Reconstructing cell cycle pseudo time-series via single-cell transcriptome data

Nature Communications

Volumn 8, Issue 1, 2017, Pages

  Liu, Zehua ^a   Lou, Huazhe ^a   Xie, Kaikun ^a   Wang, Hao ^a   Chen, Ning ^a   Aparicio, Oscar M ^b   Zhang, Michael Q ^a,c   Jiang, Rui ^a   Chen, Ting ^a,b  

^a TSINGHUA UNIVERSITY   (China)

^b UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS AT DALLAS   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

TRANSCRIPTOME;

CELLS AND CELL COMPONENTS; CIRCADIAN RHYTHM; GENE EXPRESSION; METHYLATION; PHYSIOLOGICAL RESPONSE; TIME SERIES; TUMOR;

ALGORITHM; ANIMAL CELL; ARTICLE; CELL CYCLE; CELL CYCLE G2 PHASE; CELL CYCLE M PHASE; CELL CYCLE PHASE; CELL DIFFERENTIATION; COMPARATIVE STUDY; CONSENSUS DEVELOPMENT; CONTROLLED STUDY; GENE EXPRESSION; HEMATOPOIETIC STEM CELL; HIDDEN MARKOV MODEL; HUMAN; HUMAN CELL; HUMAN EMBRYONIC STEM CELL; K NEAREST NEIGHBOR; METHYLATION; MOUSE; MOUSE EMBRYONIC STEM CELL; NONHUMAN; SINGLE CELL ANALYSIS; ANIMAL; BAYES THEOREM; CYTOLOGY; DNA METHYLATION; G1 PHASE CELL CYCLE CHECKPOINT; G2 PHASE CELL CYCLE CHECKPOINT; MARKOV CHAIN; METABOLISM; MULTIGENE FAMILY; PROCEDURES; SEQUENCE ANALYSIS; TIME FACTOR;

ANIMALS; BAYES THEOREM; DNA METHYLATION; G1 PHASE CELL CYCLE CHECKPOINTS; G2 PHASE CELL CYCLE CHECKPOINTS; HUMAN EMBRYONIC STEM CELLS; HUMANS; MARKOV CHAINS; MICE; MOUSE EMBRYONIC STEM CELLS; MULTIGENE FAMILY; SEQUENCE ANALYSIS, RNA; SINGLE-CELL ANALYSIS; TIME FACTORS; TRANSCRIPTOME;

EID: 85021092677     PISSN: None     EISSN: 20411723     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1038/s41467-017-00039-z     Document Type: Article

References (49)

