Environmental Science in the Media: Effects of Opposing Viewpoints on Risk and Uncertainty Perceptions

Science Communication

Volumn 37, Issue 3, 2015, Pages 287-313

  Kortenkamp, Katherine V ^a   Basten, Bianca ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN LA CROSSE   (United States)

Author keywords

risk communication; risk perception; source credibility; uncertainty

Indexed keywords

EID: 84930519857     PISSN: 10755470     EISSN: 15528545     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/1075547015574016     Document Type: Article

References (55)

1. Anderson C. A.,Lepper M. R.,Ross L.Perseverance of social theories: The role of explanation in the persistence of discredited information.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 1980;39:1037-1049
2. Bennett W. L.An introduction to journalism norms and representations of politics.Political Communication. 1996;13:373-384
3. Böhm G.,Pfister H.Action tendencies and characteristics of environmental risks.Acta Psychologica. 2000;104:317-337
4. Boykoff M. T.Flogging a dead norm? Newspaper coverage of anthropogenic climate change in the United States and United Kingdom from 2003-2006.Area. 2007a;39:470-481
5. Boykoff M. T.From convergence to contention: United States mass media representations of anthropogenic climate change science.Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers. 2007b;32:477-489
6. Boykoff M. T.,Boykoff J. M.Balance as bias: Global warming and the US prestige press.Global Environmental Change. 2004;14:125-136
7. Boykoff M. T.,Mansfield M.“Ye olde hot aire”: Reporting on human contributions to climate change in the UK tabloid press.Environmental Research Letters. 2008;3:1-8
8. Budescu D. V.,Broomell S.,Por H.Improving communication of uncertainty in the reports of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change.Psychological Science. 2009;20:299-308
9. Cho C. H.,Martens M. L.,Kim H.,Rodrigue M.Astroturfing global warming: It isn’t always greener on the other side of the fence.Journal of Business Ethics. 2011;104:571-587
10. Corbett J. B.,Durfee J. L.Testing public (un)certainty of science: Media representations of global warming.Science Communication. 2004;26:129-151
11. Dearing J. W.Newspaper coverage of maverick science: Creating controversy through balancing.Public Understanding of Science. 1995;4:341-361
12. Dixon G. N.,Clarke C. E.Heightening uncertainty around certain science: Media coverage, false balance, and the autism-vaccine controversy.Science Communication. 2013;35:358-382
13. Dunlap R. E.,Van Liere K. D.A proposed measuring instrument and preliminary results: The “new environmental paradigm.”.Journal of Environmental Education. 1978;9:10-19
14. Dunlap R. E.,Van Liere K. D.,Mertig A. G.,Jones R. E.Measuring endorsement of the new ecological paradigm: A revised NEP scale.Journal of Social Issues. 2000;56:425-442
15. Dunwoody S.Communicating uncertainty: Media coverage of new and controversial science. Friedman S. M.Dunwoody S.Rogers C. L., ed. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum; 1999:59-79.
16. DunwoodyS. (2005). Weight-of-evidence reporting: What is it? Why use it?Neiman Reports, 59(4), 89-91. Retrieved from http://www.nieman.harvard.edu/reportsitemprint.aspx?id=100595
17. Dunwoody S.,Griffin R. J.Judgments, decisions, and public policy. Fox J. C.Gowda R., ed. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press; 2002:177-198.
18. Dunwoody S.,Peters H. P.Mass media coverage of technological and environmental risks: A survey of the research in the United States and Germany.Public Understanding of Science. 1992;1:199-230
19. Ecker U. K. H.,Lewandowsky S.,Swire B.,Chang D.Correcting false information in memory: Manipulating the strength of misinformation encoding and its retraction.Psychological Bulletin & Review. 2011;18:570-578
20. Edwards K.,Bryan T. S.Judgmental biases produced by instructions to disregard: The paradoxical case of emotional information.Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin. 1997;23:849-864
21. Entman R. M.,Rojecki A.Freezing out the public: Elite and media framing of the U.S. anti-nuclear movement.Political Communication. 1993;10:155-173
22. Evans J. B.,Barston J. L.,Pollard P.On the conflict between logic and belief in syllogistic reasoning.Memory & Cognition. 1983;11:295-306
23. Frewer L. J.,Hunt S.,Brennan M.,Kuznesof S.,Ness M.,Ritson C.The views of scientific experts on how the public conceptualize uncertainty.Journal of Risk Research. 2003;6:75-85
24. Glisky E. L.,Polster M. R.,Routhieaux B. C.Double dissociation between item and source memory.Neuropsychology. 1995;9:229-235
25. Climate change 2013: The physical science basis. Geneva, Switzerland: Author; 2013:
26. Jensen J. D.Scientific uncertainty in news coverage of cancer research: Effects of hedging on scientists’ and journalists’ credibility.Human Communication Research. 2008;34:347-369
