Accelerated mineralization of dense collagen-nano bioactive glass hybrid gels increases scaffold stiffness and regulates osteoblastic function

Biomaterials

Volumn 32, Issue 34, 2011, Pages 8915-8926

  Marelli, Benedetto ^a   Ghezzi, Chiara E ^a   Mohn, Dirk ^b   Stark, Wendelin J ^b   Barralet, Jake E ^a   Boccaccini, Aldo R ^c   Nazhat, Showan N ^a  

^a MCGILL UNIVERSITY   (Canada)

^b ETH ZURICH   (Switzerland)

^c UNIVERSITY OF ERLANGEN NUREMBERG   (Germany)

Author keywords

Dense collagen scaffolds; Hydroxyapatite; Mineralization; Nano bioactive glass; Nanocomposite hydrogels; Tissue engineering

Indexed keywords

ALKALINE PHOSPHATASE; BIOLOGICAL PROPERTIES; BONE TISSUE ENGINEERING; CALCIUM PHOSPHATE FORMATION; CELL DELIVERY; COLLAGEN SCAFFOLDS; COMPRESSIVE MODULI; HIGH SURFACE AREA; HOMOGENEOUS GROWTH; HYBRID GELS; HYDROGEL SCAFFOLDS; HYDROXYLAPATITE; MC3T3-E1; METABOLIC ACTIVITY; MICRO-STRUCTURAL; MINERALIZATION; NANO-SIZED; NANOCOMPOSITE HYDROGELS; NANOFIBRILLAR; OSTEOBLASTIC FUNCTIONS; OSTEOGENIC DIFFERENTIATION; OSTEOGENIC SUPPLEMENTS; SIMULATED BODY FLUIDS;

BIOACTIVE GLASS; BONE; CALCIUM PHOSPHATE; CELL CULTURE; CELLS; COLLAGEN; GELS; HYDROGELS; HYDROXYAPATITE; MECHANICAL PROPERTIES; MINERALOGY; NANOCOMPOSITES; PHOSPHATASES; SOL-GELS; TISSUE; TISSUE ENGINEERING;

SCAFFOLDS (BIOLOGY);

ALKALINE PHOSPHATASE; CALCIUM PHOSPHATE; COLLAGEN GEL; HYDROXYAPATITE; MOLECULAR SCAFFOLD; NANOCOMPOSITE;

ANIMAL CELL; ARTICLE; BODY FLUID; BONE DEVELOPMENT; BONE REGENERATION; BONE TISSUE; CELL DIFFERENTIATION; CELL VIABILITY; ENZYME SYNTHESIS; IMPLANT; MINERALIZATION; MOUSE; NONHUMAN; OSTEOBLAST; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RAT; RIGIDITY; TISSUE ENGINEERING;

ALKALINE PHOSPHATASE; ANIMALS; CALCIFICATION, PHYSIOLOGIC; CELL LINE; CELL SURVIVAL; CERAMICS; COLLAGEN; COMPRESSIVE STRENGTH; DURAPATITE; GELS; MICE; OSTEOBLASTS; TISSUE ENGINEERING; TISSUE SCAFFOLDS;

EID: 80053128542     PISSN: 01429612     EISSN: 18785905     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2011.08.016     Document Type: Article

References (65)

