Single-cell RNA-seq reveals dynamic paracrine control of cellular variation

Nature

Volumn 510, Issue 7505, 2014, Pages 363-369

  Shalek, Alex K ^a,b,c   Satija, Rahul ^c   Shuga, Joe ^d   Trombetta, John J ^c   Gennert, Dave ^c   Lu, Diana ^c   Chen, Peilin ^d   Gertner, Rona S ^a,b   Gaublomme, Jellert T ^a,b   Yosef, Nir ^c   Schwartz, Schraga ^c   Fowler, Brian ^d   Weaver, Suzanne ^d   Wang, Jing ^d   Wang, Xiaohui ^d   Ding, Ruihua ^a,b   Raychowdhury, Raktima ^c   Friedman, Nir ^e   Hacohen, Nir ^c,f   Park, Hongkun ^a,b,c   May, Andrew P ^d   Regev, Aviv ^c,g   more..

^a HARVARD UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b HARVARD UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^c BROAD INSTITUTE OF MIT AND HARVARD   (United States)

^d FLUIDIGM CORPORATION   (United States)

^e HEBREW UNIVERSITY OF JERUSALEM   (Israel)

^f MASSACHUSETTS GENERAL HOSPITAL   (United States)

^g MASSACHUSETTS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

BETA INTERFERON; BREFELDIN A; IMMUNOGLOBULIN ENHANCER BINDING PROTEIN; INTERFERON REGULATORY FACTOR 1; INTERFERON REGULATORY FACTOR 7; LIPOPOLYSACCHARIDE; STAT1 PROTEIN;

BLOOD; GENE EXPRESSION; RNA; RODENT; SECRETION;

ANIMAL CELL; ARTICLE; BIMODAL GENE; BONE MARROW; CELL COMMUNICATION; CHROMATIN; CHROMATIN IMMUNOPRECIPITATION; DENDRITIC CELL; EXTRACELLULAR SIGNALLING; FLUORESCENCE IN SITU HYBRIDIZATION; GENE; GENE ACTIVATION; GENE EXPRESSION; GENETIC VARIABILITY; IMMUNE RESPONSE; IMMUNE RESPONSE GENE; KNOCKOUT MOUSE; LIMIT OF DETECTION; MICROFLUIDICS; NONHUMAN; PARACRINE SIGNALING; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROMOTER REGION; QUANTITATIVE ANALYSIS; REAL TIME POLYMERASE CHAIN REACTION; RNA SEQUENCE; SIGNAL TRANSDUCTION;

MUS;

ANIMALS; ANTIGENS, VIRAL; BASE SEQUENCE; CELL COMMUNICATION; DENDRITIC CELLS; GENE EXPRESSION PROFILING; GENE EXPRESSION REGULATION; IMMUNITY; INTERFERON-BETA; MICE; MICROFLUIDIC ANALYTICAL TECHNIQUES; PARACRINE COMMUNICATION; PRINCIPAL COMPONENT ANALYSIS; RNA, MESSENGER; SINGLE-CELL ANALYSIS;

EID: 84903185013     PISSN: 00280836     EISSN: 14764687     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1038/nature13437     Document Type: Article

References (36)

