Bedside sonographic measurement of the inferior vena cava caval index is a poor predictor of fluid responsiveness in emergency department patients

EMA - Emergency Medicine Australasia

Volumn 24, Issue 5, 2012, Pages 534-539

  Corl, Keith ^a,b   Napoli, Anthony M ^a   Gardiner, Fenwick ^a  

^a BROWN UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b Fremont Emergency Services   (United States)

Author keywords

Bedside ultrasound; Caval index; Fluid responsiveness; Inferior vena cava

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; CARDIOVASCULAR PARAMETERS; CAVAL INDEX; CENTRAL VENOUS PRESSURE; CLINICAL ARTICLE; ECHOGRAPHY; EMERGENCY WARD; FEMALE; FLUID RESPONSIVENESS; HEART INDEX; HEART OUTPUT; HEART PRELOAD; HUMAN; HYPOVOLEMIA; IMPEDANCE CARDIOGRAPHY; INFERIOR CAVA VEIN; MALE; POINT OF CARE TESTING; PRIORITY JOURNAL;

ADULT; CENTRAL VENOUS PRESSURE; CONFIDENCE INTERVALS; EMERGENCY SERVICE, HOSPITAL; FEMALE; HEALTH STATUS INDICATORS; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; POINT-OF-CARE SYSTEMS; PROGNOSIS; PROSPECTIVE STUDIES; ROC CURVE; UNITED STATES; URBAN POPULATION; VENA CAVA, INFERIOR; WATER-ELECTROLYTE BALANCE;

EID: 84867332864     PISSN: 17426731     EISSN: 17426723     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1742-6723.2012.01596.x     Document Type: Article

References (25)

1. Eisenberg PR, Jaffe AS, Schuster DP. Clinical evaluation compared to pulmonary artery catheterization in the hemodynamic assessment of critically ill patients. Crit. Care Med. 1984; 12: 549-553.
2. Wo CC, Shoemaker WC, Appel PL, Bishop MH, Kram HB, Hardin E. Unreliability of blood pressure and heart rate to evaluate cardiac output in emergency resuscitation and critical illness. Crit. Care Med. 1993; 21: 218-223.
3. Harvey S, Harrison DA, Singer M etal. Assessment of the clinical effectiveness of pulmonary artery catheters in management of patients in intensive care (PAC-Man): a randomised controlled trial. Lancet 2005; 366 (9484): 472-477.
4. Rivers E, Nguyen B, Havstad S etal. Early goal-directed therapy in the treatment of severe sepsis and septic shock. N. Engl. J. Med. 2001; 345: 1368-1377.
5. Bendjelid K, Romand JA. Fluid responsiveness in mechanically ventilated patients: a review of indices used in intensive care. Intensive Care Med. 2003; 29: 352-360.
6. Glickman SW, Kit Delgado M, Hirshon JM etal. Defining and measuring successful emergency care networks: a research agenda. Acad. Emerg. Med. 2010; 17: 1297-1305.
7. Nagdev AD, Merchant RC, Tirado-Gonzalez A, Sisson CA, Murphy MC. Emergency department bedside ultrasonographic measurement of the caval index for noninvasive determination of low central venous pressure. Ann. Emerg. Med. 2010; 55: 290-295.
8. Kumar A, Anel R, Bunnell E etal. Pulmonary artery occlusion pressure and central venous pressure fail to predict ventricular filling volume, cardiac performance, or the response to volume infusion in normal subjects. Crit. Care Med. 2004; 32: 691-699.
9. Barbier C, Loubieres Y, Schmit C etal. Respiratory changes in inferior vena cava diameter are helpful in predicting fluid responsiveness in ventilated septic patients. Intensive Care Med. 2004; 30: 1740-1746.
10. Feissel M, Michard F, Faller JP, Teboul JL. The respiratory variation in inferior vena cava diameter as a guide to fluid therapy. Intensive Care Med. 2004; 30: 1834-1837.
11. Boulain T, Achard JM, Teboul JL, Richard C, Perrotin D, Ginies G. Changes in BP induced by passive leg raising predict response to fluid loading in critically ill patients. Chest 2002; 121: 1245-1252.
12. Preau S, Saulnier F, Dewavrin F, Durocher A, Chagnon JL. Passive leg raising is predictive of fluid responsiveness in spontaneously breathing patients with severe sepsis or acute pancreatitis. Crit. Care Med. 2010; 38: 819-825.
13. Monnet X, Rienzo M, Osman D etal. Passive leg raising predicts fluid responsiveness in the critically ill. Crit. Care Med. 2006; 34: 1402-1407.
14. Milzman D, Napoli AM. Examining the affect of norepinephrine on cardiac preload and reduced preload dependency in septic shock. Crit. Care Med. 2011; 39: 888-889.
15. Shoemaker WC, Belzberg H, Wo CC etal. Multicenter study of noninvasive monitoring systems as alternatives to invasive monitoring of acutely ill emergency patients. Chest 1998; 114: 1643-1652.
16. Napoli AM, Machan JT, Corl K, Forcada A. The use of impedance cardiography in predicting mortality in emergency department patients with severe sepsis and septic shock. Acad. Emerg. Med. 2010; 17: 452-455.
17. Shoemaker WC, Wo CC, Yu S, Farjam F, Thangathurai D. Invasive and noninvasive haemodynamic monitoring of acutely ill sepsis and septic shock patients in the emergency department. Eur. J. Emerg. Med. 2000; 7: 169-175.
18. American College of Emergency Physicians. ACEP emergency ultrasound guidelines-2001. Ann. Emerg. Med. 2001; 38: 470-481.
19. Dellinger RP, Levy MM, Carlet JM etal. Surviving Sepsis Campaign: international guidelines for management of severe sepsis and septic shock: 2008. Intensive Care Med. 2008; 34: 17-60.
20. Marik PE, Baram M, Vahid B. Does central venous pressure predict fluid responsiveness? A systematic review of the literature and the tale of seven mares. Chest 2008; 134: 172-178.
21. Napoli AM, Corl K, Gardiner F, Forcada A. Prognostic value of noninvasive measures of contractility in emergency department patients with severe sepsis and septic shock undergoing early goal-directed therapy. J. Crit. Care 2011; 26: 47-53.
22. Puskarich MA, Trzeciak S, Shapiro NI, Heffner AC, Kline JA, Jones AE. Outcomes of patients undergoing early sepsis resuscitation for cryptic shock compared with overt shock. Resuscitation 2011; 82: 1289-1293.
23. Carlbom DJ, Rubenfeld GD. Barriers to implementing protocol-based sepsis resuscitation in the emergency department-results of a national survey. Crit. Care Med. 2007; 35: 2525-2532.
24. Maynard C, Beshansky JR, Griffith JL, Selker HP. Causes of chest pain and symptoms suggestive of acute cardiac ischemia in African-American patients presenting to the emergency department: a multicenter study. J. Natl Med. Assoc. 1997; 89: 665-671.
25. Wallace DJ, Allison M, Stone MB. Inferior vena cava percentage collapse during respiration is affected by the sampling location: an ultrasound study in healthy volunteers. Acad. Emerg. Med. 2010; 17: 96-99.