Does Respiratory Variation in Inferior Vena Cava Diameter Predict Fluid Responsiveness: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Shock

Volumn 47, Issue 5, 2017, Pages 550-559

  Long, Elliot ^a,b,c   Oakley, Ed ^a,b,c   Duke, Trevor ^a,b,c   Babl, Franz E ^a,b,c  

^a ROYAL CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL   (Australia)

^b MURDOCH CHILDREN'S RESEARCH INSTITUTE   (Australia)

^c UNIVERSITY OF MELBOURNE   (Australia)

Author keywords

Circulatory failure; echocardiography; fluid therapy; resuscitation; sepsis; shock

Indexed keywords

ACUTE DISEASE; ARTIFICIAL VENTILATION; BLOOD VESSEL DIAMETER; BREATHING; ECHOCARDIOGRAPHY; FLUID RESUSCITATION; HUMAN; INFERIOR CAVA VEIN; ISCHEMIA; REVIEW; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; SYSTEMATIC REVIEW; TREATMENT RESPONSE; VENTILATED PATIENT; FLUID THERAPY; META ANALYSIS; PHYSIOLOGY; PROCEDURES; SEPSIS; SHOCK; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

FLUID THERAPY; HUMANS; SEPSIS; SHOCK; TREATMENT OUTCOME; VENA CAVA, INFERIOR;

EID: 85017633263     PISSN: 10732322     EISSN: 15400514     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/SHK.0000000000000801     Document Type: Review

References (88)

