A long-term view on learning to Argue in Facebook: The effects of group awareness tools and argumentation scripts

Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning Conference, CSCL

Volumn 1, Issue , 2015, Pages 110-117

  Puhl, Thomas ^a   Tsovaltzi, Dimitra ^a   Weinberger, Armin ^a  

^a SAARLAND UNIVERSITY   (Germany)

Author keywords

Argumentation; Group awareness; Long term study; Scripts; Social networking sites

Indexed keywords

E-LEARNING;

ARGUMENTATION; GROUP AWARENESS; LONG TERM STUDY; SCRIPTS; SOCIAL NETWORKING SITES;

SOCIAL NETWORKING (ONLINE);

EID: 85026847650     PISSN: 15734552     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (36)

1. Andriessen, J. E. B. (2006). Arguing to learn. In K. Sawyer (Ed.), (Tran.), Handbook of the Learning Sciences (443-459). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
2. Bodemer, D. (2011). Tacit guidance for collaborative multimedia learning. Computers in Human Behavior, 27(3), 1079-1086. doi:10.1016/j.chb.2010.05.016
3. Buder, J., & Bodemer, D. (2008). Supporting controversial CSCL discussions with augmented group awareness tools. International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning, 3(2), 123-139. doi:10.1007/s11412-008-9037-5
4. Caralis, P.V., Hammond, J.S. (1992). Attitudes of medical students, housestaff, and faculty physicians toward euthanasia and termination of life-sustaining treatment. Critical Medical Care, 20(5):683-90.
5. Dillenbourg, P. (2002). Over-scripting CSCL. In P. A. Kirschner (Ed.), Three worlds of CSCL: Can we support CSCL (pp. 61-91). Heerlen: Open University of the Netherlands.
6. Eagly, A., & Chaiken, S. (1995). Attitude strength, attitude structure and resistance to change. In R. Petty and J. Kosnik (Eds.), Attitude Strength. (pp. 413-432). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
7. Engelmann, T., Kolodziej, R., & Hesse, F. W. (2014). Preventing undesirable effects of mutual trust and the development of skepticism in virtual groups by applying the knowledge and information awareness approach. International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning, 9(2), 211-235. doi:10.1007/s11412-013-9187-y
8. Erber, M. W., Hodges, S. D., & Wilson, T. D. (1995). Attitude strength, attitude stability, and the effects of analyzing reasons. In R. Petty and J. Kosnik (Eds.), Attitude Strength. (pp. 433-454). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
9. Felton, M., & Kuhn, D. (2001). The development of argumentive discourse skill. Discourse Processes, 32(2), 135-153. doi:10.1207/S15326950DP3202&3_03
10. Fischer, F., Kollar, I., Stegmann, K., & Wecker, C. (2013). Toward a script theory of guidance in computersupported collaborative learning. Educational psychologist, 48(1), 56-66.
11. Greenhow, C. (2008). Connecting informal and formal learning experiences in the age of participatory media: Commentary on Bull et al. Contemporary Issues in Technology and Teacher Education, 8, 187-194.
12. Greenhow, C., & Robelia, B. (2009). Informal learning and identity formation in online social networks. Learning, Media and Technology, 34(2), 119-140. doi:10.1080/17439880902923580
13. Ihmeideh, F. M., & Al-omari, A. A. (2010). Attitudes toward Communication Skills among Students’ - Teachers’ in Jordanian Public Universities, 35(4).
14. Janssen, J., & Bodemer, D. (2013). Coordinated computer-supported collaborative learning: Awareness and awareness tools. Educational Psychologist, 48:1, 40-55
15. Jermann, P. & Dillenbourg, P. (2002). Elaborating new arguments through a CSCL script. In Andriessen, J., Baker, M., Suthers, D. (eds.), Arguing to Learn: Confronting Cognitions in Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning environments, 1-6. Kluwer Academic Publishers. Printed in the Netherlands.
16. Jermann, P., & Dillenbourg, P. (1999). An analysis of learner arguments in a collective learning environment. Proceedings of the 1999 conference on Computer support for collaborative learning - CSCL’99, 265-273.
17. Karpinski, A. C., Kirschner, P. a., Ozer, I., Mellott, J. a., & Ochwo, P. (2013). An exploration of social networking site use, multitasking, and academic performance among United States and European university students. Computers in Human Behavior, 29(3), 1182-1192. doi:10.1016/j.chb.2012.10.011
