Ultrasonographic measurement of the respiratory variation in the inferior vena cava diameter is predictive of fluid responsiveness in critically ill patients: Systematic review and meta-analysis

Ultrasound in Medicine and Biology

Volumn 40, Issue 5, 2014, Pages 845-853

  Zhang, Zhongheng ^a   Xu, Xiao ^a   Ye, Sheng ^b   Xu, Lei ^a  

^a ZHEJIANG UNIVERSITY   (China)

^b CHILDREN S HOSPITAL OF ZHEJIANG UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (China)

Author keywords

Critical illness; Fluid responsiveness; Mechanical ventilation; Meta analysis; Ultrasonography; Variation in inferior vena cava

Indexed keywords

FORECASTING; RESPIRATORY MECHANICS; ULTRASONOGRAPHY; VENTILATION;

CRITICAL ILLNESS; FLUID RESPONSIVENESS; INFERIOR VENA CAVA; MECHANICAL VENTILATION; META ANALYSIS;

DIAGNOSIS;

ARTIFICIAL VENTILATION; BREATHING PATTERN; CENTRAL VENOUS PRESSURE; CRITICALLY ILL PATIENT; DIAGNOSTIC ACCURACY; DIAGNOSTIC TEST ACCURACY STUDY; ECHOGRAPHY; FALSE NEGATIVE RESULT; FLUID RESUSCITATION; HEART PRELOAD; HEART RIGHT ATRIUM PRESSURE; HUMAN; INFERIOR CAVA VEIN; LUNG FUNCTION; POSITIVE END EXPIRATORY PRESSURE; PREDICTIVE VALUE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PULSE PRESSURE; RECEIVER OPERATING CHARACTERISTIC; REVIEW; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; SYSTEMATIC REVIEW; SYSTOLIC BLOOD PRESSURE; TIDAL VOLUME; ADMINISTRATION AND DOSAGE; BREATHING; COLLOID; CRITICAL ILLNESS; FLUID THERAPY; HEART STROKE VOLUME; META ANALYSIS; MORPHOMETRICS; PHYSIOLOGY; PROCEDURES; REPRODUCIBILITY; STATISTICS AND NUMERICAL DATA; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

COLLOID; CRYSTALLOID; ISOTONIC SOLUTION;

BODY WEIGHTS AND MEASURES; COLLOIDS; CRITICAL ILLNESS; FLUID THERAPY; HUMANS; ISOTONIC SOLUTIONS; PREDICTIVE VALUE OF TESTS; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; RESPIRATION; RESPIRATION, ARTIFICIAL; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; STROKE VOLUME; TIDAL VOLUME; TREATMENT OUTCOME; VENA CAVA, INFERIOR;

EID: 84897038744     PISSN: 03015629     EISSN: 1879291X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.ultrasmedbio.2013.12.010     Document Type: Review

References (35)