1. Tay, S. et al. Single-cell NF-kB dynamics reveal digital activation and analogue information processing. Nature 466, 267-271 (2010).
2. Raj, A. & Van Oudenaarden, A. Single-molecule approaches to stochastic gene expression. Ann. Rev. Biophys. 38, 255-270 (2009).
3. Slack, M. D., Martinez, E. D., Wu, L. F. & Altschuler, S. J. Characterizing heterogeneous cellular responses to perturbations. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 105, 19306-19311 (2008).
4. Sharma, S. V. et al. A chromatin-mediated reversible drug-tolerant state in cancer cell subpopulations. Cell 141, 69-80 (2010).
5. Spencer, S. L., Gaudet, S., Albeck, J. G., Burke, J. M. & Sorger, P. K. Non-genetic origins of cell-to-cell variability in TRAIL-induced apoptosis. Nature 459, 428-432 (2009).
6. Taniguchi, Y. et al. Quantifying E. coli proteome and transcriptome with single-molecule sensitivity in single cells. Science 329, 533-538 (2010).
7. Loewer, A. & Lahav, G. We are all individuals: causes and consequences of non-genetic heterogeneity in mammalian cells. Curr. Opin. Genet. Dev. 21, 753-758 (2011).
8. Feinerman, O. et al. Single-cell quantification of IL-2 response by effector and regulatory T cells reveals critical plasticity in immune response. Mol. Syst. Biol. 6, 437-453 (2010).
9. Veening, J.-W., Smits, W. K. & Kuipers, O. P. Bistability, epigenetics, and bet-hedging in bacteria. Ann. Rev. Microbiol. 62, 193-210 (2008).
10. Fang, M., Xie, H., Dougan, S. K., Ploegh, H. & Van Oudenaarden, A. Stochastic cytokine expression induces mixed T helper cell states. PLoS Biol. 11, e1001618 (2013).
11. Chalancon, G. et al. Interplay between gene expression noise and regulatory network architecture. Trends Genet. 28, 221-232 (2012).
12. Bendall, S. C. et al. Single-cell mass cytometry of differential immune and drug responses across a human hematopoietic continuum. Science 332, 687-696 (2011).
13. Hashimshony, T., Wagner, F., Sher, N. & Yanai, I. CEL-Seq: single-cell RNA-Seq by multiplexed linear amplification. Cell Rep. 2, 666-673 (2012).
14. Islam, S. et al. Characterization of the single-cell transcriptional landscape by highly multiplex RNA-seq. Genome Res. 21, 1160-1167 (2011).
15. Ramsköld, D. et al. Full-length mRNA-Seq from single-cell levels of RNA and individual circulating tumor cells. Nature Biotechnol. 30, 777-782 (2012).
16. Shalek, A. K. et al. Single-cell transcriptomics reveals bimodality in expression and splicing in immune cells. Nature 498, 236-240 (2013).
17. Tang, F. et al. mRNA-Seq whole-transcriptome analysis of a single cell. Nature Methods 6, 377-382 (2009).
18. Amit, I. et al. Unbiased reconstruction of a mammalian transcriptional network mediating pathogen responses. Science 326, 257-263 (2009).
19. Wu, A. R. et al. Quantitative assessment of single-cell RNA-sequencing methods. Nature Methods 11, 41-46 (2014).
20. Storey, J. D. & Tibshirani, R. Statistical significance for genomewide studies. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 100, 9440-9445 (2003).
21. McDavid, A. et al. Data exploration, quality control and testing in single-cell qPCR-based gene expression experiments. Bioinformatics 29, 461-467 (2013).
22. Islam, S. et al. Highly multiplexed and strand-specific single-cell RNA 59 end sequencing. Nature Protocols 7, 823-828 (2012).
23. Marinov, G. K. et al. From single-cell to cell-pool transcriptomes: stochasticity in gene expression and RNA splicing. Genome Res. 24, 496-510 (2014).
24. Garber, M. et al. A high-throughput chromatin immunoprecipitation approach reveals principles of dynamic gene regulation inmammals. Mol. Cell 47, 810-822 (2012).
25. Weibrecht, I. et al. Visualising individual sequence-specific protein-DNA interactions in situ. New Biotechnol. 29, 589-598 (2012).
26. Lee, T. K. et al. A noisy paracrine signal determines the cellular NFkB response to lipopolysaccharide. Sci. Signal. 2, ra65 (2009).
27. Rand, U. et al. Multi-layered stochasticity and paracrine signal propagation shape the type-I interferon response. Mol. Syst. Biol. 8, 584 (2012).
28. Zhao, M., Zhang, J., Phatnani, H., Scheu, S. & Maniatis, T. Stochastic expression of the interferon-b gene. PLoS Biol. 10, e1001249 (2012).
29. Snijder, B. et al. Population context determines cell-to-cell variability in endocytosis and virus infection. Nature 461, 520-523 (2009).
30. Benveniste, E. N., Qin, H.& Type, I. Interferons as anti-inflammatory mediators. Sci. STKE 416, pe70 (2007).
31. Freedberg, I. M., Tomic-Canic, M., Komine, M. & Blumenberg, M. Keratins and the keratinocyte activation cycle. J. Invest. Dermatol. 116, 633-640 (2001).
32. Rabani, M. et al. Metabolic labeling of RNA uncovers principles of RNA production and degradation dynamics in mammalian cells. Nature Biotechnol. 29, 436-442 (2011).
33. Waters, C. M. & Bassler, B. L. Quorum sensing: cell-to-cell communication in bacteria. Ann. Rev. Cell Dev. Biol. 21, 319-346 (2005).
34. Banchereau, J., Pascual, V. & Type, I. Interferon in systemic lupus erythematosus and other autoimmune diseases. Immunity 25, 383-392 (2006).
35. Hall, J. C. & Rosen, A. Type I interferons: crucial participants in disease amplification in autoimmunity. Nature Rev. Rheumatol. 6, 40-49 (2010).
36. Li, B. & Dewey, C. N. RSEM: accurate transcript quantification from RNA-Seq data with or without a reference genome. BMC Bioinformatics 12, 323 (2011).