Towards personality-driven persuasive health games and gamified systems

Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems - Proceedings

Volumn 2017-May, Issue , 2017, Pages 1015-1027

  Orji, Rita ^a,b   Nacke, Lennart E ^b   Di Marco, Chrysanne ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF WATERLOO   (Canada)

^b UNIVERSITY OF WATERLOO   (Canada)

Author keywords

Behavior change; Gamified design; Personality; Personalization; Persuasive game; Persuasive strategies; Risky health behavior; Serious games

Indexed keywords

BEHAVIORAL RESEARCH; HEALTH; HUMAN COMPUTER INTERACTION; HUMAN ENGINEERING; MOTIVATION;

BEHAVIOR CHANGE; HEALTH BEHAVIORS; PERSONALITY; PERSONALIZATIONS; PERSUASIVE GAME; PERSUASIVE STRATEGIES;

SERIOUS GAMES;

EID: 85026734459     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1145/3025453.3025577     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (65)

1. Atif Alamri, Mohammad Mehedi Hassan, M. Anwar Hossain, Muhammad Al-Qurishi, Yousuf Aldukhayyil, and M Shamim Hossain. 2014. Evaluating the impact of a cloud-based serious game on obese people. Computers in Human Behavior 30: 468-475. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2013.06.021
2. Sonia M. Arteaga, Víctor M. González, Sri Kurniawan, and Raquel a. Benavides. 2012. Mobile games and design requirements to increase teenagers' physical activity. Pervasive and Mobile Computing 8, 6: 900-908. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.pmcj.2012.08.002
3. Sonia M. Arteaga, Mo Kudeki, and Adrienne Woodworth. 2009. Combating obesity trends in teenagers through persuasive mobile technology. ACM SIGACCESS Accessibility and Computing, 94: 17-25. http://doi.org/10.1145/1595061.1595064
4. Magnus Bang, Carin Torstensson, and Cecilia Katzeff. 2006. The PowerHhouse: A Persuasive Computer Game Designed to Raise Awareness of Domestic Energy Consumption. Persuasive Technology: 123-132. http://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/11755494-33.
5. Marek Bell, Matthew Chalmers, Louise Barkhuus, et al. 2006. Interweaving mobile games with everyday life. Proceedings of the {SIGCHI} conference on Human Factors in computing systems, ACM, 417-426. http://doi.org/10.1145/1124772.1124835
6. Shlomo Berkovsky, Mac Coombe, Jill Freyne, Dipak Bhandari, and Nilufar Baghaei. 2010. Physical activity motivating games: virtual rewards for real activity. Proceedings of the International Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, ACM, 243-252. http://doi.org/10.1145/1753326.1753362
7. Max Birk and Regan L. Mandryk. 2013. Control your gameself. Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems - CHI '13, ACM Press, 685. http://doi.org/10.1145/2470654.2470752
8. M Buhrmester, T Kwang, and Gosling S. D. 2011. Amazon's Mechanical Turk A New Source of Inexpensive, Yet High-Quality, Data? Perspectives on Psychological Science 6, 1: 3-5. http://doi.org/doi:10.1177/1745691610393980
9. Marc Busch, E. Mattheiss, M. Reisinger, R. Orji, P. Fröhlich, and M. Tscheligi. 2016. More than sex: The role of femininity and masculinity in the design of personalized persuasive games. http://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-31510-2-19
10. Marc Busch, Elke Mattheiss, Wolfgang Hochleitner, et al. 2016. Using Player Type Models for Personalized Game Design - An Empirical Investigation. International Journal on Interaction Design & Architecture(s) Accepted f.
11. Wynne W. Chin. 1998. The Partial Least Squares Approach to Structural Equation Modeling. Modern Methods for Business Research 292, 2: 298-336.
12. Nathalie Colineau and Cécile Paris. 2011. Can beneficial habits be induced through reflection. Workshop on User Models for Motivational Systems, held in conjunction with the User Modeling, Adaptation and Personalization Conference. Retrieved from http://www.ict.csiro.au/staff/nathalie.colineau/publications/Colineau-Paris-WorkshopUM4Motivation.pdf