1. Alsous F., Khamiees M., DeGirolamo A., Amoateng-Adjepong Y., Manthous C.A. Negative fluid balance predicts survival in patients with septic shock: A retrospective pilot study. Chest 2000, 117:1749-1754.
2. Au S.M., Vieillard-Baron A. Bedside echocardiography in critically ill patients: A true hemodynamic monitoring tool. Curr Cardiol Rev 2011, 7:197-200.
3. Barbier C., Loubières Y., Schmit C., Hayon J., Ricôme J.L., Jardin F., Vieillard-Baron A. Respiratory changes in inferior vena cava diameter are helpful in predicting fluid responsiveness in ventilated septic patients. Intensive Care Med 2004, 30:1740-1746.
4. Boyd J.H., Forbes J., Nakada T.A., Walley K.R., Russell J.A. Fluid resuscitation in septic shock: A positive fluid balance and elevated central venous pressure are associated with increased mortality. Crit Care Med 2011, 39:259-265.
5. Brun C., Zieleskiewicz L., Textoris J., Muller L., Bellefleur J.P., Antonini F., Tourret M., Ortega D., Vellin A., Lefrant J.Y., Boubli L., Bretelle F., Martin C., Leone M. Prediction of fluid responsiveness in severe preeclamptic patients with oliguria. Intensive Care Med 2013, 39:593-600.
6. Byon H.J., Lim C.W., Lee J.H., Park Y.H., Kim H.S., Kim C.S., Kim J.T. Prediction of fluid responsiveness in mechanically ventilated children undergoing neurosurgery. Br J Anaesth 2013, 110:586-591.
7. Corl K., Napoli A.M., Gardiner F. Bedside sonographic measurement of the inferior vena cava caval index is a poor predictor of fluid responsiveness in emergency department patients. Emerg Med Australas 2012, 24:534-539.
8. Corrêa T.D., Vuda M., Blaser A.R., Takala J., Djafarzadeh S., Dünser M.W., Silva E., Lensch M., Wilkens L., Jakob S.M. Effect of treatment delay on disease severity and need for resuscitation in porcine fecal peritonitis. Crit Care Med 2012, 40:2841-2849.
9. De Backer D., Cortés D.O. Characteristics of fluids used for intravascular volume replacement. Best Pract Res Clin Anaesthesiol 2012, 26:441-451.
10. Dechartres A., Trinquart L., Boutron I., Ravaud P. Influence of trial sample size on treatment effect estimates: Meta-epidemiological study. BMJ 2013, 346:f2304.
11. DerSimonian R., Kacker R. Random-effects model for meta-analysis of clinical trials: an update. Contemp Clin Trials 2007, 28:105-114.
12. Dipti A., Soucy Z., Surana A., Chandra S. Role of inferior vena cava diameter in assessment of volume status: A meta-analysis. Am J Emerg Med 2012, 30:1414-1419.e1.
13. Feissel M., Michard F., Faller J.P., Teboul J.L. The respiratory variation in inferior vena cava diameter as a guide to fluid therapy. Intensive Care Med 2004, 30:1834-1837.
14. Heenen S., De Backer D., Vincent J.L. How can the response to volume expansion in patients with spontaneous respiratory movements be predicted?. Crit Care 2006, 10:R102.
15. Hofer C.K., Cannesson M. Monitoring fluid responsiveness. Acta Anaesthesiol Taiwan 2011, 49:59-65.
16. Juhl-Olsen P., Frederiksen C.A., Sloth E. Ultrasound assessment of inferior vena cava collapsibility is not a valid measure of preload changes during triggered positive pressure ventilation: A controlled cross-over study. Ultraschall Med 2012, 33:152-159.
17. Machare-Delgado E., Decaro M., Marik P.E. Inferior vena cava variation compared to pulse contour analysis as predictors of fluid responsiveness: A prospective cohort study. JIntensive Care Med 2011, 26:116-124.
18. Mandeville J.C., Colebourn C.L. Can transthoracic echocardiography be used to predict fluid responsiveness in the critically ill patient? A systematic review. Crit Care Res Pract 2012, 2012:513480.
19. Marik P.E., Baram M., Vahid B. Does central venous pressure predict fluid responsiveness? A systematic review of the literature and the tale of seven mares. Chest 2008, 134:172-178.
20. Marik P.E., Cavallazzi R., Vasu T., Hirani A. Dynamic changes in arterial waveform derived variables and fluid responsiveness in mechanically ventilated patients: A systematic review of the literature. Crit Care Med 2009, 37:2642-2647.
21. Mitaka C., Nagura T., Sakanishi N., Tsunoda Y., Amaha K. Two-dimensional echocardiographic evaluation of inferior vena cava, right ventricle, and left ventricle during positive-pressure ventilation with varying levels of positive end-expiratory pressure. Crit Care Med 1989, 17:205-210.
22. Moretti R., Pizzi B. Inferior vena cava distensibility as a predictor of fluid responsiveness in patients with subarachnoid hemorrhage. Neurocrit Care 2010, 13:3-9.
23. Muller L., Bobbia X., Toumi M., Louart G., Molinari N., Ragonnet B., Quintard H., Leone M., Zoric L., Lefrant J.Y., the AzuRea Group Respiratory variations of inferior vena cava diameter to predict fluid responsiveness in spontaneously breathing patients with acute circulatory failure: Need for a cautious use. Crit Care 2012, 16:R188.
24. Murphy C.V., Schramm G.E., Doherty J.A., Reichley R.M., Gajic O., Afessa B., Micek S.T., Kollef M.H. The importance of fluid management in acute lung injury secondary to septic shock. Chest 2009, 136:102-109.
25. Royse C.F., Canty D.J., Faris J., Haji D.L., Veltman M., Royse A. Core review: Physician-performed ultrasound: The time has come for routine use in acute care medicine. Anesth Analg 2012, 115:1007-1028.
26. Rutter C.M., Gatsonis C.A. Ahierarchical regression approach to meta-analysis of diagnostic test accuracy evaluations. Stat Med 2001, 20:2865-2884.
27. Saks V., Dzeja P., Schlattner U., Vendelin M., Terzic A., Wallimann T. Cardiac system bioenergetics: Metabolic basis of the Frank-Starling law. JPhysiol 2006, 571(Pt 2):253-273.
28. Saugel B., Kirsche S.V., Hapfelmeier A., Phillip V., Schultheiss C., Schmid R.M., Huber W. JCrit Care 2013, 28:537.e1-537.e9.
29. Soubrier S., Saulnier F., Hubert H., Delour P., Lenci H., Onimus T., Nseir S., Durocher A. Can dynamic indicators help the prediction of fluid responsiveness in spontaneously breathing critically ill patients?. Intensive Care Med 2007, 33:1117-1124.
30. Suehiro K., Rinka H., Ishikawa J., Fuke A., Arimoto H., Miyaichi T. Stroke volume variation as a predictor of fluid responsiveness in patients undergoing airway pressure release ventilation. Anaesth Intensive Care 2012, 40:767-772.
31. Teboul J.L., Monnet X. Pulse pressure variation and ARDS. Minerva Anestesiol 2013, 79:398-407.
32. Whiting P., Rutjes A.W., Reitsma J.B., Bossuyt P.M., Kleijnen J. The development of QUADAS: A tool for the quality assessment of studies of diagnostic accuracy included in systematic reviews. BMC Med Res Methodol 2003, 3:25.
33. Yang S.Y., Shim J.K., Song Y., Seo S.J., Kwak Y.L. Validation of pulse pressure variation and corrected flow time as predictors of fluid responsiveness in patients in the prone position. Br J Anaesth 2013, 110:713-720.
34. Zhang Z., Lu B., Sheng X., Jin N. Accuracy of stroke volume variation in predicting fluid responsiveness: A systematic review and meta-analysis. JAnesth 2011, 25:904-916.
35. Zhang Z., Xu X., Ni H. Small studies may overestimate the effect sizes in critical care meta-analyses: A meta-epidemiological study. Crit Care 2013, 17:R2.