Neutralizing misinformation through inoculation: Exposing misleading argumentation techniques reduces their influence

PLoS ONE

Volumn 12, Issue 5, 2017, Pages

  Cook, John ^a,b   Lewandowsky, Stephan ^b,c   Ecker, Ullrich K H ^b  

^a GEORGE MASON UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF WESTERN AUSTRALIA   (Australia)

^c UNIVERSITY OF BRISTOL   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CLIMATE CHANGE; CONSENSUS DEVELOPMENT; GREENHOUSE EFFECT; HUMAN; INOCULATION; MARKET; SCIENTIST; VOICE; INFORMATION SERVICE; STANDARDS;

CLIMATE CHANGE; INFORMATION SERVICES;

EID: 85019162784     PISSN: None     EISSN: 19326203     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0175799     Document Type: Article

References (78)

1. Chigwedere P., Seage G. R. III, Gruskin S., Lee T. H., & Essex M. (2008). Estimating the lost benefits of antiretroviral drug use in South Africa. JAIDS Journal of Acquired Immune Deficiency Syndromes, 49 (4), 410-415. PMID: 19186354
2. Smith MJ, Ellenberg SS, Bell LM, Rubin DM. Media coverage of the measles-mumps-rubella vaccine and autism controversy and its relationship to MMR immunization rates in the United States. Pediatrics. 2008; 121(4), e836-e843. https://doi.org/10.1542/peds.2007-1760 PMID: 18381512
3. Poland GA, Spier R. Fear, misinformation, and innumerates: how the Wakefield paper, the press, and advocacy groups damaged the public health. Vaccine. 2010; 28(12), 2361-2362. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.vaccine.2010.02.052 PMID: 20199766
4. Carrillo-Santisteve P, Lopalco PL. Measles still spreads in Europe: Who is responsible for the failure to vaccinate? Clinical Microbiology and Infection. 2012; 18(s5), 50-56.
5. Majumder MS, Cohn EL, Mekaru SR, Huston JE, Brownstein JS. Substandard vaccination compliance and the 2015 measles outbreak. JAMA pediatrics. 2015; 169(5), 494-495. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamapediatrics.2015.0384 PMID: 25774618
6. CDC (2017). Measles Cases and Outbreaks. Cdc.gov. https://www.cdc.gov/measles/cases-outbreaks.html
7. Richter T, Schroeder S, Wöhrmann B. You don't have to believe everything you read: Background knowledge permits fast and efficient validation of information. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 2009; 96, 538-558. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0014038 PMID: 19254102
8. Johnson T. J., Bichard S. L., & Zhang W. Communication communities or "cyberghettos?": A path analysis model examining factors that explain selective exposure to blogs. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication. 2009. 15(1), 60-82.
9. Ecker UKH, Swire B, Lewandowsky S. Correcting misinformation-A challenge for education and cognitive science. In Rapp D. N. & Braasch J. L. G. (Eds.), Processing Inaccurate Information: Theoretical and Applied Perspectives from Cognitive Science and the Educational Sciences (pp. 13-38). 2014; Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
10. Lewandowsky S, Ecker UKH, Seifert CM, Schwarz N, Cook J. Misinformation and its correction-Continued influence and successful debiasing. Psychological Science in the Public Interest. 2012; 13(3), 106-131. https://doi.org/10.1177/1529100612451018 PMID: 26173286
11. Nyhan B, Reifler J. When corrections fail: The persistence of political misperceptions. Political Behavior. 2010; 32(2), 303-330.
12. Cook J, Lewandowsky S. Rational irrationality: Modeling climate change belief polarization using Bayesian networks. Topics in Cognitive Science. 2016; 8(1), 160-179. https://doi.org/10.1111/tops. 12186 PMID: 26749179
13. Compton J. Inoculation theory. The SAGE handbook of persuasion: Developments in theory and practice. 2013; 220-236.
14. McGuire WJ, Papageorgis D. The relative efficacy of various types of prior belief-defense in producing immunity against persuasion. Public Opinion Quarterly. 1961; 26, 24-34.
