectral, multi-temporal and multi-sensor images using principal components analysis and artificial neural networks: Beykoz case. In Proceedings of the XXXV ISPRS Congress, Melbourne, Australia, 25 August-1 September 2012; p. 408.
86. Moran, E.F., Brondizio, E.S., Tucker, J.M., Silva-Fosberg, M.C., McCracken, S., Falesi, I. Effects of soil fertility and land-use on forest successional in Amazônia. Forest Ecol. Manag. 2000, 139, 93-108.
87. Ponzoni, F.J., Shimabukuro, Y.E., Kuplich, T.M. Sensoriamento Remoto da Vegetação; Oficina de Textos: São Paulo, Brazil, 2012.
88. Goel, N.S. Models of vegetation canopy reflectance and their use in estimation of biophysical parameters from reflectance data. Remote Sens. Rev. 1988, 4, 1-21.
89. Murthy, C.S., Raju, P.V., Badrinath, K.V.S. Classification of wheat crop with multi-temporal images: Performance of maximum likelihood and artificial neural networks. Int. J. Remote Sens. 2003, 24, 4871-4890.
90. Walton, J.T. Subpixel Urban Land Cover Estimation: Comparing Cubist, Random Forests, and Support Vector Regression. Photogramm. Eng. Remote Sens. 2008, 74, 1213-1222.
91. Novack, T., Esch, T., Kux, H., Stilla, U. Machine Learning Comparison between WorldView-2 and QuickBird-2-Simulated Imagery Regarding Object-Based Urban Land Cover Classification. Remote Sens. 2011, 3, 2263-2282.
92. Topaloglu, R.H., Sertela, E., Musaoglu, N. Assessment of classification accuracies of Sentinel-2 and Landsat-8 data for land cover/use mapping. In Proceedings of the International Archives of the Photogrammetry, Remote Sensing and Spatial Information Sciences, 41-B8, XXIII ISPRS Congress, Prague, Czech Republic, 12-19 July 2016; pp. 1055-1059.
93. Sothe, C., Schimalski, M.B., Liesenberg, V., de Almeida, C.M. Potencial dos dados Sentinel-2 e Landsat-8 para a classificação do uso e cobertura da terra de um ambiente costeiro. In Proceedings of the XVIII Brazilian Symposium on Remote Sensing-SBSR, Santos, SP, Brazil, 28-31 May 2017.
94. Sette, P.G.C., Maillard, P. Análise de textura de imagem de alta resolução para aprimorar a acurácia da classificação da mata atlântica no sul da Bahia. In Proceedings of the XV Brazilian Symposium on Remote Sensing-SBSR, Curitiba, PR, Brazil, 29 April-4 May 2011.
95. Araújo, E.H.G. Análise Multi-Temporal de Cenas do Satélite QuickBird Usando um novo Paradigma de Classificação de Imagens e Inferências Espaciais. Estudo de Caso: Belo Horizonte, MG. (INPE-13956-TDI/1062). Master's Thesis, National Institute for Space Research, São José dos Campos, 2006.
96. Roslani, M.A., Mustapha, M.A., Lihan, T., Wan Juliana, W.A. Classification of mangroves vegetation species using texture analysis on Rapideye satellite imagery. AIP Conf. Proc. 2013, 1571, 480.
97. Gomes, M.F., Maillard, P. Using spectral and textural features from RapidEye images to estimate age and structural parameters of Cerrado vegetation. Int. J. Remote Sens. 2015, 36, 3058-3076.
98. Schultz, B., Immitzer, M., Formaggio, A.R., Sanches, I.D.A., Luiz, A.J.B., Atzberger, C. Self-Guided Segmentation and Classification of Multi-Temporal Landsat 8 Images for Crop Type Mapping in Southeastern Brazil. Remote Sens. 2015, 7, 14482-14508.
99. Ramoelo, A., Cho, M., Mathieu, R., Skidmore, A.K. Potential of Sentinel-2 spectral configuration to assess rangeland quality. J. Appl. Remote Sens. 2015.
100. Schuster, C., Förster, M., Kleinschmit, B. Testing the Red Edge Channel for Improving Land-Use Classifications Based on High-Resolution Multi-Spectral Satellite Data. Int. J. Remote Sens. 2012, 33, 5583-5599.
101. Tigges, J., Lakes, T., Hostert, P. Urban vegetation classification: Benefits of multitemporal RapidEye satellite data. Remote Sens. Environ. 2013, 136, 66-75.
102. Adelabu, S., Mutanga, O., Adam, E. Evaluating the impact of red-edge band from Rapideye image for classifying insect defoliation levels. ISPRS J. Photogramm. Remote Sens. 2014, 95, 34-41.