The effects of embodied persuasive games on player attitudes toward people using wheelchairs

Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems - Proceedings

Volumn , Issue , 2014, Pages 3413-3422

  Gerling, Kathrin M ^a   Mandryk, Regan L ^a   Birk, Max ^a   Miller, Matthew ^a   Orji, Rita ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF SASKATCHEWAN   (Canada)

Author keywords

Attitude Change; Disability; Embodied Interaction; Persuasive Games

Indexed keywords

WHEELCHAIRS;

ATTITUDE CHANGE; DESIGN STRATEGIES; DISABILITY; EFFECTIVE APPROACHES; EMBODIED INTERACTION; PERSONS WITH DISABILITIES; PERSUASIVE GAMES; POSITIVE ATTITUDE;

HANDICAPPED PERSONS;

EID: 84900402824     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1145/2556288.2556962     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (39)

1. Alhabash, S. and Wise, K. PeaceMaker: Changing Students' Attitudes Toward Palestinians and Israelis Through Video Game Play. International Journal of Communication 6, (2012), 356-380.
2. Bang, M., Torstensson, C. and Katzeff, C. The PowerHouse: A Persuasive Computer Game Designed to Raise Awareness of Domestic Energy Consumption. Persuasive Technology. (2006), 123-132.
3. Baranowski, T., Baranowski, J., Cullen, K. W., Marsh, T., Islam, N., Zakeri, I., Honess-Morreale, L., & demoor, C. (2003). Squire's Quest!: Dietary outcome evaluation of a multimedia game. American journal of preventive medicine, 24(1), 52-61.
4. Barsalou, L. W. Perceptual Symbol Systems. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 22, 4 (1999), 577-660.
5. Bem, D. J. Self-perception: An alternative interpretation of cognitive dissonance phenomena. Psychological Review 74, 3 (1967), 183.
6. Bogost, I. Persuasive Games on Mobile Devices. Fogg, B.J. Eckles, D.(eds): Mobile Persuasion, (2007).
7. Brinol, P. and Petty, R.E. Embodied Persuasion. In: Semin, G.R. & Smith, E.R. (Eds.): Embodied grounding. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (2008).
8. Brown, A. Q&A: Littleloud talks guilt and gaming with Sweatshop. 2011. http://www.wired.co.uk/news/archive/2011-07/22/sweatshop-q-and-a/ viewgallery/269289.
9. Columna, L., Yang, S., Arndt, K., and Lieberman, L. Using Online Videos for Disability Awareness. Journal of Physical Education, Recreation & Dance 80, 8 (2009), 19-24.
10. Dourish, P. Where the Action is. The Foundations of Embodied Interaction. MIT Press (2004).
11. Flower, A., Burns, M.K., Bottsford-Miller, N.A. Meta-Analysis of Disability Simulation Research. Remedial and Special Education 28, 2 (2007), 72-79.
12. Fogg, B.J. Persuasive Technology: Using Computers to Change What We Think and Do. Morgan Kaufmann, 2003.
13. French, S. Simulation Exercises in Disability Awareness Training: A critique. Disability, Handicap & Society 7, 3 (1992), 257-266.
14. Gerling, K.M., Kalyn, M.R., and Mandryk, R.L. KINECTWheels: Wheelchair-Accessible Motion-Based Game Interaction. In: EA of CHI 2013, ACM (2013).
15. Grayson, E. and Marini, I. Simulated disability exercises and their impact on attitudes toward persons with disabilities. International Journal of Rehabilitation Research 19, (1996), 123-131.
16. Ishii, H. and Ullmer, B. Tangible Bits: Towards Seamless Interfaces between People, Bits and Atoms. In: Proc. of CHI 1997, ACM (1997), 234-241.
17. Khaled, R., Barr, P., Noble, J., Fischer, R. and Biddle, R. 2007. Fine tuning the persuasion in persuasive games. Persuasive Technology. (2007), 36-47.
18. Krahé, B. and Altwasser, C. Changing Negative Attitudes Towards Persons with Physical Disabilities: An Experimental Intervention. Journal of Community & Applied Social Psychology 16, (2006), 56-69.
