Automatic labelling and selection of training samples for high-resolution remote sensing image classification over urban areas

Remote Sensing

Volumn 7, Issue 12, 2015, Pages 16024-16044

  Huang, Xin ^a   Weng, Chunlei ^a   Lu, Qikai ^a   Feng, Tiantian ^b   Zhang, Liangpei ^a  

^a WUHAN UNIVERSITY   (China)

^b TONGJI UNIVERSITY   (China)

Author keywords

Active learning; Image classification; Maximum likelihood classification; Support vector machine; Training samples

Indexed keywords

ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE; CLASSIFICATION (OF INFORMATION); GEOGRAPHIC INFORMATION SYSTEMS; IMAGE PROCESSING; IMAGE RECONSTRUCTION; MAXIMUM LIKELIHOOD; OPEN SYSTEMS; REMOTE SENSING; SAMPLING; SEMANTICS; SUPERVISED LEARNING; SUPPORT VECTOR MACHINES;

ACTIVE LEARNING; AUTOMATIC INFORMATION; CLASSIFICATION PERFORMANCE; HIGH RESOLUTION IMAGE; HIGH RESOLUTION REMOTE SENSING IMAGES; MAXIMUM LIKELIHOOD CLASSIFICATIONS; SUPERVISED CLASSIFICATION; TRAINING SAMPLE;

IMAGE CLASSIFICATION;

EID: 85019767202     PISSN: None     EISSN: 20724292     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3390/rs71215819     Document Type: Article

References (41)

