A library of Solanum lycopersicoides introgression lines in cultivated tomato

Genome

Volumn 48, Issue 4, 2005, Pages 685-697

  Canady, Michael A ^a,b   Meglic, Vladimir ^a,c   Chetelat, Roger T ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^b Nunhems USA   (United States)

^c AGRICULTURAL INSTITUTE OF SLOVENIA   (Slovenia)

Author keywords

Alien introgression; Lycopersicon esculentum; Segregation distortion; Solanum lycopersicoides; Solanum lycopersicum

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; CROSS BREEDING; FERTILITY; FRUIT; GENETICS; GENOTYPE; HYBRIDIZATION; PHENOTYPE; PLANT CHROMOSOME; PLANT SEED; SOLANUM; TOMATO;

CHROMOSOMES, PLANT; CROSSES, GENETIC; FERTILITY; FRUIT; GENOTYPE; HYBRIDIZATION, GENETIC; LYCOPERSICON ESCULENTUM; PHENOTYPE; SEEDS; SOLANUM;

LYCOPERSICON ESCULENTUM; SOLANUM; SOLANUM LYCOPERSICOIDES;

EID: 26944442761     PISSN: 08312796     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1139/G05-032     Document Type: Article

References (45)

1. Alpert, K.B., and Tanksley, S.D. 1996. High-resolution mapping and isolation of a yeast artificial chromosome contig containing fw2.2: a major fruit weight quantitative trait locus in tomato. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 93: 15503-15507.
2. Brouwer, D.J., and St. Clair, D.A. 2004. Fine mapping of three quantitative trait loci for late blight resistance in tomato using near isogenic lines (NILs) and subNILs. Theor. Appl. Genet. 108: 628-638.
3. Chetelat, R.T. 1998. Bco, a corolla pigment intensifier on chromosome 7. Rep. Tomato Genet. Coop. 48: 10-12.
4. Chetelat, R.T., and DeVerna, J.W. 1991. Expression of unilateral incompatibility in pollen of Lycopersicon pennellii is determined by major loci on chromosomes 1, 6 and 10. Theor. Appl. Genet. 82: 704-712.
5. Chetelat, R.T., and Meglic, V. 2000. Molecular mapping of chromosome segments introgressed from Solanum lycopersicoides into cultivated tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum). Theor. Appl. Genet. 100: 232-241.
6. Chetelat, R.T., Rick, C.M., and DeVerna, J.W. 1989. Isozyme analysis, chromosome pairing, and fertility of Lycopersicon esculentum x Solanum lycopersicoides diploid backcross hybrids. Genome, 32: 783-790.
7. Chetelat, R.T., Cisneros, P., Stamova, L., and Rick, C.M. 1997. A male-fertile Lycopersicon esculentum x Solanum lycopersicoides hybrid enables direct backcrossing to tomato at the diploid level. Euphytica, 95: 99-108.
8. Chetelat, R.T., Rick, C.M., Cisneros, P., Alpert, K.B., and DeVerna, J.W. 1998. Identification, transmission, and cytological behavior of Solanum lycopersicoides Dun. monosomic alien addition lines in tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum Mill.). Genome, 41: 40-50.
9. 1 Lycopersicon esculentum x Solanum lycopersicoides reveals overall synteny but suppressed recombination between these homeologous genomes. Genetics, 154: 857-867.
10. Doganlar, S., Frary, A., Ku, H.-M., and Tanksley, S.D. 2002. Mapping quantitative trait loci in inbred backcross lines of Lycopersicon pimpinellifolium (LA1589). Genome, 45: 1189-1202.
11. Eshed, Y., and Zamir, D. 1995. An introgression line population of Lycopersicon pennellii in the cultivated tomato enables the identification and fine mapping of yield-associated QTL. Genetics, 141: 1147-1162.
12. Feinberg, A.P., and Vogelstein, B. 1983. A technique for radiolabeling DNA restriction endonuclease fragments to high specific activity. Anal. Biochem. 132: 6-13.
13. Fishman, L., and Willis, J.H. 2001. Evidence for Dobzhansky-Muller incompatibilities contributing to the sterility of hybrids between Mimulus guttatus and M. nasutus. Evolution, 55: 1932-1942.
14. Fridman, E., Pleban, T., and Zamir, D. 2000. A recombination hotspot delimits a wild-species quantitative trait locus for tomato sugar content to 484 bp within an invertase gene. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 97: 4718-4723.
15. Fukuoka, S., Namai, H., and Okuno, K. 1998. RFLP mapping of the genes controlling hybrid breakdown in rice (Oryza sativa L.). Theor. Appl. Genet. 97: 446-449.
16. Fulton, T.M., Chunwongse, J., and Tanksley, S.D. 1995. Microprep protocol for extraction of DNA from tomato and other herbaceous plants. Plant Mol. Biol. Rep. 13: 207-209.
17. Fulton, T.M., Beckbunn, T., Emmatty, D., Eshed, Y., Lopez, J., Petiard, V., Uhlig, J., Zamir, D., and Tanksley, S.D. 1997. QTL analysis of an advanced backcross of Lycopersicon peruvianum to the cultivated tomato and comparisons with QTLs found in other wild species. Theor. Appl. Genet. 95: 881-894.
18. Fulton, T.M., Grandillo, S., Beck-Bunn, T., Fridman, E., Frampton, A., Lopez, J., Petiard, V., Uhlig, J., Zamir, D., and Tanksley, S.D. 2000. Advanced backcross QTL analysis of a Lycopersicon esculentum x Lycopersicon parviflorum cross. Theor. Appl. Genet. 100: 1025-1042.
