Functionalized scaffolds to enhance tissue regeneration

Regenerative Biomaterials

Volumn 2, Issue 1, 2015, Pages 47-57

  Guo, Baolin ^a   Lei, Bo ^a   Li, Peng ^a   Ma, Peter X ^a,b  

^a XI'AN JIAOTONG UNIVERSITY   (China)

^b UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN   (United States)

Author keywords

Antimicrobial coatings; Bioactive nanocomposites; Biomaterials; Bone tissue engineering; Electrically conductive polymers; Molecule releasing scaffolds; Scaffolds

Indexed keywords

ANILINE; ANTIBIOTIC AGENT; BIOMATERIAL; CATHELICIDIN ANTIMICROBIAL PEPTIDE LL 37; CHONDROITIN SULFATE; CHROMOGRANIN A; COLLAGEN; GELATIN; GLASS; HYDROXYAPATITE; IODINE; MACROGOL; MERCURY; MOLECULAR SCAFFOLD; NANOCOMPOSITE; POLY(3 HYDROXYBUTYRIC ACID); POLYCAPROLACTONE; POLYLACTIDE; POLYMER; QUATERNARY AMMONIUM DERIVATIVE; SILICON DIOXIDE; SILVER; TITANIUM DIOXIDE; TRIBUTYLTIN;

ANTIBACTERIAL ACTIVITY; ANTIFUNGAL ACTIVITY; BIOCOMPATIBILITY; BONE ALLOGRAFT; BONE DEFECT; BONE REGENERATION; ELECTROSPINNING; HUMAN; HYDROGEL; MATERIAL COATING; NANOFABRICATION; NERVE REGENERATION; NONHUMAN; PHASE SEPARATION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; REVIEW; SURFACE PROPERTY; TISSUE ENGINEERING; TISSUE REGENERATION; TISSUE SCAFFOLD;

EID: 85026963215     PISSN: 20563418     EISSN: 20563426     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1093/rb/rbu016     Document Type: Review

References (106)

