Brazilian Atlantic Forest lato sensu: The most ancient Brazilian forest, and a biodiversity hotspot, is highly threatened by climate change;Mata Atlântica lato sensu: A mais antiga das florestas brasileiras, e um hotspot de biodiversidade, está altamente ameaçada pelas mudanças climáticas

Brazilian Journal of Biology

Volumn 70, Issue 3 SUPPL., 2010, Pages 697-708

  Colombo, A F ^a   Joly, C A ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CAMPINAS   (Brazil)

Author keywords

Brazilian Atlantic Forest trees; Climate change; GARP; MaxEnt; Species niche modeling

Indexed keywords

ANDIRA FRAXINIFOLIA; EUTERPE EDULIS; HYERONIMA ALCHORNEOIDES; INGA; MOLLINEDIA; MYRTACEAE; SCHEFFLERA; VIROLA; VOCHYSIA;

EID: 78751512242     PISSN: 15196984     EISSN: 16784375     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1590/s1519-69842010000400002     Document Type: Article

References (45)

1. ALMEIDA, FFM. and CARNEIRO, CDR., 1998. Origem e evolução da Serra do Mar. Revista Brasileira de Geociências, vol. 28, no. 2, p. 135-150.
2. BEHLING, H. and NEGRELLE, RRB., 2001. Late Quaternary tropical rain forest and climate dynamics from the Atlantic lowland in southern Brazil. Quaternary Research, vol. 56, p. 87-101.
3. BROW Jr., KS., 1987. Conclusion, synthesis and alternative hypotheses. In WHITMORE, TC. and PRANCE, GT. (Eds.). Biogeography and Quartenary history in Tropical America.p. 175-196. Oxford Science Publications.
4. BUSH, MB. and OLIVEIRA, PE., 2006. The rise and fall of the Refugial Hypothesis of Amazonian speciation: a paleoecological perspective. Biota Neotropica, vol. 6, no. 1. Available from: .
5. CAVALCANTI, RB. and JOLY, CA., 2002. Biodiversity and Conservation Priorities in the Cerrado Region. In OLIVEIRA, PE. and MARQUIS, RJ. (Eds.). The Cerrados of Brazil. Ecology and Natural History of a Neotropical Savana. New York: Columbia Univesity Press, p. 351-367.
6. CHAPMAN, AD., MUÑOZ, MES. and KOCH, I., 2005. Environmental information: placing biodiversity phenomena in an ecological and environmental context. Biodiversity Informatics, vol. 2, p. 24-41.
7. COSTA, LP., 2003. The historical bridge between the Amazon and the Atlantic Forest of Brazil: a study of molecular phylogeography with small mammals. Journal of. Biogeography, vol. 30, no. 1, p. 71-86.
8. ELITH, J., GRAHAM, CH. and ANDERSON, RP., 2006. Novel methods improve prediction of species' distributions from occurrence data. Ecography, vol. 29, p. 129-151.
9. FONSECA, GAB., 1989. Small mammal species diversity in Brazilian tropical primary and secondary forests of different sizes. Revista Brasileira de Zoologia, vol. 6, no. 3, p. 381-422.
10. Fundação S.O.S. Mata Atlântica and Instituto Nacional de Pesquisas Espaciais - INPE, 1998. Atlas da evolução dos remanescentes florestais e ecossistemas associados no domínio da Mata Atlântica no período 1990-1995. São Paulo.
11. Instituto Brasileiro de Geografia e Estatística - IBGE, 1988. Mapa de Vegetação do Brasil.Brasília, DF: IBGE.
12. Instituto Brasileiro de Geografia e Estatística - IBGE, 1993. Mapa de vegetação do Brasil. Rio de Janeiro, IBGE. Available from: .
13. International Panel on Climate Change - IPCC, 2007. Climate change 2007: Mitigation - Contribution of Working group III to the Fourth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
14. JOLY, CA., AIDAR, MPM. and KLINK, CA., 1999. Evolution of the Brazilian phytogeography classification systems: implications for biodiversity conservation. Ciência e Cultura, vol. 51, no. 5/6, p. 331-348.
15. KLOCKOW, D., TARGA, HJ. and VAUTZ, W., 1997. Air pollution and vegetation damage in the tropics - the Serra do Mar as an example.Geesthacht, Germany: GKSS -Forschungszentrum Geesthacht. Final Report 1990-1996.
16. KLUMP, A., DOMINGOS, M. and KLUMP, G., 2002. Foliar nutrient contents in tree species of the Atlantic Rain Forest as influenced by air pollution from the industrial complex of Cubatão, SE-Brazil. Water, Air, Soil Pollution, vol. 133, p. 315-333.
17. LAURANCE, WF. and DELAMONICA, P., 1998. Ilhas de sobrevivência. Ciência Hoje, vol. 24, p. 26-31.
18. LEDRU, MP., ROUSSEAU, DD., CRUZ Jr., FW., RICCOMINI, C., KARMANN, I. and MARTIN, L., 2005. Paleoclimate changes during the last 100 ka from a record in the Brazilian Atlantic rainforest region and interhemispheric comparison. Quaternary Research, vol. 64, p. 444-450.
19. LYONS, KS., 2003. A quantitative assessment of the rate of range shifts of Pleistocene mammals. Journal of Mammalogy, vol. 84, p. 385-402.