1. Zhao, Y., et al. Dysregulation of cardiogenesis, cardiac conduction, cell cyclein mice lacking miRNA-1-2. Cell 129, 303-317 (2007).
2. Spellman, P. T., et al. Comprehensive identification of cell cycle-regulated genesof the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae by microarray hybridization. Mol. Biol.Cell 9, 3273-3297 (1998).
3. Ly, T., et al. A proteomic chronology of gene expression through the cell cycle inhuman myeloid leukemia cells. Elife 3, e01630 (2014).
4. Wu, A. R., et al. Quantitative assessment of single-cell RNA-sequencingmethods. Nat. Methods 11, 41-46 (2014).
5. Tang, F., et al. mRNA-Seq whole-transcriptome analysis of a single cell. Nat.Methods 6, 377-382 (2009).
6. Kolodziejczyk, A. A., Kim, J. K., Svensson, V., Marioni, J. C., Teichmann, S. A.The technology and biology of single-cell RNA sequencing. Mol. Cell 58, 610-620 (2015).
7. Shalek, A. K., et al. Single-cell RNA-seq reveals dynamic paracrine control ofcellular variation. Nature 510, 363-369 (2014).
8. Satija, R., Farrell, J. A., Gennert, D., Schier, A. F., Regev, A. Spatialreconstruction of single-cell gene expression data. Nat. Biotechnol. 33, 495-502(2015).
9. Cadwell, C. R., et al. Electrophysiological, transcriptomic and morphologicprofiling of single neurons using Patch-seq. Nat. Biotechnol. 34, 199-203(2016).
10. Stegle, O., Teichmann, S. A., Marioni, J. C. Computational and analyticalchallenges in single-cell transcriptomics. Nat. Rev. Genet. 16, 133-145 (2015).
11. Leng, N., et al. Oscope identifies oscillatory genes in unsynchronized single-cellRNA-seq experiments. Nat. Methods 12, 947-950 (2015).
12. Scialdone, A., et al. Computational assignment of cell-cycle stage fromsingle-cell transcriptome data. Methods 85, 54-61 (2015).
13. Kowalczyk, M. S., et al. Single-cell RNA-seq reveals changes in cell cycle anddifferentiation programs upon aging of hematopoietic stem cells. Genome Res.25, 1860-1872 (2015).
14. Marco, E., et al. Bifurcation analysis of single-cell gene expression datareveals epigenetic landscape. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 111, E5643-E5650(2014).
15. Trapnell, C., et al. The dynamics and regulators of cell fate decisions arerevealed by pseudotemporal ordering of single cells. Nat. Biotechnol. 32, 381-386 (2014).
16. Ji, Z., Ji, H. TSCAN: Pseudo-time reconstruction and evaluation in single-cellRNA-seq analysis. Nucleic Acids Res. 44, e117 (2016).
17. Bendall, S. C., et al. Single-cell trajectory detection uncovers progression andregulatory coordination in human B cell development. Cell 157, 714-725(2014).
18. Setty, M., et al. Wishbone identifies bifurcating developmental trajectories fromsingle-cell data. Nat. Biotechnol. 34, 637-645 (2016).
19. Haghverdi, L., Buttner, M., Wolf, F. A., Buettner, F., Theis, F. J. Diffusionpseudotime robustly reconstructs lineage branching. Nat. Methods 13, 845-848(2016).
20. Kafri, R., et al. Dynamics extracted from fixed cells reveal feedback linking cellgrowth to cell cycle. Nature 494, 480-483 (2013).
21. Gut, G., Tadmor, M. D., Pe'er, D., Pelkmans, L., Liberali, P. Trajectories ofcell-cycle progression from fixed cell populations. Nat. Methods 12, 951-954(2015).
22. Buettner, F., et al. Computational analysis of cell-to-cell heterogeneity insingle-cell RNA-sequencing data reveals hidden subpopulations of cells. Nat.Biotechnol. 33, 155-160 (2015).
23. Sasagawa, Y., et al. Quartz-Seq: A highly reproducible and sensitive single-cellRNA sequencing method, reveals non-genetic gene-expression heterogeneity.Genome Biol. 14, R31 (2013).
24. McDavid, A., et al. Modeling Bi-modality improves characterization of cell cycleon gene expression in single cells. PLoS Comput. Biol. 10, e1003696 (2014).
25. Kolodziejczyk, A. A., et al. Single Cell RNA-sequencing of Pluripotent Statesunlocks modular transcriptional variation. Cell Stem Cell 17, 471-485 (2015).
26. Treutlein, B., et al. Reconstructing lineage hierarchies of the distal lungepithelium using single-cell RNA-seq. Nature 509, 371-378 (2014).
27. Tirosh, I., et al. Dissecting the multicellular ecosystem of metastatic melanomaby single-cell RNA-seq. Science 352, 189-196 (2016).
28. Angermueller, C., et al. Parallel single-cell sequencing links transcriptional andepigenetic heterogeneity. Nat. Methods 13, 229-232 (2016).
29. Whitfield, M. L., et al. Identification of genes periodically expressed in thehuman cell cycle and their expression in tumors. Mol. Biol. Cell 13, 1977-2000(2002).
30. Sakaue-Sawano, A., et al. Visualizing spatiotemporal dynamics of multicellularcell-cycle progression. Cell 132, 487-498 (2008).
31. Santos, A., Wernersson, R., Jensen, L. J. Cyclebase 3.0: A multi-organismdatabase on cell-cycle regulation and phenotypes. Nucleic Acids Res. 43, D1140-D1144 (2015).
32. Rosenkrantz, D. J., Stearns, R. E., Philip, M., Lewis, I. An analysis of severalheuristics for the traveling salesman problem. SIAM J. Comput. 6, 563-581(1977).
33. Tan, A. C., Naiman, D. Q., Xu, L., Winslow, R. L., Geman, D. Simple decisionrules for classifying human cancers from gene expression profiles.Bioinformatics 21, 3896-3904 (2005).
34. Kosorok, M. R. On Brownian distance covariance and high dimensional data.Ann. Appl. Stat. 3, 1266-1269 (2009).
35. Kraskov, A., Stögbauer, H., Grassberger, P. Estimating mutual information.Physical Review E 69, 066138 (2004).
36. Ashburner, M., et al. Gene ontology: Tool for the unification of biology. TheGene ontology consortium. Nat. Genet. 25, 25-29 (2000).
37. Granovskaia, M. V., et al. High-resolution transcription atlas of the mitotic cellcycle in budding yeast. Genome Biol. 11, R24 (2010).
38. Sharova, L. V., et al. Database for mRNA half-life of 19, 977 genes obtained byDNA microarray analysis of pluripotent and differentiating mouse embryonicstem cells. DNA Res. 16, 45-58 (2009).
39. Brown, S. E., Fraga, M. F., Weaver, I. C., Berdasco, M., Szyf, M. Variations inDNA methylation patterns during the cell cycle of HeLa cells. Epigenetics 2, 54-65 (2007).
40. Vandiver, A. R., Idrizi, A., Rizzardi, L., Feinberg, A. P., Hansen, K. D. DNAmethylation is stable during replication and cell cycle arrest. Sci. Rep. 5, 17911(2015).
41. Macosko, E. Z., et al. Highly parallel genome-wide expression profiling ofindividual cells using nanoliter droplets. Cell 161, 1202-1214 (2015).
42. Nagano, T., et al. Single-cell Hi-C reveals cell-to-cell variability in chromosomestructure. Nature 502, 59-64 (2013).
43. Buenrostro, J. D., et al. Single-cell chromatin accessibility reveals principles ofregulatory variation. Nature 523, 486-490 (2015).
44. Macaulay, I. C., et al. G&T-seq: Parallel sequencing of single-cell genomes andtranscriptomes. Nat. Methods 12, 519-522 (2015).
45. Zhang, R., Lahens, N. F., Ballance, H. I., Hughes, M. E., Hogenesch, J. B.A circadian gene expression atlas in mammals: Implications for biology andmedicine. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 111, 16219-16224 (2014).
46. Anders, S., Huber, W. Differential expression analysis for sequence countdata. Genome Biol. 11, R106 (2010).
47. Mann, T. P. Numerically stable hidden Markov model implementation.http://bozeman.genome.washington.edu/compbio/mbt599-2006/hmm-scaling-revised.pdf. (2006).
48. Grun, D., Kester, L., van Oudenaarden, A. Validation of noise models forsingle-cell transcriptomics. Nat. Methods 11, 637-640 (2014).
49. Reshef, D. N., et al. Detecting novel associations in large data sets. Science 334, 1518-1524 (2011).