19. Lewis, J., Brown, D., Cranton, W., and Mason, R. Simulating visual impairments using the Unreal Engine 3 game engine. In: Proc. of SeGAH 2011, IEEE (2011).
20. Loke, L. and Robertson, T. Moving and Making Strange: An Embodied Approach To Movement-Based Interaction Design. ACM TOCHI 20, 1 (2013).
21. Lyons, L., Slattery, B., Jimenez, P., Lopez, B., and Moher, T. Don't Forget about the Sweat: Effortful Embodied Interaction in Support of Learning. In: Proc. of TEI 2012, ACM (2012), 77-84.
22. Marshall, C. and Rossman, G.B. 2011. Designing Qualitative Research. Sage Publishers: Thousand Oaks, CA, USA.
23. Meyers, A.R., Anderson, J.J., Miller, D.R., Shipp, K., and Hoenig, H. Barriers, facilitators, and access for wheelchair users: Substantive and methodologic lessons from a pilot study of environmental effects. Social Science & Medicine 55, (2002), 1435-1446.
24. Miller, S.R. Attitudes toward Individuals with Disabilities: Does Empathy Explain the Difference in Scores between Men and Women? Annals of Behavioral Science and Medical Education 16, 1 (2010), 3-6.
25. Mueller, F., Edge, D., Vetere, F., Gibbs, M.R., Agamanolis, S., Bongers, B., and Sheridan, J.G. 2011. Designing Sports: A Framework for Exertion Games. In: Proc. of CHI 2011, ACM (2011), 2651-2660.
26. Niedenthal, P. M., Barsalou, L. W., Winkielman, P., Krauth-Gruber, S., and Ric, F. Embodiment in attitudes, social perception, and emotion. Personality and Social Psychology Review 9, 3 (2005), 184-211.
27. Oinas-Kukkonen, H. and Harjumaa, M. A systematic framework for designing and evaluating persuasive systems. Persuasive Technology, (2008), 164-176.
28. Orji, R., Mandryk, R.L., Vassileva, J., and Gerling, K.M. Tailoring persuasive health games to gamer type. In: Proc. of CHI 2013, ACM (2013), 2467-2476.
29. Orji, R., Vassileva, J., and Mandryk R. L. Modeling the Efficacy of Persuasive Strategies for Different Gamer Types in Serious Games for Health. User Modeling and User-Adapted Interaction: Special Issue on Personalization and Behaviour Change (in press).
30. Power, M., & Green, A. The WHOQOL-DIS Group The Attitudes to Disability Scale (ADS): Development and psychometric properties. Journal of Intellectual Disability Research 54, 9 (2010), 860-874.
31. Petty, R. E. and Cacioppo, J. T. The elaboration likelihood model of persuasion. Communication and Persuasion, Springer (1986), 1-24.
32. Pivik, J., McComas, J., Macfarlane, I., and Laflamme, M. Using Virtual Reality to Teach Disability Awareness. J. Educational Computing Research 26, 2 (2002), 203-218.
33. Przybylski, A.K., Weinstein, N., Murayama, K., Lynch, M.F., & Ryan, R.M., The ideal-self at play: The appeal of video games that let you be all you can be. Psychological Science, 2011, 23 (1), 69-76.
34. Ruiz, S., York, A., Stein, M., Keating, N., Santiago, K. Darfur is Dying. 2009. http://www.darfurisdying.com/.
35. Ryan, R. M., Rigby, C. S., & Przybylski, A. K., Motivational pull of video games: A self-determination theory approach. Motivation and Emotion 30, (2006).
36. Sherman, D.K., Gangi, C., and White, M.L. Embodied cognition and health persuasion: Facilitating intentionbehavior consistency via motor manipulations. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology 46, (2010), 461-464.
37. Stokes, B. Videogames have changed: Time to consider 'Serious Games'? The Development Education Journal, (2005), 6-13.
38. Watson, D., & Clark, L. A. The PANAS-X: Manual for the positive and negative affect schedule-Expanded Form. Iowa City: University of Iowa (1994).
39. Wilson, S. and Lieberman, L. Disability awareness in physical education. Strategies 13, 6 (2000), 29-33.