1. Weiner S., Wagner H.D. The material bone: structure-mechanical function relations. Annu Rev Mater Sci 1998, 28(1):271-298.
2. Guilak F., Cohen D.M., Estes B.T., Gimble J.M., Liedtke W., Chen C.S. Control of stem cell fate by physical interactions with the extracellular matrix. Cell Stem Cell 2009, 5(1):17-26.
3. Prodanov L., te Riet J., Lamers E., Domanski M., Luttge R., van Loon J., et al. The interaction between nanoscale surface features and mechanical loading and its effect on osteoblast-like cells behavior. Biomaterials 2010, 31(30):7758-7765.
4. Hutmacher D.W. Scaffolds in tissue engineering bone and cartilage. Biomaterials 2000, 21(24):2529-2543.
5. Williams D.F. On the nature of biomaterials. Biomaterials 2009, 30(30):5897-5909.
6. Rezwan K., Chen Q.Z., Blaker J.J., Boccaccini A.R. Biodegradable and bioactive porous polymer/inorganic composite scaffolds for bone tissue engineering. Biomaterials 2006, 27(18):3413-3431.
7. Drury J.L., Mooney D.J. Hydrogels for tissue engineering: scaffold design variables and applications. Biomaterials 2003, 24(24):4337-4351.
8. Geckil H., Xu F., Zhang X., Moon S., Demirci U. Engineering hydrogels as extracellular matrix mimics. Nanomedicine 2010, 5(3):469-484.
9. Peppas N.A., Hilt J.Z., Khademhosseini A., Langer R. Hydrogels in biology and medicine: from molecular principles to bionanotechnology. Adv Mater 2006, 18(11):1345-1360.
10. Lee C.H., Singla A., Lee Y. Biomedical applications of collagen. Int J Pharm 2001, 221(1-2):1-22.
11. Gkioni K., Leeuwenburgh S.C.G., Douglas T.E.L., Mikos A.G., Jansen J.A. Mineralization of hydrogels for bone regeneration. Tissue Eng Part B 2010, 16(6):577-585.
12. Rajan N., Habermehl J., Cote M.-F., Doillon C.J., Mantovani D. Preparation of ready-to-use, storable and reconstituted type I collagen from rat tail tendon for tissue engineering applications. Nat Protoc 2007, 1(6):2753-2758.
13. Lees S. Considerations regarding the structure of the mammalian mineralized osteoid from viewpoint of the generalized packing model. Connect Tissue Res 1987, 16(4):281-303.
14. Brinkman W.T., Nagapudi K., Thomas B.S., Chaikof E.L. Photo-cross-linking of type I collagen gels in the presence of smooth muscle cells: mechanical properties, cell viability, and function. Biomacromolecules 2003, 4(4):890-895.
15. Bilgin C.C., Lund A.W., Can A., Plopper G.E., Yener Bl Quantification of three-dimensional cell-mediated collagen remodeling using graph theory. PLoS ONE 2010, 5(9):e12783.
16. Chang C.-F., Lee M.-W., Kuo P.-Y., Wang Y.-J., Tu Y.-H., Hung S.-C. Three-dimensional collagen fiber remodeling by mesenchymal stem cells requires the integrin-matrix interaction. J Biomed Mater Res A 2007, 80A(2):466-474.
17. Brown R.A., Wiseman M., Chuo C.B., Cheema U., Nazhat S.N. Ultrarapid engineering of biomimetic materials and tissues: fabrication of nano- and microstructures by plastic compression. Adv Funct Mater 2005, 15(11):1762-1770.
18. Ghezzi C.E., Muja N., Marelli B., Nazhat S.N. Real time responses of fibroblasts to plastically compressed fibrillar collagen hydrogels. Biomaterials 2011, 32(21):4761-4772.
19. Bitar M., Salih V., Brown R.A., Nazhat S.N. Effect of multiple unconfined compression on cellular dense collagen scaffolds for bone tissue engineering. J Mater Sci Mater Med 2007, 18(2):237-244.
20. Bitar M., Brown R.A., Salih V., Kidane A.G., Knowles J.C., Nazhat S.N. Effect of cell density on osteoblastic differentiation and matrix degradation of biomimetic dense collagen scaffolds. Biomacromolecules 2008, 9(1):129-135.
21. Buxton P.G., Bitar M., Gellynck K., Parkar M., Brown R.A., Young A.M., et al. Dense collagen matrix accelerates osteogenic differentiation and rescues the apoptotic response to MMP inhibition. Bone 2008, 43(2):377-385.
