Gender, age, and responsiveness to cialdini’s persuasion strategies

Lecture Notes in Computer Science (including subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics)

Volumn 9072, Issue , 2015, Pages 147-159

  Orji, Rita ^a   Mandryk, Regan L ^a   Vassileva, Julita ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF SASKATCHEWAN   (Canada)

Author keywords

Age Persuasive strategies; Behavior change; Gender; Individual differences; Persuasive technology; Persuasiveness; Susceptibility

Indexed keywords

ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE; COMPUTERS; MAGNETIC SUSCEPTIBILITY;

BEHAVIOR CHANGE; GENDER; INDIVIDUAL DIFFERENCES; PERSUASIVE TECHNOLOGY; PERSUASIVENESS;

SOCIAL SCIENCES;

EID: 84937501149     PISSN: 03029743     EISSN: 16113349     Source Type: Book Series    
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-20306-5_14     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (30)

1. Fogg, B.J.: Persuasive Technology: Using Computers to Change What We Think and Do. Morgan Kaufmann (2003)
2. Oinas-Kukkonen, H., Harjumaa, M.: Persuasive systems design: Key issues, process model, and system features. Commun. Assoc. Inf. Syst. 24, 28 (2009)
3. Cialdini, R.: Harnessing the science of persuasion. Harv. Bus. Rev. 79, 72–79 (2001)
4. A Kaptein, et al.: Adaptive Persuasive Systems. Trans. Interact. Intell. Syst. 2, 1–25 (2012)
5. Orji, R.: Design for Behaviour Change: A Model-driven Approach for Tailoring Persuasive Technologies (2014)
6. A Orji, et al.: Modeling the Efficacy of Persuasive Strategies for Different Gamer Types in Serious Games for Health. User Model. User Adapt. Interact. Spec. Issue Pers. Behav. Chang. 42, 453–498 (2014)
7. Kaptein, M., Lacroix, J., Saini, P.: Individual differences in persuadability in the health promotion domain. In: Ploug, T., Hasle, P., Oinas-Kukkonen, H. (eds.) PERSUASIVE 2010. LNCS, vol. 6137, pp. 94–105. Springer, Heidelberg (2010)
8. Orji, R.O., Vassileva, J., Mandryk, R.L.: Modeling Gender Differences in Healthy Eating Determinants for Persuasive Intervention Design. In: Berkovsky, S., Freyne, J. (eds.) PERSUASIVE 2013. LNCS, vol. 7822, pp. 161–173. Springer, Heidelberg (2013)
9. Orji, R., Mandryk, R.L.: Developing culturally relevant design guidelines for encouraging healthy eating behavior. Int. J. Hum. Comput. Stud. 72, 207–223 (2014)
10. A Dawson, et al.: Examining gender differences in the health behaviors of Canadian university students. J. R. Soc. Promot. Health 127, 38–44 (2007)
11. Cialdini, R.B.: The Science of Persuasion. Sci. Am. Mind. 284, 76–84 (2004)
12. Clark, W.R., Tennessee, M.: Using the Six Principles of Influence to Increase Student Involvement in Professional Organizations: A Relationship Marketing Approach. J. Adv. Mark. Educ. 12, 43–52 (2008)
13. Kaptein, M., Markopoulos, P., de Ruyter, B., Aarts, E.: Can you be persuaded? individual differences in susceptibility to persuasion. In: Gross, T., Gulliksen, J., Kotzé, P., Oestreicher, L., Palanque, P., Prates, R.O., Winckler, M. (eds.) INTERACT 2009. LNCS, vol. 5726, pp. 115–118. Springer, Heidelberg (2009)
14. Halko, S., Kientz, J.A.: Personality and Persuasive Technology: An Exploratory Study on Health-Promoting Mobile Applications. In: Ploug, T., Hasle, P., Oinas-Kukkonen, H. (eds.) PERSUASIVE 2010. LNCS, vol. 6137, pp. 150–161. Springer, Heidelberg (2010)
15. A Cialdini, et al.: Preference for consistency: The development of a valid measure and the discovery of surprising behavioral implications 69, 318–328 (1995)
16. Mason, W., Suri, S.: Conducting behavioral research on Amazon’s Mechanical Turk. Behav. Res. Methods. 44, 1–23 (2012)
17. Buhrmester, M.D., Kwang, T., Gosling, S.D.: Amazon’s Mechanical Turk A New Source of Inexpensive, Yet High-Quality, Data? Perspect. Psychol. Sci. 6, 3–5 (2011)
18. A Hinton, et al.: SPSS Explained. Routledge (2004)
19. Chin, W.W.: The Partial Least Squares Approach to Structural Equation Modeling, http://www.bibsonomy.org/bibtex/276aba15e34b8d636650ed79f158 1f50b/naegle
20. Rhoads, K.V., Cialdini, R.B.: The business of influence: Principles that lead to success in commercial settings. In: The Persuasion Handbook: Dev. in Theory and Pract., pp. 513–542 (2002)
21. A Pure, et al: Understanding and Evaluating Source Expertise in an Evolving Media Environment. In: Takševa, T. (ed.) Social Software and the Evolution of User Expertise: Future Trends in Knowledge Creation and Dissemination, pp. 37–51. IGI Global (2013)
22. Billy, J.O., Udry, J.R.: Patterns of adolescent friendship and effects on sexual behavior. Soc. Psychol. Q., 27-41 (1985)
23. A Dohmen, et al.: Representative Trust and Reciprocity: Prevalence and Determinants. Econ. Inq. 46, 84–90 (2006)
24. Rau, H.A.: Trust and Trustworthiness: A Survey of Gender Differences. Psychol. Gend. Differ., 205–224 (2011)
25. Chaudhuri, A., Gangadharan, L.: Gender Differences in Trust and Reciprocity (2003)
26. West, S.G.: Increasing the attractiveness of college cafeteria food: A reactance theory perspective. J. Appl. Psychol. 6, 656 (1975)
27. A Orji, et al.: Providing for Impression Management in Persuasive Designs. Persuas. Technol., 1–4 (2012)
28. Lackenbauer, S.D.: Do I Feel Dissonance Over You? Sex Differences in the Experience of Dissonance for Romantic Partners (2011)
29. Dare, B., Guadagno, R., Nicole Muscanell, M.A.: Commitment: The Key to Women Staying in Abusive Relationships. J. Interpers. Relations, Intergr. Relations Identity 6, 58–64 (2013)
30. Lin, J.J., Mamykina, L., Lindtner, S., Delajoux, G., Strub, H.B.: Fish’n’Steps: Encouraging physical activity with an interactive computer game. In: Dourish, P., Friday, A. (eds.) UbiComp 2006. LNCS, vol. 4206, pp. 261–278. Springer, Heidelberg (2006)