'Spalog' and 'sequelog': Neutral terms for spatial and sequence similarity [1]

Current Biology

Volumn 14, Issue 5, 2004, Pages

  Varshavsky, Alexander ^a  

^a CALIFORNIA INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 1842485068     PISSN: 09609822     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.cub.2004.02.014     Document Type: Note

References (9)

1. Fitch W. Distinguishing homologous from analogous proteins. Syst. Zool. 19:1970;99-113.
2. Koonin E.V., Galperin M.Y. Sequence - Evolution - Function: Computational Approaches in Comparative Genomics. 2002;Kluwer Academic Publishers, Boston.
3. Reeck G.R., de Haën C., Teller D.C., Doolittle R.F., Fitch W.M., Dickerson R.E., Chambon P., McLachlan A.D., Margoliash E., Jukes T.H., et al. Homology in proteins and nucleic acids: a terminology muddle and a way out of it. Cell. 50:1987;667.
4. Sonnhammer E.L., Koonin E.V. Orthology, paralogy, and proposed classification for paralog subtypes. Trends Genet. 18:2002;619-620.
5. Jensen R.A. Orthologs and paralogs - we need to get it right. Genome Biol. 2:2001;1002.
6. von Heijne G. Sequence analysis in molecular biology. 1987;Academic Press, New York.
7. Holm L., Sander C. Dali: a network tool for protein structure comparison. Trends Biochem. Sci. 20:1995;478-480.
8. Abagyan R.A., Batalov S. Do aligned sequences share the same fold? J. Mol. Biol. 273:1997;355-368.
9. Wang C.C., Xi J., Begley T.P., Nicholson L.K. Solution structure of ThiS and implications for the evolutionary roots of ubiquitin. Nat. Struct. Biol. 8:2001;47-51.