27. Jensen J. D.,Hurley R. J.Conflicting stories about public scientific controversies: Effects of news convergence and divergence on scientists’ credibility.Public Understanding of Science. 2012;21:689-704
28. Johnson B. B.Further notes on public responses to uncertainty in risks and science.Risk Analysis. 2003;23:781-789
29. Johnson B. B.,Slovic P.Lay views on uncertainty in environmental health risk assessment.Journal of Risk Research. 1998;1:261-279
30. Johnson H. M.,Seifert C. M.Sources of the continued influence effect: When misinformation in memory affects later inferences.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition. 1994;20:1420-1436
31. Jurica P. J.,Shimamura A. P.Monitoring item and source information: Evidence of a negative generation effect in source memory.Memory & Cognition. 1999;27:648-656
32. Kassin S. M.,Sommers S. R.Inadmissible testimony, instructions to disregard, and the jury: Substantive versus procedural considerations.Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin. 1997;23:1046-1054
33. Kassin S. M.,Studebaker C. A.Intentional forgetting: Interdisciplinary approaches. Golding J. M.MacLeod C. M., ed. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum; 1998:413-434.
34. Keppel G.,Wickens T. D.Design and analysis: A researcher’s handbook. 2004. Design and analysis: A researcher’s handbook (4th ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall; 2004:
35. Klettke B.,Graesser A. C.,Powell M. B.Expert testimony in child sexual abuse cases: The effects of evidence, coherence and credentials on juror decision making.Applied Cognitive Psychology. 2010;24:481-494
36. Klettke B.,Powell M.The effects of evidence, coherence and credentials on jury decision-making in child sexual abuse trials.Psychiatry, Psychology and Law. 2011;18:263-269
37. Kumkale G. T.,Albarracín D.The sleeper effect in persuasion: A meta-analytic review.Psychological Bulletin. 2004;130:143-172
38. Levett L. M.,Kovera M. B.The effectiveness of opposing expert witnesses for educating jurors about unreliable expert evidence.Law and Human Behavior. 2008;32:363-374
39. Levett L. M.,Kovera M. B.Psychological mediators of the effects of opposing expert testimony on juror decisions.Psychology, Public Policy, and Law. 2009;15:124-148
40. Lewandowsky S.,Ecker U. K. H.,Seifert C. M.,Schwarz N.,Cook J.Misinformation and its correction: Continued influence and successful debiasing.Psychological Science in the Public Interest. 2012;13:106-131
41. Lewis J.,Speers T.Misleading media reporting? The MMR story.Nature Reviews: Immunology. 2003;3:913-918
42. Lord C. G.,Ross L.,Lepper M. R.Biased assimilation and attitude polarization: The effects of prior theories on subsequently considered evidence.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 1979;37:2098-2109
43. Miller K.Smoking up a storm: Public relations and advertising in the construction of the cigarette problem, 1953-1954.Journalism Monographs. 1992;136:1-35
44. Science and engineering indicators 2012. Arlington, VA: National Science Foundation; 2012:
45. Nerb J.,Spada H.,Lay K.Research in social problems and public policy: Vol. 9. Environmental risks: Perception, evaluation and management. Youn T. I. K.Böm G.Nerb J.McDaniels T.Spada H., ed. Bingley, England: Emerald Group; 2001:57-85.
46. Painter J.Climate change in the media: Reporting risk and uncertainty. London, England: I. B. Tauris; 2013:
47. Pew Research Center. (2012, September). Trends in news consumption: 1991-2012—In changing news landscape, even television is vulnerable. Washington, DC: Author. Retrieved from http://www.people-press.org/files/legacy-pdf/2012%20News%20Consumption%20Report.pdf
48. Pornpitakpan C.The persuasiveness of source credibility: A critical review of five decades’ evidence.Journal of Applied Social Psychology. 2004;34:243-281
49. Powell M.,Dunwoody S.,Griffin R.,Neuwirth K.Exploring lay uncertainty about an environmental health risk.Public Understanding of Science. 2007;16:323-343
50. Ryan M.Journalistic ethics, objectivity, existential journalism, standpoint epistemology, and public journalism.Journal of Mass Media Ethics. 2001;16:3-22
51. Stocking S. H.Communicating uncertainty: Media coverage of new and controversial science. Friedman S. M.Dunwoody S.Rogers C. L., ed. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum; 1999:23-41.
52. Stocking S. H.,Holstein L. W.Manufacturing doubt: Journalists’ roles and the construction of ignorance in a scientific controversy.Public Understanding of Science. 2009;18:23-42
53. Sturgis P.,Allum N.Science in society: Re-evaluating the deficit model of public attitudes.Public Understanding of Science. 2004;13:55-74
54. Wilson K. M.Drought, debate, and uncertainty: measuring reporters’ knowledge and ignorance about climate change.Public Understanding of Science. 2000;9:1-13
55. Zehr S. C.Public representations of scientific uncertainty about global climate change.Public Understanding of Science. 2000;9:85-103