1. Chen GP, Ushida T, Tateishi T. Scaffold design for tissue engineering. Macromol Biosci 2002;2:67-77.
2. Hubbell JA. Biomaterials in tissue engineering. Bio-Technology 1995;13:565-76.
3. Liu XH, Ma PX. Polymeric scaffolds for bone tissue engineering. Ann Biomed Eng 2004;32:477-86.
4. Ma PX. Biomimetic materials for tissue engineering. Adv Drug Delivery Rev 2008;60:184-98.
5. Guo BL, Ma PX. Synthetic biodegradable functional polymers for tissue engineering-a brief review. Sci China Chem 2014;57:490-500.
6. Shin H, Jo S, Mikos AG. Biomimetic materials for tissue engineering. Biomaterials 2003;24:4353-64.
7. Guimard NK, Gomez N, Schmidt CE. Conducting polymers in biomedical engineering. Prog Polym Sci 2007;32:876-921.
8. Wu SL, Liu XM, Yeung KWK et al. Biomimetic porous scaffolds for bone tissue engineering. Mat Sci Eng R 2014;80:1-36.
9. Okamoto M, John B. Synthetic biopolymer nanocomposites for tissue engineering scaffolds. Prog Polym Sci 2013;38:1487-503.
10. Kane R, Ma PX. Mimicking the nanostructure of bone matrix to regenerate bone. Mater Today 2013;16:418-23.
11. Zhang ZP, Hu J, Ma PX. Nanofiber-based delivery of bioactive agents and stem cells to bone sites. Adv Drug Delivery Rev 2013;64:1129-41.
12. Wong LJ, Kavallaris M, Bulmus V. Doxorubicin conjugated, crosslinked, PEGylated particles prepared via one-pot thiol-ene modification of a homopolymer scaffold: synthesis and in vitro evaluation. Polym Chem 2011;2:385-93.
13. He SH, Xia T, Wang H et al. Multiple release of polyplexes of plasmids VEGF and bFGF from electrospun fibrous scaffolds towards regeneration of mature blood vessels. Acta Biomater 2012;8:2659-69.
14. von Eiff C, Jansen B, Kohnen W et al. Infections associated with medical devices-pathogenesis, management and prophylaxis. Drugs 2005;65:179-214.
15. Hetrick EM, Schoenfisch MH. Reducing implant-related infections: active release strategies. Chem Soc Rev 2006;35:780-9.
16. Huang JY, Murata H, Koepsel RR et al. Antibacterial polypropylene via surface-initiated atom transfer radical polymerization. Biomacromolecules 2007;8:1396-9.
17. Muto C, Herbert C, Harrison E et al. Reduction in central line-associated bloodstream infections among patients in intensive care units-Pennsylvania, April 2001-March 2005 [Reprinted from MMWR, Vol. 54, pp. 1013-6, 2005). JAMA 2006;295:269-70.
18. Vasilev K, Cook J, Griesser HJ. Antibacterial surfaces for biomedical devices. Expert Rev Med Dev 2009;6:553-67.
19. Mawad D, Stewart E, Officer DL et al. A single component conducting polymer hydrogel as a scaffold for tissue engineering. Adv Funct Mater 2012;22:2692-9.
20. Guiseppi-Elie A. Electroconductive hydrogels: synthesis, characterization and biomedical applications. Biomaterials 2010;31:2701-16.
21. Drury JL, Mooney DJ. Hydrogels for tissue engineering: scaffold design variables and applications. Biomaterials 2003;24:4337-51.
22. Liu YD, Hu J, Zhuang XL et al. Synthesis and characterization of novel biodegradable and electroactive hydrogel based on aniline oligomer and gelatin. Macromol Biosci 2011;12:241-50.
23. Guo BL, Glavas L, Albertsson AC. Biodegradable and electrically conducting polymers for biomedical applications. Prog Polym Sci 2013;38:1263-86.
24. Guo BL, Finne-Wistrand A, Albertsson AC. Versatile functionalization of polyester hydrogels with electroactive aniline oligomers. J Polym Sci A Polym Chem 2011;49:2097-105.
25. Guo BL, Finne-Wistrand A, Albertsson AC. Degradable and electroactive hydrogels with tunable electrical conductivity and swelling behavior. Chem Mater 2011;23:1254-62.
26. Guo BL, Finne-Wistrand A, Albertsson AC. Facile synthesis of degradable and electrically conductive polysaccharide hydrogels. Biomacromolecules 2011;12:2601-9.
27. Zhang L, Li Y, Li L et al. Non-cytotoxic conductive carboxymethylchitosan/ aniline pentamer hydrogels. React Funct Polym 2014;82:81-8.
28. Li LC, Ge J, Guo BL et al. In situ forming biodegradable electroactive hydrogels. Polym Chem 2014;5:2880-90.
29. Li XM, Wang L, Fan YB et al. Nanostructured scaffolds for bone tissue engineering. J Biomed Mater Res A 2013;101:2424-35.
30. Bose S, Roy M, Bandyopadhyay A. Recent advances in bone tissue engineering scaffolds. Trends Biotechnol 2012;30:546-54. gelatin-genipin-hydroxyapatite composite scaffolds colonized by human primary osteoblasts are suitable for bone tissue engineering applications: in vitro evidences. J Biomed Mater Res A 2014;102:1415-21.
