An N-end rule pathway that recognizes proline and destroys gluconeogenic enzymes

Science

Volumn 355, Issue 6323, 2017, Pages

  Chen, Shun Jia ^a   Wu, Xia ^a   Wadas, Brandon ^b   Oh, Jang Hyun ^a   Varshavsky, Alexander ^a  

^a California Institute of Technology   (United States)

^b HARVARD MEDICAL SCHOOL   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

FBP1 PROTEIN, S CEREVISIAE; FRUCTOSE BISPHOSPHATASE; GLUCOSE; ICL1 PROTEIN, S CEREVISIAE; ISOCITRATE LYASE; MALATE DEHYDROGENASE; MDH2 PROTEIN, S CEREVISIAE; PROLINE; PROTEIN KINASE C; SACCHAROMYCES CEREVISIAE PROTEIN; VESICULAR TRANSPORT PROTEIN; VID24 PROTEIN, S CEREVISIAE;

CHEMISTRY; DEFICIENCY; ENZYME SPECIFICITY; ENZYMOLOGY; GENETICS; GLUCONEOGENESIS; METABOLISM; PROTEIN DEGRADATION; SACCHAROMYCES CEREVISIAE;

FRUCTOSE-BISPHOSPHATASE; GLUCONEOGENESIS; GLUCOSE; ISOCITRATE LYASE; MALATE DEHYDROGENASE; PROLINE; PROTEIN KINASE C; PROTEOLYSIS; SACCHAROMYCES CEREVISIAE; SACCHAROMYCES CEREVISIAE PROTEINS; SUBSTRATE SPECIFICITY; VESICULAR TRANSPORT PROTEINS;

EID: 85017885362     PISSN: 00368075     EISSN: 10959203     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1126/SCIENCE.AAL3655     Document Type: Article

References (52)

