The Political Divide on Climate Change: Partisan Polarization Widens in the U.S.

Environment

Volumn 58, Issue 5, 2016, Pages 4-23

  Dunlap, Riley E ^a   McCright, Aaron M ^b   Yarosh, Jerrod H ^a  

^a OKLAHOMA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84985001759     PISSN: 00139157     EISSN: 19399154     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/00139157.2016.1208995     Document Type: Article

References (130)

1. R. S. Devine, Bush Versus the Environment (New York, NY: Anchor Books, 2004).
2. A. M. McCright and R. E. Dunlap, “Anti-Reflexivity: The American Conservative Movement’s Success in Undermining Climate Science and Policy,” Theory, Culture and Society 26 (2010): 100–33.
3. L. Saad and J. M. Jones, “U.S. Concern about Global Warming at Eight-Year High,” at http://wwwgallup.com/poll/190010/concern-global-warming-eightyear-high.aspx?g_source=globalwarming&g_medium=search&g_campaign=tiles
4. D. L. Guber and C. I. Bosso, “‘High Hopes and Bitter Disappointment’: Public Discourse and the Limits of the Environmental Movement in Climate Change Politics” in N. J. Vig and M. E. Kraft, eds., Environmental Policy: New Directions for the 21st Century, 8th ed. (Washington, DC: CQ Press, 2013), 55–56.
5. Ibid., page 56.
6. J. A. Layzer, Open for Business: Conservatives’ Opposition to Environmental Regulation (Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 2012).
7. D. Jamieson, Reason in a Dark Time (New York: Oxford University Press, 2014)
8. E. Pooley, The Climate War New York: Hyperion, 2010
9. T. Skocpol, “Naming the Problem: What It Will Take to Counter Extremism and Engage Americans in the Fight Against Global Warming” (Cambridge, MA: Department of Sociology, Harvard University, 2012).
10. M. E. Kahn and M. J. Kotchen, “Business Cycle Effects on Concern about Climate Change: The Chilling Effect of Recession,” Climate Change Economics 2 (2011): 25773.
11. W. J. Miller, “One Nation … Indivisible? Polarization in America Today,” American Behavioral Scientist 66 (2012): 1607–611.
12. R. Draper, Do Not Ask What Good We Do: Inside the U.S. House of Representatives (New York, NY: Free Press, 2012).
13. C. Hare and K. T. Poole, “The Polarization of Contemporary American Politics,” Polity 46 (2014): 411.
14. G. C. Jacobson, “The Electoral Origins of Polarized Politics,” American Behavioral Scientist 56 (2012): 1612–630
15. G. C. Jacobson, “Partisan Polarization in American Politics: A Background Paper,” Presidential Studies Quarterly 43 (2013): 688–708.
16. Miller, note 8.
17. L. Mason, “‘I Disrespectfully Agree’: The Differential Effects of Partisan Sorting on Social and Issue Position,” American Journal of Politics 59 (2015): 141.
18. Ibid., page 131.
19. A. I. Abramowitz and S. Webster, “The Rise of Negative Partisanship and the Nationalization of U.S. Elections in the 21st Century,” Electoral Studies 41 (2016): 14.
20. Pew Research Center, Partisanship and Political Animosity in 2016 (Washington, DC: Pew Research Center, 2016).
21. Ibid., page 18.
22. T. E. Mann and N. J. Ornstein, It’s Even Worse Than It Was (New York, NY: Basic Books, 2016)
23. Jacobson, note 11, 2012 and 2013
24. Hare and Poole, note 10
25. Mason, note 13.
26. J. Mayer, Dark Money (New York, NY: Doubleday, 2016), Chap. 7.
27. Jacobson, 2012, note 11
28. L. A. Bradberry and G. C. Jacobson, “The Tea Party and the 2012 Presidential Election,” Electoral Studies 40 (2015): 500-8
29. V. Williamson, T. Skocpol, and J. Coggin, “The Tea Party and the Remaking of Republican Conservatism,” Perspectives on Politics 9 (2011): 25–43
30. T. Skocpol and A. Hertel-Fernandez, “The Koch etwork and the Rightward Shift in U.S. Politics,” Presented at the Annual Meeting of the Midwest Political Science Association, Chicago, IL, 2016.
31. Layzer, note 6.
32. R. E. Dunlap and M. P. Allen, “Partisan Difference on Environmental Issues: A Congressional Roll-Call Analysis,” Western Political Quarterly 49 (1976): 384–97.
