Rational Irrationality: Modeling Climate Change Belief Polarization Using Bayesian Networks

Topics in Cognitive Science

Volumn 8, Issue 1, 2016, Pages 160-179

  Cook, John ^a,b   Lewandowsky, Stephan ^b,c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF QUEENSLAND   (Australia)

^b UNIVERSITY OF WESTERN AUSTRALIA   (Australia)

^c UNIVERSITY OF BRISTOL   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Bayes' theorem; Bayesian updating; Belief polarization; Climate change

Indexed keywords

AUSTRALIA; BAYES THEOREM; CLIMATE CHANGE; CONSENSUS; CULTURAL ANTHROPOLOGY; DEFENSE MECHANISM; HUMAN; PERCEPTION; PSYCHOLOGICAL MODEL; QUESTIONNAIRE; UNITED STATES;

AUSTRALIA; BAYES THEOREM; CLIMATE CHANGE; CONSENSUS; CULTURE; HUMANS; MODELS, PSYCHOLOGICAL; PERCEPTION; RATIONALIZATION; SURVEYS AND QUESTIONNAIRES; UNITED STATES;

EID: 84956588124     PISSN: 17568757     EISSN: 17568765     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/tops.12186     Document Type: Article

References (50)

1. Anderegg, W. R. L., Prall, J. W., Harold, J., & Schneider, S. H. (2010). Expert credibility in climate change. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 107, 12107-12109.
2. Andreoni, J., & Mylovanov, T. (2012). Diverging opinions. American Economic Journal: Microeconomics, 4(1), 209-232.
3. Bartels, L. M. (2002). Beyond the running tally: Partisan bias in political perceptions. Political Behavior, 24, 117-150.
4. Batson, C. D. (1975). Rational processing or rationalization - effect of disconfirming information on a stated religious belief. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 32, 176-184.
5. Berrens, R. P., Bohara, A. K., Jenkins-Smith, H., Silva, C., & Weimer, D. L. (2003). The advent of Internet surveys for political research: A comparison of telephone and Internet samples. Political Analysis, 11(1), 1-22.
6. Bullock, J. (2009). Partisan bias and the Bayesian ideal in the study of public opinion. Journal of Politics, 71, 1109-1124.
7. Cohen, G. L., Sherman, D. K., Bastardi, A., Hsu, L., McGoey, M., & Ross, L. (2007). Bridging the partisan divide: Self-affirmation reduces ideological closed-mindedness and inflexibility in negotiation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 93(3), 415.
8. Cook, J., Nuccitelli, D., Green, S. A., Richardson, M., Winkler, B., Painting, R., Way, R., Jacobs, P., & Skuce, A. (2013). Quantifying the consensus on anthropogenic global warming in the scientific literature. Environmental Research Letters, 8(2), 024024 + .
9. Ding, D., Maibach, E. W., Zhao, X., Roser-Renouf, C., & Leiserowitz, A. (2011). Support for climate policy and societal action are linked to perceptions about scientific agreement. Nature Climate Change, 1(9), 462-466.
10. Dixit, A., & Weibull, J. (2007). Political polarization. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 104, 7351.
11. Doran, P., & Zimmerman, M. (2009). Examining the scientific consensus on climate change. Eos, Transactions American Geophysical Union, 90, 21-22.
12. Gerber, A., & Green, D. (1999). Misperceptions about perceptual bias. Annual Review of Political Science, 2(1), 189-210.
13. Griffiths, T. L., & Tenenbaum, J. B. (2006). Optimal predictions in everyday cognition. Psychological Science, 17, 767-773.
14. Hardisty, D. J., Johnson, E. J., & Weber, E. U. (2010). A dirty word or a dirty world? Attribute framing, political affiliation, and query theory. Psychological Science, 21(1), 86-92.
15. Hart, P. S., & Nisbet, E. C. (2011). Boomerang effects in science communication: How motivated reasoning and identity cues amplify opinion polarization about climate mitigation policies. Communication Research, 39(6), 701-723.
16. Heath, Y., & Gifford, R. (2006). Free-market ideology and environmental degradation - the case of belief in global climate change. Environment and Behavior, 38, 48-71.
17. Inhofe, J. M. (2012). The greatest hoax: How the global warming conspiracy threatens your future. Washington, DC: WND Books.
18. Jern, A., Chang, K. M. K., & Kemp, C. (2014). Belief polarization is not always irrational. Psychological Review, 121(2), 206.
19. Kahan, D., Jenkins-Smith, H., & Braman, D. (2011). Cultural cognition of scientific consensus. Journal of Risk Research, 14, 147-174.
20. Kahan, D. M., Wittlin, M., Peters, E., Slovic, P., Ouellette, L. L., Braman, D., & Mandel, G. N. (2011). The tragedy of the risk-perception commons: culture conflict, rationality conflict, and climate change. Temple University Legal Studies Research Paper (2011-26).
21. Kahneman, D., & Tversky, A. (1973). On the psychology of prediction. Psychological Review, 80(4), 237.
22. Keeley, B. L. (1999). Of conspiracy theories. The Journal of Philosophy, 96(3), 109-126.
23. Körding, K. P., & Wolpert, D. M. (2004). Bayesian integration in sensorimotor learning. Nature, 427(6971), 244-247.
