Memory for fact, fiction, and misinformation: The Iraq War 2003

Psychological Science

Volumn 16, Issue 3, 2005, Pages 190-195

  Lewandowsky, Stephan ^a   Stritzke, Werner G K ^a   Oberauer, Klaus ^b   Morales, Michael ^c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF WESTERN AUSTRALIA   (Australia)

^b UNIVERSITY OF POTSDAM   (Germany)

^c STATE UNIVERSITY OF NEW YORK   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; ARTICLE; AUSTRALIA; COMPARATIVE STUDY; CONCEPT FORMATION; CULTURAL ANTHROPOLOGY; CULTURAL FACTOR; FANTASY; FEMALE; GERMANY; HUMAN; INTERPERSONAL COMMUNICATION; IRAQ; LEARNING; LONG TERM MEMORY; MALE; MASS MEDIUM; MENTAL FUNCTION; MOTIVATION; PUBLIC OPINION; RECALL; UNITED STATES; WAR;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; AUSTRALIA; CONCEPT FORMATION; CROSS-CULTURAL COMPARISON; CULTURE; FANTASY; FEMALE; GERMANY; HUMANS; IRAQ; MALE; MASS MEDIA; MENTAL PROCESSES; MENTAL RECALL; MOTIVATION; PUBLIC OPINION; RETENTION (PSYCHOLOGY); SET (PSYCHOLOGY); TRUTH DISCLOSURE; UNITED STATES; WAR;

EID: 15944394098     PISSN: 09567976     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.0956-7976.2005.00802.x     Document Type: Article

References (10)

1. Cheung, G.W., & Rensvold, R.B. (2000). Assessing extreme and acquiescence response sets in cross-cultural research using structural equations modeling. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 31, 187-212.
2. Fein, S., McCloskey, A.L., & Tomlinson, T.M. (1997). Can the jury disregard that information? The use of suspicion to reduce the prejudicial effects of pretrial publicity and inadmissible testimony. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 23, 1215-1226.
3. Johnson, H.M., & Seifert, C.M. (1994). Sources of the continued influence effect: When misinformation in memory affects later inferences. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 20, 1420-1436.
4. Johnson, H.M., & Seifert, C.M. (1998). Updating accounts following a correction of misinformation. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 24, 1483-1494.
5. Kassin, S.M., & Sukel, H. (1997). Coerced confessions and the jury: An experimental test of the "harmless error" rule. Law and Human Behavior, 21, 27-46.
6. Millis, K.K., & Erdman, B.J. (1998). Comprehending news articles: Updating the news. Poetics, 25, 343-361.
7. Roediger, H.L., III. (1996). Memory illusions. Journal of Memory and Language, 35, 76-100.
8. Roediger, H.L., III, & McDermott, K.B. (1995). Creating false memories: Remembering words not presented in lists. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 21, 803-814.
9. Seifert, C.M. (2002). The continued influence of misinformation in memory: What makes a correction effective? In B.H. Ross (Ed.), The psychology of learning and motivation: Advances in research and theory (Vol. 41, pp. 265-292). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
10. Wilkes, A.L., & Reynolds, D.J. (1999). On certain limitations accompanying readers' interpretations of corrections in episodic text. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Experimental Psychology, 52A, 165-183.