19. Ji, Y., and Chetelat, R.T. 2003. Homeologous pairing and recombination in Solanum lycopersicoides monosomic addition and substitution lines of tomato. Theor. Appl. Genet. 106: 979-989.
20. Ji, Y., Pertuze, R.A., and Chetelat, R.T. 2004. Genome differentiation by GISH in interspecific and intergeneric hybrids of tomato and related nightshades. Chrom. Res. 12: 107-116.
21. Lawson, D.M., Lunde, C.F., and Mutschler, M.A. 1997. Marker-assisted transfer of acylsugar-mediated pest resistance from the wild tomato, Lycopersicon pennellii, to the cultivated tomato, Lycopersicon esculentum. Mol Breed. 3: 307-317.
22. Liu, Y.-S., and Zamir, D. 1999. Second generartion L. pennellii introgression lines and the concept of bin mapping. Rep. Tomato Genet. Coop. 49: 26-30.
23. 2 populations containing L. esculentum versus L. pennellii cytoplasm. Sex. Plant Reprod. 8: 361-368.
24. Livingstone, K., and Rieseberg, L. 2003. Chromosomal evolution and speciation: a recombination-based approach. New Phytol. 161: 107-112.
25. Menzel, M.Y. 1962. Pachytene chromosomes of the intergeneric hybrid Lycopersicon esculentum x Solanum lycopersicoides. Am. J. Bot. 49: 605-615.
26. Monforte, A.J., and Tanksley, S.D. 2000. Development of a set of near isogenic and backcross recombinant inbred lines containing most of the Lycopersicon hirsutum genome in a L. esculentum genetic background: a tool for gene mapping and gene discovery. Genome, 43: 803-813.
27. Moyle, L.C., and Graham, E.B. 2005. Genetics of hybrid incompatibility between Lycopersicon esculentum and L. hirsutum. Genetics, 169: 355-373.
28. Navarro, A., and Barton, N.H. 2003. Chromosomal speciation and molecular divergence - accelerated evolution in rearranged chromosomes. Science (Washington, D.C.), 300: 321-324.
29. Orr, H.A. 1995. The population genetics of speciation: the evolution of hybrid incompatibilities. Genetics, 139: 1805-1813.
30. Peralta, I.E., and Spooner, D.M. 2001. Granule-bound starch synthase (GBSSI) gene phylogeny of wild tomatoes (Solanum L. Section Lycopersicon [Mill.] Wettst. Subsection Lycopersicon). Am. J. Bot. 88: 1888-1902.
31. Pertuzé, R.A., Ji, Y., and Chetelat, R.T. 2002. Comparative linkage map of the Solanum lycopersicoides and S. sitiens genomes and their differentiation from tomato. Genome, 45: 1003-1012.
32. Pertuzé, R.A., Ji, Y., and Chetelat, R.T. 2003. Transmission and recombination of homeologous Solanum sitiens chromosomes in tomato. Theor. Appl. Genet. 107: 1391-1401.
33. Pillen, K., Pineda, O., Lewis, C.B., and Tanksley, S.D. 1996. Status of genome mapping tools in the taxon Solanaceae. In Genome mapping in plants. R.G. Landes Co., Austin, Tex. pp. 282-308.
34. Rick, C.M. 1951. Hybrids between Lycopersicon esculentum Mill., and Solanum lycopersicoides Dun. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 37: 741-744.
35. Rick, C.M. 1967. Exploiting species hybrids for vegetable improvement. Proc. XVII Int'l. Hort. Congress, III: 217-229.
36. Rick, C.M. 1979. Biosystematic studies in Lycopersicon and closely related species of Solanum. In The biology and taxonomy of the Solanaceae. Academic Press, New York. pp. 667-678.
37. Rick, C.M. 1988. Tomato-like nightshades: affinities, autecology, and breeders opportunities. Econ. Bot. 42: 145-154.
38. Rick, C.M., DeVerna, J.W., Chetelat, R.T., and Stevens, M.A. 1986. Meiosis in sesquidiploid hybrids of Lycopersicon esculentum and Solanum lycopersicoides. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 83: 3580-3583.
39. Rick, C.M., Chetelat, R.T., and DeVerna, J.W. 1988. Recombination in sesquidiploid hybrids of Lycopersicon esculentum x Solanum lycopersicoides and derivatives. Theor. Appl. Genet. 76: 647-655.
40. Rick, C.M., Cisneros, P., Chetelat, R.T., and DeVerna, J.W. 1994. Abg - a gene on chromosome 10 for purple fruit derived from S. lycopersicoides. Rep. Tomato Genet. Coop. 44: 29-30.
41. Rick, C.M., Gifford, E.M., and Chetelat, R.T. 1996. Genetics, anatomy, and geneology of obscuravenosa, a monogenic tomato leaf trait. Tomato Mol. Biol. Symp. (UC-Berkeley) O15.
42. Stebbins, G.L. 1950. Variation and evolution in plants. Columbia University Press, New York.
43. Tanksley, S.D., Ganal, M.W., Prince, J.P., de Vicente, M.C., Bonierbale, M.W., Broun, P., Fulton, T.M., Giovanonni, J.J., Grandillo, S., Martin, G.B., Messeguer, R., Miller, J.C., Miller, L., Paterson, A.H., Pineda, O., Roder, M., Wing, R.A., Wu, W., and Young, N.D. 1992. High density molecular linkage maps of the tomato and potato genomes. Genetics, 132: 1141-1160.
44. Xu, P., Rogers, S.J., and Roossinck, M.J. 2004. Expression of antiapoptotic genes bcl-xl and ced-9 in tomato enhances tolerance to viral-induced necrosis and abiotic stress. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 101: 15805-15810.
45. Zamir, D. 2001. Improving plant breeding with exotic genetic libraries. Nat. Rev. Genet. 2: 983-989.