31. Xia Y, Zhou PY, Cheng XS et al. Selective laser sintering fabrication of nano-hydroxyapatite/poly-epsilon-caprolactone scaffolds for bone tissue engineering applications. Int J Nanomed 2013;8:4197-213.
32. Fricain JC, Schlaubitz S, Le Visage C et al. A nano-hydroxyapatite-pullulan/dextran polysaccharide composite macroporous material for bone tissue engineering. Biomaterials 2013;34:2947-59.
33. Vozzi G, Corallo C, Carta S et al. Collagen-gelatin-genipin-hydroxyapatite composite scaffolds colonized by human primary osteoblasts are suitable for bone tissue engineering applications: in vitro evidences. J Biomed Mater Res A 2014;102:1415-21.
34. Yan LP, Silva-Correia J, Correia C et al. Bioactive macro/micro porous silk fibroin/nano-sized calcium phosphate scaffolds with potential for bone-tissue-engineering applications. Nanomedicine 2013;8:359-78.
35. Hayati AN, Rezaie HR, Hosseinalipour SM. Preparation of poly(3-hydroxybutyrate)/nano-hydroxyapatite composite scaffolds for bone tissue engineering. Mater Lett 2011;65:736-9.
36. Lei B, Chen XF, Wang YJ et al. Surface nanoscale patterning of bioactive glass to support cellular growth and differentiation. J Biomed Mater Res A 2010;94A:1091-9.
37. Lei B, Chen XF, Han X et al. Unique physical-chemical, apatite-forming properties and human marrow mesenchymal stem cells (HMSCs) response of sol-gel bioactive glass microspheres. J Mater Chem 2011;21:12725-34.
38. Boccaccini AR, Erol M, Stark WJ et al. Polymer/bioactive glass nanocomposites for biomedical applications: a review. Compos Sci Technol 2010;70:1764-76.
39. Srinivasan S, Jayasree R, Chennazhi KP et al. Biocompatible alginate/ nano bioactive glass ceramic composite scaffolds for periodontal tissue regeneration. Carbohydr Polym 2012;87:274-83.
40. Marelli B, Ghezzi CE, Mohn D et al. Accelerated mineralization of dense collagen-nano bioactive glass hybrid gels increases scaffold stiffness and regulates osteoblastic function. Biomaterials 2011;32:8915-26.
41. Misra SK, Ansari TI, Valappil SP et al. Poly(3-hydroxybutyrate) multifunctional composite scaffolds for tissue engineering applications. Biomaterials 2010;31:2806-15.
42. Lei B, Shin KH, Noh DYet al. Bioactive glass microspheres as reinforcement for improving the mechanical properties and biological performance of poly(e-caprolactone) polymer for bone tissue regeneration. J Biomed Mater Res B 2012;100B:967-75.
43. Lei B, Shin KH, Noh DY et al. Sol-gel derived nanoscale bioactive glass (NBG) particles reinforced poly(epsilon-caprolactone) composites for bone tissue engineering. Mat Sci Eng C Mater 2013;33:1102-8.
44. Meretoja VV, Tirri T, MalinMet al. Ectopic bone formation in and softtissue response to P(CL/DLLA)/bioactive glass composite scaffolds. Clin Oral Implants Res 2014;25:159-64.
45. Wu CT, Zhang YF, Zhou YH et al. A comparative study of mesoporous glass/silk and non-mesoporous glass/silk scaffolds: physiochemistry and in vivo osteogenesis. Acta Biomater 2011;7:2229-36.
46. Jones JR. Review of bioactive glass: from Hench to hybrids. Acta Biomater 2013;9:4457-86.
47. Lei B, Shin KH, Koh YH et al. Porous gelatin-siloxane hybrid scaffolds with biomimetic structure and properties for bone tissue regeneration. J Biomed Mater Res B 2014.
48. Allo BA, Rizkalla AS, Mequanint K. Synthesis and electrospinning of epsilon-polycaprolactone-bioactive glass hybrid biomaterials via a sol-gel process. Langmuir 2010;26:18340-8.
49. Shirosaki Y, Okayama T, Tsuru K et al. Synthesis and cytocompatibility of porous chitosan-silicate hybrids for tissue engineering scaffold application. Chem Eng J 2008;137:122-8.
50. Lei B, Shin KH, Jo IH et al. Highly porous gelatin-silica hybrid scaffolds with textured surfaces using new direct foaming/freezing technique. Mater Chem Phys 2014;145:397-402.
51. Guo BL, Finne-Wistrand A, Albertsson AC. Molecular architecture of electroactive and biodegradable copolymers composed of polylactide and carboxyl-capped aniline trimer. Biomacromolecules 2010;11:855-63.
52. Lee JY. Electrically conducting polymer-based nanofibrous scaffolds for tissue engineering applications. Polym Rev 2013;53:443-59.
53. Guo BL, Sun Y, Finne-Wistrand A et al. Electroactive tubular porous scaffolds with degradability and non-cytotoxicity for neural tissue regeneration. Acta Biomater 2012;8:144-53.
