Genome differentiation between Lycopersicon esculentum and L. pennellii as revealed by genomic in situ hybridization

Euphytica

Volumn 127, Issue 2, 2002, Pages 227-234

  Haider Ali, S N ^a   Ramanna, M S ^a   Jacobsen, E ^a   Visser, R G F ^a  

^a WAGENINGEN UNIVERSITY   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

Genome differentiation; GISH; L. pennellii; Lycopersicon esculentum

Indexed keywords

EMBRYOPHYTA; LYCOPERSICON; LYCOPERSICON ESCULENTUM; LYCOPERSICON PENNELLII; SOLANUM TUBEROSUM;

EID: 0036403694     PISSN: 00142336     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1023/A:1020282311843     Document Type: Article

References (29)

1. Ali, S.N., D.J. Huigen, M.S. Ramanra, E. Jacobsen & R.G.F. Visser, 2001. Genomic in situ hybridization analysis of a trigenomic hybrid involving Solanum and Lycopersicon species. Genome 44: 299-304.
2. Bonierbale, M., R.L. Plaisted & S.D. Tanksley, 1988. RFLP maps of potato and tomato based on a common set of clones reveal modes of chromosomal evolution. Genetics 120: 1095-1103.
3. Chetelat,R.T., V. Meglic, P. Cisneros, 2000. A genetic map of tomato based on BC91) Lycopersicon esculentum x Solanum lycopersicoides reveals overall synteny but supressed recombination between these two homoeologous genomes. Genetics 154: 857-867.
4. Davies, A., G. Jenkins & H. Rees, 1990. The fate of multivalents during meiotic prophase in the hybrid Gibasis consobrina x G. karwinskyana Rafin. (Commelinaceae). Genetica 82: 103-110.
5. De Jong, JH., A.M.A. Wolters, J.M. Kok, H. Verhaar & J. van Eden, 1993. Chromosome pairing and potential for intergeneric recombination in some hypotetraploid somatic hybrids of Lycopersicon esculentum (+) Solanum tuberosum. Genome 36: 1032-1041.
6. D'Hont, A., P.S. Rao, P. Feldmann, L. Grivet, N.I. Faridi, P. Taylor & J.C. Glaszmann, 1995. Identification and characterisation of sugarcane intergeneric hybrids, Saccharum officinarum x Erianthus arundinaceus, with molecular markers and DNA in situ hybridisation. Theor Appl Genet 91: 320-326.
7. D'Hont, A., L. Grivet, P. Feldmann, S. Rao, N. Berding & J.C. Glaszmann, 1996. Characterisation of the double genome structure of modern sugarcane cultivars (Saccharum spp.) by molecular cytogenetics. Mol Gen Genet 250: 405-413.
8. D'Hont A, A. Paget-Goy, J. Escoute & F. Carreel, 2000. The interspecific genome structure of cultivated banana, Musa spp. Revealed by genomic DNA in situ hybridisation. Theor Appl Genet 100: 177-183.
9. Ganal, MW., N.L.V. Lapitan & S.D. Tanksley, 1988. A molecular and cytogenetic survey of major repeated DNA sequences in tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum). Mol Gen Genet 213: 262-268.
10. Garriga-Calderé, F., D.J. Huigen, F. Filotico, E. Jacobsen & M.S. Ramanna, 1997. Identification of alien chromosomes through GISH and RFLP analysis and the potential for establishing potato lines with monosomic addition tomato chromosomes. Genome 40: 666-673.
11. Garriga-Calderé F., D.J. Huigen, E. Jacobsen & M.S. Ramanna, 1999. Prospects for introgressing tomato chromosomes into the potato genome: an assessment through GISH analysis. Genome 42: 282-288.
