The message is on the wall? Emotions, social media and the dynamics of institutional complexity

Academy of Management Journal

Volumn 60, Issue 3, 2017, Pages 922-953

  Toubiana, Madeline ^a   Zietsma, Charlene ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ALBERTA   (Canada)

^b YORK UNIVERSITY   (Canada)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 85023196173     PISSN: 00014273     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.5465/amj.2014.0208     Document Type: Article

References (69)

1. Barros, M. 2014. Tools of legitimacy: The case of the petrobras corporate blog. Organization Studies, 35: 1211-1230.
2. Battilana, J., & Dorado, S. 2010. Building sustainable hybrid organizations:The caseof commercialmicrofinance organizations. Academy of Management Journal, 53: 1419-1440.
3. Battilana, J., & Lee, M. 2014. Advancing research on hybrid organizing - insights from the study of social enterprises. The Academy of Management Annals, 8: 397-441.
4. Besharov, M., & Smith, W. 2014. Multiple logics in organizations: Explaining their varied nature and implications. Academy ofManagement Review, 39: 364-381.
5. Binder, A. 2007. For love and money: Organizations' creative responses to multiple environmental logics. Theory and Society, 36: 547-571.
6. Caldwell, C., Davis, B., & Devine, J. 2009. Trust, faith, and betrayal: Insights from management for the wise believer. Journal of Business Ethics, 84: 103-114.
7. Collins, R. 2004. Interaction ritual chains. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
8. Comunello, F., & Anzera, G. 2012. Will the revolution be tweeted? A conceptual framework for understanding social media and the Arab Spring. Islam & Christian-Muslim Relations, 23: 453-470.
9. Creed, W. E. D., Dejordy, R., & Lok, J. 2010. Being the change: Resolving institutional contradiction through identity work. Academy of Management Journal, 53: 1336-1364.
10. Creed,W. E. D.,Hudson, B. A.,Okhuysen,G.A.,&Smith-Crowe, K. 2014. Swimming in a sea of shame: incorporating emotion into explanations of institutional reproduction and change. Academy of Management Review, 39: 275-301.
11. DiMaggio, P. J., & Powell, W. W. 1983. The iron cage revisited: institutional isomorphism and collective rationality in organizational fields. American Sociological Review, 48: 147-160.
12. Dunn, M. B., & Jones, C. 2010. Institutional logics and institutional pluralism: The contestation of care and science logics in medical education, 1967-2005. Administrative Science Quarterly, 55: 114-149.
13. Eisenhardt, K. M. 1989. Building theories from case study research. Academy of Management Review, 14: 532-550.
14. Emirbayer,M., & Goldberg, C. 2005. Pragmatism, Bourdieu, andcollective emotions incontentiouspolitics.Theory and Society, 34: 469-518.
15. Friedland, R. 2013a. God, love and other good reasons for practice: Thinking through institutional logics. In M. Lounsbury, & E. Boxenbaum (Eds.), Institutional logics in action: Research in the sociology of organizations, Vol. 39A: 25-50. Bingley, U.K.: Emerald Group Publishing.
16. Friedland, R. 2013b. Review: The institutional logics perspective: A new approach to culture, structure and process, Management, 15(5): 582-595.
17. Friedland, R. 2017. Moving institutional logics forward: Emotion and meaningful material practice. Organization Studies. Published online ahead of print.
18. Friedland, R., & Alford, R. R. 1991. Bringing society back: Symbols, practices, and institutional contradictions. In W. W. Powell, & P. J. DiMaggio (Eds.), The new institutionalism in organizational analysis: 232-263. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
19. Glynn, M. A., & Lounsbury, M. 2005. From the critics' corner: Logic blending, discursive change and authenticity in a cultural production system. Journal of Management Studies, 42: 1031-1055.
20. Gooty, J., Gavin, M., & Ashkanasy, N. M. 2009. Emotions research in OB: The challenges that lie ahead. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 30: 833-838.