1. Vincent JL, De Backer D: Circulatory shock. N Engl J Med 18(369):1726-1734, 2013.
2. Cawcutt KA, Peters SG: Severe sepsis and septic shock: clinical overview and update on management. Mayo Clin Proc 11(89):1572-1578, 2014.
3. Ruth A, McCracken CE, Fortenberry JD, Hall M, Simon HK, Hebbar KB: Pediatric severe sepsis: current trends and outcomes from the Pediatric Health Information Systems database. Pediatr Crit Care Med 9(15):828-838, 2014.
4. Mayr FB, Yende S, Angus DC: Epidemiology of severe sepsis. Virulence 1(5):4-11, 2014.
5. Balamuth F, Weiss SL, Neuman MI, Scott H, Brady PW, Paul R, Farris RW, McClead R, Hayes K, Gaieski D, et al.: Pediatric severe sepsis in U.S. children's hospitals. Pediatr Crit Care Med 9(15):798-805, 2014.
6. Gaieski DF, Edwards JM, Kallan MJ, Carr BG: Benchmarking the incidence and mortality of severe sepsis in the United States. Crit Care Med 5(41):1167-1174, 2013.
7. Schlapbach LJ, Straney L, Alexander J, MacLaren G, Festa M, Schibler A, Slater A: Mortality related to invasive infections, sepsis, and septic shock in critically ill children in Australia and New Zealand, 2002-13: a multicentre retrospective cohort study. Lancet Infect Dis 1(15):46-54, 2015.
8. Watson RS, Carcillo JA: Scope and epidemiology of pediatric sepsis. Pediatr Crit Care Med 3(6):S3-5, 2005.
9. Jaramillo-Bustamante JC, Maŕin-Agudelo A, Fernández-Laverde M, Baren o-Silva J: Epidemiology of sepsis in pediatric intensive care units: First Colombian Multicenter Study. Pediatr Crit Care Med 5(13):501-508, 2012.
10. Angus DC, van der Poll T: Severe sepsis and septic shock. N Engl J Med 9(369):840-851, 2013.
11. Hartman ME, Linde-Zwirble WT, Angus DC, Watson RS: Trends in the epidemiology of pediatric severe sepsis. Pediatr Crit Care Med 7(14): 686-693, 2013.
12. Russell JA: Management of sepsis. N Engl J Med 16(355):1699-1713, 2006.
13. Durand P, Chevret L, Essouri S, Haas V, Devictor D: Respiratory variations in aortic blood flow predict fluid responsiveness in ventilated children. Intensive Care Med 5(34):888-894, 2008.
14. Choi DY, Kwak HJ, Park HY, Kim YB, Choi CH, Lee JY: Respiratory variation in aortic blood flow velocity as a predictor of fluid responsiveness in children after repair of ventricular septal defect. Pediatr Cardiol 8(31):1166-1170, 2010.
15. Raux O, Spencer A, Fesseau R, Mercier G, Rochette A, Bringuier S, Lakhal K, Capdevila X, Dadure C: Intraoperative use of transoesophageal Doppler to predict response to volume expansion in infants and neonates. Br J Anaesth 1(108):100-107, 2012.
16. Lukito V, Djer MM, Pudjiadi AH, Munasir Z: The role of passive leg raising to predict fluid responsiveness in pediatric intensive care unit patients. Pediatr Crit Care Med 3(13):155-160, 2012.
17. Pereira de Souza Neto E, Grousson S, Duflo F, Ducreux C, Joly H, Convert J, Mottolese C, Dailler F, Cannesson M: Predicting fluid responsiveness in mechanically ventilated children under general anaesthesia using dynamic parameters and transthoracic echocardiography. Br J Anaesth 6(106):856-864, 2011.
18. Renner J, Broch O, Duetschke P, Scheewe J, Hocker J, Moseby M, Jung O, Bein B: Prediction of fluid responsiveness in infants and neonates undergoing congenital heart surgery. Br J Anaesth 1(108):108-115, 2012.
19. Kircher BJ, Himelman RB, Schiller NB: Noninvasive estimation of right atrial pressure from the inspiratory collapse of the inferior vena cava. Am J Cardiol 4(66):493-496, 1990.
20. Monnet X, Bataille A, Magalhaes E, Barrois J, Le Corre M, Gosset C, Guerin L, Richard C, Teboul JL: End-tidal carbon dioxide is better than arterial pressure for predicting volume responsiveness by the passive leg raising test. Intensive Care Med 1(39):93-100, 2013.
21. Ognibene FP, Parker MM, Natanson C, Shelhamer JH, Parrillo JE: Depressed left ventricular performance. Response to volume infusion in patients with sepsis and septic shock. Chest 5(93):903-910, 1988.
22. Cordemans C, De Laet I, Van Regenmortel N, Schoonheydt K, Dits H, Huber W, Malbrain ML: Fluid management in critically ill patients: the role of extra-vascular lung water, abdominal hypertension, capillary leak, and fluid balance. Ann Intensive Care 1(2):S1, 2012.
23. Marik PE: Iatrogenic salt water drowning and the hazards of a high central venous pressure. Ann Intensive Care 4(2):21, 2014.
24. Boyd JH, Forbes J, Nakada TA, Walley KR, Russell JA: Fluid resuscitation in septic shock: a positive fluid balance and elevated central venous pressure are associated with increased mortality. Crit Care Med 2(39): 259-265, 2011.