33. Editorial Board, “G.O.P. Assault on Environmental Laws,” New York Times, June 8, 2015, at http://www.nytimes.com/2015/06/08/opinion/gopassault-on-environmental-laws.html?_r=0
34. J. Plautz, “10 Environmental Regulations the Republican Congress Wants to Kill,” The Atlantic, February 5, 2015, at http://www.theatlantic.com/politics/archive/2015/02/10-environmental-regulations-the-republican-congresswants-to-kill/452625
35. R. Leber, “The Five Battlefronts in Republicans’ War on the EPA,” New Republic, November 10, 2014, at https://newrepublic.com/article/120228/what-expect-gop-war-epa.
36. A. M. McCright, C. Xiao, and R. E. Dunlap, “Political Polarization on Support for Government Spending on Environmental Protection in the USA, 1974–2012,” Social Science Research 48 (2014): 251–60.
37. Mayer, note 18
38. Skocpol and Hertel-Fernandez, note 19.
39. A. Leiserowitz, E. Maibach, C. Roser-Renouf, and J. D. Hmielowski, Politics & Global Warming: Democrats, Republicans, Independents, and the Tea Party (New Haven, CT: Yale University and George Mason University, Yale Project on Climate Change Communication, 2011)
40. L. C. Hamilton and K. Saito, “A Four-Party View of US Environmental Concern,” Environmental Politics 24 (2015): 212–27.
41. Mayer, note 18. page 216.
42. Pooley, note 7
43. Mayer, note 18
44. Skocpol, note 7.
45. R. E. Dunlap and P. J. Jacques, “Climate Change Denial Books and Conservative Think Tanks: Exploring the Connection,” American Behavioral Scientist 57 (2013): 699–731
46. S. W. Elsasser and R. E. Dunlap, “Leading Voices in the Denier Choir: Conservative Columnists’ Dismissal of Global Warming and Denigration of Climate Science,” American Behavioral Scientist 57 (2013): 754–76.
47. G. S. Sargent, “They’re Not Scientists,” New Republic, December 2015, 32–37
48. T. Germain, K. Ellingboe, and K. Kroh, “The Anti-Science Climate Denier Caucus: 114th Congress Edition,” Climate Progress, January 8, 2015, at https://newrepublic.com/article/123240/theyre-not-scientists
49. Editorial Board, “The Latest Attack on Climate Science,” New York Times, December 4, 2015, at http://www.nytimes.com/2015/12/04/opinion/thelatest-attack-on-climate-science.html.
50. R. E. Dunlap and A. M. McCright, “A Widening Gap: Republican and Democratic Views on Climate Change,” Environment 50 (September/October 2008): 26–35.
51. A. M. McCright and R. E. Dunlap, “The Politicization of Climate Change: Political Polarization in the American Public’s Views of Global Warming,” Sociological Quarterly 52 (2011): 155–94
52. D. L. Guber, “A Cooling Climate for Change? Party Polarization and the Politics of Global Warming,” American Behavioral Scientist 57 (2013): 93–115
53. L. C. Hamilton, J. Hartter, M. Lemcke-Stampone, D. W. Moore, and T. G. Safford, “Tracking Public Beliefs About Anthropogenic Climate Change,” PLoS ONE 10 (2015):e0138208, doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0138208
54. A. Leiserowitz, E. Maibach, C. Roser-Renouf, G. Feinberg, and S. Rosenthal, Politics and Global Warming, Fall 2015 (New Haven, CT: Yale University and George Mason University, Yale Program on Climate Change Communication, 2015).
55. Kahn and Kotchen, note 7.
56. Dunlap and Jacques, note 29
57. Elsasser and Dunlap, note 27.
58. A. Leiserowitz, E. W. Maibach, C. Roser-Renouf, N. Smith, and E. Dawson, “Climategate, Public Opinion and the Loss of Trust,” American Behavioral Scientist 57 (2013): 818–37
59. R. J. Brulle, J. Carmichael, and J. C. Jenkins, “Shifting Public Opinion on Climate Change: An Empirical Assessment of Factors Influencing Concern over Climate Change in the U.S., 2002–2010,” Climatic Change 114 (2012): 169–88
60. E. Maiabach, A. Leiserowitz, C. Roser-Renouf, T. Myers, S. Rosenthal, and G. Feinberg, The Francis Effect: How Pope Francis Changed the Conversation about Global Warming (Fairfax, VA: George Mason University and Yale University, George Mason University Center for Climate Change Communication, 2015).
61. R. E. Dunlap, “Global Warming or Climate Change: Is There a Difference?,” http://www.gallup.com/poll/168617/global-warming-climate-change-difference.aspx?g_source=dunlap&g_medium=search&g_campaign=tiles.