15. Heath Y, Gifford R. Free-market ideology and environmental degradation-the case of belief in global climate change. Environment and Behavior. 2006; 38, 48-71.
16. Kahan D, Jenkins-Smith H, Braman D. Cultural cognition of scientific consensus. Journal of Risk Research. 2011; 14, 147-174.
17. Lewandowsky S, Oberauer K, Gignac GE. NASA faked the Moon landing-Therefore, (climate) science is a hoax. An anatomy of the motivated rejection of science. Psychological Science. 2013; 24(5), 622-633. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797612457686 PMID: 23531484
18. Stenhouse N, Maibach EW, Cobb S. Meteorologists' views about global warming: A survey of American Meteorological Society professional members. Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society. 2013;
19. Malka A, Krosnick JA, Langer G. The association of knowledge with concern about global warming: Trusted information sources shape public thinking. Risk Analysis. 2009; 29, 633-647. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1539-6924.2009.01220.x PMID: 19302280
20. Lewandowsky S, Gignac GE, Oberauer K. The role of conspiracist ideation and worldviews in predicting rejection of science. PLOS ONE. 2013; 8(10), e75637. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0075637 PMID: 24098391
21. Smith N, Leiserowitz AA. The rise of global warming skepticism: exploring affective image associations in the United States over time. Risk Analysis. 2012; 32(6), 1021-1032. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1539-6924.2012.01801.x PMID: 22486296
22. Anderegg WRL, Prall JW, Harold J, Schneider SH. Expert credibility in climate change. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America. 2010; 107, 12107-12109. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1003187107 PMID: 20566872
23. Cook J, Oreskes N, Doran PT, Anderegg WR, Verheggen B, Maibach EW, et al. Consensus on consensus: a synthesis of consensus estimates on human-caused global warming. Environmental Research Letters. 2016; 11(4):048002.
24. Doran P, Zimmerman M. Examining the scientific consensus on climate change. Eos, Transactions American Geophysical Union. 2009; 90, 21-22.
25. Cook J, Nuccitelli D, Green SA, Richardson M, Winkler B, Painting R, et al. Quantifying the consensus on anthropogenic global warming in the scientific literature. Environmental Research Letters. 2013; 8 (2), 024024+.
26. Oreskes N. The scientific consensus on climate change. Science. 2014; 306(5702), 1686-1686.
27. Leiserowitz A, Maibach E, Roser-Renouf C, Feinberg G, Rosenthal S. Climate change in the American mind: March, 2015. 2015; Yale University and George Mason University. New Haven, CT: Yale Project on Climate Change Communication.
28. Ding D, Maibach EW, Zhao X, Roser-Renouf C, Leiserowitz A. Support for climate policy and societal action are linked to perceptions about scientific agreement. Nature Climate Change. 2011; 1(9), 462-466.
29. Lewandowsky S, Gignac GE, Vaughan S. The pivotal role of perceived scientific consensus in acceptance of science. Nature Climate Change. 2013; 3(4), 399-404.
30. van der Linden SL, Leiserowitz AA, Feinberg GD, Maibach EW. The scientific consensus on climate change as a gateway belief: Experimental evidence. PLoS ONE. 2015;
31. Diethelm P, McKee M. Denialism: what is it and how should scientists respond? The European Journal of Public Health. 2009; 19(1), 2-4. https://doi.org/10.1093/eurpub/ckn139 PMID: 19158101
32. Jensen, C. (1998). How many climate researchers support the "Leipzig Declaration"? Accessed via http://research.greenpeaceusa.org/?a=download&d=3603
33. van der Linden SL, Leiserowitz AA, Rosenthal SA, Feinberg GD, Maibach EW. Inoculating the public against misinformation about climate change. Global Challenges. 2017; 1(2).
34. Boykoff MT, Boykoff JM. Balance as bias: Global warming and the US prestige press. Global Environmental Change. 2004; 14, 125-136.
35. Boykoff MT, Mansfield M. 'Ye Olde Hot Aire': Reporting on human contributions to climate change in the UK tabloid press, Environmental Research Letters. 2008a; 3, 1-8.