1. D. G. Fraenkel, Yeast Intermediary Metabolism (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press, 2011).
2. L. Rui, Energy metabolism in the liver. Compr. Physiol. 4, 177–197 (2014). doi: 10.1002/cphy.c130024; pmid: 24692138
3. M. Hoffman, H. L. Chiang, Isolation of degradation-deficient mutants defective in the targeting of fructose-1,6bisphosphatase into the vacuole for degradation in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Genetics 143, 1555–1566 (1996). pmid: 8844145
4. M. Hämmerle et al., Proteins of newly isolated mutants and the amino-terminal proline are essential for ubiquitin-proteasome-catalyzed catabolite degradation of fructose-1,6bisphosphatase of Saccharomyces cerevisiae. J. Biol. Chem. 273, 25000–25005 (1998). doi: 10.1074/jbc.273.39.25000; pmid: 9737955
5. R. Menssen et al., Exploring the topology of the Gid complex, the E3 ubiquitin ligase involved in catabolite-induced degradation of gluconeogenic enzymes. J. Biol. Chem. 287, 25602–25614 (2012). doi: 10.1074/jbc.M112.363762; pmid: 22645139
6. O. Santt et al., The yeast GID complex, a novel ubiquitin ligase (E3) involved in the regulation of carbohydrate metabolism. Mol. Biol. Cell 19, 3323–3333 (2008). doi: 10.1091/mbc.E08-03-0328; pmid: 18508925
7. J. Regelmann et al., Catabolite degradation of fructose-1,6bisphosphatase in the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae: A genome-wide screen identifies eight novel GID genes and indicates the existence of two degradation pathways. Mol. Biol. Cell 14, 1652–1663 (2003). doi: 10.1091/mbc.E02-08-0456; pmid: 12686616
8. A. A. Alibhoy, H. L. Chiang, Vacuole import and degradation pathway: Insights into a specialized autophagy pathway. World J. Biol. Chem. 2, 239–245 (2011). doi: 10.4331/wjbc.v2.i11.239; pmid: 22125667
9. B. J. Giardina, H. L. Chiang, Fructose-1,6-bisphosphatase, malate dehydrogenase, isocitrate lyase, phosphoenolpyruvate carboxykinase, glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase, and cyclophilin A are secreted in Saccharomyces cerevisiae grown in low glucose. Commun. Integr. Biol. 6, e27216 (2013). doi: 10.4161/cib.27216; pmid: 24563717
10. A. A. Alibhoy, B. J. Giardina, D. D. Dunton, H. L. Chiang, Vid30 is required for the association of Vid vesicles and actin patches in the vacuole import and degradation pathway. Autophagy 8, 29–46 (2012). doi: 10.4161/auto.8.1.18104; pmid: 22082961
11. C. R. Brown, A. B. Wolfe, D. Cui, H. L. Chiang, The vacuolar import and degradation pathway merges with the endocytic pathway to deliver fructose-1,6-bisphosphatase to the vacuole for degradation. J. Biol. Chem. 283, 26116–26127 (2008). doi: 10.1074/jbc.M709922200; pmid: 18660504
12. K. I. Minard, L. McAlister-Henn, Glucose-induced degradation of the MDH2 isozyme of malate dehydrogenase in yeast. J. Biol. Chem. 267, 17458–17464 (1992). pmid: 1324938
13. B. Li et al., Fructose-1,6-bisphosphatase opposes renal carcinoma progression. Nature 513, 251–255 (2014). doi: 10.1038/nature13557; pmid: 25043030
14. E. Balsa-Martinez, P. Puigserver, Cancer cells hijack gluconeogenic enzymes to fuel cell growth. Mol. Cell 60, 509–511 (2015). doi: 10.1016/j.molcel.2015.11.005; pmid: 26590709
15. N. Kobayashi et al., RanBPM, Muskelin, p48EMLP, p44CTLH, and the armadillo-repeat proteins ARMC8a and ARMC8b are components of the CTLH complex. Gene 396, 236–247 (2007). doi: 10.1016/j.gene.2007.02.032; pmid: 17467196
16. O. Francis, F. Han, J. C. Adams, Molecular phylogeny of a RING E3 ubiquitin ligase, conserved in eukaryotic cells and dominated by homologous components, the muskelin/ RanBPM/CTLH complex. PLOS ONE 8, e75217 (2013). doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0075217; pmid: 24143168
17. T. Pfirrmann et al., RMND5 from Xenopus laevis is an E3 ubiquitin-ligase and functions in early embryonic forebrain development. PLOS ONE 10, e0120342 (2015). doi: 10.1371/ journal.pone.0120342; pmid: 25793641
18. A. Bachmair, D. Finley, A. Varshavsky, In vivo half-life of a protein is a function of its amino-terminal residue. Science 234, 179–186 (1986). doi: 10.1126/science.3018930; pmid: 3018930
19. C. S. Hwang, A. Shemorry, A. Varshavsky, N-terminal acetylation of cellular proteins creates specific degradation signals. Science 327, 973–977 (2010). doi: 10.1126/ science.1183147; pmid: 20110468
20. A. Shemorry, C. S. Hwang, A. Varshavsky, Control of protein quality and stoichiometries by N-terminal acetylation and the N-end rule pathway. Mol. Cell 50, 540–551 (2013). doi: 10.1016/j.molcel.2013.03.018; pmid: 23603116
21. M. K. Kim, S. J. Oh, B. G. Lee, H. K. Song, Structural basis for dual specificity of yeast N-terminal amidase in the N-end rule pathway. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 113, 12438–12443 (2016). doi: 10.1073/pnas.1612620113; pmid: 27791147
22. A. Varshavsky, The N-end rule pathway and regulation by proteolysis. Protein Sci. 20, 1298–1345 (2011). doi: 10.1002/ pro.666; pmid: 21633985
23. D. Finley, H. D. Ulrich, T. Sommer, P. Kaiser, The ubiquitin-proteasome system of Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Genetics 192, 319–360 (2012). doi: 10.1534/genetics.112.140467; pmid: 23028185
24. D. J. Gibbs, J. Bacardit, A. Bachmair, M. J. Holdsworth, The eukaryotic N-end rule pathway: Conserved mechanisms and diverse functions. Trends Cell Biol. 24, 603–611 (2014). doi: 10.1016/j.tcb.2014.05.001; pmid: 24874449
25. T. Tasaki, S. M. Sriram, K. S. Park, Y. T. Kwon, The N-end rule pathway. Annu. Rev. Biochem. 81, 261–289 (2012). doi: 10.1146/annurev-biochem-051710-093308; pmid: 22524314
26. A. Mogk, R. Schmidt, B. Bukau, The N-end rule pathway for regulated proteolysis: Prokaryotic and eukaryotic strategies. Trends Cell Biol. 17, 165–172 (2007). doi: 10.1016/ j.tcb.2007.02.001; pmid: 17306546