22. Pedraza C.E., Marelli B., Chicatun F., McKee M.D., Nazhat S.N. An in vitro assessment of a cell-containing collagenous extracellular matrix-like scaffold for bone tissue engineering. Tissue Eng Part A 2010, 16(3):781-793.
23. Marelli B., Ghezzi C.E., Barralet J.E., Boccaccini A.R., Nazhat S.N. Three-dimensional mineralization of dense nanofibrillar collagen-Bioglass hybrid scaffolds. Biomacromolecules 2010, 11(6):1470-1479.
24. Xynos I.D., Edgar A.J., Buttery L.D.K., Hench L.L., Polak J.M. Ionic products of bioactive glass dissolution increase proliferation of human osteoblasts and induce insulin-like growth factor II mRNA expression and protein synthesis. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 2000, 276(2):461-465.
25. Hattar S., Asselin A., Greenspan D., Oboeuf M., Berdal A., Sautier J.M. Potential of biomimetic surfaces to promote in vitro osteoblast-like cell differentiation. Biomaterials 2005, 26(8):839-848.
26. Bosetti M., Cannas M. The effect of bioactive glasses on bone marrow stromal cells differentiation. Biomaterials 2005, 26(18):3873-3879.
27. ® 45S5 dissolution. J Biomed Mater Res 2001, 55(2):151-157.
28. Leu A., Leach J. Proangiogenic potential of a collagen/bioactive glass substrate. Pharma Res 2008, 25(5):1222-1229.
29. ®-filled polylactide foams for bone tissue engineering scaffolds. J Biomed Mater Res A 2003, 67A(4):1401-1411.
30. Xu C., Su P., Chen X., Meng Y., Yu W., Xiang A.P., et al. Biocompatibility and osteogenesis of biomimetic bioglass-collagen-phosphatidylserine composite scaffolds for bone tissue engineering. Biomaterials 2011, 32(4):1051-1058.
31. Hofmann S., Hagenmüller H., Koch A.M., Müller R., Vunjak-Novakovic G., Kaplan D.L., et al. Control of in vitro tissue-engineered bone-like structures using human mesenchymal stem cells and porous silk scaffolds. Biomaterials 2007, 28(6):1152-1162.
32. Vunjak-Novakovic G., Obradovic B., Martin I., Bursac P.M., Langer R., Freed L.E. Dynamic cell seeding of polymer scaffolds for cartilage tissue engineering. Biotechnol Progr 1998, 14(2):193-202.
33. Engler A.J., Sen S., Sweeney H.L., Discher D.E. Matrix elasticity directs stem cell lineage specification. Cell 2006, 126(4):677-689.
34. Dalby M.J., Gadegaard N., Tare R., Andar A., Riehle M.O., Herzyk P., et al. The control of human mesenchymal cell differentiation using nanoscale symmetry and disorder. Nat Mater 2007, 6(12):997-1003.
35. Webster T.J., Siegel R.W., Bizios R. Osteoblast adhesion on nanophase ceramics. Biomaterials 1999, 20(13):1221-1227.
36. Webster T.J., Ergun C., Doremus R.H., Siegel R.W., Bizios R. Enhanced functions of osteoblasts on nanophase ceramics. Biomaterials 2000, 21(17):1803-1810.
37. Kay S., Thapa A., Haberstroh K.M., Webster T.J. Nanostructured polymer/nanophase ceramic composites enhance osteoblast and chondrocyte adhesion. Tissue Eng 2002, 8(5):753-761.
38. Palin E., Liu H.N., Webster T.J. Mimicking the nanofeatures of bone increases bone-forming cell adhesion and proliferation. Nanotechnol 2005, 16(9):1828-1835.
39. Misra S.K., Mohn D., Brunner T.J., Stark W.J., Philip S.E., Roy I., et al. Comparison of nanoscale and microscale bioactive glass on the properties of P(3HB)/Bioglass composites. Biomaterials 2008, 29(12):1750-1761.
40. Boccaccini A.R., Erol M., Stark W.J., Mohn D., Hong Z., Mano J.F. Polymer/bioactive glass nanocomposites for biomedical applications: a review. Compos Sci Technol 2010, 70(13):1764-1776.
41. Brunner T.J., Grass R.N., Stark W.J. Glass and bioglass nanopowders by flame synthesis. Chem Commun 2006, 1384-1386. (13).
42. Mohn D., Zehnder M., Imfeld T., Stark W.J. Radio-opaque nanosized bioactive glass for potential root canal application: evaluation of radiopacity, bioactivity and alkaline capacity. Int Endod J 2010, 43(3):210-217.