13. Sunny Consolvo, David W McDonald, and James A Landay. 2009. Theory-driven design strategies for technologies that support behavior change in everyday life. Proceedings of the international conference on Human factors in computing systems, ACM, 405-414. http://doi.org/10.1145/1518701.1518766
14. Aubrey C. Daniels. 2000. Bringing Out the Best in People: How to Apply the Astonishing Power of Positive Reinforcement. McGraw-Hill.
15. Filip Drozd, Tuomas Lehto, and Harri Oinas-Kukkonen. 2012. Exploring perceived persuasiveness of a behavior change support system: A structural model. Lecture Notes in Computer Science (including subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics), 157-168. http://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-31037-9-14
16. Brian J. Fogg. 2003. Persuasive Technology: Using Computers to Change What We Think and Do. Morgan Kaufmann. http://doi.org/10.1145/764008.763957
17. Yuichi Fujiki, Konstantinos Kazakos, Colin Puri, Pradeep Buddharaju, Ioannis Pavlidis, and James Levine. 2008. {NEAT-o-Games:} blending physical activity and fun in the daily routine. Computers in Entertainment 6, 2: 1-22. http://doi.org/10.1145/1371216.1371224
18. Kathrin M Gerling, Regan L Mandryk, Max Birk, Matthew Miller, and Rita Orji. The Effects of Embodied Persuasive Games on Player Attitudes Toward People Using Wheelchairs. http://doi.org/10.1145/2556288.2556962
19. Lewis. R Goldberg. 1993. The structure of phenotypic personality traits. American Psychologist 48, 1: 26-34. http://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.48.1.26
20. Andrea Grimes, Vasudhara Kantroo, and Rebecca E Grinter. 2010. Let's play!: mobile health games for adults. Proceedings of the 12th ACM international conference on Ubiquitous computing: 241-250. http://doi.org/10.1145/1864349.1864370
21. Andrea Grimes, Desney Tan, and Dan Morris. 2009. Toward technologies that support family reflections on health. Proceedings of the {ACM} 2009 international conference on Supporting group work, ACM, 311-320. http://doi.org/10.1145/1531674.1531721
22. Joe F. Hair, Christian M. Ringle, and Marko Sarstedt. 2011. PLS-SEM: Indeed a Silver Bullet. Journal of Marketing Theory and Practice 19, 2: 139-152. http://doi.org/10.2753/MTP1069-6679190202
23. Sajanee Halko and Julie A Kientz. 2010. Personality and persuasive technology: An exploratory study on health-promoting mobile applications. Persuasive Technology, Springer, 150-161. http://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-13226-1-16
24. Juho Hamari, Jonna Koivisto, and Tuomas Pakkanen. 2014. Do Persuasive Technologies persuade? - A review of empirical studies. Proceedings of Persuasive'14, LNCS 8462, Springer International Publishing Switzerland, 118-136.
25. Juho Hamari, Jonna Koivisto, and Harri Sarsa. 2014. Does gamification work? - A literature review of empirical studies on gamification. Proceedings of the Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, JANUARY: 3025-3034. http://doi.org/10.1109/HICSS.2014.377
26. Jacob B Hirsh, Sonia K Kang, and Galen V Bodenhausen. 2012. Personalized persuasion: tailoring persuasive appeals to recipients' personality traits. Psychological science 23, 6: 578-81. http://doi.org/10.1177/0956797611436349
27. Marc Busch, Mattheiss Elke, Rita Orji, Marczewski, Andrzej, Wolfgang Hochleitner, Michael Lankes, Lennart E. Nacke, Tscheligi, Manfred. 2015. Personalization in serious and persuasive games and gamified interactions. CHI PLAY 2015 - Proceedings of the 2015 Annual Symposium on ComputerHuman Interaction in Play: 811-816. http://doi.org/10.1145/2793107.2810260
28. Astrid Jander, Rik Crutzen, Liesbeth Mercken, Math Candel, and Hein de Vries. 2016. Effects of a Web-Based Computer-Tailored Game to Reduce Binge Drinking Among Dutch Adolescents: A Cluster Randomized Controlled Trial. Journal of medical Internet research 18, 2: e29. http://doi.org/10.2196/jmir.4708
29. Astrid Jander, Rik Crutzen, Liesbeth Mercken, and Hein De Vries. 2014. A Web-based computer-tailored game to reduce binge drinking among 16 to 18 year old Dutch adolescents: development and study protocol. BMC Public Health 14: 1054. http://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2458-14-1054