21. Greenwood, R., Diaz, A. M., Li, S. X., & Lorente, J. C. 2010. The multiplicity of institutional logics and the heterogeneity of organizational responses. Organization Science, 21: 521-539.
22. Greenwood, R., Oliver, C., Sahlin, K., & Suddaby, R. 2008. The Sage handbook of organizational institutionalism. London, U.K.: Sage Publications.
23. Greenwood, R., Raynard, M., Kodeih, F., Micelotta, E. R., & Lounsbury, M. 2011. Institutional complexity and organizational responses. The Academy of Management Annals, 5: 317-371.
24. Gutierrez, B., Howard-Grenville, J., & Scully, M. A. 2010. The faithful rise up: split identification and an unlikely change effort. Academy of Management Journal, 53: 673-700.
25. Hallett, T. 2003. Emotional feedback and amplification in social interaction. The Sociological Quarterly, 44: 705-726.
26. Helms, W. S., Oliver, C., & Webb, K. 2012. Antecedents of settlement on a newinstitutional practice: Negotiation of the ISO 26000 standard on social responsibility. Academy of Management Journal, 55: 1120-1145.
27. Hirsch, P.M., & Lounsbury,M. 1997. Ending the family quarrel. The American Behavioral Scientist, 40: 406-418.
28. Jarzabkowski, P., Matthiesen, J., & Van de Ven, A. H. 2009. Doing which work? A practice approach to institutional pluralism. In T. B. Lawrence, R. Suddaby, & B. Leca (Eds.), Institutional work: Actors and agency in institutional studies of organizations: 284-316. Cambridge, U.K.: Cambridge University Press.
29. Jay, J. 2013. Navigating paradox as a mechanism of change and innovation in hybrid organizations. Academy of Management Journal, 56: 137-159.
30. Kraatz, M. S., & Block, E. S. 2008. Organizational implications of institutional pluralism. In R. Greenwood, C. Oliver, K. Sahlin, & R. Suddaby (Eds.), The Sage handbook of organizational institutionalism: 99-129. London, U.K.: Sage.
31. Krippendorff, K. 2004. Content analysis: An introduction to its methodology Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
32. Lazarus, R. S. 1995. Emotions express a social relationship, but it is an individual mind that creates them. Psychological Inquiry, 6: 253-265.
33. Lewis, K., Gray, K., & Meierhenrich, J. 2014. The structure of online activism. Sociological Science, 1: 1-9.
34. Lok, J. 2010. Institutional logics as identity projects. Academy of Management Journal, 53: 1305-1335.
35. Lounsbury, M. 2007. A tale of two cities: Competing logics and practice variation in the professionalizing of mutual funds. Academy of Management Journal, 50: 289-307.
36. Marquis, C., & Lounsbury, M. 2007. Vive la resistance: Competing logics and the consolidation of U.S. community banking. Academy of Management Journal, 50: 799-820.
37. Meyer, J. W., & Rowan, B. 1977. Institutionalized organizations: Formal structure as myth and ceremony. American Journal of Sociology, 83: 340-363.
38. Meyer, R. E., & Hammerschmid, G. 2006. Changing institutional logics and executive identities. The American Behavioral Scientist, 49: 1000-1014.
39. Murray, F. 2010. The oncomouse that roared: Hybrid exchange strategies as a source of distinction at the boundary of overlapping institutions. American Journal of Sociology, 116: 341-388.
40. Nielsen, R. K. 2013. Mundane internet tools, the risk of exclusion, and reflexive movements - Occupy Wall Street and political uses of digital networked technologies. The Sociological Quarterly, 54: 159-228.
41. Oliver, C. 1991. Strategic responses to institutional processes. Academy of Management Review, 16: 145-179.
42. Pache, A.-C., & Santos, F. 2010. When worlds collide: The internal dynamics of organizational responses to conflicting institutional demands. Academy of Management Review, 35: 455-476.
43. Pache, A.-C., & Santos, F. 2013. Embedded in hybrid contexts: How individuals in organizations respond to competing institutional logics. In M. Lounsbury, & E. Boxenbaum (Eds.), Research in the sociology of organizations: Institutional logics in action, part B, Vol. 39B: 3-35. Bingley, U.K.: Emerald Publishing Group.