27. D. A. Dougan, D. Micevski, K. N. Truscott, The N-end rule pathway: From recognition by N-recognins, to destruction by AAA+ proteases. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 1823, 83–91 (2012). doi: 10.1016/j.bbamcr.2011.07.002; pmid: 21781991
28. M. Eldeeb, R. Fahlman, The N-end rule: The beginning determines the end. Protein Pept. Lett. 23, 343–348 (2016). doi: 10.2174/0929866523666160108115809; pmid: 26743630
29. E. Graciet, F. Wellmer, The plant N-end rule pathway: Structure and functions. Trends Plant Sci. 15, 447–453 (2010). doi: 10.1016/j.tplants.2010.04.011; pmid: 20627801
30. H. K. Kim et al., The N-terminal methionine of cellular proteins as a degradation signal. Cell 156, 158–169 (2014). doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2013.11.031; pmid: 24361105
31. K. I. Piatkov, C. S. Brower, A. Varshavsky, The N-end rule pathway counteracts cell death by destroying proapoptotic protein fragments. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 109, E1839–E1847 (2012). doi: 10.1073/pnas.1207786109; pmid: 22670058
32. K. I. Piatkov, J.-H. Oh, Y. Liu, A. Varshavsky, Calpain-generated natural protein fragments as short-lived substrates of the N-end rule pathway. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 111, E817–E826 (2014). doi: 10.1073/pnas.1401639111; pmid: 24550490
33. C. S. Brower, K. I. Piatkov, A. Varshavsky, Neurodegenerationassociated protein fragments as short-lived substrates of the N-end rule pathway. Mol. Cell 50, 161–171 (2013). doi: 10.1016/j.molcel.2013.02.009; pmid: 23499006
34. K. Yamano, R. J. Youle, PINK1 is degraded through the N-end rule pathway. Autophagy 9, 1758–1769 (2013). doi: 10.4161/auto.24633; pmid: 24121706
35. H. Cha-Molstad et al., Amino-terminal arginylation targets endoplasmic reticulum chaperone BiP for autophagy through p62 binding. Nat. Cell Biol. 17, 917–929 (2015). doi: 10.1038/ ncb3177; pmid: 26075355
36. S. Prakash, T. Inobe, A. J. Hatch, A. Matouschek, Substrate selection by the proteasome during degradation of protein complexes. Nat. Chem. Biol. 5, 29–36 (2009). doi: 10.1038/ nchembio.130; pmid: 19029916
37. B. Wadas, K. I. Piatkov, C. S. Brower, A. Varshavsky, Analyzing N-terminal arginylation through the use of peptide arrays and degradation assays. J. Biol. Chem. 291, 20976–20992 (2016). doi: 10.1074/jbc.M116.747956; pmid: 27510035
38. S. E. Park et al., Control of mammalian G protein signaling by N-terminal acetylation and the N-end rule pathway. Science 347, 1249–1252 (2015). doi: 10.1126/science.aaa3844; pmid: 25766235
39. H. Aksnes, A. Drazic, M. Marie, T. Arnesen, First things first: Vital protein marks by N-terminal acetyltransferases. Trends Biochem. Sci. 41, 746–760 (2016). doi: 10.1016/ j.tibs.2016.07.005; pmid: 27498224
40. M. J. Dörfel, G. J. Lyon, The biological functions of Naa10—From amino-terminal acetylation to human disease. Gene 567, 103–131 (2015). doi: 10.1016/j.gene.2015.04.085; pmid: 25987439
41. P. Kötter, J. E. Weigand, B. Meyer, K.-D. Entian, B. Suess, A fast and efficient translational control system for conditional expression of yeast genes. Nucleic Acids Res. 37, e120 (2009). doi: 10.1093/nar/gkp578; pmid: 19592423
42. Q. Xiao, F. Zhang, B. A. Nacev, J. O. Liu, D. Pei, Protein N-terminal processing: Substrate specificity of Escherichia coli and human methionine aminopeptidases. Biochemistry 49, 5588–5599 (2010). doi: 10.1021/bi1005464; pmid: 20521764
43. M. Vidal, S. Fields, The yeast two-hybrid assay: Still finding connections after 25 years. Nat. Methods 11, 1203–1206 (2014). doi: 10.1038/nmeth.3182; pmid: 25584376
44. A. Brückner, C. Polge, N. Lentze, D. Auerbach, U. Schlattner, Yeast two-hybrid, a powerful tool for systems biology. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 10, 2763–2788 (2009). doi: 10.3390/ ijms10062763; pmid: 19582228
45. T. Stellberger et al., Improving the yeast two-hybrid system with permutated fusions proteins: The Varicella Zoster Virus interactome. Proteome Sci. 8, 8 (2010). doi: 10.1186/ 1477-5956-8-8; pmid: 20205919
46. N. Johnsson, A. Varshavsky, Split ubiquitin as a sensor of protein interactions in vivo. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 91, 10340–10344 (1994). doi: 10.1073/pnas.91.22.10340; pmid: 7937952
47. A. Dünkler, J. Müller, N. Johnsson, Detecting protein-protein interactions with the split-ubiquitin sensor. Methods Mol. Biol. 786, 115–130 (2012). doi: 10.1007/978-1-61779-292-2_7; pmid: 21938623
48. M. A. Batalia, E. J. Collins, Peptide binding by class I and class II MHC molecules. Biopolymers 43, 281–302 (1997). doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0282(1997)43:4<281::AIDBIP3>3.0.CO;2-R; pmid: 9316393
49. R. Yaneva, C. Schneeweiss, M. Zacharias, S. Springer, Peptide binding to MHC class I and II proteins: New avenues from new methods. Mol. Immunol. 47, 649–657 (2010). doi: 10.1016/j.molimm.2009.10.008; pmid: 19910050
50. G.-C. Hung, C. R. Brown, A. B. Wolfe, J. Liu, H.-L. Chiang, Degradation of the gluconeogenic enzymes fructose-1,6bisphosphatase and malate dehydrogenase is mediated by distinct proteolytic pathways and signaling events. J. Biol. Chem. 279, 49138–49150 (2004). doi: 10.1074/jbc. M404544200; pmid: 15358789
51. A. Varshavsky, ‘Spalog’ and ‘sequelog’: Neutral terms for spatial and sequence similarity. Curr. Biol. 14, R181–R183 (2004). doi: 10.1016/j.cub.2004.02.014; pmid: 15028230
52. S. Goetze et al., Identification and functional characterization of N-terminally acetylated proteins in Drosophila melanogaster. PLOS Biol. 7, e1000236 (2009). doi: 10.1371/journal. pbio.1000236; pmid: 19885390