36. Painter J. Climate change in the media: Reporting risk and uncertainty. 2013; London, England: I. B. Tauris.
37. Clarke CE. A question of balance the autism-vaccine controversy in the British and American Elite Press. Science Communication. 2008; 30(1), 77-107.
38. Kortenkamp KV, Basten B. Environmental science in the media-Effects of opposing viewpoints on risk and uncertainty perceptions. Science Communication. 2015; 1075547015574016.
39. Dixon GN, Clarke CE. Heightening uncertainty around certain science media coverage, false balance, and the autism-vaccine controversy. Science Communication. 2013; 35(3), 358-382.
40. Stocking SH, Holstein LW. Manufacturing doubt: Journalists' roles and the construction of ignorance in a scientific controversy. Public Understanding of Science. 2009; 18, 23-42. https://doi.org/10.1177/0963662507079373 PMID: 19579533
41. Cook J. Countering Climate Science Denial and Communicating Scientific Consensus. Oxford Encyclopedia of Climate Change Communication. 2016; London: Oxford University Press.
42. Lewandowsky S, Stritzke WG, Oberauer K, Morales M. Memory for Fact, Fiction, and Misinformation The Iraq War 2003. Psychological Science. 2005; 16(3), 190-195. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0956-7976. 2005.00802.x PMID: 15733198
43. Bae J, Cameron GT. Conditioning effect of prior reputation on perception of corporate giving. Public Relations Review. 2006; 32(2), 144-150.
44. Banas JA, Rains SA. A meta-analysis of research on inoculation theory. Communication Monographs. 2010; 77(3), 281-311.
45. Duryea EJ. Utilizing tenets of inoculation theory to develop and evaluate a preventive alcohol education intervention. Journal of School Health. 1983; 53(4), 250-256. PMID: 6552340
46. Pfau M, Bockern SV, Kang JG. Use of inoculation to promote resistance to smoking initiation among adolescents. Communications Monographs. 1992; 59(3), 213-230.
47. Niederdeppe J, Gollust SE, Barry CL. Inoculation in competitive framing examining message effects on policy preferences. Public Opinion Quarterly. 2014; 78(3), 634-655.
48. Banas JA, Miller G. Inducing resistance to conspiracy theory propaganda: Testing inoculation and metainoculation strategies. Human Communication Research. 2013; 39(2), 184-207.
49. Wood ML. Rethinking the inoculation analogy: Effects on subjects with differing preexisting attitudes. Human Communication Research. 2007; 33(3), 357-378.
50. Miller CH, Ivanov B, Sims J, Compton J, Harrison KJ, Parker KA, et al. Boosting the potency of resistance: Combining the motivational forces of inoculation and psychological reactance. Human Communication Research. 2013; 39(1), 127-155.
51. Koehler DJ. Can Journalistic "False Balance" Distort Public Perception of Consensus in Expert Opinion? Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied, 2016; 22(1), 24. https://doi.org/10.1037/xap0000073 PMID: 26752513
52. Malka A, Krosnick JA, Debell M, Pasek J, Schneider D. Featuring skeptics in news media stories about global warming reduces public beliefs in the seriousness of global warming. Woods Institute for the Environment, Stanford University, Technical Paper. 2009; http://woods.stanford.edu/research/globalwarming-skeptics.html.
53. Berrens RP, Bohara AK, Jenkins-Smith H, Silva C, Weimer DL. The advent of Internet surveys for political research: A comparison of telephone and Internet samples. Political Analysis. 2003; 11(1), 1-22.
54. Hoaglin DC, Iglewicz B, Tukey JW. Performance of some resistant rules for outlier labeling, Journal of American Statistical Association. 1986; 81, 991-999.
55. Ohanian R. Construction and validation of a scale to measure celebrity endorsers' perceived expertise, trustworthiness, and attractiveness. Journal of Advertising. 1990; 19(3), 39-52.
56. McCright AM, Charters M, Dentzman K, Dietz T. Examining the effectiveness of climate change frames in the face of a climate change denial counter-frame. Topics in Cognitive Science. 2016; 8, 76-97. https://doi.org/10.1111/tops.12171 PMID: 26621098