30. John B. Jemmott, Loretta Sweet Jemmott, and Geoffrey T. Fong. 1992. Reductions in HIV risk-associated sexual behaviors among black male adolescents: effects of an AIDS prevention intervention. American Journal of Public Health 82, 3: 372-377. http://doi.org/10.2105/AJPH.82.3.372
31. Shih-Ping Jeng and Ching-I Teng. 2008. Personality and motivations for playing online games. Social Behavior and Personality: an international journal 36, 8: 1053-1060. http://doi.org/10.2224/sbp.2008.36.8.1053
32. Yuan Jia, Bin Xu, Yamini Karanam, and Stephen Voida. 2016. Personality, targeted/Gamification: A Survey Study on Personality Traits and Motivational Affordances. Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. http://doi.org/10.1145/2858036.2858515
33. Daniel Johnson and John Gardner. 2010. Personality, Motivation and Video Games. Proceedings of the 22nd Conference of the Computer-Human Interaction Special Interest Group of Australia on Computer-Human Interaction - OZCHI '10, 276. http://doi.org/10.1145/1952222.1952281
34. Henry F. Kaiser. 1970. A second generation little jiffy. Psychometrika 35, 4: 401-415. http://doi.org/10.1007/BF02291817
35. Maurits Kaptein, Boris De Ruyter, Panos Markopoulos, and Emile Aarts. 2012. Adaptive Persuasive Systems. ACM Transactions on Interactive Intelligent Systems 2, 2: 1-25. http://doi.org/10.1145/2209310.2209313
36. Rilla Khaled, Ronald Fischer, James Noble, and Robert Biddle. 2008. A qualitative study of culture and persuasion in a smoking cessation game. Proceedings of the Third International Conference on Persuasive Technology for Human Well-Being, Springer Berlin Heidelberg, 224-236. http://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-68504-3-20
37. Yvonne Klisch, Leslie M Miller, Margaret E Beier, and Shu Wang. 2012. Teaching the biological consequences of alcohol abuse through an online game: Impacts among secondary students. CBE Life Sciences Education 11, 1: 94-102. http://doi.org/10.1187/cbe.11-04-0040
38. Yvonne Klisch, Leslie M Miller, Shu Wang, and Joel Epstein. 2012. The Impact of a Science Education Game on Students' Learning and Perception of Inhalants as Body Pollutants. Journal of Science Education and Technology 21, 2: 295-303. http://doi.org/10.1007/s10956-011-9319-y
39. Emil Kupek. 2006. Beyond logistic regression: structural equations modelling for binary variables and its application to investigating unobserved confounders. BMC medical research methodology 6, 1: 13. http://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2288-6-13
40. Tuomas Lehto and Harri Oinas-Kukkonen. 2011. Persuasive features in web-based alcohol and smoking interventions: a systematic review of the literature. Journal of medical Internet research 13, 3: e46. http://doi.org/10.2196/jmir.1559
41. Corrie Lelie. 2005. The value of storyboards in the product design process. Personal and Ubiquitous Computing 10, 2-3: 159-162. http://doi.org/10.1007/s00779-005-0026-7
42. Edwin Locke and Gary Latham. 1994. Goal-setting theory.
43. Salvatore R. Maddi. 1989. Personality theories: A comparative analysis, 5th ed. Dorsey Press.
44. Winter Mason and Siddharth Suri. 2012. Conducting behavioral research on Amazon's Mechanical Turk. Behavior research methods 44, 1: 1-23. http://doi.org/10.3758/s13428-011-0124-6
45. Oded Nov and Ofer Arazy. 2013. Personality-targeted design: theory, experimental procedure, and preliminary results. Proceedings of the 2013 conference on Computer⋯, 977-984. http://doi.org/10.1145/2441776.2441887
46. Harri Oinas-kukkonen and Marja Harjumaa. 2008. A Systematic Framework for Designing and Evaluating Persuasive Systems. PERSUASIVE, Springer, 1-5. http://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-68504-3
47. Harri Oinas-kukkonen and Marja Harjumaa. 2009. Persuasive Systems Design: Key Issues, Process Model, and System Features Persuasive Systems Design: Key Issues, Process Model, and System Features. Communications of the Association for Information Systems 24, 1: 28.