1. Wang, L.; Sousa, W.P.; Gong, P.; Biging, G.S. Comparison of IKONOS and QuickBird images for mapping mangrove species on the caribbean coast of panama. Remote Sens. Environ. 2004, 91, 432-440.
2. Zhang, L.; Huang, X.; Huang, B.; Li, P. A pixel shape index coupled with spectral information for classification of high spatial resolution remotely sensed imagery. IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote Sens. 2006, 44, 2950-2961.
3. Dundar, M.M.; Landgrebe, D. A model-based mixture-supervised classification approach in hyperspectral data analysis. IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote Sens. 2002, 40, 2692-2699.
4. Richards, J.A.; Kingsbury, N.G. Is there a preferred classifier for operational thematic mapping? IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote Sens. 2014, 52, 2715-2725.
5. Del Frate, F.; Pacifici, F.; Schiavon, G.; Solimini, C. Use of neural networks for automatic classification from high-resolution images. IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote Sens. 2007, 45, 800-809.
6. Licciardi, G.; Del Frate, F. A neural network approach for pixel unmixing in hyperspectral data. In Proceedings of the 2nd Workshop on Hyperspectral Image and Signal Processing: Evolution in Remote Sensing, Reykjavik, Iceland, 14-16 June 2010.
7. Roy, M.; Routaray, D.; Ghosh, S.; Ghosh, A. Ensemble of multilayer perceptrons for change detection in remotely sensed images. IEEE Geosci. Remote Sens. 2014, 11, 49-53.
8. Santos, A.B.; de Albuquerque Araújo, A.; Menotti, D. Combining multiple classification methods for hyperspectral data interpretation. IEEE J. Sel. Top. Appl. Earth Observ. Remote Sens. 2013, 6, 1450-1459.
9. Melgani, F.; Bruzzone, L. Classification of hyperspectral remote sensing images with support vector machines. IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote Sens. 2004, 42, 1778-1790.
10. Bruzzone, L.; Carlin, L. A multilevel context-based system for classification of very high spatial resolution images. IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote Sens. 2006, 44, 2587-2600.
11. Huang, X.; Zhang, L. An SVM ensemble approach combining spectral, structural, and semantic features for the classification of high-resolution remotely sensed imagery. IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote Sens. 2013, 51, 257-272.
12. Huang, X.; Zhang, L. Comparison of vector stacking, multi-SVMs fuzzy output, and multi-svms voting methods for multiscale vhr urban mapping. IEEE Geosci. Remote Sens. Lett. 2010, 7, 261-265.
13. Pal, M.; Foody, G.M. Feature selection for classification of hyperspectral data by SVM. IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote Sens. 2010, 48, 2297-2307.
14. Mather, P.; Tso, B. Classification Methods for Remotely Sensed Data, 2nd ed.; Taylor and Francis: Abingdon, UK, 2004.
15. Tuia, D.; Volpi, M.; Copa, L.; Kanevski, M.; Munoz-Mari, J. A survey of active learning algorithms for supervised remote sensing image classification. IEEE J. Sel. Top. Signal Process. 2011, 5, 606-617.
16. Demir, B.; Persello, C.; Bruzzone, L. Batch-mode active-learning methods for the interactive classification of remote sensing images. IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote Sens. 2011, 49, 1014-1031.
17. Di, W.; Crawford, M.M. View generation for multiview maximum disagreement based active learning for hyperspectral image classification. IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote Sens. 2012, 50, 1942-1954.
18. Patra, S.; Bruzzone, L. A novel SOM-SVM-Based active learning technique for remote sensing image classification. IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote Sens. 2014, 52, 6899-6910.
19. Persello, C.; Boularias, A.; Dalponte, M.; Gobakken, T.; Naesset, E.; Scholkopf, B. Cost-sensitive active learning with lookahead: Optimizing field surveys for remote sensing data classification. IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote Sens. 2014, 52, 6652-6664.
20. Mitra, P.; Shankar, B.U.; Pal, S.K. Segmentation of multispectral remote sensing images using active support vector machines. Pattern Recognit. Lett. 2004, 25, 1067-1074.
21. Persello, C.; Bruzzone, L. Active learning for domain adaptation in the supervised classification of remote sensing images. IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote Sens. 2012, 50, 4468-4483.
22. Rajan, S.; Ghosh, J.; Crawford, M.M. An active learning approach to hyperspectral data classification. IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote Sens. 2008, 46, 1231-1242.
23. Sinno Jialin, P.; Qiang, Y. A survey on transfer learning. IEEE Trans. Knowl. Data Eng. 2010, 22, 1345-1359.
24. Huang, X.; Zhang, L. A multidirectional and multiscale morphological index for automatic building extraction from multispectral GeoEye-1 imagery. Photogramm. Eng. Remote Sens. 2011, 77, 721-732.
25. Huang, X.; Zhang, L. Morphological building/shadow index for building extraction from high-resolution imagery over urban areas. IEEE J. Sel. Top. Appl. Earth Observ. Remote Sens. 2012, 5, 161-172.
26. Gao, B.-C. NDWI-A normalized difference water index for remote sensing of vegetation liquid water from space. Remote Sens. Environ. 1996, 58, 257-266.
27. Goward, S.N.; Markham, B.; Dye, D.G.; Dulaney, W.; Yang, J. Normalized difference vegetation index measurements from the advanced very high resolution radiometer. Remote Sens. Environ. 1991, 35, 257-277.
28. Bennett, J. Openstreetmap: Be Your Own Cartographer; Packt Publishing: Birmingham, UK, 2010.
29. Huang, X.; Lu, Q.; Zhang, L. A multi-index learning approach for classification of high-resolution remotely sensed images over urban areas. ISPRS J. Photogramm. Remote Sens. 2014, 90, 36-48.
30. Tang, Y.; Huang, X.; Zhang, L. Fault-tolerant building change detection from urban high-resolution remote sensing imagery. IEEE Geosci. Remote Sens Lett. 2013, 10, 1060-1064.
31. Wikipedia. Available online: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/HSL_and_HSV (accessed on 25 November 2015).
32. Jain, A.K.; Duin, R.P.W.; Mao, J. Statistical pattern recognition: A review. IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal Mach. Intell. 2000, 22, 4-37.
33. Abe, S. Support Vector Machines for Pattern Classification; Springer: Berlin, Germany, 2010.
34. Zadrozny, B. Learning and evaluating classifiers under sample selection bias. In Proceedings of the 21th International Conference on Machine Learning, Banff, AB, Canada, 4-8 June 2004.
35. Foody, G.M.; Mathur, A. The use of small training sets containing mixed pixels for accurate hard image classification: Training on mixed spectral responses for classification by a svm. Remote Sens. Environ. 2006, 103, 179-189.
36. Møller, M.F. A scaled conjugate gradient algorithm for fast supervised learning. Neural Netw. 1993, 6, 525-533.
37. Breiman, L. Random forests. Mach. Learn. 2001, 45, 5-32.
38. Pal, M. Random forest classifier for remote sensing classification. Int. J. Remote Sens. 2005, 26, 217-222.
39. Luo, T.; Kramer, K.; Samson, S.; Remsen, A.; Goldgof, D.B.; Hall, L.O.; Hopkins, T. In Active learning to recognize multiple types of plankton. In Proceedings of the 17th International Conference on Pattern Recognition, Cambridge, UK, 23-26 August 2004; Volume 473, pp. 478-481.
40. Persello, C.; Bruzzone, L. Active and semisupervised learning for the classification of remote sensing images. IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote Sens. 2014, 52, 6937-6956.
41. Olofsson, P.; Foody, G.M.; Herold, M.; Stehman, S.V.; Woodcock, C.E.; Wulder, M.A. Good practices for estimating area and assessing accuracy of land change. Remote Sens. Environ. 2014, 148, 42-57.