Erratum: Genome-wide target specificities of CRISPR RNA-guided programmable deaminases (Nature Biotechnology (2017) 35 (475-480) DOI: 10.1038/nbt.3852);Genome-wide target specificities of CRISPR RNA-guided programmable deaminases

Nature Biotechnology

Volumn 35, Issue 5, 2017, Pages 475-480

  Kim, Daesik ^a   Lim, Kayeong ^a,b   Kim, Sang Tae ^b   Yoon, Sun Heui ^a   Kim, Kyoungmi ^b   Ryu, Seuk Min ^a,b   Kim, Jin Soo ^a,b,c  

^a Seoul National University   (South Korea)

^b Institute for Basic Science   (South Korea)

^c University of Science and Technology (UST)   (South Korea)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

AROMATIC COMPOUNDS; DNA; NUCLEIC ACIDS;

DNA DOUBLE STRAND BREAKS; DNA MODIFYING ENZYMES; EUKARYOTIC GENOME; GENOME SEQUENCING; INDEPENDENT ASSESSMENT; SINGLE NUCLEOTIDES; TARGET ACTIVITY; WHOLE GENOME SEQUENCING;

GENES;

APOLIPOPROTEIN B MESSENGER RNA EDITING ENZYME CATALYTIC POLYPEPTIDE 1; CAS9 NICKASE; CYTOSINE; DEAMINASE; GENOMIC DNA; GUIDE RNA; NUCLEASE; RNA; TRANSCRIPTION FACTOR EMX1; UNCLASSIFIED DRUG; URACIL; CASPASE 9; CRISPR ASSOCIATED PROTEIN; CYTIDINE DEAMINASE; HYBRID PROTEIN;

ARTICLE; CLUSTERED REGULARLY INTERSPACED SHORT PALINDROMIC REPEAT; CONTROLLED STUDY; DOUBLE STRANDED DNA BREAK; ENZYME SPECIFICITY; HUMAN; HUMAN CELL; HUMAN GENOME; IN VITRO STUDY; INDEL MUTATION; MUTATION RATE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; WHOLE GENOME SEQUENCING; BASE PAIRING; GENE EDITING; GENETICS; POINT MUTATION; PROCEDURES; SITE DIRECTED MUTAGENESIS;

BASE PAIRING; CASPASE 9; CLUSTERED REGULARLY INTERSPACED SHORT PALINDROMIC REPEATS; CRISPR-ASSOCIATED PROTEINS; CYTIDINE DEAMINASE; GENE EDITING; GENOME, HUMAN; HUMANS; MUTAGENESIS, SITE-DIRECTED; POINT MUTATION; RECOMBINANT FUSION PROTEINS; RNA;

EID: 85018935232     PISSN: 10870156     EISSN: 15461696     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1038/nbt0817-797d     Document Type: Erratum

References (24)

1. Komor, A.C., Kim, Y.B., Packer, M.S., Zuris, J.A. & Liu, D.R. Programmable editing of a target base in genomic DNA without double-stranded DNA cleavage. Nature 533, 420-424 (2016).
2. Nishida, K. et al. Targeted nucleotide editing using hybrid prokaryotic and vertebrate adaptive immune systems. Science 353, 1248-1257 (2016).
3. Ma, Y. et al. Targeted AID-mediated mutagenesis (TAM) enables efficient genomic diversification in mammalian cells. Nat. Methods 13, 1029-1035 (2016).
4. Hess, G.T. et al. Directed evolution using dCas9-targeted somatic hypermutation in mammalian cells. Nat. Methods 13, 1036-1042 (2016).
5. Yang, L. et al. Engineering and optimising deaminase fusions for genome editing. Nat. Commun. 7, 13330 (2016).
6. Kim, H. & Kim, J.S. A guide to genome engineering with programmable nucleases. Nat. Rev. Genet. 15, 321-334 (2014).
7. Tsai, S.Q. et al. GUIDE-seq enables genome-wide profiling of off-target cleavage by CRISPR-Cas nucleases. Nat. Biotechnol. 33, 187-197 (2015).
8. Frock, R.L. et al. Genome-wide detection of DNA double-stranded breaks induced by engineered nucleases. Nat. Biotechnol. 33, 179-186 (2015).
9. Ran, F.A. et al. In vivo genome editing using Staphylococcus aureus Cas9. Nature 520, 186-191 (2015).
10. Crosetto, N. et al. Nucleotide-resolution DNA double-strand break mapping by next-generation sequencing. Nat. Methods 10, 361-365 (2013).
11. Wang, X. et al. Unbiased detection of off-target cleavage by CRISPR-Cas9 and TALENs using integrase-defective lentiviral vectors. Nat. Biotechnol. 33, 175-178 (2015).
12. Gabriel, R. et al. An unbiased genome-wide analysis of zinc-finger nuclease specificity. Nat. Biotechnol. 29, 816-823 (2011).
13. Kim, D. et al. Digenome-seq: genome-wide profiling of CRISPR-Cas9 off-target effects in human cells. Nat. Methods 12, 237-243 (2015).
14. Kim, D., Kim, S., Kim, S., Park, J. & Kim, J.S. Genome-wide target specificities of CRISPR-Cas9 nucleases revealed by multiplex Digenome-seq. Genome Res. 26, 406-415 (2016).
15. Kim, D. et al. Genome-wide analysis reveals specificities of Cpf1 endonucleases in human cells. Nat. Biotechnol. 34, 863-868 (2016).
16. Lin, Y. et al. CRISPR/Cas9 systems have off-target activity with insertions or deletions between target DNA and guide RNA sequences. Nucleic Acids Res. 42, 7473-7485 (2014).
17. Bae, S., Park, J. & Kim, J.S. Cas-OFFinder: a fast and versatile algorithm that searches for potential off-target sites of Cas9 RNA-guided endonucleases. Bioinformatics 30, 1473-1475 (2014).
18. Kyoungmi Kim, K. et al. Highly efficient RNA-guided base editing in mouse embryos. Nat. Biotechnol. http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nbt.3816 (2017).
19. Fu, Y., Sander, J.D., Reyon, D., Cascio, V.M. & Joung, J.K. Improving CRISPR-Cas nuclease specificity using truncated guide RNAs. Nat. Biotechnol. 32, 279-284 (2014).
20. Cho, S.W. et al. Analysis of off-target effects of CRISPR/Cas-derived RNA-guided endonucleases and nickases. Genome Res. 24, 132-141 (2014).
21. Slaymaker, I.M. et al. Rationally engineered Cas9 nucleases with improved specificity. Science 351, 84-88 (2016).
22. Kleinstiver, B.P. et al. High-fidelity CRISPR-Cas9 nucleases with no detectable genome-wide off-target effects. Nature 529, 490-495 (2016).
23. Cho, S.W., Lee, J., Carroll, D., Kim, J.S. & Lee, J. Heritable gene knockout in Caenorhabditis elegans by direct injection of Cas9-sgRNA ribonucleoproteins. Genetics 195, 1177-1180 (2013).
24. Kim, S., Kim, D., Cho, S.W., Kim, J. & Kim, J.S. Highly efficient RNA-guided genome editing in human cells via delivery of purified Cas9 ribonucleoproteins. Genome Res. 24, 1012-1019 (2014).