20. MARTINEZ-MEYER, E., PETERSON, AT. and HARGROVE, WW., 2004. Ecological niches as stable distributional constraints for Pleistocene extinctions and climate change projections for biodiversity. Global Ecology and Biogeography, vol. 13, p. 305-314.
21. MYERS, N., MITTERMEIER, RA., MITTERMEIER, CG., FONSECA, GAB. and KENT, J., 2000. Biodiversity hotspots for conservation priorities. Nature, vol. 403, p. 853-858.
22. OLIVEIRA FILHO, AT. and FONTES, MAL., 2000. Patterns of floristic differentiation among Atlantic forests in Southeastern Brazil, and the influence of climate. Biotropica, vol. 32, no. 4b, p. 793-810.
23. OLIVEIRA, RJ., 2001. Análise da variação florístico-estrutural das florestas atlânticas no estado de São Paulo, Brasil.Campinas: Biology Institute State University of Campinas. [PhD Thesis].
24. PETERSON, AT. and SHAW, J., 2003. Lutzomyia vectors for cutaneous leishmaniasis in Southern Brazil: ecological niche models, predicted geographic distributions, and climate change effects. International Journal for Parasitology, vol. 33, p. 919-931.
25. PETERSON, AT., 2001. Predicting species' geographic distributions based on ecological niche modeling. The Condor, vol. 103, p. 599-605.
26. PETERSON, AT., BALL, LG. and COHOON, KC., 2002. Predicting distributions of Mexican birds using ecological niche modeling methods. Ibis, vol. 144, p. 27-32.
27. PETERSON, AT., PAPES, M. and EATON, MUIR., 2007. Transferability and model evaluation in ecological niche modeling: a comparison of GARP and Maxent. Ecography, vol. 30, no. 4, p. 550-560.
28. PETERSON, AT., SOBERON, J. and SANCHEZ-CORDERO, V., 1999. Conservatism of ecological niches in evolutionary time. Science, vol. 285, no. 1265-1267.
29. PHILLIPS, SJ., ANDERSON, RP. and SCHAPIRE, RE., 2006. Maximum entropy modeling of species geographic distributions. Ecological Modelling, vol. 190, no. 231-259.
30. RIBEIRO, MC., METZGER, JP., MARTENSEN, AC., PONZONI, FJ. and HIROTA, MM., 2009. The Brazilian Atlantic Forest: How much is left, and how is the remaining forest distributed? Implications for conservation. Biological Conservation, vol. 142, p. 1141-1153.
31. RIZZINI, CT., 1997. Tratado de fitogeografia do Brasil. 2 ed. Ambito Cultural Edições Ltda.
32. ROCHELLE, ALC., 2008. Heterogeneidade ambiental, diversidade e estrutura da comunidade arbórea de um trecho da Floresta Ombrófila. Campinas: Biology Institute, State University of Campinas. [MSc Thesis].
33. RODRIGUES, RR., MARTINS, SV. and GANDOLFI, S., 2007. High Diversity Forest Restoration in Degraded Areas: Methods and Projects in Brazil. Hauppauge, New York: Nova Science Publishers.
34. SALIS, SM., SHEPHERD, GJ. and JOLY, CA., 1995. Floristic comparison between mesophytic forests of the interior of the state of São Paulo, S.E. Brazil. Vegetatio, vol. 119, p. 155-164.
35. SCUDELLER, VV. and MARTINS, FR., 2003. FITOGEO - um banco de dados aplicado à Fitogeografia. Acta Amazônica, vol. 33, no. 1, p. 9-21.
36. SENTELHAS, PC., PEREIRA, AR. and ANGELOCCI, LR., 2000. Meteorologia Agrícola. 3 ed. Piracicaba, SP: ESALQ.
37. SinBiota, 2006. Sistema de informação ambiental do programa.BIOTA/FAPESP. Available from: .
38. SIQUEIRA, MF. and PETERSON, AT., 2003. Consequences of global climate change for geographic distributions of Cerrado tree species. Biota Neotropica, vol. 3, no. 2. Available from: .
39. SpeciesLink, 2006. Sistema de Informação Distribuído para Coleções Biológicas: a Integração do Species Analyst e do SinBiota. Available from: .
40. STOCKWELL, DRB. and NOBLE, I., 1992. Induction of sets of rules from animal distribution data: a robust and informative method of data analysis. Mathematics and Computer in Simulation, vol. 33, p. 385-390.
41. STOCKWELL, DRB. and PETERS, DP., 1999. The GARP modeling system: problems and solutions to automated spatial prediction. International Journal of Geographic Information Science, vol. 13, p. 143-158.
42. THOMAS, WMW., CARVALHO, AMV., AMORIM, AMA., GARRISON, J. and ARBELÁZ, AL., 1998. Plant endemism in two forests in southern Bahia, Brazil. Biodiversity and Conservation, vol. 7, p. 311-322.
43. THOMAZ, LD. and MONTEIRO, R., 1997. Composição florística da Mata Atlântica de encosta da Estação Biológica de Santa Lúcia, município de Santa Teresa-ES. Boletim do Museu de Biologia Mello-Leitão, Nova Série, vol. 7, p. 3-48.
44. THOMPSON, RS. and MEAD, JI., 1982. Late Quaternary environments and biogeography in the Great Basin. Quaternary Research, vol. 17, p. 39-55.
45. WELLS, PV., 1983. Paleobiogeography of montane islands in the Great Basin since the last glaciopluvial. Ecological Monographs, vol. 53, p. 341-382.