57. Deryugina T, Shurchkov O. The Effect of Information Provision on Public Consensus about Climate Change. PLOS ONE. 2016; 11(4), e0151469. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0151469 PMID: 27064486
58. NCES. Digest of Education Studies: 2008. National Center for Education Statistics. 2009; http://nces. ed.gov/programs/digest/d08/tables-3.asp#Ch3aSub4
59. Gardner MN, Brandt AM. "The doctors' choice is America's choice": The physician in US cigarette advertisements, 1930-1953. American Journal of Public Health. 2006; 96(2), 222. https://doi.org/10.2105/AJPH.2005.066654 PMID: 16434689
60. Dunlap RE, McCright AM, Yarosh JH. The Political Divide on Climate Change: Partisan Polarization Widens in the US. Environment. Science and Policy for Sustainable Development. 2016; 58(5), 4-23.
61. McCright AM, Dunlap RE. The politicization of climate change and polarization in the American public's views of global warming, 2001-2010. Sociological Quarterly. 2011; 52, 155-194.
62. Kahneman D. Maps of bounded rationality: Psychology for behavioral economics. American Economic Review. 2003; 1449-1475.
63. Ecker UKH, Lewandowsky S, Tang DTW. Explicit warnings reduce but do not eliminate the continued influence of misinformation. Memory & Cognition. 2010; 38(8), 1087-1100.
64. Brehm JW. A theory of psychological reactance. 1966; New York, NY: Academic Press.
65. Walker J. Draft global climate science communications action plan. 1998; Accessed via http://research. greenpeaceusa.org/?a=view&d=4383
66. Luntz F. The environment: a cleaner, safer, healthier America. Luntz Research. 2002; Alexandria. https://www2.bc.edu/~plater/Newpublicsite06/suppmats/02.6.pdf
67. Elsasser SW, Dunlap RE. Leading voices in the denier choir: Conservative columnists' dismissal of global warming and denigration of climate science. American Behavioral Scientist. 2012; 0002764212469800.
68. Cook J, Jacobs P. Scientists are from Mars, laypeople are from Venus: An evidence-based rationale for communicating the consensus on climate. Reports of the National Center for Science Education. 2014; 34, 6, 3.1-3.10.
69. Maibach E, Myers T, Leiserowitz A. Climate scientists need to set the record straight: There is a scientific consensus that human-caused climate change is happening. Earth's Future. 2014; 2(5), 295-298.
70. Kowalski P, Taylor AK. The effect of refuting misconceptions in the introductory psychology class. Teaching of Psychology, 2009; 36:153-159.
71. Muller DA, Bewes J, Sharma MD, Reimann P. Saying the wrong thing: improving learning with multimedia by including misconceptions. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning. 2007; 24, 144-155
72. Muller DA, Sharma MD, Reimann P. Raising cognitive load with linear multimedia to promote conceptual change. Wiley InterScience. 2008;
73. Ecker UKH, Hogan JL, Lewandowsky S. Reminders and Repetition of Misinformation: Helping or Hindering Its Retraction? Journal of Applied Research in Memory and Cognition. 2017.
74. McCuin JL, Hayhoe K, Hayhoe D. Comparing the effects of traditional vs. misconceptions-based instruction on student understanding of the greenhouse effect. Journal of Geoscience Education. 2014; 62(3), 445-459.
75. Bedford D. Agnotology as a teaching tool: Learning climate science by studying misinformation. Journal of Geography. 2010; 109(4), 159-165.
76. Tippett CD. Refutation text in science education: A review of two decades of research. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education. 2010; 8(6), 951-970.
77. Cook J, Bedford D, Mandia S. Raising climate literacy through addressing misinformation: Case studies in agnotology-based learning. Journal of Geoscience Education. 2014; 62(3), 296-306.
78. Cook J, Schuennemann K, Nuccitelli D, Jacobs P, Cowtan K, Green S, et al. Making sense of climate science denial. edX. 2015; http://edx.org/understanding-climate-denial