25. Arikan AA, Zappitelli M, Goldstein SL, Naipaul A, Jefferson LS, Loftis LL: Fluid overload is associated with impaired oxygenation and morbidity in critically ill children. Pediatr Crit Care Med 3(13):253-258, 2012.
26. Foland JA, Fortenberry JD, Warshaw BL, Pettignano R, Merritt RK, Heard ML, Rogers K, Reid C, Tanner AJ, Easley KA: Fluid overload before continuous hemofiltration and survival in critically ill children: a retrospective analysis. Crit Care Med 8(32):1771-1776, 2004.
27. Rosenberg AL, Dechert RE, Park PK, Bartlett RH: Review of a large clinical series: association of cumulative fluid balance on outcome in acute lung injury: a retrospective review of the ARDSnet tidal volume study cohort. J Intensive Care Med 1(24):35-46, 2009.
28. Micek ST, McEvoy C, McKenzie M, Hampton N, Doherty JA, Kollef MH: Fluid balance and cardiac function in septic shock as predictors of hospital mortality. Crit Care 5(17):246, 2013.
29. Selewski DT, Cornell TT, Lombel RM, Blatt NB, Han YY, Mottes T, Kommar-eddi M, Kershaw DB, Shanley TP, Heung M: Weight-based determination of fluid overload status and mortality in pediatric intensive care unit patients requiring continuous renal replacement therapy. Intensive Care Med 7(37):1166-1173, 2011.
30. Kelm DJ, Perrin JT, Cartin-Ceba R, Gajic O, Schenck L, Kennedy CC: Fluid overload in patients with severe sepsis and septic shock treated with early goal-directed therapy is associated with increased acute need for fluid-related medical interventions and hospital death. Shock 1(43):68-73, 2015.
31. Bundgaard-Nielsen M, Secher NH, Kehlet H: 'Liberal' vs. 'restrictive' peri-operative fluid therapy-a critical assessment of the evidence. Acta Anaesthe-siol Scand 7(53):843-851, 2009.
32. Marik PE: Fluid responsiveness and the six guiding principles of fluid resuscitation. Crit Care Med 44(10):1920-1922, 2016.
33. Myburgh JA, Mythen MG: Resuscitation fluids. N Engl J Med 25(369): 2462-2463, 2013.
34. Monnet X, Marik P, Teboul JL: Passive leg raising for predicting fluid responsiveness: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Intensive Care Med epub 42:1935-1947, 2016.
35. De Backer D, Fagnoul D: Intensive care ultrasound: VI. Fluid responsiveness and shock assessment. Ann Am Thor Soc 1(11):129-136, 2014.
36. Evans D, Ferraioli G, Snellings J, Levitov A: Volume responsiveness in critically ill patients: use of sonography to guide management. J Ultrasound Med 1(33):3-7, 2014.
37. Mandeville JC, Colebourn CL: Can transthoracic echocardiography be used to predict fluid responsiveness in the critically ill patient? A systematic review. Crit Care Res Pract 2(12):513-519, 2012.
38. Zhang Z, Xu X, Ye S, Xu L: Ultrasonographic measurement of the respiratory variation in the inferior vena cava diameter is predictive of fluid responsiveness in critically ill patients: systematic review and meta-analysis. Ultrasound Med Biol 5(40):845-853, 2014.
39. Pinsky MR: Recent advances in the clinical application of heart-lung inter-actions. Curr Opin Crit Care 1(8):26-31, 2002.
40. Charron C, Caille V, Jardin F, Vieillard-Baron A: Echocardiographic measurement of fluid responsiveness. Curr Opin Crit Care 3(12):249-254, 2006.
41. Vegas A, Denault A, Royse C: A bedside clinical and ultrasound-based approach to hemodynamic instability-Part II: bedside ultrasound in hemodynamic shock: continuing professional development. Can J Anaesth 11(61): 1008-1027, 2014.
42. Wallace DJ, Allison M, Stone MB: Inferior vena cava percentage collapse during respiration is affected by the sampling location: an ultrasound study in healthy volunteers. Acad Emerg Med 1(17):96-99, 2010.
43. Dellinger RP, Levy MM, Rhodes A, Annane D, Gerlach H, Opal SM, Sevransky JE, Sprung CL, Douglas IS, Jaeschke R, et al.: Surviving sepsis campaign: international guidelines for management of severe sepsis and septic shock: 2012. Crit Care Med 2(41):580-637, 2013.
44. Brierley J, Carcillo JA, Choong K, Cornell T, Decaen A, Deymann A, Doctor A, Davis A, Duff J, Dugas MA, et al.: Clinical practice parameters for hemodynamic support of pediatric and neonatal septic shock: 2007 update from the American College of Critical Care Medicine. Crit Care Med 2(37):666-688, 2009.
45. Maconochie IK, de Caen AR, Aickin R, Atkins DL, Biarent D, Guerguerian AM, Kleinman ME, Kloeck DA, Meaney PA, Nadkarni VM, et al.: Part 6: Pediatric basic life support and pediatric advanced life support: 2015 International Consensus on Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation and Emergency Cardiovascular Care Science with Treatment Recommendations. Resuscitation 95:147-168, 2015.