62. J. R. Petrocik, “Measuring Party Supporters: Leaners are Not Independents,” Electoral Studies 28 (2009): 562–72
63. Abramowitz and Webster, note 15.
64. C. Bousallis and T. G. Coan, “Text-Mining the Signals of Climate Change Doubt,” Global Environmental Change 36 (2016): 89–100
65. J. Farrell, “Corporate Funding and Ideological Polarization About Climate Change,” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 113 (January 5, 2016): 92–97.
66. Bousallis and Coan, note 37, and Farrell, note 37.
67. A. Seifter, D. Robbins, and K. Kalhoefer, “How Broadcast Networks Covered Climate Change in 2015,” Media Matters for America, March 7, 2016, at http://mediamatters.org/research/2016/03/07/study-howbroadcast-networks-covered-climate-ch/208881
68. M. T. Boykoff, “”Public Enemy No. 1? Understanding Media Representations of Outlier Views on Climate Change,” American Behavioral Scientist 57 (2013): 796–817.
69. Boykoff, note 41.
70. N. Oreskes and E. M. Conway, Merchants of Doubt (New York, NY: Bloomsbury, 2010)
71. R. E. Dunlap and A. M. McCright, “Challenging Climate Change: The Denial Countermovement,” in R. E. Dunlap and R. J. Brulle, eds., Climate Change and Society: Sociological Perspectives (New York, NY: Oxford University Press, 2015), pp. 300–32.
72. A. Leiserowitz, E. Maibach, C. Roser-Renouf, G. Feinberg, and S. Rosenthal, Politics and Global Warming, Spring 2016 (New Haven, CT: Yale University and George Mason University, Yale Program on Climate Change Communication, 2016).
73. J. Cook et al., “Consensus on Consensus: A Synthesis of Consensus Estimates on Human-Caused Global Warming,” Environmental Research Letters 11 (2016): 048002.
74. Mason, 2015, note 13
75. Jacobson, 2012, note 11.
76. McCright and Dunlap, note 30
77. Guber, note 30.
78. Oreskes and Conway, note 44
79. Layzer, note 6
80. Dunlap and McCright, note 44.
81. Dunlap and McCright, note 44
82. McCright and Dunlap, note 30
83. Oreskes and Conway, note 44.
84. D. L. Levy, “It’s the Real Thing: The Power of Koch,” Climate Inc., September 8, 2010, at http://climateinc.org/2010/09/koch_climate/
85. Jacobson, 2012, note 11, page 1620.
86. A. Leiserowitz et al., note 45
87. Jacobson, 2012, note 11
88. Mason, note 13.
89. S. C. Moser and L. Dilling, L., “Making Climate Hot: Communicating the Urgency and Challenge of Global Climate Change,” Environment 46 (2004): 32–46
90. M. C. Nisbet, “Communicating Climate Change: Why Frames Matter to Public Engagement,” Environment 51 (2009): 514–18.
91. R. Gifford and L. A. Comeau, “Message Framing Influences Perceived Climate Change Competence, Engagement, and Behavioral Intentions,” Global Environmental Change 21 (2011): 1301-7
92. T. A. Myers, M C. Nisbet, E. W. Maibach, and A. Leiserowitz, “A Public Health Frame Arouses Hopeful Emotions about Climate Change,” Climatic Change 113 (2012): 1105–12.
93. A. M. McCright, M. Charters, K. Dentzman, and T. Dietz, “Examining the Effectiveness of Climate Change Frames in the Face of a Denialist Counter-Frame,” Topics in Cognitive Science 8 (2016): 76–97.
94. P. S. Hart and E. C. Nisbet, “Boomerang Effects in Science Communication: How Motivated Reasoning and Identity Cues Amplify Opinion Polarization about Climate Mitigation Policies,” Communication Research 39 (2012): 701–23
95. J. Zhou, “Boomerangs Versus Javelins: How Polarization Constrains Communication on Climate Change,” Environmental Politics 25 (2016): 788–811.
96. G. Goebbert, H. C. Jenkins-Smith, K. Klockow, M. Nowlin, and C. Silva, “Weather, Climate, and Worldviews: The Sources and Consequences of Changes in Local Weather Patterns,” Weather, Climate, & Society 4 (2012): 132–44.
97. B. Kvaløy, Finseraas, H. and O. Listhaug, “The Publics’ Concern for Global Warming: A Cross-National Study of 47 Countries,” Journal of Peace Research 49 (2012): 11–22.
98. S. D. Brody, S. Zahran, Vedlitz, A. and H. Grover, “Examining the Relationship Between Physical Vulnerability and Public Perceptions of Global Climate Change in the United States,” Environment & Behavior 41 (2008): 72–95.