18. Keller, S., Bruder, S., & Schmitz, B. (2010). Lernberatungskompetenz situativ messen - Validierung eines Situationsbeurteilungstests. Vortrag auf der 74. Tagung der AEPF (Arbeitsgruppe für Empirische Pädagogische Forschung), Friedrich-Schiller-Universität Jena, Jena.
19. ® and academic performance. Computers in Human Behavior, 26(6), 1237-1245. doi:10.1016/j.chb.2010.03.024
20. Kobbe, L., Weinberger, A., Dillenbourg, P., Harrer, A., Hämäläinen, R., Häkkinen, P., & Fischer, F. (2007). Specifying computer-supported collaboration scripts. International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning, 2(2-3), 211-224. doi:10.1007/s11412-007-9014-4
21. Kollar, I., Fischer, F., & Slotta, J. D. (2007). Internal and external scripts in computer-supported collaborative inquiry learning. Learning & Instruction, 17(6), 708-721.
22. Kuhn, D., & Crowell, A. (2011). Dialogic argumentation as a vehicle for developing young adolescents’ thinking. Psychological Science, 22, 545-552.
23. Nasir, N.S. (2002). Identity, goals, and learning: Mathematics in cultural practice. Mathematical Thinking and Learning, 4, 213-248.
24. Noroozi, O., Weinberger, A., Biemans, H. J. A., Mulder, M., & Chizari, M. (2012). Argumentation-Based Computer Supported Collaborative Learning (ABCSCL): A synthesis of 15 years of research. Educational Research Review, 7(2), 79-106. doi: 10.1016/j.edurev.2011.11.006
25. Nussbaum, M. E. (2008). Collaborative discourse, argumentation, and learning: Preface and literature review. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 33(3), 345-359. doi:10.1016/j.cedpsych.2008.06.001
26. Phielix, C., Prins, F. J., & Kirschner, P. A. (2010). Awareness of group performance in a CSCL-environment: Effects of peer feedback and reflection. Computers in Human Behavior, 26, 151-161.
27. Phielix, C., Prins, F. J., Kirschner, P. a., Erkens, G., & Jaspers, J. (2011). Group awareness of social and cognitive performance in a CSCL environment: Effects of a peer feedback and reflection tool. Computers in Human Behavior, 27(3), 1087-1102. doi:10.1016/j.chb.2010.06.024
28. Puhl, T., Tsovaltzi, D. & Weinberger, A. (in review). Blending Facebook into seminars for practicing argumentation: A long-term perspective on the effects of group awareness tools and scripts. Computers in Human Behavior.
29. Reimann, P., Utz, W., Unterberger, R., Halb, W. (2014). Capturing Learning over Time for Supporting Pedagogical Decision Making: A Process Modeling Approach. In Elena Barbera, Peter Reimann (Eds.), Assessment and Evaluation of Time Factors in Online Teaching and Learning, (pp. 264-293). Hershey, PA: Information Science Reference.
30. Sangin, M., Molinari, G., Nüssli, M.-A., & Dillenbourg, P. (2011). Facilitating peer knowledge modeling: Effects of a knowledge awareness tool on collaborative learning outcomes and processes. Computers in Human Behavior, 27(3), 1059-1067. doi:10.1016/j.chb.2010.05.032
31. Sassenberg, K., & Boos, M. (2003). Attitude change in computer-mediated communication: Effects of anonymity and category norms. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, 6(4), 405-422. doi:10.1177/13684302030064006
32. Tsovaltzi, D., Judele, R., Puhl, T., & Weinberger, A. (in review). Scripts and Group Awareness Support in the Service of Learning in Facebook: How does CSCL compare to Social Networking Sites? Computers in Human Behavior.
33. Tsovaltzi, D., Puhl, T., Judele, R. & Weinberger, A. (2014). Group Awareness Support and Argumentation Scripts for Individual Preparation of Arguments in Facebook. Computers & Education, 76, 108-118, doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2014.03.012.
34. Wecker, C. & Fischer, F. (2014). Where is the evidence? A meta-analysis on the role of argumentation for the acquisition of domain-specific knowledge in computer-supported collaborative learning. Computers & Education 75, 218-228.
35. Weinberger, A. & Fischer, F. (2006). A framework to analyse argumentative knowledge construction in computer-supported collaborative learning. Computers & Education, 46, 71-95.
36. Weinberger, A., Stegmann, K., Fischer, F. (2010). Learning to argue online: Scripted groups surpass individuals (unscripted groups do not). Computers in Human Behavior, 26(4), 506-515.