46. de Caen AR, Berg MD, Chameides L, Gooden CK, Hickey RW, Scott HF, Sutton RM, Tijssen JA, Topjian A, van der Jagt EW, et al.: Part 12: Pediatric Advanced Life Support: 2015 American Heart Association Guidelines Update for Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation and Emergency Cardiovascular Care. Circulation 2(132):526-542, 2015.
47. WHO. WHO Guideline: Updates on Paediatric Emergency Triage, Assessment and Treatment: Care of Critically-Ill Children. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2016.
48. Cecconi M, De Backer D, Antonelli M, Beale R, Bakker J, Hofer C, Jaeschke R, Mebazaa A, Pinsky MR, Teboul JL, et al.: Consensus on circulatory shock and hemodynamic monitoring. Task force of the European Society of Intensive Care Medicine. Intensive Care Med 12(40):1795-1815, 2014.
49. Gan H, Cannesson M, Chandler JR, Ansermino JM: Predicting fluid responsiveness in children: a systematic review. Anesth Analg 6(117):1380-1392, 2013.
50. Carsetti A, Cecconi M, Rhodes A: Fluid bolus therapy: monitoring and predicting fluid responsiveness. Curr Opin Crit Care 5(21):388-394, 2015.
51. Michard F, Teboul JL: Predicting fluid responsiveness in ICU patients: a critical analysis of the evidence. Chest 6(121):2000-2008, 2002.
52. Marik PE, Cavallazzi R, Vasu T, Hirani A: Dynamic changes in arterial waveform derived variables and fluid responsiveness in mechanically ventilated patients: a systematic review of the literature. Crit Care Med 9(37):2642-2647, 2009.
53. Sondergaard S: Pavane for a pulse pressure variation defunct. Crit Care 6(17):327, 2013.
54. Suehiro K, Joosten A, Murphy LS, Desebbe O, Alexander B, Kim SH, Cannesson M: Accuracy and precision of minimally-invasive cardiac output monitoring in children: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Clin Monit Comput 30(5):603-620, 2016.
55. Marik PE: Noninvasive cardiac output monitors: a state-of the-art review. J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth 1(27):121-134, 2013.
56. Peyton PJ, Chong SW: Minimally invasive measurement of cardiac output during surgery and critical care: a meta-analysis of accuracy and precision. Anesthesiology 5(113):1220-1235, 2010.
57. Pugsley J, Lerner AB: Cardiac output monitoring: is there a gold standard and how do the newer technologies compare? Semin Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth 4(14):274-282, 2010.
58. Chatterjee K: The Swan-Ganz catheters: past, present, and future. A viewpoint. Circulation 1(119):147-152, 2009.
59. Harvey S, Harrison DA, Singer M, Ashcroft J, Jones CM, Elbourne D, Brampton W, Williams D, Young D, Rowan K: Assessment of the clinical effectiveness of pulmonary artery catheters in management of patients in intensive care (PAC-Man): a randomised controlled trial. Lancet 9484(366): 472-477, 2005.
60. Raval NY, Squara P, Cleman M, Yalamanchili K, Winklmaier M, Burkhoff D: Multicenter evaluation of noninvasive cardiac output measurement by bioreac-tance technique. J Clin Monit Comput 2(22):113-119, 2008.
61. Stetz CW, Miller RG, Kelly GE, Raffin TA: Reliability of the thermodilution method in the determination of cardiac output in clinical practice. Am Rev Resp Dis 6(126):1001-1004, 1982.
62. Bland JM, Altman DG: Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement. Lancet 8476(1):307-310, 1986.
63. Critchley LA, Critchley JA: A meta-analysis of studies using bias and precision statistics to compare cardiac output measurement techniques. J Clin Monit Comput 2(15):85-91, 1999.
64. Squara P, Denjean D, Estagnasie P, Brusset A, Dib JC, Dubois C: Noninvasive cardiac output monitoring (NICOM): a clinical validation. Intensive Care Med 7(33):1191-1194, 2007.
65. Whiting PF, Rutjes AW, Westwood ME, Mallett S, Deeks JJ, Reitsma JB, Leeflang MM, Sterne JA, Bossuyt PM: QUADAS-2: a revised tool for the quality assessment of diagnostic accuracy studies. Ann Intern Med 8(155):529-536, 2011.
66. Juni P, Witschi A, Bloch R, Egger M: The hazards of scoring the quality of clinical trials for meta-analysis. JAMA 11(282):1054-1060, 1999.
67. Whiting P, Harbord R, Kleijnen J: No role for quality scores in systematic reviews of diagnostic accuracy studies. BMC Med Res Methodol 26(5):19, 2005.
68. Westendorp RG, Brand A, Haanen J, van Hinsbergh VW, Thompson J, van Furth R, Meinders EA: Leukaplasmapheresis in meningococcal septic shock. Am J Med 5(92):577-578, 1992.