54. Xu H, Holzwarth JM, Yan Y et al. Conductive PPY/PDLLA conduit for peripheral nerve regeneration. Biomaterials 2014;35:225-35.
55. Holzwarth JM, Ma PX. 3D nanofibrous scaffolds for tissue engineering. J Mater Chem 2011;21:10243-51.
56. Zhang SG. Fabrication of novel biomaterials through molecular selfassembly. Nat Biotechnol 2003;21:1171-8.
57. Li LC, Ge J, Wang L et al. Electroactive nanofibrous biomimetic scaffolds by thermally induced phase separation. J Mater Chem B 2014;2:6119-30.
58. Gu BK, Kim MS, Kang CM et al. Fabrication of conductive polymerbased nanofiber scaffolds for tissue engineering applications. J Nanosci Nanotech 2014;14:7621-6.
59. Rim NG, Shin CS, Shin H. Current approaches to electrospun nanofibers for tissue engineering. Biomed Mater 2013;8:014102.
60. Ma XJ, Ge J, Li Yet al. Nanofibrous electroactive scaffolds from a chitosan-graft-aniline tetramer by electrospinning for tissue engineering. RSC Adv 2014;4:13652-61.
61. Greiner A, Wendorff JH. Electrospinning: a fascinating method for the preparation of ultrathin fibres. Angew Chem Int Ed 2007;46:5670-703.
62. Sill TJ, von Recum HA. Electro spinning: applications in drug delivery and tissue engineering. Biomaterials 2008;29:1989-2006.
63. Subramanian A, Krishnan UM, Sethuraman S. Axially aligned electrically conducting biodegradable nanofibers for neural regeneration. J Mater Sci Mater Med 2012;23:1797-809.
64. Kai D, Prabhakaran MP, Jin GR et al. Polypyrrole-contained electrospun conductive nanofibrous membranes for cardiac tissue engineering. J Biomed Mater Res A 2011;99A:376-85.
65. Chen MC, Sun YC, Chen YH. Electrically conductive nanofibers with highly oriented structures and their potential application in skeletal muscle tissue engineering. Acta Biomater 2013;9:5562-72.
66. Aznar-Cervantes S, Roca MI, Martinez JG et al. Fabrication of conductive electrospun silk fibroin scaffolds by coating with polypyrrole for biomedical applications. Bioelectrochemistry 2012;85:36-43.
67. Llorens E, Armelin E, Perez-Madrigal MD et al. Nanomembranes and nanofibers from biodegradable conducting polymers. Polymers 2013;5:1115-57.
68. Pelto J, Bjorninen M, Palli A et al. Novel polypyrrole-coated polylactide scaffolds enhance adipose stem cell proliferation and early osteogenic differentiation. Tissue Eng Part A 2013;19:882-92.
69. Lee JY, Bashur CA, Milroy CA et al. Nerve growth factor-immobilized electrically conducting fibrous scaffolds for potential use in neural engineering applications. IEEE Trans Nanobiosci 2012;11:15-21.
70. Frohbergh ME, Katsman A, Botta GR et al. Electrospun hydroxyapatitecontaining chitosan nanofibers crosslinked with genipin for bone tissue engineering. Biomaterials 2012;33:9167-78.
71. Pascu EI, Stokes J, McGuinness GB. Electrospun composites of PHBV, silk fibroin and nano-hydroxyapatite for bone tissue engineering. Mat Sci Eng C Mater 2013;33:4905-16.
72. Phipps MC, Clem WC, Grunda JM et al. Increasing the pore sizes of bone-mimetic electrospun scaffolds comprised of polycaprolactone, collagen I and hydroxyapatite to enhance cell infiltration. Biomaterials 2012;33:524-34.
73. Holzwarth JM, Ma PX. Biomimetic nanofibrous scaffolds for bone tissue engineering. Biomaterials 2011;32:9622-9.
74. Liu X, Smith LA, Hu J et al. Biomimetic nanofibrous gelatin/apatite composite scaffolds for bone tissue engineering. Biomaterials 2009;30:2252-8.
75. Gao CX, Gao Q, Li YD et al. In vitro evaluation of electrospun gelatinbioactive glass hybrid scaffolds for bone regeneration. J Appl Polym Sci 2013;127:2588-99.
76. Kouhi M, Morshed M, Varshosaz J et al. Poly (epsilon-caprolactone) incorporated bioactive glass nanoparticles and simvastatin nanocomposite nanofibers: preparation, characterization and in vitro drug release for bone regeneration applications. Chem Eng J 2013;228:1057-65.
77. Lei B, Shin KH, Noh DY et al. Nanofibrous gelatin-silica hybrid scaffolds mimicking the native extracellular matrix (ECM) using thermally induced phase separation. J Mater Chem 2012;22:14133-40.
78. Mourino V, Cattalini JP, Roether JA et al. Composite polymerbioceramic scaffolds with drug delivery capability for bone tissue engineering. Expert Opin Drug Deliv 2013;10:1353-65.
79. Hu J, Ma PX. Nano-fibrous tissue engineering scaffolds capable of growth factor delivery. Pharm Res 2011;28:1273-81.