43. Kokubo T., Takadama H. How useful is SBF in predicting in vivo bone bioactivity?. Biomaterials 2006, 27(15):2907-2915.
44. Bohner M., Lemaitre J. Can bioactivity be tested in vitro with SBF solution?. Biomaterials 2009, 30(12):2175-2179.
45. Abou Neel E.A., Cheema U., Knowles J.C., Brown R.A., Nazhat S.N. Use of multiple unconfined compression for control of collagen gel scaffold density and mechanical properties. Soft Matter 2006, 2(11):986-992.
46. Fung Y.C. Biomechanics: mechanical properties of living tissues 1993, Springer-Verlag, New York. 2nd ed.
47. ® 45S5. Biomaterials 2005, 26(14):1665-1674.
48. Cerruti M., Bianchi C.L., Bonino F., Damin A., Perardi A., Morterra C. Surface modifications of bioglass immersed in TRIS-buffered solution. A multitechnical spectroscopic study. J Phys Chem B 2005, 109(30):14496-14505.
49. Li H., Ng B.S., Khor K.A., Cheang P., Clyne T.W. Raman spectroscopy determination of phases within thermal sprayed hydroxyapatite splats and subsequent in vitro dissolution examination. Acta Mater 2004, 52(2):445-453.
50. 3+ on the structure of collagen fiber. Langmuir 2009, 25(19):11905-11910.
51. Zhang W., Huang Z.-L., Liao S.-S., Cui F.-Z. Nucleation sites of calcium phosphate crystals during collagen mineralization. J Am Ceram Soc 2003, 86(6):1052-1054.
52. Marelli B., Ghezzi C.E., Barralet J.E., Nazhat S.N. Collagen gel fibrillar density dictates extent of mineralization in vitro. Soft Matter 2011, doi: 10.1039/c1sm06027a.
53. Vigier S., Catania C., Baroukh B., Saffar J.-L., Giraud-Guille M.-M., Colombier M.-L. Dense fibrillar collagen matrices sustain osteoblast phenotype in vitro and promote bone formation in rat calvaria defect. Tissue Eng Part A 2011, 17(7-8):889-898.
54. Kreger S.T., Voytik-Harbin S.L. Hyaluronan concentration within a 3D collagen matrix modulates matrix viscoelasticity, but not fibroblast response. Matrix Biol 2009, 28(6):336-346.
55. Broberg A., Heino J. Integrin [alpha]2[beta]1-dependent contraction of floating collagen gels and induction of collagenase are inhibited by tyrosine kinase inhibitors. Exp Cell Res 1996, 228(1):29-35.
56. Ngo P., Ramalingam P., Phillips J.A., Furuta G.T. Collagen gel contraction assay. Methods Mol Biol 2006, 103-109.
57. Kilarski W.W., Samolov B., Petersson L., Kvanta A., Gerwins P. Biomechanical regulation of blood vessel growth during tissue vascularization. Nat Med 2009, 15(6):657-664.
58. Gubler M., Brunner T.J., Zehnder M., Waltimo T., Sener B., Stark W.J. Do bioactive glasses convey a disinfecting mechanism beyond a mere increase in pH?. Int Endod J 2008, 41(8):670-678.
59. Loty C., Sautier J.M., Tan M.T., Oboeuf M., Jallot E., Boulekbache H., et al. Bioactive glass stimulates in vitro osteoblast differentiation and creates a favorable template for bone tissue formation. J Bone Miner Res 2001, 16(2):231-239.
60. Hoppe A., Güldal N.S., Boccaccini A.R. A review of the biological response to ionic dissolution products from bioactive glasses and glass-ceramics. Biomaterials 2011, 32(11):2757-2774.
61. ® conditioned medium in the absence of osteogenic supplements. Biomaterials 2009, 30(21):3542-3550.
62. ® composite films in the absence of osteogenic supplements. J Biomed Mater Res A 2007, 80A(4):837-851.
63. Habibovic P., Bassett D.C., Doillon C.J., Gerard C., McKee M.D., Barralet J.E. Collagen biomineralization in vivo by sustained release of inorganic phosphate ions. Adv Mater 2010, 22(16):1858-1862.
64. Wahl D.A., Czernuszka J.T. Collagen-hydroxyapatite composites for hard tissue repair. Eur Cell Mater 2006, 11:43-56.
65. Lanza R., Langer R., Vacanti J. Principles of tissue engineering 2007, Academic Press. 3rd ed.