69. DerSimonian R, Kacker R: Random-effects model for meta-analysis of clinical trials: an update. Contemp Clinical Trials 2(28):105-114, 2007.
70. Deeks JJ, Macaskill P, Irwig L: The performance of tests of publication bias and other sample size effects in systematic reviews of diagnostic test accuracy was assessed. J Clin Epidem 9(58):882-893, 2005.
71. Airapetian N, Maizel J, Alyamani O, Mahjoub Y, Lorne E, Levrard M, Ammenouche N, Seydi A, Tinturier F, Lobjoie E, et al.: Does inferior vena cava respiratory variability predict fluid responsiveness in spontaneously breathing patients? Crit Care 13(19):400, 2015.
72. Barbier C, Loubieres Y, Schmit C, Hayon J, Ricome JL, Jardin F, Vieillard-Baron A: Respiratory changes in inferior vena cava diameter are helpful in predicting fluid responsiveness in ventilated septic patients. Intensive Care Med 9(30):1740-1746, 2004.
73. Brun C, Zieleskiewicz L, Textoris J, Muller L, Bellefleur JP, Antonini F, Tourret M, Ortega D, Vellin A, Lefrant JY, et al.: Prediction of fluid responsiveness in severe preeclamptic patients with oliguria. Intensive Care Med 4(39):593-600, 2013.
74. Byon HJ, Lim CW, Lee JH, Park YH, Kim HS, Kim CS, Kim JT: Prediction of fluid responsiveness in mechanically ventilated children undergoing neuro-surgery. Br J Anaesth 4(110):586-591, 2013.
75. Charbonneau H, Riu B, Faron M, Mari A, Kurrek MM, Ruiz J, Geeraerts T, Fourcade O, Genestal M, Silva S: Predicting preload responsiveness using simultaneous recordings of inferior and superior vena cavae diameters. Crit Care 5(18):473, 2014.
76. Corl K, Napoli AM, Gardiner F: Bedside sonographic measurement of the inferior vena cava caval index is a poor predictor of fluid responsiveness in emergency department patients. Emerg Med Australas 5(24):534-539, 2012.
77. Feissel M, Michard F, Faller JP, Teboul JL: The respiratory variation in inferior vena cava diameter as a guide to fluid therapy. Intensive Care Medv 9(30): 1834-1837, 2004.
78. Lanspa MJ, Grissom CK, Hirshberg EL, Jones JP, Brown SM: Applying dynamic parameters to predict hemodynamic response to volume expansion in spontaneously breathing patients with septic shock. Shock 2(39):155-160, 2013.
79. de Valk S, Olgers TJ, Holman M, Ismael F, Ligtenberg JJ, Ter Maaten JC: The caval index: an adequate non-invasive ultrasound parameter to predict fluid responsiveness in the emergency department? BMC Anesth 12(14): 114, 2014.
80. Machare-Delgado E, Decaro M, Marik PE: Inferior vena cava variation com-pared to pulse contour analysis as predictors of fluid responsiveness: a prospective cohort study. J Intensive Care Med 2(26):116-124, 2011.
81. Moretti R, Pizzi B: Inferior vena cava distensibility as a predictor of fluid responsiveness in patients with subarachnoid hemorrhage. Neurocrit Care 1(13):3-9, 2010.
82. Muller L, Bobbia X, Toumi M, Louart G, Molinari N, Ragonnet B, Quintard H, Leone M, Zoric L, Lefrant JY: Respiratory variations of inferior vena cava diameter to predict fluid responsiveness in spontaneously breathing patients with acute circulatory failure: need for a cautious use. Crit Care 5(16):188, 2012.
83. Weber T, Wagner T, Neumann K, Deusch E: Low predictability of three different noninvasive methods to determine fluid responsiveness in critically ill children. Pediatr Crit Care Med 3(16):89-94, 2015.
84. de Oliveira OH, Freitas FG, Ladeira RT, Fischer CH, Bafi AT, Azevedo LC, Machado FR: Comparison between respiratory changes in the inferior vena cava diameter and pulse pressure variation to predict fluid responsiveness in postoperative patients. J Crit Care 8(34):46-49, 2016.
85. Sobczyk D, Nycz K, Andruszkiewicz P, Wierzbicki K, Stapor M: Ultrasono-graphic caval indices do not significantly contribute to predicting fluid responsiveness immediately after coronary artery bypass grafting when compared to passive leg raising. Cardiovasc Ultrasound 1(14):23, 2016.
86. Theerawit P, Morasert T, Sutherasan Y: Inferior vena cava diameter variation compared with pulse pressure variation as predictors of fluid responsiveness in patients with sepsis. J Crit Care 36:246-251, 2016.
87. Cannesson M, Le Manach Y, Hofer CK, Goarin JP, Lehot JJ, Vallet B, Tavernier B: Assessing the diagnostic accuracy of pulse pressure variations for the prediction of fluid responsiveness: a "gray zone" approach. Anesthesiology 2(115):231-241, 2011.
88. Via G, Tavazzi G, Price S: Ten situations where inferior vena cava ultrasound may fail to accurately predict fluid responsiveness: a physiologically based point of view. Intensive Care Med 7(42):1164-1167, 2016.