48. Rita Orji, Regan L. Mandryk, and Julita Vassileva. 2015. Gender, age, and responsiveness to cialdini's persuasion strategies. http://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-20306-5-14
49. Rita Orji. 2014. Design for Behaviour Change: A Model-driven Approach for Tailoring Persuasive Technologies. PhD Thesis: 1-257. Retrieved from http://hdl.handle.net/10388/ETD-2014-06-1555
50. Rita Orji, Regan L. Mandryk, Julita Vassileva, and Kathrin M. Gerling. 2013. Tailoring persuasive health games to gamer type. Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems - CHI '13, ACM Press, 2467-2476. http://doi.org/10.1145/2470654.2481341
51. Rita Orji and Karyn Moffatt. 2016. Persuasive technology for health and wellness: State-of-the-art and emerging trends. Health Informatics Journal 1: 7-9. http://doi.org/10.1177/1460458216650979
52. Rita Orji, Julita Vassileva, and Regan L. Mandryk. 2012. LunchTime: a slow-casual game for long-term dietary behavior change. Personal and Ubiquitous Computing 17, 6: 1211-1221. http://doi.org/10.1007/s00779-012-0590-6
53. Rita Orji, Julita Vassileva, and Regan L. Mandryk. 2014. Modeling the efficacy of persuasive strategies for different gamer types in serious games for health. User Modeling and User-Adapted Interaction 24, 5: 453-498. http://doi.org/10.1007/s11257-014-9149-8
54. Jowon Park, Yosep Song, and Ching-I Teng. 2011. Exploring the links between personality traits and motivations to play online games. Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking 14, 12: 747-51. http://doi.org/10.1089/cyber.2010.0502
55. Jr. Paul T. Costa and Robert R. McCrae. 1992. NEO Personality Inventory-Revised (NEO-PI-R) and NEO Five-Factor Inventory (NEO-FFI) Professional Manua. Psychological Assessment Resources, Odessa, FL.
56. Nicole Peever, Daniel Johnson, and John Gardner. 2012. Personality & video game genre preferences. Proceedings of The 8th Australasian Conference on Interactive Entertainment Playing the System - IE '12: 1-3. http://doi.org/10.1145/2336727.2336747
57. Beatrice Rammstedt and Oliver P. John. 2007. Measuring personality in one minute or less: A 10-item short version of the Big Five Inventory in English and German. Journal of Research in Personality 41, 1: 203-212. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrp.2006.02.001
58. Christian M. Ringle, S Wende, and J Becker. smartpls.de - next generation path modeling. Retrieved August 29, 2012 from http://www.smartpls.de/forum/contact.php
59. Burrhus F. Skinner. 1953. Science And Human Behavior. Simon and Schuster. http://doi.org/10.1037/h0052427
60. Shyam S. Sundar and Sampada S. Marathe. 2010. Personalization versus Customization: The Importance of Agency, Privacy, and Power Usage. Human Communication Research 36, 3: 298-322. http://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2958.2010.01377.x
61. R Thomas, J Cahill, and L Santilli. 1997. Using an Interactive Computer Game to Increase Skill and Self-Efficacy Regarding Safer Sex Negotiation: Field Test Results. Health Education and Behavior 24, 1: 71-86. http://doi.org/10.1177/109019819702400108
62. Gustavo F Tondello, Rina R Wehbe, Lisa Diamond, Marc Busch, Andrzej Marczewski, and Lennart E Nacke. The Gamification User Types Hexad Scale. http://doi.org/10.1145/2967934.2968082
63. Tammy Toscos, Anne Faber, Shunying An, and Mona Praful Gandhi. 2006. Chick clique: persuasive technology to motivate teenage girls to exercise. {CHI} '06 extended abstracts on Human factors in computing systems, ACM, 1873-1878. http://doi.org/10.1145/1125451.1125805
64. Khai N Truong, Gillian R Hayes, and Gregory D Abowd. 2006. Storyboarding: An Empirical Determination of Best Practices and Effective Guidelines. DIS '06 Proceedings of the 6th conference on Designing Interactive systems, ACM New York, NY, USA, 12-21. http://doi.org/10.1145/1142405.1142410
65. Veronica Lorena Zammitto. 2010. Gamers' Personality and their Gaming Preferences. School of Interactive Arts and Technology M.Sc Thesi. Retrieved April 10, 2014 from http://summit.sfu.ca/item/11349