12. Gebhardt, C., E. Ritter, A. Barone, T. Debener, B. Walkemeier, U. Schachtschabel, H. Kaufmann, R.D. Thompson, M.W. Bonierbale, M.W. Ganal, S.D. Tanksley & F. Salamini, 1991. RFLP maps of potato and their alignment with the homoeologous tomato genome. Theor Appl Genet 83: 49-57.
13. Jacobsen, E., P. Reinhout, J.E.M. Bergervoet, J. de Looff, P.E. Abidin, D.J. Huigen & M.S. Ramanna, 1992. Isolation and characterisation of potato-tomato somatic hybrids using an amylose-free potato mutant as parental genotype. Theor Appl Genet 85: 159-164.
14. Jacobsen, E., J.H. de Jong, S.A. Kamstra, P.M.M.M. van den Berg & M.S. Ramanna, 1995. Genomic in situ hybridisation (GISH) and RFLP analysis for the identification of alien chromosomes in the back cross progeny of potato (+) tomato fusion hybrids. Heredity 74: 250-257.
15. Jiang, J. & B.S. Gill, 1994. Nonisotopic in situ hybridisation and plant genome mapping: first 10 years. Genome 37: 717-725.
16. Kenton, A., 1991. Heterochromatin accumulation, disposition and diversity in Gibasis karwinskyana (Commelinaceae). Chromosoma 100: 467-478.
17. Khush, G.S. & C.M. Rick, 1963. Meiosis of hybrids between Lycopersicon esculentum and Solanum pennellii. Genetica 33: 167-183.
18. Khush, G.S. & C.M. Rick, 1968. Cytogenetic analysis of the tomato genome by means of induced deficiencies. Chromosoma 23: 452-484.
19. Kuipers, G.J., D.P.M. van Os, J.H. de Jong & M.S. Ramanna, 1997. Molecular cytogenetics of Alstromeria identification of parental genomes in interspecific hybrids and characterisation of repetitive DNA families in constitutive heterochromatin. Chromosome Res 5: 31-39.
20. 1 hybrids. The Plant Journal 2: 695-704.
21. Parokonny, A.S., J.A. Marshall, M.D. Bennett, E.C. Cocking, M.R. Davey & J.B. Power, 1997. Homoeologous pairing and recombination in backcross derivatives of tomato somatic hybrids [Lycopersicon esculentum (+) L. peruvianum]. Theor Appl Genet 94: 713-723.
22. Peterson, D.G., H.J. Price, J.S. Johnston & S.M. Stack, 1996. DNA content of heterochromatin and euchromatin in tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum) pachytene chromosomes. Genome 39: 77-82.
23. Ramanna, M.S. & R. Prakken, 1967. Structure of and homology between pachytene and somatic metaphase chromosomes of tomato. Genetica 38: 115-133.
24. Ramanna, M.S. & M. Wagenvoort, 1976. Identification of the trisomics series in diploid Solanum tuberosum L., group tuberosum I. Chromosome identification. Euphytica 30: 15-31.
25. Schwarzacher, T. & P. Heslop-Harrison, 2000. Practical in situ hybridisation. BIOS Scientific Publishers Ltd. Bath. UK.
26. Stack, S.M., 1984. Heterochromatin, the synapotonemal complex and crossing over. J Cell Sci 71: 159-176.
27. Wilkinson, M.J., S.T. Bennett, S.A. Clulow, J. Allainguillaume, K. Harding & M.D. Bennett, 1995. Evidence for somatic translocation during potato dihaploid induction. Heredity 74: 146-151.
28. Zhong, X.B., J.H. de Jong & P. Zabel, 1996. Preparation of tomato meiotic pachytene and mitotic metaphase chromosomes suitable for fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH). Chromosome Res 4: 24-28.
29. Zhong, XB., P.F. Fransz, E.J. van Wennekes, M.S. Ramanna, A.B. van Kammen, P. Zabel, J.H. de Jong, 1998. FISH studies reveal the molecular and chromosomal organisation of individual telomere domains in tomato. The Plant J 13: 507-517.