99. L. C. Hamilton and B. D. Keim, “Regional Variation in Perceptions about Climate Change,” International Journal of Climatology 29 (2009): 2348–52.
100. P. J. Egan, and M. Mullin, “Turning Personal Experience into Political Attitudes: The Effect of Local Weather on Americans’ Perceptions about Global Warming,” Journal of Politics 74 (2012): 796–809.
101. S. T. Marquart-Pyatt, A. M. McCright, T. Dietz, and R. E. Dunlap, “Political Orientation Eclipses Climate Extremes for Climate Change Perceptions,” Global Environmental Change 29 (2014): 246–57.
102. L. Hamilton, and M. Stampone, “‘Blowin’ in the Wind: Short-Term Weather and Belief in Anthropogenic Climate Change,” Weather, Climate, & Society 5 (2013): 112–19
103. Egan and Mullin, note 67, 2012.
104. P. S. Hart and E. C. Nisbet, note 62
105. D. M. Kahan, H. Jenkins-Smith, and D. Braman, “Cultural Cognition of Scientific Consensus,” Journal of Risk Research 14 (2011): 147–74
106. X. Zhao, “Media Use and Global Warming Perceptions: A Snapshot of the Reinforcing Spirals,” Communication Research 36 (2009): 698–723.
107. McCright and Dunlap, note 30
108. L. C. Hamilton, “Education, Politics, and Opinions About Climate Change: Evidence for Interaction Effects. Climatic Change 104 (2011): 231–42.
109. Dunlap and McCright, note 29
110. A. M. McCright, “Political Orientation Moderates Americans’Beliefs and Concern about Climate Change,” Climatic Change 104 (2011): 243–53.
111. Dunlap and McCright, note 29, page 33.
112. Dunlap and McCright, note 29, p. 34.
113. M. Hertsgaard, “Exxon and the Climate Fight After Paris,” The Nation 302 (February 2016), page 19.
114. N. Buxton, “COP 21 Charades: Spin, Lies and Real Hope in Paris,” Globalizations, doi:10.1080/14747731.2016.1161936
115. C. L. Spash, “This Changes Nothing: The Paris Agreement to Ignore Reality,” Globalizations, doi:10.1080/14747731.2016.1161119.
116. D. King, “Biggest Opportunity of Our Age,” Science 351 (January 8, 2001): 107
117. P. Christoff, “The Promissory Note: COP 21 and the Paris Climate Agreement,” Environmental Politics 25 (2016): 765–87.
118. S. Goldenberg, “How US Negotiators Ensured Landmark Paris Climate Agreement was Republican-Proof,” The Guardian, December 13, 2015, at http://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2015/dec/13/climate-changeparis-deal-cop21-obama-administration-congressrepublicans-environment.
119. Sargent, note 28
120. A. Parker and C. Davenport, “Donald Trump’s Energy Plan: More Fossil Fuels and Fewer Rules,” New York Times, May 26, 2016, at http://www.nytimes.com/2016/05/27/us/politics/donald-trump-global-warming-energy-policy.html
121. J. Redman, “Trump’s Climate Change Denial Is Already Complicating the Paris Climate Deal,” Huffington Post, May 27, 2016, at http://www.huffingtonpost.com/janetredman/trumps-climate-change-denial-complicatingparis-deal_b_10151148.html.
122. Hare and A Poole, note 10, page 472.
123. Jacobson, 2013, note 11.
124. S. Kull, Considering the Cost of Clean: Americans on Energy, Air Quality and Climate (College Park, MD: Program for Public Consultation, School of Public Policy, University of Maryland, 2016)
125. A. Leiserowitz et al., note 45.
126. Mason, note 13, page 141
127. Jacobson, 2013, note 11.
128. C. Moser and M. Lee-Ashley, “The Fossil-Fuel Industry Spent Big to Set the Anti-Environment Agenda of the Next Congress,” Center for American Progress, December 22, 2014, at https://www.americanprogress.org/issues/green/news/2014/12/22/103667/thefossil-fuel-industry-spent-big-to-set-the-anti-environment-agenda-of-the-next-congress
129. E. Pilkington, “Republican Hopefuls Receive $62m in Support from Donors with Fossil Fuel Ties,” The Guardian, August 12, 2015, at http://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2015/aug/12/republican-candidates-fossil-fuels-donors-superpacs.
130. Eric Wolf, “Climate Hawks Wing Some, Lose Some in Dem Platform Fight,” Politico, June 27, 2016, at http://www.politico.com/tipsheets/morning-energy/2016/06/climate-hawks-win-some-lose-some-in-dem-platformfight-215038.