44. Patton, M. Q. 2002. Qualitative research and evaluation methods (3rd ed.). London, U.K.: Sage publications.
45. Pennebaker, J. W., Fracis, M. E., & Booth, R. J. 2001. Linguistic inquiry word count: LIWC 2001. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
46. Peredo, A. M., & Chrisman, J. J. 2006. Toward a theory of community-based enterprise. Academy of Management Review, 31: 309-328.
47. Pettit, P. 2004. Hope and its place in mind. The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 592: 152-165.
48. Pratt, M. G., Rockman, K. W., & Kaufman, J. B. 2006. Constructing professional identity: The role of work and identity learning cycles in the customization of identity among medical residents. Academy of Management Journal, 49: 235-262.
49. Purdy, J. M., & Gray, B. 2009. Conflicting logics, mechanisms of diffusion, and multilevel dynamics in emerging institutional fields. Academy of Management Journal, 52: 355-380.
50. Reay, T., & Hinings, C. R. 2005. The recomposition of an organizational field: Health care in Alberta. Organization Studies, 26: 351-384.
51. Reay, T., & Hinings, C. R. 2009. Managing the rivalry of competing institutional logics. Organization Studies, 30: 629-652.
52. Reay, T., & Jones, C. 2015. Qualitatively capturing institutional logics. Strategic Organization, 14: 441-454.
53. Riaz, S., Buchanan, S., & Bapuji, H. 2011. Institutional work amidst the financial crisis: Emerging positions of elite actors. Organization, 18: 187-214.
54. Ronson, J. 2015. So you've been publically shamed. Oxford, U.K.: McMillian Publishers.
55. Schieman, S. 2006. Anger. In J. E. Stets& J.H. Turner (Eds.), Handbook of the sociology of emotions. New York, NY: Springer.
56. Schwarz, G. M., Wong, K. F. E., & Kwong, J. Y. Y. 2013. The role of regret in institutional persistence and change. Journal of Change Management, 14: 309-333.
57. Scott, W. R. 2001. Institutions and organizations. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
58. Scott, W. R. 2007. Institutions and organizations: Ideas and interests (3rd ed.). Los Angeles, CA: Sage Publications.
59. Singleton, R. A., & Straits, B. C. 2005. Approaches to social research (4th ed.). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
60. Smets, M., Morris, T. I. M., & Greenwood, R. 2012. From practice to field:Amultilevel model of practice-driven institutional change. Academy of Management Journal, 55: 877-904.
61. Swidler, A. 1986. Culture in action: Symbols and strategies. American Sociological Review, 51: 273-286.
62. Thornton, P. H. 2002. The rise of the corporation in a craft industry: Conflict and conformity in institutional logics. Academy of Management Journal, 45: 81-101.
63. Thornton, P. H., Ocasio, W., & Lounsbury, M. 2012. The institutional logics perspective: A new approach to culture, structure, and process. Oxford, U.K.: Oxford University Press.
64. Valenzuela, S. 2013. Unpacking the use of social media for protest behavior: The roles of information, opinion expression, and activism. The American Behavioral Scientist, 57: 920-942.
65. van Gestel, N., & Hillebrand, B. 2011. Explaining stability and change: The rise and fall of logics in pluralistic fields. Organization Studies, 32: 231-252.
66. Videbeck,S.L.2006.Psychiatricmentalhealth nursing (3rd ed.). Philadelphia, PA: LippincottWilliams &Wilkins.
67. Voronov, M. 2014. Towards a toolkit for emotionalizing institutional theory. In N. M. Ashkanasy W. J. Zerbe & C. E. J. Härtel (Eds.), Research on emotion in organizations: Emotions and the organizational fabric, vol. 10: 167-196. Bingley, U.K.: Emerald Group Publishing.
68. Voronov, M., & Vince, R. 2012. Integrating emotions into the analysis of institutional work. Academy of Management Review, 37: 58-81.
69. Zietsma, C., & Lawrence, T. B. 2010. Institutional work in the transformation of an organizational field: The interplay of boundary work and practice work. Administrative Science Quarterly, 52: 189-221.