24. Kuhn, D., & Lao, J. (1996). Effects of evidence on attitudes: is polarization the norm?. Psychological Science, 7(2), 115-120.
25. Lewandowsky, S., Cook, J., Oberauer, K., Brophy, S., Lloyd, E. A., & Marriott, M. (2015). Recurrent fury: conspiratorial discourse in the blogosphere triggered by research on the role of conspiracist ideation in climate denial. Journal of Social and Political Psychology, 3(1), 142-178.
26. Lewandowsky, S., Ecker, U. K., Seifert, C. M., Schwarz, N., & Cook, J. (2012). Misinformation and its correction continued influence and successful debiasing. Psychological Science in the Public Interest, 13(3), 106-131.
27. Lewandowsky, S., Gignac, G. E., & Oberauer, K. (2013). The role of conspiracist ideation and worldviews in predicting rejection of science. PLoS ONE, 8(10), e75637.
28. Lewandowsky, S., Gignac, G. E., & Vaughan, S. (2013). The pivotal role of perceived scientific consensus in acceptance of science. Nature Climate Change, 3(4), 399-404.
29. Lewandowsky, S., Griffiths, T. L., & Kalish, M. L. (2009). The wisdom of individuals: Exploring people's knowledge about everyday events using iterated learning. Cognitive Science, 33, 969-998.
30. Lewandowsky, S., Oberauer, K., & Gignac, G. E. (2013). NASA faked the moon landing-therefore, (climate) science is a hoax an anatomy of the motivated rejection of science. Psychological Science, 24(5), 622-633.
31. Lewandowsky, S., Stritzke, W. G., Oberauer, K., & Morales, M. (2005). Memory for fact, fiction, and misinformation: The Iraq War 2003. Psychological Science, 16, 190-195.
32. van der Linden, S. (2013). What a hoax. Scientific American Mind, 24(4), 40-43.
33. van der Linden, S., Leiserowitz, A., Feinberg, G., & Maibach, E. (2015). The scientific consensus on climate change as a gateway belief: Experimental evidence. PLoS ONE, 10(2), 1-8, doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0118489.
34. Lord, C., Ross, L., & Lepper, M. (1979). Biased assimilation and attitude polarization: The effects of prior theories on subsequently considered evidence. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 37, 2098-2109.
35. Malka, A., Krosnick, J. A., & Langer, G. (2009). The association of knowledge with concern about global warming: Trusted information sources shape public thinking. Risk Analysis, 29, 633-647.
36. McCright, A. M., & Dunlap, R. E. (2011). The politicization of climate change and polarization in the American public's views of global warming, 2001-2010. Sociological Quarterly, 52, 155-194.
37. McCright, A. M., Dunlap, R. E., & Xiao, C. (2013). Perceived scientific agreement and support for government action on climate change in the USA. Climatic Change, 119(2), 511-518.
38. Nisbet, M. C., & Myers, T. (2007). The polls-trends twenty years of public opinion about global warming. Public Opinion Quarterly, 71(3), 444-470.
39. Nyhan, B., & Reifler, J. (2010). When corrections fail: The persistence of political misperceptions. Political Behavior, 32(2), 303-330.
40. Oreskes, N. (2004). The scientific consensus on climate change. Science, 306(5702), 1686-1686.
41. Ohanian, R. (1990). Construction and validation of a scale to measure celebrity endorsers' perceived expertise, trustworthiness, and attractiveness. Journal of Advertising, 19(3), 39-52.
42. Pearl, J. (2000). Causality: Models, reasoning and inference. Vol. 29. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
43. Petty, R. E., & Wegener, D. T. (1999). The elaboration likelihood model: Current status and controversies. In S. Chaiken & Y. Trope (Eds.), Dual-process theories in social psychology New York: Guilford Press.
44. Plous, S. (1991). Biases in the assimilation of technological breakdowns-do accidents make us safer. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 21(13), 1058-1082.
45. R Development Core Team. (2011). R: A language and environment for statistical computing. Vienna, Austria: R Foundation for Statistical Computing.
46. Sanborn, A. N., Griffiths, T. L., & Navarro, D. J. (2010). Rational approximations to rational models: Alternative algorithms for category learning. Psychological Review, 117, 1144-1167.
47. Smith, N., & Leiserowitz, A. (2012). The rise of global warming skepticism: Exploring affective image associations in the United States over time. Risk Analysis, 32(6), 1021-1032.
48. Stenhouse, N., Maibach, E., & Cobb, S. (2013). Meteorologists' views about global warming: A survey of American Meteorological Society professional members. Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society, 95(7), 1029-1040. doi:10.1175/BAMS-D-13-00091.1.
49. Wilkins, J. (2011). Are creationists rational? Synthese, 178(2), 207-218.
50. Zimper, A., & Ludwig, A. (2009). On attitude polarization under Bayesian learning with non-additive beliefs. Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, 39(2), 181-212.