80. Liu Y, Lu Y, Tian XZ et al. Segmental bone regeneration using an rhBMP-2-loaded gelatin/nanohydroxyapatite/fibrin scaffold in a rabbit model. Biomaterials 2009;30:6276-6285.
81. Kanczler JM, Ginty PJ, White L et al. The effect of the delivery of vascular endothelial growth factor and bone morphogenic protein-2 to osteoprogenitor cell populations on bone formation. Biomaterials 2010;31:1242-50.
82. Sohier J, Hamann D, Koenders M et al. Tailored release of TGF-beta(1) from porous scaffolds for cartilage tissue engineering. Int J Pharm 2007;332:80-9.
83. Wei GB, Jin QM, Giannobile WVet al. The enhancement of osteogenesis by nano-fibrous scaffolds incorporating rhBMP-7 nanospheres. Biomaterials 2007;28:2087-96.
84. Gristina AG. Biomaterial-centered infection: microbial adhesion versus tissue integration. Science 1987;237:1588-95.
85. Schierholz JM, Beuth J. Implant infections: a haven for opportunistic bacteria. J Hosp Infect 2001;49:87-93.
86. Kim K, Luu YK, Chang C et al. Incorporation and controlled release of a hydrophilic antibiotic using poly(lactide-co-glycolide)-based electrospun nanofibrous scaffolds. J Controlled Release 2004;98:47-56.
87. Feng K, Sun H, Bradley MA et al. Novel antibacterial nanofibrous PLLA scaffolds. J Controlled Release 2010;146:363-9.
88. Tiller JC, Sprich C, Hartmann L. Amphiphilic conetworks as regenerative controlled releasing antimicrobial coatings. J Controlled Release 2005;103:355-67.
89. Kumar A, Vemula PK, Ajayan PM et al. Silver-nanoparticleembedded antimicrobial paints based on vegetable oil. Nat Mater 2008; 7:236-41.
90. Ho CH, Tobis J, Sprich C et al. Nanoseparated polymeric networks with multiple antimicrobial properties. Adv Mater 2004;16:957-61.
91. Kristinsson KG, Jansen B, Treitz U et al. Antimicrobial activity of polymers coated with iodine-complexed polyvinylpyrrolidone J Biomater Appl 1991;5:173-84.
92. Mohiti-Asli M, Pourdeyhimi B, Loboa EG. Novel, silver-ion-releasing nanofibrous scaffolds exhibit excellent antibacterial efficacy without the use of silver nanoparticles. Acta Biomater 2014;10:2096-104.
93. Cohen ML. Changing patterns of infectious disease. Nature 2000;406:762-7.
94. Bullen JJ, Rogers HJ, Spalding PB et al. Iron and infection: the heart of the matter. FEMS Immunol Med Microbiol 2005;43:325-30.
95. Ferreira L, Zumbuehl A. Non-leaching surfaces capable of killing microorganisms on contact. J Mater Chem 2009;19:7796-806.
96. Girshevitz O, Nitzan Y, Sukenik CN. Solution-deposited amorphous titanium dioxide on silicone rubber: a conformal, crack-free antibacterial coating. Chem Mater 2008;20:1390-6.
97. Etienne O, Gasnier C, Taddei C et al. Antifungal coating by biofunctionalized polyelectrolyte multilayered films. Biomaterials 2005;26:6704-12.
98. Lee SB, Koepsel RR, Morley SWet al. Permanent, nonleaching antibacterial surfaces. 1. Synthesis by atom transfer radical polymerization. Biomacromolecules 2004;5:877-882.
99. Murata H, Koepsel RR, Matyjaszewski K et al. Permanent, non-leaching antibacterial surfaces-2: How high density cationic surfaces kill bacterial cells. Biomaterials 2007;28:4870-9.
100. Huang JY, Koepsel RR, Murata H et al. Nonleaching antibacterial glass surfaces via "Grafting Onto": the effect of the number of quaternary ammonium groups on biocidal activity. Langmuir 2008;24:6785-95.
101. Gabriel M, Nazmi K, Veerman EC et al. Preparation of LL-37-grafted titanium surfaces with bactericidal activity. Bioconjugate Chem 2006;17:548-50.
102. Zhou CC, Li P, Qi XB et al. A photopolymerized antimicrobial hydrogel coating derived from epsilon-poly-L-lysine. Biomaterials 2011;32:2704-12.
103. Lim K, Chua RRY, Saravanan R et al. Immobilization studies of an engineered arginine-tryptophan-rich peptide on a silicone surface with antimicrobial and antibiofilm activity. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces 2013;5:6412-22.
104. Li X, Li P, Saravanan R et al. Antimicrobial functionalization of silicone surfaces with engineered short peptides having broad spectrum antimicrobial and salt-resistant properties. Acta Biomater 2014;10:258-66.
105. Li P, Poon YF, Li WF et al. A polycationic antimicrobial and biocompatible hydrogel with microbe membrane suctioning ability. Nat Mater 2011;10:149-56.
106. Li P, Zhou C, Rayatpisheh S et al. Cationic peptidopolysaccharides show excellent broad-spectrum antimicrobial activities and high selectivity. Adv Mater 2012;24:4130-7.